Someone left the following comment as a “drive by”:
*** begin quote ***
Submitted on 2011/01/27 at 22:13
Democrat Barack Hussein Obama
ILLEGAL ALIEN
*** end quote ***
While an interesting proposition, it does nothing to advance the discussion.
While I am a “proof-er”, I can easily see an interesting thread of possibility.
- Let’s suppose that all the papers are out in the open.
- Let’s further suppose that there is something embarrassing in them, but NOT a smoking gun that the “birther’s presume”.
- Let’s further suppose that there is a lot of collateral information and documentation that supports his citizenship. (For example, a copy of his birth certificate or something that is not admissible as evidence.)
- Then, there may NOT be a birth certificate on file in Hawaii. (We all know how screwed up the Gooferment is. So why can’t they lose a perfectly insignificant birth certificate?)
So, that’s it. No birth certificate, but yet, there’d be enough proof to put the issue to rest once and for all.
It would explain what he didn’t want public. Now, you may think that is “tin foil hat” thinking, but this is the essence between being a “proofer” and a “birther”. Since we can’t even define the spectrum of possibilities, we can’t even assign probabilities. So, every theory is equally likely.
The drive-by comment is itself stupid!
Everyone knows that there is no such thing as jumbo shrimp, an honest politician, or “illegal aliens”.
# # # # # posted 2011-01-28 14:13








