LIBERTY: Computerized Voting

Thursday, November 6, 2008

http://www.wxpnews.com/archives/wxpnews-352-20081104.htm

>Computerized Voting: Is It Trustworthy Yet?


No!
As IT types, we KNOW how lame the system is.
Personally, I think, imho, we need PAPER.
We have to have a machine that collects the vote and produces a printed receipt. That receipt can be visually verified by the voter. Then that receipt should be deposited into the “ballot box”. The machine can be the quick fast collection tool. If there are disputes, then the printed receipts can be counted.
We SHOULD use the Iraqi low tech system to prevent fraud (i.e., the thumb dipped in indelible ink)! We SHOULD require photo identification to vote. We SHOULD have photos in the registration records that election officials use to very who is voting.
If long lines bother you, we really should go to a more representative system. All this “voting” makes no sense. Vote for your local politician and have them represent you.
!:-)fjohn

RANT: workers got a $30 pre-paid Visa card

Thursday, November 6, 2008

http://www.wthr.com/global/story.asp?s=9299280

Obama campaign workers angry over unpaid wages
Posted: Nov 5, 2008 03:38 PM
Updated: Nov 5, 2008 11:03 PM

*** begin quote ***

A former spokesman for the Obama campaign said 375 people were hired as part of the Vote Corps program and said people signed up to work three-hour shifts at a time. Three hours of canvassing got workers a $30 pre-paid Visa card.

*** end quote ***

I’m sure that TAXES were paid on ll these GIFT cards! Wouldn’t want to be SLEFISH?

# # # # #


GUNS: Menedez is anti-gun freedom. What a surprise!

Thursday, November 6, 2008

From: “Senator Robert Menendez” <Senator_Menendez@menendez.senate.gov>

Date: November 5, 2008 11:48:47 AM EST

To: Reinke

Subject: Re: From Senator Menendez’s Website

Dear Mr. Reinke:

Thank you for contacting me with your concerns regarding the National Capital Security and Safety Act (H.R. 6842). I appreciate the opportunity to hear your views on this important issue.

As you may know, the National Capital Security and Safety Act will make significant negative changes to the District of Columbia’s existing firearms law. For example, this legislation would repeal the District of Columbia’s current ban on semiautomatic assault weapons, as well as it’s prohibition on individuals carrying guns in public. It would eliminate the District of Columbia’s firearm registration system and do away with criminal background checks for secondhand gun purchases. In a nutshell, it will require the District to remove all restrictions on gun ownership that go beyond the minimum federal requirements and would prohibit the District from adopting gun regulations from other cities and states. I find this legislation to be unacceptable.

Like many issues that come before the United States Congress, the issue of gun control has two sides, each of which is strongly and passionately defended by its supporters. As your Senator, I firmly believe in the right of all citizens to use firearms responsibly to protect one’s home and family. I also support safe recreational use of guns, as long as participants act responsibly. I do not, however, support gun use by all people in all situations, and I am committed to keeping guns out of the hands of criminals and those that will use them to do harm. I believe the National Capital Security and Safety Act could have a considerable negative impact on safety and security in the nation’s capital. Therefore, I cannot support it. Although this bill passed through the House of Representatives with the support of the National Rifle Association by a vote of 266-152, I will continue to work to improve the bill on the Senate side so that a safe and reasonable gun control law can be enacted.

Again, thank you for contacting me regarding this important issue. Please do not hesitate to contact me in the future about this or any other matter of concern. I invite you to visit my website (http://menendez.senate.gov) to learn of other important issues to New Jersey.

# – # – #

What part of “shall not be infringed” does Senator Menedez NOT understand?

If the pen is mightier than the sword, then Menedez would seek “reasonable printer control”?

Argh!

# # # # #


GUNS: An intended rape victim shot and killed her attacker

Thursday, November 6, 2008

http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/laworder/story/9C58494B45470714862574F3006D0CA6?OpenDocument

Cops: Cape Girardeau woman kills man who returned to rape her second time
By Heather Ratcliffe
ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH
10/31/2008

*** begin quote ***

An intended rape victim shot and killed her attacker this morning in Cape Girardeau when he broke into her home to rape her a second time, police said.

*** end quote ***

Self-defense!

A great antidote to rape.

# # # # #


RANT: We have an “economic illiterate” as US Senator!

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/11/how_stupid_is_senator_menendez.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7FJX5QiCrw

November 04, 2008

How stupid is Senator Menendez?

Larrey Anderson

*** begin quote ***

Either he is stupid or he is intentionally confusing the difference between the income tax and capital gains taxes.

Watch this interview of Senator Robert Menendez, a New Jersey Democrat, by Neil Cavuto on FOX news.

*** end quote ***

Well, we have Lautenberg too.

<Just shaking my head!>

I don’t think we have ANYTHING to worry about. There won’t be any tax cuts period.

Then sheeple have been fooled again.

# # # # #


POLITICAL: Record turnout?

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Drudge is reporting 62M votes of O and 55M votes for McC. That’s 117M votes in a country of 300M? A third in what’s widely touted as the best turn out ever.

Do we have the beginnings of a revolt?

# # # # #


POLITICAL: Who’s to blame for the election?

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Well. clearly, the McCain campaign was a disaster, but is it all his fault.

(1) The liberal media certainly was Obama’s chief cheerleader.

(2) George Bush made his first mistake when there was no viable VP to take over for him.

(3) George Bush was a closet liberal. He didn’t govern as a “conservative”; compassionate or otherwise.

(4) The failure to regulate the mortgage market with a simple effective “damping” of the sub-prime mortgage market was a critical gooferment failure. NINJA loans were a well known scandal. The Fed could have put in a minimum percentage down payment rule; akin to its margin requirement rule. Congress — being paid off by Fannie and Freddie — could have passed restraining legislation; at least to divide Fannie and Freddie into small regional competitors. The Judiciary could have found that loan agreements that had negative amortization, adjustable into the sky, or other terms as unenforceable as “fraudulent” or “unsuitable”. So there’s enough blame to go around.

(5) The sheeple are easily led. A victory for the dis-education system of Horace Mann. It’s created uncritical voters who are easily swung by emotional media.

The question becomes what will the Republican / December duopoly? Does Liberty have a doorway to slip through with the demolition of the Republican Party and will the Democrats be destroyed by success?

Out of the rubble can Liberty activists forge a new path to a voluntary society?

# # # # #


MONEY: CD Ladders for the novice.

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

What are “Ladders?

A ladder is a climbing device that is characterized by “rungs” that one steps on as you move “upward”. Oh, you knew that. In the financial world, ladders are a bundle of financial assets that have different maturities over time. Those assets could be bonds with different due dates; as opposed to stocks that are an equity interest.

Ladders are of interest in that one can construct a portfolio of bonds that has essentially a different characteristic from the underlying components. Bonds have some typical characteristics: amount, term, rate, and rating. Using a “ladder”, you can create a portfolio that has an higher effective annual interest rate than you’d anticipate. Using a different type of “ladder”, you can create your own version of a bond mutual fund. And, using again a different type of ladder, you can create your own “pension fund”.

“Certificate of Deposit” ladders, my particular favorite, are essentially a bundle of individual certificates of deposit that you consider as a unit or a “portfolio”. You can use all sorts of bonds and even preferred stock as you see fit. My preference is for FDIC insured Certificates of Deposit. (Please be sure to check with the FDIC website. This is pretty much as close to certainty as you can get.)

One drawback of say one year certificates of deposit is that of the low interest rate; use a ladder to get the five year rate. One drawback of a bond mutual fund is that variability in the value of the fund as interest rates fluctuate. One draw back of a pension from a pension fund is that the monthly pension goes away at death.

If you look into the technical descriptions, you will find that our “CD Ladder” overcomes many of the drawbacks. Low one year CD rates can be overcome by rolling five year CD terms. (More about that later) The fluctuation of a bond fund can be overcome by the date certain aspect of a CD; you always get your money back regardless of interest rates. And, the pension check disappearing at death can be overcome by the ladder goes into your estate when you die.

Laddering is a hedge against market volatility. If rates go up, you will be able to invest in a higher rate CD; bond funds lose value when rates go up. On the other hand, if the rates go down, at least you’ve got the other CDs invested at a good rate for longer and the not all of your eggs come due at the same time; bond funds go up in value but pay less interest at the new rate.

To create a CD ladder, you buy several CDs with varying lengths and interest rates. Let’s just use a simple ladder that I recommend to old retirees. The “12 by 5”! Think 60 Five Year 5% CDs spread out over the Twelve Months across Five Years that mature every month. Lets use a portfolio of 60k$ for ease of thinking. Every month, they have a 1k$ CD to roll over. They can take the interest 50$ and party. Trivial for a pension, right? But these are rich senior citizens. Make that a 50K$ CD and that’s 2.5k$ per month. Or, 30k$ per year. That’s a 3M$ portfolio. Better than Social Security. And, it safe, secure, and can be created by an individual with ease. Sleep easy!

OK, you don’t have 3M$ idle and let’s look at another example.

Emergency funds, or savings, are nicely addressed by a “4 by 5” ladder. Think 20 Five Year 5% CDs spread out over the Four Quarters across Five Years. Lets use an Emergency Fund of 100k$. That should cover most emergencies I can think of. Every quarter, you have a 5k$ CD that comes due and you roll it over. Should an emergency come that requires tapping the fund, you just break the last CD. Usually the penalty is just the interest. Some banks will even give you a loan at a very cheap rate, pledging the CD as collateral. It’s a little hard to crack into them, so you’re less likely to call an emergency that isn’t a true one. Since you’d lose money by doing anything with them, you’re motivated to figure out an alternative. But, if you need them, they are there. I like borrowing against them as opposed to cashing them.

Entry into the program is relatively simple. When starting, we bought five “First Quarter” (i.e., 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years), a Ninety Day for “Second Quarter”, a One Eighty Day for the “Third Quarter”, and a Two Seventy Day for the “Fourth Quarter”. Then, at each quarter, we “exploded” the roll over into the five “children” (i.e., 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years). Hardest part was to explain to the Bank Folks what we wanted. We had to be very focused. Exiting from the program is just stopping the roll overs.

You may need to be a little tactical in getting to the target distribution. Banks usually have “special deals” for odd terms. Recently, when we were setting up the previously described “4 by 5”, the Bank had a “sale” on some odd terms at significantly higher rates. In looking at the odd terms, it was possible to “steer” them into giving us what we wanted.

Opinion: These are essential for old retirees. But of limited usefulness for young workers, except for use as emergency funds and for the savings layer of their financial pyramid, where they serve very nicely.

# # # # #


POLITICAL: Nuke the FED!

Monday, November 3, 2008

http://www.lewrockwell.com/rockwell/austrian-econ-more-than-ever.html

Why Austrian Economics Matters More Than Ever
by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.

*** begin quote ***

Abolishing the Fed would put a huge brake on the planning state. Without the ability to expand the money supply at will, the federal government would become about as threatening as state or local government. That is to say, the federal government would still be an intolerable imposition on life, liberty, and property. But we wouldn’t be worrying about hyperinflation, large scale bubbles in specific sectors, crazy business cycles, trillion-dollar bailouts, controls that reach into every nook and cranny of our lives, a cradle to grave welfare state, or a global empire that invades any and every country at will, and makes America the enemy to whole regions of the world.

That’s only the beginning of what the end of the Fed would mean. It would dramatically change the political culture in this country. Bureaucracies would tumble. Trade would stabilize. The investment-risk calculus would accord with the free market. The left could no longer live out its pipe dreams of socialist utopia at our expense. The right would have to give up its wacky notion of a world police state. The power ambitions of whole sectors of society would be scaled back.

The state is always and everywhere a danger, even when it has no monopoly on money and no printing press that can create money tickets at will. But a state with the ability to make its own money is a grave and relentless threat to prosperity and freedom. It leaves the future entirely to the discretion of the money managers. Every day we live under the threat that the US could be the next Weimar Republic or even another Zimbabwe. All that stands between us and that day is the wisdom and prudence of the Fed.

*** end quote ***

There was a fundamental shift in America that was done without the People even being aware of the terrible path they were being taken down.

With the financial meltdown (i.e., criminal collusion between Congress and Wall Street), it seems like an appropriate time to put the Fed out of business.

It’s un-American!

# # # # #


RANT: Obama will bankrupt the coal industry!?!

Monday, November 3, 2008

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/11/02/hidden-audio-obama-tells-sf-chronicle-he-will-bankrupt-coal-industry

Hidden Audio: Obama Tells SF Chronicle He Will Bankrupt Coal Industry
By P.J. Gladnick (Bio | Archive)
November 2, 2008 – 07:26 ET

Imagine if John McCain had whispered somewhere that he was willing to bankrupt a major industry? Would this declaration not immediately be front page news? Well, Barack Obama actually flat out told the San Francisco Chronicle (SF Gate) that he was willing to see the coal industry go bankrupt in a January 17, 2008 interview. The result? Nothing. This audio interview has been hidden from the public…until now.

# – # – #

Interesting how everything is coming out now!

# # # # #