EVLYNN: Reinke, Evlynn Marie Mahoney (1/1/47-2/26/11) the love of my life

Sunday, February 27, 2011

http://1000memories.com/evy-reinke/memories

[JR: To choked up for words.]

# # # # #


TINFOILHAT: WTC7 collapse

Sunday, February 27, 2011

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/02/19/michael-fullerton-scientific-theory-of-the-wtc-7-collapse/

February 19, 2011
Scientific Theory of the WTC 7 Collapse
By Michael Fullerton
Foreign Policy Journal

http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/02/14/a-scientific-theory-of-the-wtc-7-collapse/

*** begin quote ***

On September 11, 2001 a third building came down. This building was 7 World Trade Center (WTC 7), a 47-story building about the width and length of a football field. NIST, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, was tasked with officially explaining how WTC 7 fell. Their theory is documented in the report entitled Final Report of the Collapse of Building 7[1]. Many people are under the mistaken impression that NIST’s theory of how WTC 7 fell down is a valid scientific theory. In science however, a valid theory must be the simplest theory available that best explains all the available empirical data.[2] This article will show that the NIST theory is a highly convoluted theory that cannot explain important observations.

*** end quote ***

Any more, I don’t believe anyone.

If this is plausible, then following it to its logical conclusion is like a horror film. But this is real life.

# # # # #


%d bloggers like this: