TINFOILHAT: Obama’s Social Security Number challenged


Obama’s Social Security Number challenged
Exclusive: Jack Cashill reports on woman’s court filing based on myriad anomalies
Jack Cashill is an Emmy-award winning independent writer and producer with a Ph.D. in American Studies from Purdue.

*** begin quote ***

If Barack Obama has an immediate eligibility problem, it is more likely to derive from the Social Security Number he has been using for the last 35 years than from his birth certificate.

Ohio private investigator Susan Daniels has seen to that. On Monday, July 2, she filed suit in Geauga County (Ohio) Common Pleas Court demanding that Jon Husted, Ohio secretary of state, remove Obama’s name from the ballot until Obama can prove the validity of his Social Security Number.

Daniels, who has vetted thousands of Social Security Numbers for numerous other clients, has done her homework. In her filing, she thoroughly documents her contention “that Barack Obama has repeatedly, consistently, and with intent misrepresented himself by using a fraudulently obtained Social Security Number.”

To acquire appropriate standing in court, Daniels has gone to the trouble of establishing herself as a valid write-in candidate for president. Before she is through, this 70-something mother of seven, who has been a licensed Ohio PI since 1995, may cause Obama more trouble than the Romney campaign.

*** and ***

Daniels checked other databases as well to validate her findings, including the Massachusetts Department of Motor Vehicles and the IRS. Yes, Obama used the 042 number to get a driver’s license when at Harvard and as recently as on his 2009 income tax return.

In her research, Daniels kept coming across what she calls a “marked anomaly,” one she had never seen before – multiple birthdates listed for the same person. The 08/04/1961 and 04/08/1961 variation made sense, but the frequent appearance of the year “1890″ did not.

The ample evidence Daniels gathered led her to believe that the 042 number Obama has been using “had previously been issued to another person,” one who lived in Connecticut between 1977 and 1979 and who was born in 1890.

This assertion can be verified. By law, the Social Security Administration will have kept on microfilm a copy of the original SS-5 application attached to a particular Social Security Number. Daniels, however, does not have access to that microfilm.

*** and ***

What Daniels has done, however, is establish a paper trail so indisputably legitimate that even the most squeamish of conservative media will have a hard time finding fault.

The major media, of course, will not bother to look. It is up to our Beltway brethren to step up and ask some very basic questions of the president that they, through their timidity in 2008, helped elect. The Romney campaign cannot talk about this issue without their support.

*** end quote ***

We have ample evidence that BHO44 is not what he claims to be. 

At the very least, he’s a “paper construct”.

One can sneer at the Tin Foil Hat brigade, of which I count myself as one, at “conspiracy nuts”. But, what one can NOT dispute is “evidence”.

Let one of those who sneer step up to the defense bar and take a stab at an argument that this is NOT at least Felony Fraud. 

If you or I did it, we’d be on our way to be Bubba’s girlfriend at the Big House. Not the White House.

The silence is deafening.

“We, The Sheeple” have been defrauded by the political class. And, let down by the Fourth Estate, the Press. They have the First Amendment and the Republic’s trust to do their job of investigative journalism. What do they teach in Journalism school? If they did that in engineering skrule buildings would be falling over left and right. (“We just ignored calculating the load!”)


The Republic is doomed in more was than one.

# – # – # – # – #