LIBERTY: Where government is concerned, never forget the Law of Unintended Consequences

Sunday, December 17, 2006

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0%2C%2C2089-2508262%2C00.html

http://tinyurl.com/y97scb

The Sunday Times December 17, 2006
Tsunami survivors given the lash
Michael Sheridan and Dewi Loveard, Banda Aceh
Disaster donations help Islamic vigilante force impose punishments on women

***Begin Quote***

International aid workers and Indonesian women’s organisations are now expressing dismay that the flow of foreign cash for reconstruction has allowed the government to spend scarce money on a new bureaucracy and religious police to enforce puritan laws, such as the compulsory wearing of headscarves.

***End Quote***

So here we have donations for the victims of a natural disaster perverted into oppressing the people.


LIBERTY: The UN … an idea who time never was and is fatally flawed

Sunday, December 17, 2006

http://www.lewrockwell.com/reese/reese328.html

http://tinyurl.com/v3eyj

 

Put No Faith in the United Nations
by Charley Reese

***Begin Quote***

My first choice is and always has been to abrogate the treaty and withdraw from the U.N. completely. If it were merely a worthless organization, that wouldn’t be so bad, but it is a very expensive organization, which has great capacity to cause trouble.

***End Quote***

An excellent opinion, The UN is ineffective, inefficient, expensive, permits leaders to misbehave, and screws up NYC. Nuke ’em.

You have to wonder about any organization that allows murderers to be in charge of “human rights”.

Withdraw now. Stop paying. Boot ’em out.

It’s a “club” we shouldn’t be in!


RANT: No plus sign gmail

Sunday, December 17, 2006

TOPPIX


ALUMNI: Big sites don’t allow obit search, aren’t indexed in the search engines, and have no feedback mechanism

Sunday, December 17, 2006

In investigating the failure of the automated searches to detect two jasper obits last week, I found that the NY Daily News and NY Post don’t have searchable obits. Apparently also Google doesn’t index them either. As usual with big sites, there’s no way to ask either.


PRODUCTIVITY: Use TWO gmail accounts to protect an ISP email account

Saturday, December 16, 2006

Many people advocate using a gmail account to protect against spam.

In my normal blundering way, I’m using two gmails to protect my ISP account from spam, and giving me a fully authenticated email address using gmail’s plus sign feature.

So let me see if I can explain how to duplicate the Yahoo AddressGuard. You can create and manage disposable email addresses to defend your primary address against spam. In Yahoo’s offering, they assign you a base name, unrelated to your real email name. Then Yahoo allows you to create suffixes that are just a string of characters. A real email address is created by base name, a minus sign, a suffix, and @yahoo.com. The suffix gets appended to the base separated by a a minus sign. (Great minds think … differently!) So if your real name is ABCDEF and your base name is ZXCVBN, then you can create, for example, ZXCVBN-EBAY. Then the address ZXCVBN-EBAY@yahoo.com will forward to ABCDEF@yahoo.com and you can even send from ZXCVBN-EBAY! Should your ZXCVBN-EBAY get spammed, then you can turn it off! They are easy to create, but there is no reporting or database with it. AND, it ain’t free!!!

So I sought to recreate that capability with GMail.

To refresh your memory, GMAIL (to their credit) has innovated by adding the capability to allow a plus sign in the email address. So if your gmail email address is abcdef @ gmail dot com, then you can put anything you want after a plus sign. So if email comes addressed as abcdef + fedcba @ gmail dot com will get delivered to your email account and you can test on that stuff after the plus sign.

Web sites may choke on the plus sign. (Gripe at them and don’t use their site till they fix it!)

I wanted to keep the base name concept. And, you want to control & database those suffixes. So here’s my concept.

I have an ISP account I want to protect called NORMAL@isp.com. So I created a “front door” account called FRONT@gmail.com and a “back door” account called WEIRD@gmail.com.

To test it all out I set it up so that FRONT forwards to WEIRD and WEIRD forwards to NORMAL. When it all works, I break that forwarding.

So far no big deal, just moving a lot of messages around. Except that FRONT does get vacuumed for spam by Google.

Now lets start using suffixes.

I created a table of suffixes and record where I use it. I then create a filter in the FRONT gmail that forwards FRONT+suffix to WEIRD+suffix. Then over on WEIRD, I create a filter that forwards WEIRD+suffix to NORMAL.

NOW:

* NORMAL only gets authentic pre-approved email.

* WEIRD is the protected hidden yahoo BASENAME equivalent.

* FRONT messages without a suffix get stopped there.

* FRONT and WEIRD get Google’s vacuuming for SPAM.

* If WEIRD is guessed by an alpha spammer, doesn’t move to NORMAL without a filter.

* Should any suffix be compromised, it can be stopped quickly by deleting the equivalent WEIRD filter.

* A web site, or intruder, who drops the suffix, to spam you, doesn’t reach NORMAL.

I think you need WEIRD, the second hidden BASENAME equivalent, so that you can change FRONT from time to time as needed. You could also have multiple “front doors” (i.e., FRONT1; FRONT2; etc.) feeding one WEIRD.

This a free solution equivalent to Yahoo’s address guard. It’s a great spam preventive.

For example, I now give each use of my gmail address a unique unguessable random code. (You expected different from a fellow who uses long strange email addresses?) Any email that arrives without a “plus code” is suspected of being spam. Should I get spam, I can pinpoint where the breakdown occurred.

Your comments, please?


LIBERTY: Gubamint Skools … a powerful indictment

Friday, December 15, 2006

http://www.steve-olson.com/how-the-public-school-system-crushes-souls/

http://tinyurl.com/yxfj6f

 

How the Public School System Crushes Souls
December 12th, 2006 by Steve

***Begin Quote***

When you read about the problems with American education, you usually read a bunch statistics about literacy and dropout rates. But those statistics don’t do the subject justice because the problem with American education is a human story. Every dropout is a human being, every illiterate teenager is an individual, every teen that commits suicide was somebody’s baby, and every kid that’s doing 20 to life is a real breathing person – full of potential.

***End Quote***

This is a terrible story. At the root of it, one has to recognize that the country has made a terrible mistake. Education is too important to be left to this governmental abuse.


RANT: Politics as usual in Trenton

Friday, December 15, 2006

Isn’t interesting to review the “accomplishments” of the NuJerzee Legislature this year:

* No property tax reform

* No state pension reform

* No state worker benefit reform

* No limitation on pensions for part-time politicians

* No education reform

but they did pass a civil union bill. Huh?

My agenda:

* Repeal the state sales tax hike; it was just for pork, wasn’t it?

* Reform state pensions into a 401k; if IBM can do, why can’t the state?

* Eliminate a state benefits; raise people’s pay to cover a benefit; why is it the taxpayer’s problem?

* No pensions for any politicians; how did that boondoggle get started?

* No salaries for any state official — legislator, elected official, or judge; they should be honored to serve. Give’em a dollar a year and charge them for parking! Salaries for civil service workers; all else get zip nada nothing!

* Eliminate federal, state, or local — any government at all — involvement in education; why when commies run “reeducation camps” is it bad, but, when our government does it, that’s good? People had those children, let them educate them!

* Eliminate the government involvement in marriage; it was just to prevent black men from marrying white women any way, so why continue?

And while it is never mentioned:

* Repeal all state gun laws; what part of “shall not be infringed” don’t all these lawyers understand?

Besides we’ll need those guns to finally clean up the various rats nest of thugs in DC, Trenton, and elsewhere.

Shine up Trenton’s “golden” dome! Even that’s a fake. An illusion. A fraud.


PRODUCTIVITY: Secret questions are not foolproof … but you can make them!

Thursday, December 14, 2006

Network World’s Identity Management Newsletter, 12/11/06
Secret questions are not foolproof
By Dave Kearns

***Begin Quote***

The problem, as many have pointed out, is that this so-called secret information is readily discoverable by anyone who wants to dig a bit. As security maven Bruce Schneier said in “The Curse of the Secret Question” : “I’ll bet the name of my family’s first pet is in some database somewhere.” Bruce’s suggestion? “My usual technique is to type a completely random answer – I madly slap at my keyboard for a few seconds – and then forget about it. This ensures that some attacker can’t bypass my password and try to guess the answer to my secret question, but is pretty unpleasant if I forget my password.” Well that actually defeats the one good purpose of the secret password as well as blocking the bad uses – an example of tossing out the baby with the bathwater. I’ve got a better suggestion.

***End Quote***

May I suggest our old friend ROBOFORM’s random string generator?

Yup, for each site that needs my Mom’s maiden name, they can have a unique one. F53FA849645C26 for Yahoo, EFA897CABA45D4 for Google, and DAD999B5244BA2 for AOL.

And, if they want my favorite pet’s name, it’s in turn C9AF, 7B2B, or 222459.

See spammers can go ahead and guess all they want!

And, my first car was a BAD753!


TECHNOLOGY: John McCain doesn’t like the blogs; this blog doesn’t like him either!

Thursday, December 14, 2006

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/13/mccain-war-on-blogs/

John McCain’s War On Blogs

***Begin Quote***

John McCain has made clear that he doesn’t like the blogosphere.

***End Quote***

Just to be clear, this blogger doesn’t like John McCain.

As a POW, he took parole and broke faith with his fellow POWs. As a member of the Keating Five, he demonstrated his “honesty” credentials. As part of the McCain – Feingold team, he demonstrated his thoughts on the First Amendment.

The people of Arizona should be embarrassed to have him as their senator.

Time to repeal the direct election of senators anyway. The dead old white guys had it right!


RANT: Parents should NOT lie … about anything!

Thursday, December 14, 2006

This time of year brings out my favorite gripe, rant, and kvetch. Parents should never EVER lie to their children. Not once! The tooth fairy, easter bunny, or Santa Claus don’t have to be lied about.

If’n I was a parent, and the Intelligent Designer had the good sense not to give a child to such a weirdo, I would not lie. Anytime, for any reason, under any circumstances.

Child: Is there a Santa Claus?

Parent: Well, I would never lie to you. I don’t know for sure. I’ve never seen him, but an awful lot people seem to think so. There are a lot of unexplained unseen things like the wind, electricity, and time. So what do you believe?

Never lie!

How can they trust you on the important stuff, if they can not trust you on the trivial stuff?