SAD: Always liked him and his performances

Sunday, June 3, 2012

http://news.yahoo.com/family-feud-tv-host-richard-dawson-died-142027262.html

‘Family Feud’ TV host Richard Dawson has died
Associated PressAssociated Press – 5 hrs ago

*** begin quote ***

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Richard Dawson, the wisecracking British entertainer who was among the schemers in the 1960s sitcom “Hogan’s Heroes” and a decade later began kissing thousands of female contestants as host of the game show “Family Feud” has died. He was 79.

*** end quote ***

Sad. He’s was always entertaining.

# – # – # – # – #  2012-Jun-03 @ 16:02  


POLITICAL: Marriage — MYOB

Sunday, June 3, 2012

http://lewrockwell.com/lazarowitz/lazarowitz44.1.html 

The Right To Marry
by Scott Lazarowitz

*** begin quote ***

Once, again, the “gay marriage” or same-sex marriage distraction is in the news and on the talk shows. Some people say it is a societal or cultural issue that government must address, and others say it is a religious issue.

The same-sex marriage issue is a private issue. And yes, the individual has a right to marry.

Who the hell is the government to allow or forbid private people to establish their own voluntary associations, relationships, contracts and marriages?

Regarding the right to marry, while the Bill of Rights does not mention that specifically, the Ninth Amendment does state that “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”

There are an infinite number of rights that human beings have. Each individual has an inherent right as a human being to one’s life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, as long as one doesn’t interfere with anyone else’s same right.

Based on this right of self-ownership, each individual has an absolute natural right to do with one’s life, one’s person and property as one wishes, as long as one is peaceful. Unfortunately, statists and politicians do not understand this.

*** end quote ***

As pro-life pro-choice little L libertarian, I think marriage is between a man and woman for the purpose of raising children. (Yeah, yeah, I know all the arguments about that.)

BUT, I also think that what anyone else does is NONE of my business. 

Communities, Churches, and individuals can form their own opinions. Without my help or the Gooferment’s force.

Peace.

No one should ever be forced to do or abstain from anything.

So to the Gooferment should not be picking winners and losers via tax or benefit policies. 

Just stay out of the bedrooms and all the rooms.

While there is some modest State interest in ensuring that “children” are provided for, they are the future citizens. At some point in their “life”, they have God-given rights. We recognize “rights” as a way to maintain peaceful cooperation amount equals.

The essence of all human problems seems to originate with the meme that one human can “force” another to do, or not do, something.

The proof is drugs in prison.

So too is the meme that “marriage” is any concern of the State.  

MYOB!

# – # – # – # – #   


ECONOMICS: My financial team says …

Saturday, June 2, 2012

This fellow leads the group that manages my portfolio (Four years? Average north of 10% for each or the years. One year over 20+%!). While I disagree with him about the long term prospects (i.e.,gold versus the US$), he’s been much “right-er” than I have over the last few years. I think he gives good advice — those four principles — for investors and savers of all sizes.

FWIW!

As usual, the talking heads, politicians, and bureaucrats have, and have had, the “story” all wrong.

Congress causes “bubbles” by messing with stuff it doesn’t understand!

* Either in “moving water from end of the pool to another” it sets off ripples that drown everyone (all of us in the pool). For example, “bailouts”. Failures, even big gigantic enormous ones, are GOOD!

Imagine that instead of enriching Big Labor UAW, the President / Gooferment had the huevos to say:

*** begin quote ***

“Well guys, that’s just too <Expletive Deleted> bad.

We’ll put extra folks on at the Unemployment Office and …

… remember “We, The Sheeple” guarantee your pensions up to 35k/per year just like we did for the Delta pilots.

Executives, we think WalMart needs help. 

And, hey, all you other executives that are running big companies, we want to help you focus — so effective First of Next Month — all salaries in the USA can NOT be more than mine / the President’s. You can’t believe your job is harder than his and hence worth more.

Boards of Directors, you can award more comp to your execs but it has to be in the form of a 25 year equal step ladder of your UNINSURED corporate bonds. I’m sure Treasury Secretary Little Taxcheat Timmy Geitner can explain the concept! (25M$ equals 25 1M$ bonds dated in successive years). By the way BoD’s, your comp regardless of amount will be structure the same way.

That should focus everyone on the big picture.

Thanks for playing “Capitalism version 2.0”

*** end quote ***

* By changing rules, they don’t understand. Example, Glass Stegal, Community Reinvestment Act, and my personal favorite “the short seller’s uptick rule” that allow bear raids on publicly listed companies.

(Note Bene: The “uptick” rule says you can ONLY sell short — borrowing the stock — after an uptick in the sale price of the stock. That means you can put in lots of short sale orders to drive the prices down all by yourself. And, that rule cause the brokers to charge lot’s more for the trade. I know it was at one time 10x the regular trade price at Merrill. They had whole parts of trading desks that managed short sales. Made lots of money doing it. And, when the genius changed that rule, those folks lost their jobs and corporations found themselves under attack (i.e., good companies perceived as weak were subject to bear raid, the stock price was driven down, they were taken over, privatized at that low price, the ordinary players got killed, and the raiders would reap big profits for moving paper.)

* By imposing MEANINGLESS regulations and laws (e.g., GBLA, SOX, Graham, Dodd, etc.) that were supposed to prevent abuses and (a) didn’t plus (b) made everything more expensive by increase admin.

* Finally, by excessive spending and borrowing, they robbed the money of its value. “King Dollar” is a great strategy for the poor and those on fixed incomes because their “money” retains its purchasing power. For example, three silver dimes int he late Fifties Early Sixties bought a gallon of gas; now those same three SILVER dimes can be sold for their melt value and buy 1½ gallons of gas. The politicians point blame at the EVIL oil companies, but IN FACT, gas is “cheaper” now. It’s the money that’s worth less.

At least in the days of King Richard and the Sheriff of Nottingham, the Gooferment had to send the Sheriff’s men out to rob the poor serfs. Or, shave the coins. That’s why coins originally had milled edges; so you could tell if they had been altered.

Argh!

So bottom line:

Ric says: today’s news is better than you’re lead to believe.

This fat old white guy injineer say: “The PAST was MUCH WORSE than you’ve been lead to believe. AND, structurally, you should be upset because the same problem makers are in charge! Still as clueless as they have ALWAYS been.”

Argh! to the N-th power.  

 

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Edelman Financial Services <client@ricedelman.com>
Date: Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:37 PM
Subject: Market Update
To: XYZXYZXYZXYZ@reinke.cc

Edelman Financial Services

Dear John:

I’ve heard about “A Tale of Two Cities,” but this is ridiculous! Indeed, rarely have we seen such a huge disconnect between the stock market and the economy.

To illustrate, allow me to share some facts with you.

In the past six months, one million Americans who were out of work have found jobs, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The unemployment rate remains too high, but the BLS says the rate is currently at its lowest level in more than three years, despite this week’s “gloomy” news that 69,000 additional Americans found work last month.

Inflation (as measured by the Consumer Price Index) is running at the unusually low annual rate of 2.3% as of April 30. By comparison, inflation has averaged 3.2% since 1926. And I can remember when inflation was 15% back in 1980. (Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.)

The price of a barrel of oil fell below $90 last week, reaching its lowest price since October 21, according to the Department of Energy. Stockpiles are at a 22-year high, reports the Energy Information Administration.

Home sales in all four geographic sectors of the U.S. were 10% higher in April than a year ago, says the National Association of Realtors. And the Commerce Department reports that home prices are up 5% from this time last year. Moody’s Analytics called these reports “a genuine rebound” for the housing sector. No wonder that, as Investor’s Business Daily reports, homebuilder sentiment is at a five-year high. And mortgage rates have hit another all-time low, just 3.78% for the 30-year fixed, according to Freddie Mac.

Consumer debt is dropping rapidly. Equifax’s April National Consumer Credit Trends Report and TransUnion have reported:

A 52% decline in the number of write-offs compared to April 2009. We’re now at a level comparable to the pre-recession level of 2006 and the trend continues to improve.
Home finance balances have decreased $1.2 trillion since October 2008, posting the fourth consecutive year of decline.
Home equity revolving balances are $560 billion, down $115 billion from three years ago.
Foreclosures on home equity revolving credit have dropped 37% from a year ago. It’s the lowest in two years.
Auto loans at least 60 days overdue have declined 27% from last April. Meanwhile, Ford’s credit rating was raised by Moody’s to investment-grade for the first time in seven years.

The nation’s banks earned $35 billion in the first three months of 2012. That’s the biggest quarterly profit since 2007, according to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Two out of three banks reported higher profits than for the same period a year ago. Meanwhile, bank losses on failed loans fell to the lowest level in four years and the number of troubled banks fell for the fourth consecutive quarter, says the FDIC. And the National Credit Union Administration says credit unions have granted nearly $12 billion in business loans, setting a new record.

The banks aren’t the only businesses making money. After-tax corporate profits (as a percent of the nation’s GDP) were 9.75% as of December 31, 2011 – compared to just 5.7% in Q4 1999, at the height of the dot-com craze. (Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Department of Commerce). Corporate dividends are on pace for an all-time high, reports Standard & Poor’s, and American corporations have accumulated a record level of cash – $1.2 trillion, according to Moody’s Investors Service.

A new report by educational firm Financial Finesse on employee financial stress says that only 16% of employees now report “high” or “overwhelming” financial stress levels, down 30% from two years ago. And consumer sentiment, measured monthly by the University of Michigan, is now at the highest level since October 2007.

As these facts illustrate, the U.S. economy is continuing its recovery from the depths of the Credit Crisis of 2008, and in many areas we’ve returned to pre-crisis levels. And indications are strong that our nation’s recovery will continue for years to come.

Such positive news would suggest that stock prices should be soaring. And indeed they were for the first three months of this year (the Dow Jones Industrial Average1 gained 8.8% through March 31). And although the economic data continues to be good (as described above), the stock market was flat in April and fell sharply in May. (The Dow dropped 5.8% in May. That might not sound like much, but May produced only five daily gains; the last time a single month had so few daily gains was in 1968! And the last time we experienced a month with just four days of gains occurred – are you ready for this? – in 1903!)

Some folks might say that a pullback makes sense and that stock prices can’t be expected to continue rising at the pace set earlier this year. But that sentiment belies the facts. While the S&P 500 Stock Index2 is at the same level as it was in 2000, the current operating profits of the 500 companies that comprise the S&P 500 are 1.8 times higher than they were then. If prices in 2000 were accurate based on profits, then today’s stock market – based on that math – should be 81% higher than it is. In other words, the Dow Jones Industrial Average should be at 22,431, not 12,293 (which was Thursday’s actual close).

Consider this: the earnings yield on the S&P 500 is 8.7%; the yield on the 10-year Treasury Note is 1.6%. The last time the spread was this wide was 1967! This statistic from Standard and Poor’s, like all the others I’ve shared, is completely at odds with May’s performance.

And there’s more. Since October 2007, when the stock market last attained an all-time high, investors have yanked $420 billion from stock mutual funds. They’ve withdrawn $31 billion this year alone, through May 23, according to the Investment Company Institute. So there is no question that, despite gains in consumer confidence and robust corporate profits, investors are displaying no stomach for stocks. They’d rather own just about anything else, even if it means earning nothing (such as bank accounts and money market funds that pay 0.01% annually), losing money in a desperate effort to avoid, well, losing money (gold prices are down about 15% since the highs reached last August according to The Wall Street Journal, despite the claims of many that gold is a “safe haven”), blindly (and foolishly) chasing some get-rich-quick fad (ever hear of an IPO called Facebook?) or incorrectly thinking that long-term bonds are a safe haven (have you read my Special Report warning about “this most dangerous of assets”? If not, ask us to send you a copy).

We all know why investors are so averse to investing in stocks: their attitudes range from fear (Europe, the U.S. federal deficit and state pension-fund shortfalls top the list) to anger (about our do-nothing Congress, incompetent federal regulators and greedy Wall Street banks and brokerage firms) to confusion (conflicting news reports that are inflicted upon us moment by moment in a never-ending media frenzy, made worse by the fact that this is an election year). None of those sentiments cause one to feel confident about investing in stocks.

So, I’m stumped. Every week, Branderson and I talk to a million people on the radio, trying to explain to them why they shouldn’t be full of fear about today’s economy. Together with our colleague, Financial Educator Keith Spengel, we have talked to thousands of people this year in seminars and webcasts on the same subject. And, of course, all the advisors here at Edelman Financial talk daily with hundreds of people. In each instance, we try to show how much money American companies are earning, and how well positioned we are as a nation to confront, withstand and overcome the many serious challenges that we face. And most importantly, we try to help consumers understand that the key to their future financial security lies not in the actions of Congress or leaders of the Eurozone, but in their own personal actions. We want people to realize that it’s how they handle their money today that will be the key determinant for how much money they will have in the future – that what matters to them personally has more to do with how much they are personally saving and where they are saving it than with whatever new law or regulation comes out of Congress next month or next year.

Unlike the masses, you get it. I know you do. You understand that the key to investment success is found by following four simple rules: diversify extensively3 (so that disarray in the stock market won’t cause you too much harm), focus on your long-term goals (because today’s worries, no matter how severe they appear, will be nothing more than distant memories in the future), rebalance your portfolio (to benefit from short-term volatility by capturing profits and buying shares that are relatively low in price) and keep your costs low (by purchasing investments that are sharply lower in cost than most others). These four rules serve as the basis for your investment in the Edelman Managed Asset Program®, and they serve you well. I know you get it.

Still, it is frustrating when stock prices fall in the short-term due solely to absurd, illogical behavior. It’s disturbing when investors let their imaginations run wild, focusing on what might happen instead of what actually is happening.

So, yes, stock prices in May were down. Not only did U.S. stocks decline, as noted earlier, but it was even worse for foreign stocks. (The EAFE Index2, a measure of foreign stocks, fell 9.4% in May, or twice as much as the S&P 500 – reflecting current angst about Europe.) Despite May’s dreary results, we remain confident, and you should too. Current prices merely reflect the fear, anger and confusion of the moment. Those sentiments will pass, and when they do – as investors realize that they (once again) have been focusing on all the wrong things – we expect prices to rebound with a resurgence that will surprise a great many people.

How close are we to such times? No one knows of course, but consider the chart below: it shows each week’s average recommended stock allocation of the chief market strategists at six large financial firms (Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Bank of Montreal, Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan Chase, Oppenheimer and UBS). Currently, these “experts” are recommending that investors place only 51% of assets in stocks! That low an amount is practically unheard of. In fact, it’s occurred only twice in the 22-year history of this weekly survey. And those two other times were in May 1997 (immediately followed by a 77% gain in the NASDAQ over the next 24 months) and in March 2009 (immediately followed by a 100% gain in the S&P 500 over the next 25 months). If history is any guide, the bearishness of these “experts” is foretelling a major market upswing!

Wall Street Allocation Stock

In the meantime, though, rough markets are likely. As we’ve witnessed several times in the past few years, political leaders and natural disasters can create short-term havoc in the financial markets. Those who panic and sell during such times risk financial devastation, but those who keep their heads, stay focused on their goals and remain committed to their investment strategy discover that they can weather the storm with less volatility than others and potentially emerge with quicker recovery and the achievement of all-time-high account values faster than they might otherwise expect.

Storm clouds surround stock prices, but in our opinion, they are not accurately reflecting the true value of companies both in the United States and abroad. Don’t be surprised at your May statement, and don’t place too much emphasis on it. We certainly aren’t. All the advisors here at the firm still have our own money invested in the Edelman Managed Asset Program®, just like you, and we aren’t changing a thing.

To be sure, market volatility (meaning daily price movements) has been very low for the past six months. But as events continue to unfold in Europe, and as our election approaches, it would not be surprising for the markets to experience a resurgence in volatility, similar to what was experienced in 2011. Don’t assume that volatility is bad, or predictive of anything. High winds often accompany big storms, but in the end, the sun always returns, shining brightly. If you have any questions or concerns be sure to talk to your Edelman advisor.

As always, we’ll keep you posted.

Best,
Ric Edelman
Chairman and CEO

1The Dow Jones Industrial Average is an index that shows how 30 large, publicly owned companies based in the United States have traded during a standard trading session in the stock market.

2An index is a hypothetical portfolio of specific securities, the performance of which is often used as a benchmark in judging the relative performance of securities. Indexes are unmanaged portfolios and should only be used as comparisons with securities with similar investment characteristics and criteria. It is impossible to invest in an index. The performance information for any of the indices does not take into account any taxes imposed on, or any fees, expenses, commissions or other charges which may be incurred by portfolio management or the investor for such a portfolio. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

3Diversification does not assure or guarantee better performance and cannot eliminate the risk of investment losses. There are no guarantees that a diversified portfolio will outperform a non-diversified portfolio.

Copyright © 2012 Edelman Financial Services. All rights reserved.

Ric Edelman is Chairman and CEO of Edelman Financial Services, a Registered Investment Adviser, and CEO, President and a Director of The Edelman Financial Group (NASDAQ: EF). He is an Investment Adviser Representative who offers advisory services through EFS and a Registered Principal of (and offering securities through) Sanders Morris Harris Inc., an affiliated broker/dealer, member FINRA/SIPC.

If you would like to manage your email preferences, please ….

This message was sent by Edelman Financial Services – 4000 Legato Road, 9th Floor, Fairfax, VA 22033 – (888) 752-6742.

# – # – # – # – #   


FUN: BBT “My (super) power is the ability to pretend like I give a damn about your pidley ass problems” — The Pants Alternative (3/22/10)

Saturday, June 2, 2012

ROFL!

# – # – # – # – #   


SURVIVAL: PrepareHub, a not-for-profit

Saturday, June 2, 2012

http://www.preparehub.org

Welcome to PrepareHub.org

We beta-launched this site on Saturday, May 26, 2012, as part of our celebration of EMPact America’s third anniversary.

You are welcome to sign up as a member now and start looking through the site and the Citizens’ Exchange(TM) — which is what we’re calling the online store.

Founded in 2009

EMPact America is a not-for-profit that was incorporated in New York State on May 26, 2009. PrepareHub.org is EMPact America’s latest venture, intended to be a place where people concerned about EMP can interact.

Celebrating Our Third Anniversary

We hope you will explore the various features our site has to offer. We created this online space for you to log on and create a dynamic member profile, collaborate on projects, share your ideas and expertise – and, most important, connect with others who are interested in and involved with preparedness efforts.

# – # – # – # – #   

[TIP ‘o’ the HAT to: Jim Rawles http://survivalblog.com/2012/05/notes-from-jwr-472.html ]

# – # – # – # – #   


FUN: BBT “OK the (Schrödinger’s) cat’s alive. Let go to dinner” –The Tangerine Factor

Friday, June 1, 2012

After a terrible drive north, I got a good laff out of this.

# – # – # – # – #  2012-Jun-01 @ 22:40  


INTERESTING: History’s dictators have always hated cats

Friday, June 1, 2012

http://ncc-1776.org/tle2012/tle670-20120513-03.html

Cats and Dogs
by L. Neil Smith
Attribute to L. Neil Smith’s The Libertarian Enterprise

*** begin quote ***

I find it endlessly fascinating that with one exception, history’s dictators have always hated cats, who, as independent creatures and nature’s libertarians, are not the best pet for someone who thinks he owns everybody else’s lives. Some individuals appear to resent their independence. For me, it’s the main characteristic that makes cats attractive.

The exception (I’ve pondered over this like a puzzle, for years) was Vladimir Ilich Lenin, who made a point of being photographed with his cat (I have its name around here somewhere) on more than one occasion.

It may not tell the whole story—nothing does—but the next time you wonder about a politician, or a potential employee or boss, or even that redhead you find intriguing, find out how they feel about cats. Come to think of it, I wonder where Obama, Romney, and Ron Paul stand.

It may tell you how they feel about individual liberty.

*** end quote ***

Hmm, one of my co-workers rescues dogs and has four. 

Wonder what that says about her.

Maybe I should get a cat?

Hmmm!

Seems like there’s a Big Bang episode that covers that.

# – # – # – # – #   


RANT: Multiple DUIs

Thursday, May 31, 2012

Instead of focusing on the average joe who has a beer with dinner, this is the problem! 4 DUIs. Why is he out of jail?

Of course, then the problem would be solved and no need for “checkpoints” as revenue raising.

f———- Forwarded message ———-

From: South Brunswick Twp Police Department
Date: Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Subject: Advisory Message: Cops catch drunk driver after near collision and chase
To: reinke

Message sent via Nixle | Go to nixle.com | Unsubscribe
Agency Logo
Wednesday May 30, 2012, 8:37 AM
South Brunswick Twp Police Department

CHIEF RAYMOND J. HAYDUCKAAdvisory: Cops catch drunk driver after near collision and chase

Hi fjohn reinke,

A drunk driver, who had been convicted four times previously for driving while under the influence, was arrested Saturday morning after nearly striking a police car and leading officers on a chase. The incident began at 1:30am as Sergeant Frank Lombardo was driving east on Route 522. William Campbell age 52 of Franklin Park was operating his 1994 Ford pickup truck south on North Umberland Way. He entered the intersection of Route 522 without stopping and nearly ran into Sergeant Lombardo’s marked patrol car. The sergeant had to slam on his brakes to avoid a collision.

The sergeant then activated his lights and siren attempting to stop the vehicle. The pickup truck accelerated and struck two curbs as it winded through the South Ridge Townhomes development. Campbell then pulled onto New Road and headed east. He turned off of New Road into a commerical development accelerating behind some buildings. Sergeant Lombardo pursued him behind the buildings where Campbell made a U-turn and came back at the officer. Sergeant Lombardo was able to get his vehicle out of the way as Campbell pulled pass. Campbell then pulled up to the rear of one of the commercial buildings and parked his vehicle. He stumbled out of the driver’s seat without explanation. Sergeant Lombardo was able to arrest Campbell without further incident.

Campbell, who in addition to four driving while under the influence convictions has ten license suspensions, was charged with driving while under the influence and eluding. He was transported to police headquarters and processed. His bail was set at $25,000. He was lodged in the Middlesex County Correction Center in default of bail.

Contact Information:
Sgt James Ryan
PIO
732-329-4646
jryan@sbtnj.net

For full details, view this message on the web.

# – # – # – # – #   

Notification Image

Sent by South Brunswick Twp Police Department
540 Ridge Rd, Monmouth Junction, NJ 08852

To manage your email settings, click here. To update your account settings, login here.
If you prefer not to receive future emails, unsubscribe here.

Powered by Nixle. © 2012 Nixle, LLC. All rights reserved.

Click here to Reply, Reply to all, or Forward


FUN: Another bad joke

Thursday, May 31, 2012

FROM HR SUE:

Sven and Ole

Two Minnesota engineers were standing at the base of a flagpole, looking up.

A woman walks by asks what they were doing.

“Ve’re supposed to find da height of dis flagpole, ” said Sven, “but
ve don’t haff a ladder.”

The woman took a wrench from her purse, loosened a couple bolts, and
laid the pole down on the ground.

Then she took a tape measure from her pocketbook, took a measurement,
announced, “Twenty one feet, six inches,” and walked away.

Ole shook his head and laughed. “Ain’t dat just like a voman! Ve ask
fer da height and she gives us da length!”

# – # – #  

Guess it could have been worse. The “woman” could have been blond. LOL!

# – # – # – # – #   


GUNS: I didn’t know that

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

http://lewrockwell.com/gun-reviews/how-not-to-shoot-a-revolver.html

I didn’t know that. But then I don’t have revolvers. 

# – # – # – # – #   


POLITICAL: Now that we have a pot head as Prez …

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/05/obama-and-his-pot-smoking-choom-gang/

May 25, 2012 12:54pm
Obama and His Pot-Smoking ‘Choom Gang’

*** begin quote ***

Unlike Bill Clinton, Barack Obama never tried to say he didn’t inhale.

In his 1995 memoir “Dreams of My Father,” Obama writes about smoking pot almost like Dr. Seuss wrote about eating green eggs and ham. As a high school kid, Obama wrote, he would smoke “in a white classmate’s sparkling new van,” he would smoke “in the dorm room of some brother” and he would smoke “on the beach with a couple of Hawaiian kids.”

*** end quote ***

Now that we have a pot head as Prez …

… as a little L libertarian, I’ve always thought that our “drug policy”, “(pseudo) War on (some) Drugs”, was a best “misguided”, at worst “corrupt”. We have too many examples, anecdotal evidence, of pot not being as “bad” as booze, of high achievers who “inhaled” …

Don’t you think we could have a national dialogue about “drugs”, “drug policy”, and factual evidence?

We have mj prohibition because of hemp’s competition with the politically connected paper industry.

We have mj prohibition because of Hollywood’s “reefer madness” propaganda.

We have mj prohibition because of its association with the black community.

We have arguably ¼ of the federal prison population due to mj.

We have sick people, who need it and have no alternative for them. Not an effective alternative. Never mind a cheap alternative.

Ignore that not everyone who has a medical mj RX needs it. There are folks who legitimately need it (i.e., AIDS, chemotherapy patients, glaucoma).

Since the Chinese dynasty, there has been a residual addiction rate. Regardless if addicts were sentenced to death in China. Dealers were imprisoned for long stretches in Southeast Asia. No “public policy” makes a dent in the problem.

If the Gooferment can’t keep “drugs” out of its prisons, then perhaps we need a better strategy?

Walmart and Walgreens seem to be able to restrict access to stuff from minors.

So, why can’t we shift from the “punishment” meme that is immoral, ineffective, and inefficient to a “treatment” meme. 

How much worse could we do?

# – # – # – # – #   

 


SERVICE: FACEBOOK has risks; parents should engage a “Glenda”

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

I found something disturbing aimed at one of my young Facebook “friends”.

(You know they “friend” me when they think it’s “kool” to have some “friends” and want to build up their count. Then forget that the fat old white guy injineer “stalks” them forever. Like Glenda the Good Witch, watching over them and their online presence.)

So, I immediately alerted on it to the “command authority” (i.e., her parents) via the approved channels (i.e., her aunt).

Action was taken.

This post suggests that parents need to have a view into their children’s onine activities.

Of course, I offer my “glenda service” at my usual discount. (LOL!) But, you’ll have to be “kool” about how you get a Glenda on to their friend’s list.

“Wonder what that crazy old koot is up to this week end? You see him on Facebook don’t you, dearest child of mine?” May work?

Or, find a trusted friend or relative that the child has already been “friend-ed” during their naïve days, and assign them Glenda duty.

Forewarned is forearmed. Or in this case, four eyeballed. (Yeah, I know it falls flat. But you get the idea!)

# – # – # – # – #   


POLITICAL: “We’re all Catholics now.” — Mitt Romney

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

ere’s some discussion of the issue of the Obama mandate and a quote I hadn’t heard before.

http://intellectualoid.wordpress.com/2012/05/26/breaching-the-wall/

Tipsy Teetotaler
Sensitively dependent on initial conditions.

Posted by: readerjohn | May 26, 2012
Breaching the Wall

*** begin quote ***

I’m starting to entertain the thought that a litmus test for bad guys versus good guys is that the former want to limit religion by arbitrary state redefinition, the latter to limit government to the terms of the Constitution.

I’ve been concerned with religious freedom pretty keenly since well before I set foot in law school, and I know that this issue is one where, whatever his other defects, Romney stands in stark contrast to Obama and his administration. “We’re all Catholics now.”

*** end quote ***

I think that he’s hit the nail on the head.

Limit Gooferments; not people!

# – # – # – # – #  2012-May-29 @ 07:32  


RANT: “Audit the Fed” has some life

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

*** begin quote ***

Dear Ferdinand,

This is it!

Earlier today, I received word that Audit the Fed (H.R. 459) is now scheduled for a vote this July in the U.S. House of Representatives!

This historic moment is only possible thanks to your relentless pressure. Now we must turn up the heat to secure victory – first in the House and then in Harry Reid’s U.S. Senate.

That’s why I hope you’ll read the note below from Senator Rand Paul and take immediate action.

In Liberty,

Matt Hawes
Vice President
Campaign for Liberty

*** end quote ***

If one has to find the one single thing, that has impoverished us as a nation, while allowing the Gooferment to grow out of control and dramatically preventing us from controlling that “sprawl”, then one only has to look at the 1913 creation of the Fed.

Killing it wouldn’t solve our problems. 

But it would go along way to stop the hole we’re in from being dug to even grater depths.

AND, it would stop “inflation”. The automatic debasement of our unit of account.

The Dead Old White Guys must be rolling over to see us make this basic mistake.

# – # – # – # – #   


GOVERNACIDE: Lat’s call it “Decoration Day” again; that should be the focus

Monday, May 28, 2012

http://www.downsizedc.org/blog/does-your-rep-really-believe-the-troops-are-fighting-for-freedom

May 25, 2012
Does Your Rep Really Believe the Troops Are Fighting for Freedom?
Posted by James Wilson

*** begin quote ***

Politicians send troops abroad to die. Then they bestow fake honor on them at home. It’s called Memorial Day.

Chances are EVERY member of Congress will be back in their district, pontificating and posing as a patriot, who values the sacrifice of the fallen.

*** end quote ***

Maybe I’m a curmudgeon. Maybe I’m a cynic. Maybe I’m just a disagreeable SOB.

But I’m a vet.

And, I feel that I, and all other vets, were screwed by the political governing class.

The icon is Robert McNamara.

He knew the truth about “Viet Nam, Republic of”, but played along with the “gag”.

He confessed later on.

Too late for 55k boys who made the ultimate sacrifice because they weren’t in on the “gag”.

Ditto for WW1; Wilson’s war. Ditto for WW2; FDR’s war. Ditto for Korea; Truman’s war.

Sorry, but “We, The Sheeple” have put a stop to politician’s standing on the graves of a lot of good men and women to make their speeches.

Time to call them to account.

When the “enemy” arrives at the water’s edge, then, and only then, should we be asking the youth to defend their land.

Argh!

Un-patriotic?

Not in the least. 

Dissent is by definition patriotic.

Like Ron Paul says: “… first thing smoking coming in this direction …”!

Sorry, but I think the best way to honor Decoration Day is stop creating more graves to “decorate”.

And, the fact, that a charity has to pander on TV for funds to take care of the “wounded warriors”, is further national disgrace.

Tell me about how that’s fixed and the girls and boys aren’t wasting their blood, then you can celebrate “Memorial Day”.

Argh! To the n-th power.

# – # – # – # – #   


GOVEROTRAGEOUS: Hollywood bribes the District of Corruption

Sunday, May 27, 2012

http://www.smartmoney.com/spend/travel/10-things-hollywood-wont-tell-you-1337096257188/?cid=djem_sm_WeekontheStreet_t#articleTabs

10 Things Hollywood Won’t Tell You
Now playing: sequels, 3-D reruns and long ads.
By CHARLES PASSY

*** begin quote ***

6. “We scratch Washington’s back…”

Yep, even Hollywood has a lobbying arm: the Motion Picture Association of America, which spent more than $2 million wooing elected officials last year. And its positions aren’t always popular with either the public or politicians. Recently, the association, under the stewardship of former U.S. Sen. Chris Dodd, pushed for antipiracy legislation designed to keep films from being easily shared and copied online. But the bills were seen as restricting the overall use of the Internet and failed to garner support. After Congress put the legislation on hold, Dodd warned that “those who count on ‘Hollywood’ for support need to understand that this industry is watching very carefully who’s going to stand up for them when their job is at stake.” That led some critics to charge that the MPAA was bullying legislators and prompted an online petition asking the White House to “investigate this blatant bribery.” The Obama administration declined to comment on the petition.

*** end quote ***

This one caught even an old grump like me. I thought they were just “liberals”. Turns out they are “unindicted coconspirators”!  

# – # – # – # – #    


INTERESTING: How does one give a youngster advice?

Saturday, May 26, 2012

Dear Miss X:

May I share something that I wish some one had told me when I was your age?

You’ve recently experienced a disappointment. Crushing.

I’ve been rejected in my life.

Many times. Sometimes important; sometimes trivial. Sometimes I cared a lot; sometimes not at all.

In retrospect, I wish I’d known to ask the person rejecting, “Why?”

Robert Burns’ quote is “O would some power the giftie gie us to see ourselves as others see us.”

The JoHari window http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johari_window tells us that there is a whole “half” that we can see and that can be reduced in half by fining out what other people see.

I suggest that you want to meet the rejector and ask why?

Yup. Face 2 Face.

Ask him why? Why, you weren’t picked? In what dimensions, did you fall short of your peers? What could you have done or could not have done? What preparations could you have done?

See, now you just suspect, but you really really don’t know.

There’s one You Tube Taylor Swift video where as a young girl, she actually thanks a radio host critic for negative feedback. That’s is an astounding revelation that I never had when I was young. To interrogate a critic for feedback and thinking the person for it is a skill far beyond anyone’s years. I wish I’d had it; I wish you’d develop it.

So that’s my “pearl”. Hope I explained it well enough. It’s up to you to “steal” the idea.

I wish I had it when I was you’re age.

# – # – # – # – #   


RANT: End Gooferment Skrules

Friday, May 25, 2012

http://ncc-1776.org/tle2012/tle670-20120513-02.html

To Hell With Public Schools
by L. Neil Smith

Attribute to L. Neil Smith’s The Libertarian Enterprise

*** begin quote ***

It is time to end the public schools.

I just heard about a little boy—a six-year-old in First Grade—who is being treated like a sex criminal by the drooling half-wits who run the Aurora (Colorado) school system because he quoted an M&Ms commercial to a little girl his own age. Something about “I’m sexy and I know it”, a concept of which the poor kid can’t possibly have any understanding.

Everybody reading this knows that this is just the latest in an endless series—”a long train of abuses and usurpations” if I ever saw one—of Nazi-like idiocies occurring all over the country, and in Canada, as well. The last one that pissed off every intelligent individual on the continent was when a little girl drew a picture of a gun of some kind, and her father got strip-searched and their home invaded by uniformed goons with the intelligence of vicious man-eating eggplants.

*** end quote ***

If I had one quibble with L. Neil Smith, it is that he confuses “public schools” with “Gooferment Skrules” aka “Big Government Propaganda Reeducation Camps”. Or as some wag said: “Prison’s Minor League Training Program”.

I vaguely remember back in the days of my yute, there were “public schools” that were not run by the Government. Schools of Ethical Culture. The Lutherans had schools that weren’t “parochial”, but were open to anyone. I only vaguely remember those. They were gone before I was far along in school. There were “private” schools that were “public”. They had some number of slots paid for by benefactors to be given to worthy families; as I reflect you had to be smart and your family broke. 

“Free” Gooferment Skrules quickly wiped them all out. Who can compete with a “free good”? Like trying to market air or dirt.

Not a doubt in my mind that the current “stupidity” of Ameirkan Yute is totally due to Gooferment Skrules. Ending them would one of the single best things that could happen.

The only thing I’d rank higher would be: End the Fed; End the “(pseudo) War on (some) Drugs”; and End the Income Tax. 

But ending Gooferment Skrules would certainly be a good start and the increase in IQ would probably lead to nuking these other things!

# – # – # – # – #    


JOBFINDING: Electrical Engineer PE in Manhattan, NY

Friday, May 25, 2012

Please let me know your interest level in the 2 positions below or if you know of anyone that can assist me in my search. I will pay you $1,500 if you refer me someone that I place.

 

Lead Electrical Engineer PE in Manhattan, NY: $160K-$180K

-Manage/design/plan electrical engineering projects/department, hands on design, resource scheduling, client relations/coordination, and assign work to/mentor staff

-Projects include commercial, institutional, and industrial

 

Requirements:

-10-12+ years of electrical engineering experience

-BSEE required

-NY Electrical PE required. Electrical PE in surrounding states and LEED are a plus

Sr. HVAC PE in Manhattan, NY: $150K-$170K

-Design/plan HVAC engineering projects and client relations

-Projects include industrial, education, and healthcare

 

Requirements:

-7-10+ years of mechanical engineering experience

-BSME, PE, and LEED are required

 

Benefits for all Positions:

-Employee stock ownership, 401K, tuition reimbursement, paid holidays, PTO, short/long-term disability, employee assistance, professional license & association reimbursement, term life insurance, benefit plan, healthcare/dependent care reimbursement, public transportation/parking reimbursement, dental, and health insurance

 

John Ikariyama

Executive Recruiter at AgentHR

Office/Fax: (702) 586-3075

Emails: jikariyama@yahoo.com

jikariyama@argpeople.com

 # – # – # – # – #  2012-May-25 @ 08:50  


RANT: Gooferment protection is nonexistent; circular reasoning

Thursday, May 24, 2012

EXCERPT FROM AN EMAIL ABOUT Gooferment!

But, see there is the “key fact”, the Gooferment ENABLES that bad product to make to the market in the first place. Then you think the Gooferment should “protect” us from it. It’s ineffective and inefficient. If makers were exposed to the FULL BRUNT of their mistakes, then they would be infinitely more careful.

The marketplace exacts a SWIFT and TERRIBLE justice on the “offenders”. Think Corvair. Think Thallidomide. Think Enron. Think … any good disaster. Yeah, the Gooferment got involved long after the train left the station. I remember TIME magazine breakign the Thallidomide story and had women stopping that drug LONG before the actual link was formally recognized in Europe. Which PRECEEDED the FDA by a while.

Yes, my little L libertarian “paradise” my be only in my dreams now. But it’s coming. Because humans NEED to be free. And, you can only surpress it for so long before it erupts. My exemplar is “drugs in prisons”. Humans are irrepressible; you can only kill them.

Good point about the the seat belts. But it was one passionate committed man who dragged Gooferment along kicking a screaming. Even some good things result from a big bad thing.

# – # – # – # – #   


INTERESTING: Seatbelts

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Stapp

Dear Jasper John

I learned something new thanks to my research into seat belts.

The Air Force was very instrumental in the passing of laws making seat belts mandatory
thanks in no mall measure to the work of Col. John Stapp
Car safety

During his work at Holloman Air Force Base Stapp became interested in the implications of his work for car safety. At the time, cars were generally not fitted with seatbelts but Stapp had shown that a properly restrained human could survive far greater impacts than an unrestrained one. Many traffic accident deaths were therefore avoidable but for the lack of seatbelts. Stapp became a strong advocate and publicist for this cause, frequently steering interviews onto the subject, organizing conferences, and staging demonstrations (including the first known use of automobile crash test dummies). At one point the military objected to funding work they believed was outside their purview, but they were persuaded when Stapp gave them statistics showing that more Air Force pilots were killed in traffic accidents than in plane crashes. The culmination of his efforts came in 1966 when Stapp witnessed Lyndon B. Johnson sign the law making manufacture of cars with seatbelts (lapbelts at that time) compulsory.[1]

John Paul Stapp, M.D., Ph.D., Colonel, USAF (Ret.) (11 July 1910–13 November 1999) was a career U.S. Air Force officer, USAF flight surgeon and pioneer in studying the effects of acceleration and deceleration forces on humans. He was a colleague and contemporary of Chuck Yeager, and became known as “the fastest man on earth”.

Stebbins, Donald M. (MC1961) 

# – # – #  

Couldn’t use this in the Alumni news, but it was to good to loose.

I’d credit this “success” to the man; not the Gooferment. Even some good comes out of a “bad thing” (i.e., Gooferment).

I first heard about seat belts when my maternal Grandfather Eddie and my Dad put them in all the cars. Front and back. Long before I even knew what they were. Their use was condition of being allowed to use the car. It was so rare for my Grandfather to insist on ANYTHING, it made a big impression in my mind. This was back in the early 60’s. 

# – # – # – # – #   


GOVEROTRAGEOUS: Drones over Amerika

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

WMAL in DC is going nuts with drones and drone sightings.

They have DOD documents that say that USAF is authorized to use them in a myriad of cases. 

So has the Big Brother “Surveillance State” become a fait acompli?

Similar to one’s electronic privacy that disappeared with the introduction of the Social Security Number.

You remember that gag “Not For Identification Purposes”?

I just had to give it to the gas, electric, and cable companies to start service at my new “crash pad”.

Argh!

“We, The Sheeple” wake up. 

The “third revolutionary war” is over. YOU lost.

You may know return to the modern day bread and circuses where everyone depends on a Gooferment check (and YES, that INCLUDES Social Security!) and everyone watches “reality TV” for their “life”.

Argh! Squared.

By way of a small revolt, I only have one TV in my new condo. And, that’s just a concession to guests.

Argh! Cubed.

# – # – # – # – #    


ADMINISTRATIVE: Out of PERIDOT; In at INTL414

Monday, May 21, 2012

If you have to ask you have to ask, you dont need to know. Attention, Luddite, now you can worry. I’m on the FOURTH floor and the windows do open. Paint is progressing. ETA Friday. Furniture on Tuesday. No TV. Have to get one. No cable; have to call for install. Inet via Verizon mifi.

p.s., don’t believe Verizshit advertising mifi ain’t broadband. IMHO a 9600 modem would be better.


FUN: Interesting, imaginative visual, haunting words

Monday, May 21, 2012

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hsVICl7d8k&feature=colike

Published on May 17, 2012 by TaylorSwiftVEVO

Music video by Taylor Swift performing Eyes Open. (C) 2012 Big Machine Records, LLC.

# – # – #  

As an old “swiftie”, is this our heroine sending out a coded message to the faithful about her recent alleged bob job.

As a tin foil hat, I can read into anything.

How does one sleep with their eyes open?

LOL!

# – # – # – # – #  

Also, why is it “not  viewable from a mobile device”? Like an iPad? 

It the a deep plot by “VEVO” to get your to download their “free” IPAD app?

Does YouTube know they’re “stealing” their eyeballs and clicks?

Very interesting.

# – # – # – # – #   


MEME: Guilt blocks your smarts

Sunday, May 20, 2012

http://www.jamesaltucher.com/2012/04/how-to-be-less-stupid/

How to Be Less Stupid
Posted by James Altucher

*** begin quote ***

I’m really stupid. I can tell you in advance. I think at heart, if I work at it, I can be smart. But at the moment I’m largely an idiot. I feel I have the right knowledge but I let a lot of stuff get in the way. You know: “stuff”. Worries, guilt, paranoia, grudges, resentment. Like, for instance: I resent the people who resent me. I think they resent me for no reason. So now I resent them. What a circle-jerk!

I used to think when I added stuff to my brain I’d get smarter. But this is not true. For instance, if I look up when Charlemagne was born I’d just add a fact to my head which I will forget tomorrow. This won’t make me smarter. Subtraction, and not Addition, is what makes the window to the brain more clear, wipes away the smudges, opens the drapes.

*** and ***

6)      Guilt. A good friend of mine wrote me recently. I should say, wrote me six weeks ago. Every day when I wake up I tell myself: don’t return emails until you read, then write. But then sometimes I have other things to do. Meetings. Or BS stuff. Or eating. I say, “ok, I will return that email later.” And then when later comes I feel bad that I haven’t returned his email earlier. Then at 3am I turn over and say to Claudia, “I didn’t return that email”. She says “Urgh…ushghsh…emmmm” which was not the answer I was looking for. Then I don’t sleep as much. Then I feel guilty. That takes away about 10% of my intelligence right there.

*** end quote ***

Ahh, yes, I feel guilt.

Everyone says I have nothing to be guilty about.

That still doesn’t change how I feel.

Argh!

What do they know?

# – # – # – # – #  2012-May-16 @ 18:46  


MEME: Specifically

Saturday, May 19, 2012

http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2011/02/nine_things_successful_people.html?goback=.gde_1141097_member_114042212

Nine Things Successful People Do Differently

8:58 AM Friday February 25, 2011
by Heidi Grant Halvorson 

*** begin quote ***

Why have you been so successful in reaching some of your goals, but not others? If you aren’t sure, you are far from alone in your confusion. It turns out that even brilliant, highly accomplished people are pretty lousy when it comes to understanding why they succeed or fail. The intuitive answer — that you are born predisposed to certain talents and lacking in others — is really just one small piece of the puzzle. In fact, decades of research on achievement suggests that successful people reach their goals not simply because of who they are, but more often because of what they do.

1. Get specific. When you set yourself a goal, try to be as specific as possible. “Lose 5 pounds” is a better goal than “lose some weight,” because it gives you a clear idea of what success looks like. Knowing exactly what you want to achieve keeps you motivated until you get there. Also, think about the specific actions that need to be taken to reach your goal. Just promising you’ll “eat less” or “sleep more” is too vague — be clear and precise. “I’ll be in bed by 10pm on weeknights” leaves no room for doubt about what you need to do, and whether or not you’ve actually done it.

*** end quote ***

Seems simple enough. Be specific. And as specific as possible. I read that color is important. So I want ANOTHER blue FIT. This one that drives itself back and forth between NJ and VA. ROFL!

# – # – # – # – #