RANT: Can’t starve gooferment? Watch me!

Monday, April 13, 2009

http://channel-surfing.blogspot.com/2009/04/supermajority-super-bad-idea.html

Thursday, April 09, 2009
Supermajority a super bad idea
by Hank Kalet

*** begin quote ***

Taxes are not popular, especially now. Christie appears willing to pander to this disgust without taking into account the consequences that such a proposal would have.

*** end quote ***

reinkefj said…

*** begin quote ***

Yeah, geee, we can’t possibly STARVE the CRIMINALS in TRENTON and the bureaucrats and toadies from not having an endless supply of OUR stolen money to waste hither and yon.

They should be starved!

*** end quote ***

THEN FROM THE WOODWORK COMES “ANONYMOUS”

Anonymous Anonymous said…

*** begin quote ***

   Yeah sure, we don’t need any stinking roads, safe bridges, police, fire fighters, a judicial system, schools and screw medicaid. Let us all march into the wonderful libertarian paradise in which we just step blithely and gingerly over the bodies and rotting corpses in the streets. EMTs will require payment up front, otherwise, you just lay in the gutter until the vultures come. That’s the libertarian way. If your drinking water is polluted, TOUGH LUCK! In libertarian land it will be up to you alone to get rid of your own sewerage. Starve the beast so billionaires can get richer.

*** end quote ***

I’VE HAD ENOUGH OF HIS SNIPING

reinkefj said…

*** begin quote ***

You continue to misstate the Libertarian idea and glorify the big Gooferment solution. Sigh! Let’s try again.

>Yeah sure, we don’t need any stinking roads, safe bridges

Well we have stinking roads and bridges now. The Gooferment has raided the pennies from the gas tax to fund other wasteful programs so that there is no money for repair and maintenance. Are you arguing that what we have works so well, that we shouldn’t even consider something else? Think about the roads in Disneyland or Great Adventure. Are they in need of repair? As bloated as the Turnpike bureaucracy is, where there is a direct link between expense and the road, at least the road is in decent shape. So, do you think that if WalMart ran the road outside its store, would it be “beautiful” and smooth. I bet it would. So why do we allow the gang calling themselves North Brunswick, Middlesex County, and the State of New Jersey to rob us blind and provide substandard roads at an obscene price? Perhaps, stupidity. The unwillingness to think outside the box and consider a different way of organizing and paying for the road. Ever seen the private roads of a an adult retirement community? How do they do that without a gun toting force wielding gooferment? I bet if we had WalMart and UPS design and maintain highways, they’d be cheaper and better. I wouldn’t mind riding on WalMart #1 or UPS #27. But, I guess you’re in shock. Heck, I’d even let them put ads on the pavement. (The politicians do it. Ever see the signs thanking them for a road or construction or such! What chutzpah! They steal our money and put up a sign thanking themselves. Where’s the sign thanking the taxpayer!)

>police

Yeah, Brinks home security is completely unnecessary because your gooferment police do such a wonderful job. Next you’ll be telling us that the “police are our friends” and “never exceed their  authority”! We live in a “soft” police state now where they act alternatively between revenue generation agents, thugs, and criminals. Ever heard of “quotas”? Ever heard of “civil rights violations”? Ever heard of “drug warriors” helping themselves to the “drug raid results”? Some “friends”. With “friends” like that I don’t need enemies.

>fire fighters

Most firefighting in the US was and to some extent still is volunteer. Insurance companies and local organizations couldn’t be trusted to come up with a model that didn’t include goofement.

>a judicial system

Yeah, we cant have Judy Judy and the slew of other private arbitration providers handing out justice. Your gooferment justice system does so well. It’s half revenue production and half abuse. Think we fight the “drug war” for any other reason than keep the rationale for gooferment alive, the coffers full, and the prisons operating for the benefit of the politicians, bureaucrats, and their toadies? And even heard of “Project Innocence”? If a death row inmate survives long enough, these law students work on their case. 120 death row inmates freed due to DNA. But in YOUR court system, innocence isn’t the ultimate appeal. DNA testing is so much more expensive than killing these wretches. Ever hear of gooferment killing innocent people? That’s your justice system. Please, mine would be much more humane and cooperative. Back to the drug war, you do realize that more than half the prison population is non-violent drug offenders. What’s the % of minorities? But, your gooferment isn’t racist or opress the poor! Who cares what chemical people put in their bodies as longs as (1) they don’t hurt someone else; and (2) we don’t have to subsidize it!

>schools

Surely this is the most powerful argument for the Gooferment. By any measure, gooferment schools are merely training grounds for its prisons. “The primary victims of Philadelphia’s public schools are black students whose chances for upward mobility are being systematically destroyed by callous politicians and teacher’s unions. If the Grand Dragon of the Ku Klux Klan set out to destroy black academic excellence in Philadelphia, I doubt whether he could achieve as much damage.” Walter Williams, Jewish World Review, Dec. 19, 2001, “Education fraud in Philly” Yeah, we sure need gooferment education here in New Jersey. And, how is it I incurred the obligation to pay to educate other people’s children? I don’t feed them. I don’t house them. I didn’t have them. Why do I have to pay through the nose to “eddykate” them. Back in the days of the Hands Across New Jersey Tax revolt, I did a white paper that showed if we divided the money spent on education by all the students, we could send everyone to the Hun School in Princeton and still have a 1k$ per kid left over. Bet that calculation is still true. Give education to McDonalds and everyone one will be educated. Ever notice all the non-gooferment preschools that abound. I think there are more than six within SBT alone. Imagine if all education was privatized, there’d be schools everywhere. And on the internet. And, in all sorts of flavors we can only imagine. But, let the gooferment do it. One size fits all that is obscenely expensive and corrupt is sooooo much better!

>screw medicaid.

Yes, all the religious hospitals never gave out charity care. Were not hospitals originated by religious organization? Saint Vincents, Saint Peters, Holy Cross come to mind. And how about Deborah — how did that originate. The gooferment has INTRUDED into areas of civil society where it has no business and does it so badly that it’s a disgrace. I had a very nice lady who ran a private welfare to work organization in Trenton tell me that the mission of the State and County welfare people was to ensure they had an ever growing case load to justify their employment. And the politically connected profited on the human misery of welfare. The State pays for week in a motel what an apartment would cost for a month. But, it makes it impossible for these poor women with families to claw their way out of the grasp. (NO sexism in that. I’m sure they make it just as hard for men.)

>Let us all march into the wonderful libertarian paradise

Yes, let us. Your gooferment imprisons us if we ever try to be free!

>in which we just step blithely and gingerly over the bodies and rotting corpses in the streets.

Not likely, someone will own that road or street and be very interested in keeping it clean and neat. Not like today, where a pothole can lay unattended for years!

>EMTs will require payment up front, otherwise, you just lay in the gutter until the vultures come.

No, but EMTs may have an annual fund drive where the community contributes voluntarily for their operation. And, the people will volunteer their time and effort to succor their fellow human being. And, religious communities will feel it is their moral obligation to help their fellow man. (I think it is humorous in NYC to see Orthodox Jews in their religious attire making ambulance runs on Wall Street.) AND, yes, after a service, you might receive a modest bill for the EMT organization for the cost of their service. With a polite request, that you consider defraying the expense of that service that they willingly gave you. And, once or twice a year, you may get a letter asking for your support of 15 to 30 dollars. Better than one enormous tax bill that you can’t tell covers what.

> That’s the libertarian way.

No, that’s the gooferment way. They put a gun to your head and take “their fair share”.

>If your drinking water is polluted, TOUGH LUCK!

The Gooferment is the acknowledged biggest polluter and the biggest enabler of pollution.

>In libertarian land it will be up to you alone to get rid of your own sewerage.

Yes, you will be RESPONSIBLE to clean up after yourself. Doesn’t South Brunswick Water and Sewer run as a separate entity. I sure pay them enough. Imagine if I had choices? SBW&S versus RotoRooter W&S versus WalMart W&S. Bet there’d be lower rates! And, if I had poluting runoff, what do you think Judge Judy would say? “Clean it up or we’ll do it for you?” And, I’d have an Insurance Company looking over my shoulder to “help” avoid problems.

>Starve the beast so billionaires can get richer.

Yes, because the current system doesn’t starve the poor and reward the rich. Ever wonder why their are so many rich people in gooferment? Argh! You are soooo blind.

All libertarians want is for everyone to be free and have the same choices we want for ourselves.

It’s been a universal drive since the first gooferment took power by force of arms. The People are stronger than any gang of crooks. No matter how they clothe themselves and propagandize themselves. They are and remain thugs who enslave us with our own memes and paradigms.

I’m not a slave. I may be opressed. But, I don’t accept it. See I’m free in my own mind.

“We who lived in concentration camps can remember the men who walked through the huts comforting others, giving away their last piece of bread. They may have been few in number, but they offer sufficient proof that everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms—to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way.” Viktor Frankl 1946 “Man’s Search for Meaning”

Your gooferemnt can tax me, imprison me, and even kill me. But they can’t take away my liberty!

# # # # #

   10:17 AM

AND IT CONTINUED

Anonymous Anonymous said…

   Sure there are many volunteer fire departments but who pays for the fire houses, the equipment, the insurances for all the buildings and equipment, the fire engines, the water system that supplies the fire hydrants and maintenance of the fire hydrants and all those miles of water pipes? Who pays? We pay through taxes, TAXES! Oh no, oh my God, taxes, that’s theft, that’s socialism. Alert the media.

   Wal-Mart roads? UPS roads? Not likely, UPS is cutting jobs, FedEx is cutting jobs nationwide. DHL is pulling out of America, so forget about DHL roads. When these companies go belly up or make drastic cuts because profits are down they will just abandon their roads. These are companies that only perform functions if there is a profit involved so they would charge for the use of their roads; if UPS takes ownership of Route 27 it would become a toll road. Let’s say that Wal-Mart takes ownership of Route 1, then Route 1 would become another toll road. If they don’t make a profit on these roads then they will just abandon them.

   Of course there are crooked corrupt police but there are a sheet load of crooked corrupt people in the private free market sector, too. Because there are crooked corrupt police we should just abandon publicly funded law enforcement?? I guess we should abandon capitalism, too, because there are so many crooked, corrupt, greedy and power hungry capitalists.

   10:27 PM

Blogger reinkefj said…

   >Sure there are many volunteer fire departments

   WOW, a concession to reality.

   >hydrants and all those miles of water pipes? Who pays? We pay through taxes

   Yes, men with guns extort us to pay for a service that we may or may not want. Now, why can’t we have a “McDonalds-like” solution. Why does every two-bit dictator decide what I will and won’t have? Business offer us services that I can pick and choose voluntarily. Why can’t we just say to the gang pretending to be “government”: “No thank you!”. No government is the Mafia. You will pay for their one size solution and shut up. What if we allowed insurance companies to worry about fire protection and I got to pick between: Allstate, State Farm, and None? Think that it couldn’t work?

   >TAXES! Oh no, oh my God, taxes, that’s theft, that’s socialism. Alert the media.

   Taxes are socialism and theft. Now you are beginning to get the idea. You have a right to keep your money and spend it as you see fit. Not as a gang of people with fancy dresses and flags say you have to. That gang can be in the SB municipal building, Trenton, DC, or in countless bureaucratic offices across the land. You should be offered choices; that you can make voluntarily. Sir, would you like fries with that? Choices. It’s a mindset. To us, little L libertarian there are few few legitimate functions of what you call “government” and we call “aggression”.

   >Wal-Mart roads? UPS roads? Not likely, UPS is cutting jobs, FedEx is cutting jobs nationwide.

   > DHL is pulling out of America, so forget about DHL roads.

   WalMart spent millions designing a truck with less drag to save gas and deliver lower costs. I’d love to see what they could do with a road!

   >When these companies go belly up or make drastic cuts because profits are down they will just >abandon their roads.

   Like the State does when they need the money for other purposes? ROFL, you have to be joshing me. When budgets get tight, the first thing the gooferment cuts is “services” to its “customers”. Where as a company cuts the fat.

   >would become another toll road.

   That’s only one idea in how to monetize a road. Advertising is another. Don’t try to guess what a company or a bright individual will do, you can’t. See that’s what makes a market so dynamic. Have you seen the “adopt a highway” signs. (Humorous, we pay taxes for the roads. Yet gooferment tin cups the clean up.)

   >If they don’t make a profit on these roads then they will just abandon them.

   Sure, you just throw away assets all the time. Even if you go to bankruptcy, someone buys the assets. Unless the gooferment is involved, then it’s often cheaper to abandon it. Like buildings and property taxes. And zoning and codes, that make it impossible to use. (Remember Sister Theresa in NYC was going to open a mission to help the unfortunate. She couldn’t because of all the city regs on property. When question why she didn’t have elevators, she answered that the Sisters would just carry the unfortunate from floor to floor like they do else where in the world. Denied. And, she went elsewhere.)

   >Of course there are crooked corrupt police

   Wow, another concession to the real world!

   >but there are a sheet load of crooked corrupt people in the private free market sector, too.

   First of all, there is no “free market sector” unless you consider the “underground economy” or the “illegal drug trade”. The Gooferment regulates everything. Even Madoff is a function of gooferment regulation. That fellow reported the fraud to the SEC for a decade. (Note: that covers BOTH of what you’d call “political parties” and I call “sides of the same coin”.) AND, in the supposedly “free market sector”, I chose who I give my money too. Madoff may fool me, but he didn’t force me. Fraud is a special form of aggression. BUT, he couldn’t have done it without the willing cooperation fo the gooferment.

   >Because there are crooked corrupt police we should just abandon publicly funded law enforcement??

   Yes. Not because it’s crooked, but because it’s root in force and aggression. I didn’t agree that they could use force on me, so for whence do they get the authority to hurt people. I can’t go club you. You can’t club me. So where do they get that authority to club people?

   > I guess we should abandon capitalism, too, because there are so many crooked,

   > corrupt, greedy and power hungry capitalists.

   We haven’t tried free market capitalism in this country for a long long time. Since before the Civil War. Ever since the Constitution was signed, the gooferment has been growing and intruding. Let’s try freedom and liberty. It’ll be a nice change.

   6:43 AM

# # # # #


MONEY: Obama’s “Bailout Bonds”

Friday, April 10, 2009

http://www.lewrockwell.com/rockwell/bailout-bonds.html

Bailout Bonds?
by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.

*** begin quote ***

The Obama administration is cajoling investment companies to create bailout bonds. These would be similar to the bonds that wartime presidents created to find sucker-investors for their wars. Americans were browbeaten into buying them as a patriotic duty. So too those who say “yes, we can” to the bailouts will be asked to do their patriotic duty, and buy the debt of loser companies.

It’s all part of the war on depression, which is destined to be as successful as the war on drugs. But, hey, if it is a good investment, why not buy bailout bonds? Well, there’s a problem. The bonds represent credit extended to companies and projects that are proven market failures. Creating these bonds is a way of institutionalizing the principle of buying low and selling lower.

*** end quote ***

# – # – #

An even MORE important point is who’s going to buy ANY of the US Gooferment debt?

When the pundits say ONE or TWO Trillion Dollar Deficit, (that means they haven’t or can’t tax it to zero), there are really only TWO choices: INFLATION to monetize the debt (A fancy way to say “we’re going to screw everyone who hold dollars”; that’s why the Chinese with their 5T$ are upset. Inflation is a tax on every dollar that currently exists. How many do you have?) —-OR—- BORROW it. (The Treasury issue notes and bonds, basically IOUs, to folk who think they might get their money back with interest.

Who’s going to buy 2T$ worth of debt?

Not the unemployed. Not the “scared money”. Not the Chinese. Not the retirees who have taken a 50% haircut in the market. Not those with 401ks and IRA that have taken the same haircut or worse.

Who else has savings to loan Uncle Sam?

Watch for the interest rates to rise. See bond buyers KNOW their biggest risk is inflation. For those of us who lived thru the Carter Stagflation, we remember the Treasury couldn’t sell 15% tbills because price inflation was running 20%. History WILL repeat itself.

Gold and silver. Gold and silver.

# # # # #


RANT: How do I acquire this “moral obligation”?

Thursday, April 9, 2009

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=93479

The moral dilemma of today’s statists
A Minority View Walter Williams
Posted: April 01, 2009

*** begin quote ***

There is neither moral justification nor constitutional authority for what amounts to legalized theft. This is not an argument against paying taxes. We all have a moral obligation to pay our share of the constitutionally mandated and enumerated functions of the federal government.

*** end quote ***

Unfortunately, I have to disagree with Professor Williams. I’m even further out on the Libertarian spectrum form him. I can refute his “moral obligation” with two words:

“Lysander Spooner”!

How is it I’m bound by what the DOWGs wrote before I was ever born?

And, that assumes that the Constitution in some way binds the gang in the District of Corruption!

Argh!

# # # # #


RANT: We don’t need gooferment “help”

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/026190.html

The End of the “Voucher” Argument
Posted by Thomas DiLorenzo at April 4, 2009 05:09 PM

*** begin quote ***

Proponents of a form of “market socialism” known as “school vouchers” have long ignored the argument that along with government money would come government control of private schools that accept voucher students. This would in turn destroy the private schools, eventually. This argument against vouchers was always unanswerable, but the current antics of the Obammunists should prove once and for all what a hoax it is to call voucher welfare a “libertarian” idea.

*** end quote ***

As a past fan of “vouchers”, I thought they could be useful as a transition mechanism from the Socialistic “School” system we currently have to a Free Market version. Now that we’ve seen the damage the Gooferment can do with its rules (i.e., “mark to market”; “short sale uptick rule”; taxe preferences) and its help (i.e., killing one Lehman but “saving” a competitor AIG; GM; the “bonus” executives).

In short, we just have to close it down! It’s too big, too powerful, and too dangerous.

# # # # #


GOVEROTRAGEOUS: The Gooferment refuses to TARP repayment

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123879833094588163.html

   * OPINION
   * APRIL 4, 2009

Obama Wants to Control the Banks
There’s a reason he refuses to accept repayment of TARP money.
  By STUART VARNEY

*** begin quote ***

I must be naive. I really thought the administration would welcome the return of bank bailout money. Some $340 million in TARP cash flowed back this week from four small banks in Louisiana, New York, Indiana and California. This isn’t much when we routinely talk in trillions, but clearly that money has not been wasted or otherwise sunk down Wall Street’s black hole. So why no cheering as the cash comes back?

My answer: The government wants to control the banks, just as it now controls GM and Chrysler, and will surely control the health industry in the not-too-distant future. Keeping them TARP-stuffed is the key to control. And for this intensely political president, mere influence is not enough. The White House wants to tell ’em what to do. Control. Direct. Command.

It is not for nothing that rage has been turned on those wicked financiers. The banks are at the core of the administration’s thrust: By managing the money, government can steer the whole economy even more firmly down the left fork in the road.

{Extraneous Deleted}

*** end quote ***

It’s all about taking the county socialist. He was rated the 100% liberal senator. He has no other skill than manipulation.

We will never recover from this enormous debt he’s putting on our posterity.

Like Lincoln, Wilson, FDR, Johnson, and Clinton, he’s taking us where we can’t get back from.

The American Experiment has failed.

Where will the new Revolution arise from?

When do the People again take to the barricades to fight for Freedom and Liberty?

Obama made a joke or threat to the Bankers saying “I am the only think between you and the pitchforks.” I’d take care Mister Politician. When the People get out the pitchforks as few of us my come after the Politicians and not the Bankers.

Beware the Devil’s bargain. And, the gooferment is that devil.

# # # # #


RANT: Obama’s False Choice; put us all on a plantation or a death camp!

Monday, April 6, 2009

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YjBlNjQyNzYzNzk2YjBhNjg4NDM2Y2I5MjJkMDYzNjQ=&w=MQ==

Obama’s False Choice
By Mark Steyn

*** begin quote ***

His plan to reduce tax deductions for charitable giving, for example, is not intended primarily to raise revenue, but to advance government as the distributor of largesse and diminish alternative sources of societal organization, such as civic groups. Likewise, his big plans for socialized health care, a green economy, universal college education: They’re about extending the reach of the state.

*** end quote ***

It is hard to imagine Obama’s vision.

Charity by the government; think the welfare office.

Socialized heath care; think the VA killing vets.

Green economy; massive regulation of every facet of our lives to be “green”.

Universal College education; close the parochial schools and everyone is taught the “religion” of big gooferment.

Sad future!

Hard to see how this is avoided without pain, death, and a revolt!

# # # # #


POLITICIAL: BIG GOVERNMENT can’t solve problems

Sunday, April 5, 2009

http://www.lewrockwell.com/french/french111.html

The Lies are Sacred, Blessed by Government
by Doug French

*** begin quote ***

The real trouble, as professor Cleveland points out, is that the vast majority of people have accepted big government as the solver of all problems, thus Obama’s overwhelming election victory. Education is what is needed to fix this problem. It won’t happen overnight, but if more young people read sound, well-written books like professor Cleveland’s, the nation will ultimately return to its roots.

*** end quote ***

As Regan said, “Government isn’t the solution; it’s the problem”.

How right he was.

Unfortunately, the sheep people won’t understand that,

# # # # #


INTERESTING: Deficits matter!

Saturday, April 4, 2009

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhtTfK6Vuz8&feature=player_embedded

Worst Case: The Day The Dollar Falls Part 1/6

A 2005 Dutch film about TEOTWAWKI (The End Of The World As We Know It) caused by a financial panic. All caused by big US deficits.

Interesting?

Maybe the fellow just had the year and President wrong.

Now we have Trillion Dollar Deficits for forever.

Scary!

# # # # #  


INTERESTING: Counterfeit aka fiat money messes up all calculations

Thursday, April 2, 2009

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig9/shostak7.html

Would Cleansing Banks’ Balance Sheets Kick-start the US Economy?
by Frank Shostak

*** begin quote ***

Again, note that what makes the lending possible here is not money but the saved consumer goods. Money just serves here as a facilitator. Or we can say that the act of lending here is about the transfer of final consumer goods from lender to a borrower with the help of money.

The essence of credit will not be altered by the introduction of banks. Instead of lending money directly, John could now engage in lending through the intermediary. (John transfers his money to the bank. The bank lends the money to a borrower.)

Real savings determines the size of credit. What people really want is real stuff, i.e., real savings and not money as such. Hence, as long as banks facilitate credit that is fully backed by real savings, they should be seen as the agents in the transmission of wealth.

*** end quote ***

(Disclaimer: I’m an injineer that got D’s in economics.)

This little morality play about savings misses three factors that I think are significant.

The theft of money by inflation. It in effect “steals” from every dollar holder and acts as a hidden tax.

The interest rate controlled by the central bank “taxes” savings both when the rate is too high and too low.

The baker and all who consume bread are forced to “save” by virtue of these taxes.

When money is debased, all economic calculations are done with a “broken calculator”.

IMHO!

As I said I’m just a dumb old injineer!

# # # # #


POLITICAL: Signs of revolution from the little people

Thursday, April 2, 2009

http://www.takimag.com/site/article/state_of_revolution/

State of Revolution
Posted by Jack Hunter on March 23, 2009
The national movement for state sovereignty

*** begin quote ***

For now, states’ rights legislation promises to remain symbolic, unless actions by the Obama administration pushes state legislatures toward more radical methods of circumventing federal power—or high profile, mainstream conservatives finally rally the troops by promoting what could potentially be the most serious right-wing resistance against the state in recent memory. Given Conservatism Inc.‘s current track record, we’re likely to see much worse from Obama before we ever get anything useful out of them. And states’ rights-minded legislators, with no support from their national party or allegedly sympathetic “conservative” media, will be left to defend themselves and their constituents as little more than hyperbolic Confederate retreads, two steps from “shooting at the Park Service guys out at Fort Sumter” and one-step from the loony bin—for even daring to question the legitimacy of the omnipotent modern state.

*** end quote ***

At some point, how does the “Third American Revolution” start?

Collapse of the dollar? Civil unrest? Non-violent non-cooperation? In the Jury Box? Tax revolt?

Or, does the slave merely set down their burden and refuse to pick it up.

Do the “rich” just throttle back on their earnings. Retire early. Or just “give up”?

# # # # #


RANT: A failure of leadership — O on GM!

Monday, March 30, 2009

from The Wall Street Journal

*** begin quote ***

President Barack Obama blamed leadership failures in Washington, D.C., and Detroit as a key factor in the auto industry’s decline, as he called on General Motors and Chrysler to come up with better restructuring plans.

In prepared remarks Monday, Obama said, “The pain being felt in places that rely on our auto industry is not the fault of our workers… And it is not the fault of all the families and communities that supported manufacturing plants throughout the generations… Rather, it is a failure of leadership.”

The remarks came as Obama moved to impose hard-nosed, sweeping restructuring measures on GM and Chrysler, including the ouster of GM’s Wagoner.

*** end quote ***

So the money that was put into GM for the American Taxpayer went down a rathole.

And, Obama is going to run GM?

Levine on ABC has a great rant I’m going to try and find it.

Isn’t anyone upset that Obama is now running GM? Doesn’t it remind anyone of Hitler’s fascism? And, what bout the budget and spending. You youngsters are being robbed blind. And, who do they think is going to buy all this debt? It’s trillions and trillions of dollars. We’ll be in debt forever!

# # # # #


GUNS: It’s a case of WHEN not IF; it’s about our WILL

Friday, March 27, 2009

http://www.lewrockwell.com/case/case32.html

State Imperative – Confiscation of Privately Owned Weapons by Tim Case

*** begin quote ***

Far too often the concern regarding gun ownership has revolved around the question: “Will the government seek to take our firearms?” This has consistently been the wrong inquiry; it should never have been “will,” but rather “when will.” The former is implicit with the addition of the Second Amendment to the Constitution while the latter is subject to a number of real or imagined threats to the state.

*** end quote ***

The RIGHT to Keep and Bear Arms (RKBA) is recognized in the Second Amendment to the Constitution. It flows from the basic RIGHT to life. Everyone has that RIGHT, but the have to fight for it.

As mental experiment, be a Jew in Germany when the thugs come to take you to the death camps. If each man had a gun and the courage to use it on the first thug through his door, the Nazis would have soon run out of thugs. One at a time. I can see the conversation: “No, Heinz, you go first. I insist.”

It’s not funny.

We have had the Japanese Internment. Waco, Ruby Ridge.

And, it took 50 years for FDR’s involvement in Pearl Harbor to become public.

Sorry, maybe I’m a tin foil hat? I am a “birther”.

Each man and woman will have to decide when they are the Jew in the apartment. The “Jap” in San Francisco. The Branch Davidian. The mother at Ruby Ridge.

When do you resist? Each one us will have to decide for ourselves. What is your line in the sand? When they are loading you and your family on the train to the “work camp”?

Genocide can only be done by a gooferment on an unarmed population.

Gooferment is the meme that kills!

# # # # #


RANT: Wasting the taxpayer’s time

Thursday, March 26, 2009

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hV4mOJQgUsQthrydU_Vty4iVgC5gD9759GG00

Senate reviewing how college football picks No. 1
By FREDERIC J. FROMMER – 18 hours ago

*** begin quote ***

WASHINGTON (AP) — Everyone from President Barack Obama on down to fans has criticized how college football determines its top team. Now senators are getting off the sidelines to examine antitrust issues involving the Bowl Champion Series.

*** end quote ***

Glad they aren’t spending time on anything “less” important like the deficit.

# # # # #


RANT: Obama Seeks Expanded Power to Seize Firms

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/23/AR2009032302830_pf.html

U.S. Seeks Expanded Power to Seize Firms
Goal Is to Limit Risk to Broader Economy
By Binyamin Appelbaum and David Cho
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, March 24, 2009; A01

*** begin quote ***

The Obama administration is considering asking Congress to give the Treasury secretary unprecedented powers to initiate the seizure of non-bank financial companies, such as large insurers, investment firms and hedge funds, whose collapse would damage the broader economy, according to an administration document.

The government at present has the authority to seize only banks.

Giving the Treasury secretary authority over a broader range of companies would mark a significant shift from the existing model of financial regulation, which relies on independent agencies that are shielded from the political process. The Treasury secretary, a member of the president’s Cabinet, would exercise the new powers in consultation with the White House, the Federal Reserve and other regulators, according to the document.

*** end quote ***

Anyone doubt that O is a national socialist?

# # # # #


LIBERTY: Rutgers violates all women’s Fourth Amendment rights

Sunday, March 22, 2009

After 9/11, Rutgers University instituted “security”. Theater at its best!

DSCN0145.JPG

Some how the Cure Insurance company advertising SUV is allowed to park right outside. And, I see the handicap bus blocked from dropping off at the front door. And, all those folks have to hike in.

DSCN0147.JPG

Patrons have their bags searched. All patrons. Mostly women. Men gat a pass. I’ve put Frau’s bag under my coat when she’s forgotten to leave it home or in the car.

Security theater!

Let anyone forget. RU is NOT a private business. It’s a State- funded “entity”. As such, it’s gooferment.

Note, when we went to Seton Hall, there was no such “bag check”.

How do we get our rights back, once they are taken away by gooferment?

I don’t know. Do you?

And, do get me started about the ongoing policy of selling bottles of soda but removing the cap. Students once threw them on the court.. After a few spills, smart repeat visitors just bring caps from home. Soda manufacturer put the prizes under the cap. I’ve seen the the vendors checking them. I guess they get to keep the caps that win. So they will be real diligent about “seizing ” the caps. Argh!

Students once staged a sit in on the court. We still have the absurd barriers up to prevent that from reoccurring. Hard on the handicapped and elderly who sit down court–side. Of course, there’s now VIP seating on the other side of that barrier.

It’s absurd!

# # # # #


RANT: Another Hollywood expert. Argh!

Saturday, March 21, 2009

http://www.lifenews.com/nat4912.html

Former West Wing Actress Allison Janney Cheers Obama, Stumps for Abortion
by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
March 13, 2009

*** begin quote ***

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) — Actress Allison Janney, best known for her role in the television drama “West Wing,” is stumping for the pro-abortion group Emily’s List. In a fundraising email for the political group, Janney applauds the pro-abortion record of President Barack Obama and asks for donations to support his efforts.

“During the dark days of the last administration, millions of Americans watched Martin Sheen play an intelligent, compassionate president on The West Wing,” Janney says in the email LifeNews.com received. “Isn’t it exciting to have the real thing in Barack Obama?”

Despite his decisions to force taxpayers to pay for promoting and performing abortions in other nations and embryonic stem cell research, Janney claims, “President Obama has set us on a course to move our country in a more hopeful, positive direction.”

*** end quote ***

It’s a real shame. “Liberal” Hollywood types confuse play acting for the real thing.

I’m saddened. She’s a good actress. And, she certainly has the right to speak freely. I just wish she had the same degree of understanding of a very complex issue.

(1) I object to paying for that which I find morally reprehensible. I’m force to fund Obama’s abortion plans.

(2) It’s genocide! Death by government. We’re strangling the life out of the future. I’ve made the argument before what if we have aborted the cure for cancer, the next Steven Hawking, or the future Obama?

(3) Hollywood success doesn’t translate into policy expertise or even common sense. In this case, she equates “West Wing” with the new tyranny in the White House.

(4) Abortion is a policy, social, and personal DISASTER on so many levels. Be best if the gooferment just got out of the debate. And, let the people involved sort it out. Legislating it as a right is just morally wrong!

Argh!

# # # # #   


RANT: Fundraising? How about getting something working first!

Monday, March 16, 2009

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aBcmH5_wa8J0&refer=worldwide

Obama to Test Fundraising Skills Amid ‘Donor Fatigue,’ Crisis
By Hans Nichols and Jonathan D. Salant

*** begin quote ***

March 16 (Bloomberg) — President Barack Obama will headline the first fundraiser of his presidency this month, appealing to donors large and small even as the economy struggles through the worst recession in generations.

Obama’s appearance at the Democratic National Committee’s March 25 event at the Warner Theatre in Washington, with tickets ranging from $100 to $2,500 per person, will be an early test of his ability to keep up the record-breaking fundraising he achieved during the campaign.

*** end quote ***

See it’s all about getting reelected.

Your problems don’t amount to a hill of beans!

It’s all about the parasites feeding on the taxpayers.

Argh!

# # # # #


GOVEROTRAGEOUS: Rep. Barney Frank has chutzpah!

Monday, March 16, 2009

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Frank-assails-bonuses-paid-to-apf-14646988.html  

Frank assails bonuses paid to executives at AIG
House committee chairman rails against bonuses paid executives of financially-strapped AIG
Monday March 16, 2009, 8:24 am EDT

*** begin quote ***

WASHINGTON (AP) — Rep. Barney Frank charged Monday that a decision by financially strapped insurance giant AIG to pay millions in executive bonuses amounts to “rewarding incompetence.”

*** end quote ***

He should know incompetence. He’s part of the Fannie and Freddie mess. His hands aren’t clean by any means.

Aint congresscritters funny? If they were so dangerous to our liberties!

# # # # #


GOVEROTRAGEOUS: Obama’s birth certificate

Saturday, March 14, 2009

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=91283

BORN IN THE USA?
What congressmen say about eligibility
Lawmakers’ letters insist ‘president was born in Hawaii’
Posted: March 10, 2009 9:29 pm Eastern
By Bob Unruh

*** begin quote ***

Hawaiian officials have confirmed they have a birth certificate on file for Obama, but it cannot be released without his permission. He has refused that permission. And Hawaiian officials have not revealed what information the certificate contains.

*** end quote ***

Well, adjust my tin foil hat and call me kooky.

I guess that makes me a “birthist”.

See the first thing that the media does is give you a label and then they can dismiss you.

My fear is that I guess, like FDR and Pearl Harbor, we’ll have to wait 50 years to find out that O was NOT a US citizen!

Just because they label you, doesn’t make you wrong.

All to often today, they denigrate people who ask, often too politely, WTF!

“Quo Warranto”

Or in my parlance, “sez who!”
See the essence of the argument is the prima facie case, “What are you hiding Mister Obama?”
Until that is answered, it is not moot. It’s a scandal!
So much for “running the most open and transparent government”!
# # # # #


LIBERTY: Hold the ‘Catastrophe’: Obama Says He’s ‘Highly Optimistic’ About Economy

Friday, March 13, 2009

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96SP30G5&show_article=1

Obama: Economic crisis ‘not as bad as we think’
Mar 12 05:49 PM US/Eastern
By JIM KUHNHENN
Associated Press Writer

Hold the ‘Catastrophe’: Obama Says He’s ‘Highly Optimistic’ About Economy

*** begin quote ***

WASHINGTON (AP) – Confronting misgivings, even in his own party, President Barack Obama mounted a stout defense of his blueprint to overhaul the economy Thursday, declaring the national crisis is “not as bad as we think” and his plans will speed recovery.

Challenged to provide encouragement as the nation’s “confidence builder in chief,” Obama said Americans shouldn’t be whipsawed by bursts of either bad or good news and he was “highly optimistic” about the long term.

The president’s proposals for major health care, energy and education changes in the midst of economic hard times faced skepticism from both Democrats and Republicans on Capitol Hill, as senators questioned his budget outlook and the deficits it envisions in the middle of the next decade.

But Obama, speaking to top executives of the Business Roundtable, expressed an optimistic vision and called for patience.

*** end quote ***

Well, “they” have passed the PORKULOUS bill and the various versions of TARP.

Guess they have always stampeded us into giving up more of our money and our liberty.

So much for “change”. Guess I’ll just have to “hope”.

So what are they going to repeal and cut.

# # # # #


POLITICAL: Obama signs huge spending bill and uses “signing statements” too

Thursday, March 12, 2009

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/obama_spending

Obama backs pet projects and signs spending bill
By PHILIP ELLIOTT, Associated Press Writer Philip Elliott, Associated Press Writer – Thu Mar 12, 1:41 am ET

*** begin quote ***

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama, sounding weary of criticism over federal earmarks, defended Congress’ pet projects Wednesday as he signed an “imperfect” $410 billion measure with thousands of examples. But he said the spending does need tighter restraint and listed guidelines to do it. Obama, accused of hypocrisy by Republicans for embracing billions of dollars of earmarks in the legislation, said they can be useful and noted that he has promised to curb, not eliminate them.

On another potentially controversial matter, the president also issued a “signing statement” with the bill, saying several of its provisions raised constitutional concerns and would be taken merely as suggestions. He has criticized President George W. Bush for often using such statements to claim the right to ignore portions of new laws, and on Monday he said his administration wouldn’t follow those issued by Bush unless authorized by the new attorney general.

White House officials have accused Bush of using the statements to get around Congress in pursuing anti-terror tactics.

Obama signed the bill in private, unlike a number of recent signings that took place with fanfare, but he raised the issue of earmarks in public remarks playing down their scope and possible harm in the measure.

{Extraneous Deleted}

*** end quote ***

So let me see, all those campaign promises were just hot air.

And, we hide away from the cameras to sign it.

And, you sheeple think things were going to “CHANGE”? All you can do is “HOPE” it gets better.

He’s a Chicago hack that said anything to get elected. He’s 100% Socialist.

We can only hope that the American Electorate wakes up in the mid-term election and returns us to gridlock.

Argh!

# # # # #


MEDIABIAS: A new Taliban operations officer

Thursday, March 12, 2009

NEWS YOU WON’T SEE IN THE AMERICAN MEDIA?

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/03/look_who_showed_up_as_taliban.html

March 11, 2009
Look who showed up as Taliban Operations Officer
Rick Moran

*** begin quote ***

An old friend of America’s has surfaced as Taliban operations officer, charged with coming up with ways to kill our soldiers.

We know him because he had a nice long stay at Guantanamo:

“The Taliban’s new top operations officer in southern Afghanistan had been a prisoner at the Guantanamo Bay detention center, the latest example of a freed detainee who took a militant leadership role and a potential complication for the Obama administration’s efforts to close the prison. U.S. authorities handed over the detainee to the Afghan government, which in turn released him, according to Pentagon and CIA officials.”

“Abdullah Ghulam Rasoul, formerly Guantanamo prisoner No. 008, was among 13 Afghan prisoners released to the Afghan government in December 2007. Rasoul is now known as Mullah Abdullah Zakir, a nom de guerre that Pentagon and intelligence officials say is used by a Taliban leader who is in charge of operations against U.S. and Afghan forces in southern Afghanistan.”

*** end quote ***

Now I’m a little L libertarian and wouldn’t be in Afghanistan or Iraq.

BUT, (there is always a big butt), that having been said, I’m not a pacifist. If these folks were taken for good reason, then this isn’t “catch and release”.

In the West, they have the expression “SSS”.

“Shot, shovel, and shut up!”

Varmints — two or four legged — same to me!

Add politicians and bureaucrats to that same list!

# # # # #


GOVEROTRAGEOUS: Cramer (a leftist) points out how O doesn’t get it!

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

http://www.mainstreet.com/article/moneyinvesting/news/cramer-takes-white-house-frank-rich-and-jon-stewart?page=6

Posted March 09, 2009
Cramer Takes on the White House, Frank Rich and Jon Stewart
By Jim Cramer

*** begin quote ***

Suddenly, bloggers, opinion people, columnists and, yes, pundits who haven’t paid attention to anything I have been saying or writing for the past 18 months are all over me. Suddenly, I find myself in the center of a firestorm over Obama’s economic policies, taking enfilading fire from the “liberal” media (from serious columnist Frank Rich to entertainer Jon Stewart) while being defended by Rush Limbaugh, the standard-bearer for the Republicans.

*** and ***

The answer lies in the way the two administrations handled criticism.

The Bush administration, I believed, simply chose to ignore my warnings, perhaps because of a brutal combination of ideology, fecklessness and complacency.

*** and ***

President Obama’s team, unlike Bush’s team, demonstrates a thinness of skin that shocks me. When I somewhat obviously and empirically judged that the populist Obama administration is exacerbating the crisis with its budget and policies, as evidenced by the incredible decline in the averages since his inauguration, I was met immediately with condescension and ridicule rather than constructive debate or even just benign dismissal.

*** and ***

The markets thought he could stop it; hence the giant relief rally when he was elected. But in fewer than 50 days of his ascendancy, the markets’ hopes were totally dashed and the averages are now forecasting the worst decline since the Great Depression. As someone who listens to what the averages are screaming, I think they are accurately predicting the future.

I welcome any serious exchange with the administration on the issues that are not beyond my ken: fixing house price depreciation, stopping the destruction of wealth as demonstrated by the stock market’s plunge, and solving the banking crisis before we nationalize every bank.

*** and ***

It’s time to get serious. It’s time to take the issue from the pundits and from the left and right, and put it where it belongs: serious non-ideological debate to put out the real firestorm, the collapse of the economy from Wall Street to Main Street and the ensuing Great Wealth Destruction for all.

But if it stays ad hominem, we will all be betrayed and the train wreck will become inevitable.

*** end quote ***

The inept politicians from both sides of the aisle have destroyed the investments of most people. And, all we get from them is “spend more” and “borrow more”.

STOP!

You’re putting future generations in a hole they will never get out of.

Let the failures go bankrupt. Tough medicine.

We are training future generations NOT to invest.

I’ve had two conversations that are noteworthy.

A young woman has pulled out of her 401k because the losses have eaten into her employer’s contribution and hers. A doctor is moving from equities to bonds and his “financial advisor” at the brokerage house thought it was a good idea (i.e., he gets a commission on trades; not results).

The Market’s P/E ratio is either in or going into the single digits. (Last time that happened the market doubled in a year!) The “natural recovery” from a downturn has already begun. See the uptick in home sales as the “affordability” measure is it’s lowest in decades.

Note to O: (1) Reinstate the uptick rule. (2) Aim the corporate beggars to the bankruptcy courts. (3) Grab your various regulators and ask them to resign. (4) Eliminate Federal guarantees of ARMs, Interest only, and any mortgage that’s not 20% down 30 year fixed “conforming”. (4) Tell the FBI anf your Federal Prosecutors you want some FRAUD convictions for all the bad paper. (5) Tell the SBA that you want a plan to stimulate small business by the end of the day.

Cut the spending, cut the debt, cut the waste.

Argh!

Like that’s ever going to happen!

# # # # #


GOVERNACIDE: Four civilians killed by the crash

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/025666.html

March 04, 2009
Why Isn’t This ‘Murder Through Depraved Indifference’?
Posted by William Grigg at March 4, 2009 03:06 PM

*** begin quote ***

Lt. Dan Neubauer, pilot of the stricken F/A-18D Hornet warplane that crashed in University City, near San Diego, last December could have prevented that lethal incident by diverting to North Island Naval Station, as air traffic control had originally instructed.

The jet’s right engine had failed shortly after takeoff from (appropriately enough) the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln. The other engine was failing. By diverting to North Island, Neubauer would have kept the crippled jet over the Pacific Ocean, and away from heavily populated neighborhoods.Furthermore, established emergency procedures required an emergency landing at North Island in circumstances of this kind.

Instead of following instructions, Lt. Neubauer told air traffic control that “I’m actually going to try to make it to Miramar if possible.”

That course required flying over neighborhoods full of unsuspecting civilians, putting them at unnecessary — in fact, morally impermissible — risk. As if tacitly urging Neubauer to reconsider, air traffic control provided him with a vector that took him near North Island, a course that cost a considerable amount in fuel but offered a second clear chance to avoid potential harm to civilians.

*** and ***

Of course, depraved indifference to “collateral damage” is a salient trait of militarism. This case is different from thousands of others only in that the victims were U.S. citizens, rather than natives of some distant, unfortunate land that found itself the target of the Empire’s murderous attentions.

*** end quote ***

It would be interesting to see the congresscritters, the military, or anyone justify this?

# # # # #


POLITICAL: “Your friends” the police?

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

http://www.lewrockwell.com/akers/akers104.html

Masterful Masters on Our Masters by Becky Akers

*** begin quote ***

Meet Tim Masters, an American of superior insight. After DNA evidence forced the State of Colorado to overturn his conviction for murder and free him from its cage, Mr. Masters knew precisely whom to blame for his ruined, stunted life. When CNN asked, “Any hard feelings toward the Fort Collins Police Department or the prosecutors in the case?”, Mr. Masters responded, “Oh, absolutely. They locked me up for a decade for something I didn’t do.”

*** end quote ***

Anyone, who thinks that gooferment is there to help you or to “do justice”, needs to read this tale. Without punishment for the bureaucrats, they are at ZERO risk at paying for their misdeeds.

# # # # #  


LIBERTY: If you used the system to change the system

Monday, March 9, 2009

http://freekeene.com/2009/03/02/a-story-about-change/

A Story about Change

*** begin quote ***

Hopefully you understand why I no longer believe in using the system to change the system. I’ve found the problem to be “the system”. The process for adding, changing and removing laws of any significance in the direction of freedom and liberty is hopelessly broken. Laws still work great for giving an edge to your friends, setting up barriers to entry, consolidating power to a few large players in a given industry (power, water, telephone, cable, autos, banks, etc. . ), or punishing others with unprofitable mandates.

*** end quote ***  

A well said response to the challenge; “You and the other people who agree with you could accomplish so much more if you used the system to change the system.”

The system is broken and biased against freedom and liberty!

Just try and get a third party on the ballot. Just try and get a Ron Paul as the nominee of one of the two major parties. Just try and change ANYTHING!

# # # # #