POLITICAL: FDIC Insurance higher?

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20080930/pl_bloomberg/ar8q_hit0nyi

Obama Proposes Increasing Federal Deposit Insurance to $250,000 Nadine Elsibai 1 hour, 58 minutes ago

*** begin quote ***

Sept. 30 (Bloomberg) — Barack Obama, the Democratic presidential nominee, today proposed increasing the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. limit to $250,000 from the current level of $100,000.

*** end quote ***

Sorry, I disagree. The taxpayer is not supposed to be an insurance company. The limit when it was raised led to the Savings & Loan problem. There’s no reason in today’s marketplace to have FDIC Insurance at 100k. I can understand wanting to protect small savers. But let them use Treasury Bills, just like the big boys. In the “old days” those were not available to the  little people. They are now!

No, no need for a larger FDIC, unless you want to insulate the bankers.

# # # # #


LIBERTY: Who does own the gas station? Or, anything else for that matter.

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig6/bilger2.html

Government Gouging by Aaron Bilger

*** begin quote ***

Unfortunately, the free market price system is currently being forbidden in Georgia and several other states. Politicians have enacted anti-“gouging” laws to punish sellers of gasoline who request too high a price. Whether such politicians are well-meaning but economically ignorant, or know the consequences but are cynically manipulating public distaste for higher prices despite this is up for debate, but the results are the same. Ethically, the results are detestable. Gas station operators are told in effect that they are not free; they must sell their product as an altruistic service to others rather than serving their own individual interests. Legislating an exact price ceiling (a maximum price at which gas could be sold) would be bad enough, but to compound the issue, an exact price is not given in anti-gouging laws. A supplier cannot even know if they may be violating the law, and must be constantly fearful of someone accusing them of charging “too much.” In Atlanta for now, the de facto result is gas station operators being afraid to price gasoline above $4–4.29/gallon. Asking a half-dozen local operators who ran out of gas as to why they do not raise prices resulted in the same general response; as one put it, “I cannot raise my price. It would be a crime.”

*** and ***

The culprit behind the gas shortages this time is individual state governments rather than federal government, but the solution is the same now as it was then – for politicians to stop their harmful efforts to control prices. End anti-gouging laws, end the shortage.

*** end quote ***

# – # – #

# # # # #


POLITICAL: The bailout is a vague pos!

Monday, September 29, 2008

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/023141.html

September 27, 2008

Don’t you love representative government?
Posted by Michael S. Rozeff at September 27, 2008 08:37 AM

*** begin quote ***

Don’t you love representative government? We take potshots at the bailout bill and send e-mails to Congress. Meanwhile, basically in secret, they introduce various plans. We are clueless as to what these plans are or mean. We do not know the details, only vague hints. We are totally unable to follow the debate much less influence it. Half the time or more, most Congressman likewise are clueless. A great deal of haste is involved (Haste makes Waste, remember?) We mainly get promises that, yes, a deal will be reached by Sunday, as if we actually wanted a deal. A deal before Sunday makes it easier to appear on talk shows. Then, suddenly, a bill will appear and be passed. We the people will then have spoken. Don’t you love representative government?

*** end quote ***

We know they don’t read what they pass. Why should we be expected to pay for it?

# # # # #


MONEY: Are we going to be left with a banking oligarchy?

Monday, September 29, 2008

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080929/wachovia_citigroup.html?.v=1

Citigroup to buy Wachovia banking operations
Monday September 29, 9:24 am ET

*** begin quote ***

NEW YORK (AP) — In the latest byproduct of the widening global financial crisis, Citigroup Inc. will acquire the banking operations of Wachovia Corp. in a deal facilitated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

*** end quote ***

Doesn’t anyone think that banks are becoming too big?

# # # # #


FUN: Jersey State Motto

Monday, September 29, 2008

http://tslrf.blogspot.com/2008/09/joke-of-day_7327.html

Saturday, September 27, 2008

Joke of the Day- State Mottos

{Extraneous Deleted}

New Jersey: You Want A ##$%##! Motto? I Got Yer ##$%##! Motto Right Here!

{Extraneous Deleted}

# # # # #


RANTING: Estimates? Gooferment estimates? ROFL!

Sunday, September 28, 2008

http://townhall.com/columnists/ThomasSowell/2008/09/24/a_political_solution_part_ii

Wednesday, September 24, 2008
Thomas Sowell :: Townhall.com Columnist
A Political “Solution”: Part II
by Thomas Sowell

*** begin quote ***

Estimates of how much money a government program will cost are notoriously unreliable. Estimates of the cost of the current bailout in the financial markets run into the hundreds of billions of dollars, and some say it may reach or exceed a trillion.

*** end quote ***

Estimates are always wrong. In this case, we have no idea of the liability the congress critters are signing your children up for!

# # # # #


POLITICAL: Corporations don’t pay taxes; people do. Zero the Corporate Tax Rate!

Sunday, September 28, 2008

http://www.doughroller.net/2008-presidential-elections/presidential-debate-fact-check-obama-mccain-economic-cla

First Presidential Debate Fact Check: Obama and McCain’s Economic Claims
Written by DR | Bookmarks: Reddit this, del.icio.us

*** begin quote ***

The first 2008 Presidential Debate saw both Senators Obama and McCain defend their economic proposals and attack the other’s plan. Facts, figures and statistics were flying back in forth during the exchange so fast it was difficult to keep up. So after the debate I watched the replay and read the transcript to pick out the economic claims made by both Presidential candidates. In this article, we’ll look at their claims to determine whether they are rock solid true (earning a score of 1), true but with a lot of spin (earning a score 2) or flat out, nose-growing false (earning a score of 3).

*** end quote ***

MY COMMENT ON THIS STORY

Excellent job on fact checking. Calm and reasoned. Apparently fair.

I have no “dog” in this fight. I’m a little L libertarian. Don’t care much for either candidate.

I would like to comment on “Corporate Income Tax”.

It’s a sham designed to deceive the folks as to what is the overall level of taxation that Americans pay.

CORPORATIONS DON’T PAY TAXES OR FEES. YOU DO!

As a “frugal” site, I read often, I think you’d hammer this home.

Corporations are very much like a zero sum game. If they have a cost, they pass it along to the person who buys their product or services. If it’s a widget with a pound of steel in it, your paying for that pound. Price of steel goes up, the corporation marks up the price of their product. Simple enough. If they didn’t they’d go broke.

When the gooferment imposes taxes on Corporations, that’s just another cost that the business pass along to you. EXCEPT now you can’t see it. You don’t know what portion of the cost of a loaf of bread is taxes and what portion is bread.

It gets worse, regulations and laws add costs. They come to you hidden in the cost of the products.

It gets even worse, when the gooferment taxes a product that corporations use to make or deliver other products (e.g., gasoline), that tax is a tax on taxes. And is passed along and even buried further. It has an exponential effect!

I’ve seen estimates that the real tax percentage in products is HUGE! 50 to 75%!! I don’t think anyone can tell. AND that’s excatly the politicians purpose.

Bottom line: Corporate taxes imho should be ZERO!

Let’s put the cost of gooferment squarely out in the open! These bozos are no fools. There’s a reason that Tax Day is a half a year away from election day. That reason is that they couldn’t get it any further away.

So, when either candidate talks about corporate taxes, regulation, and fees, I think they are, possibly unknowingly (But I don’t beleive that) DEFRAUDING us from know the true cost of how badly we are being ROBBED!

sigh, imho,
wake up sheeple,
fjohn

# # # # #


MONEY: Buying a “falling knife”?

Sunday, September 28, 2008

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aCNnbO2lMJG4&refer=home

WaMu Failure Shakes Seattle, From Shareholder to Job Seeker

By Peter Robison and Dina Bass

*** begin quote ***

Sept. 27 (Bloomberg) — Sally Rawlings was one of the last people to buy shares in Washington Mutual Inc., showing faith that her hometown Seattle savings and loan would be able to weather its financial crisis.

*** end quote ***

I’d suggest that she not go trying to catch “falling knives”. Although it is tempting, to buy low. But it’s low for a reason! Stop losses by not starting them?

# # # # #


RANT: DRM never!

Saturday, September 27, 2008

http://www.boingboing.net/2008/09/26/walmart-shutting-dow.html

Boing Boing – A directory of wonderful things

Wal*Mart shutting down DRM server, nuking your music collection — only people who pay for music risk losing it to DRM shenanigans

Posted by Cory Doctorow, September 26, 2008 8:34 PM

*** begin quote ***

Hey suckers! Did you buy DRM music from Wal*Mart instead of downloading MP3s for free from the P2P networks? Well, they’re repaying your honesty by taking away your music. Unless you go through a bunch of hoops (that you may never find out about, if you’ve changed email addresses or if you’re not a very technical person), your music will no longer be playable after October 9th.

*** end quote ***

That’s why I’d never buy anything with a DRM in it. I learned this lesson early and had it reinforced by Yahoo buying Real who bought whatever it was that I liked.

# # # # #


RANT: SNY network leaves RU game to TALK about the Mets!

Saturday, September 27, 2008

What a joke.

RU was playing Morgan State. Not a big game by any means. But, SNY left live coverage of that for the Mets “post game” show, where they couldn’t show any of the game highlights. So they spent the better part of a hour TALKING about it. Talked it to death! How dumb!

Sorry RU, you deserved better!

They rejoined it with 2:57 left in the SECOND quarter with the score 35 zip. Game was over.

Why bother?

Just shows you the level of respect SNY has for its viewers.

# # # # #


POLITICS: Debate reaction. Who cares what big gooferment wants!

Saturday, September 27, 2008

I too listened to the debate. Who cares! Both are big gooferment interventionists. Neither understand that the ‘crisis’ is created by the gooferment — both sides have their hands int he mess up to their elbows. The D’s created Fannie and Freddie; they tax and spend. The R’s are not much better — they promised smaller and delivered bigger; they borrow and spend. Neither of them nderstand the problem starts with gooferment and ends there. The gooferment creates the problem and then rescues us from it. A plague on both their houses.

Only freedom and liberty can prevail in the long run. Force begets force. If I can’t convince you that something is a good idea, then maybe it isn’t. I have to be humble enough to accept that.

I won’t, can’t, force you to do what you don’t wnat to do. I’d like you to do the same for me. So take your government off my neck, please!

I don’t want to buy 80% of AIG. I’d like my tax money that was stolen back. I don’t want to pay for all the things you think are “good for me”. Let me keep my money and spend it on what I think is good for me. If I make mistakes, so be it. They are MY mistakes. Please don’t inflict YOUR mistakes on me.

Take a look at the little flash movie at http://www.isil.org/resources/introduction.swf becasue it says it better than I can.

# # # # #


LIBERTY: Stop the bailout!

Saturday, September 27, 2008

http://tinyurl.com/4brspa

Download “Stop the Bailout!” 26-09-2008 (2.97 MB)
Duration: 8:05 m – Filetype: mp3 – Bitrate: 51.28820816953 KBPS – Frequency: 44100 HZ
Lew Rockwell on the Michael Reagan Show

# – # – #

Well worth a less than ten minute listen.

# # # # #


WRITING: TEOTWAWKI fiction – Chapter Ninety Three – Twenty Five Years

Saturday, September 27, 2008

Chapter Ninety Three – Twenty Five Years

October 19, 1987

It Started In Church – October 19, 1962
http://www.itstartedinchurch.com

# # # # #


FUN: 85B$ to AIG, no; 300k$ to every adult, yes!

Friday, September 26, 2008

FROM MY LUDDITE FRIEND:


From: Luddite
Date: September 26, 2008 9:04:45 AM EDTTo: “Know It All”Subject: Birk Alternative Economic Recovery Plan
*** begin quote ***

The Birk Alternative Economic Recovery Plan

I’m against the $85,000,000,000.00 bailout of AIG.

Instead, I’m in favor of giving out the $85,000,000,000 to Americas in a “We Deserve It Dividend.”

To make the math simple, let’s assume there are 200,000,000 bonafide U.S. Citizens, age 18+.

Our population is about 301,000,000 +/- counting every man, woman and child. So 200,000,000 might be a fairly good stab at adults 18 and up..

So divide 200 million adults 18+ into the $85 billon. That equals $425,000.00.

My plan is to give $425, 000 to every person 18+ as a “We Deserve It Dividend.”

Of course, it would NOT be tax free. So let’s assume a tax rate of 30%.

Every individual 18+ has to pay $127,500.00 back in taxes. That sends $25.5 billion right back to Uncle Sam.

The result is every adult 18+ has $297,500.00 net of taxes in their pocket. A husband and wife would have $595,000.00.

What would you do with $297,500.00 or $595,000.00 in your family? Pay off your mortgage – housing crisis solved. Repay college loans – what a great boost to new grads. Put away money for college – it’ll be there safe in a bank – create money to loan to entrepreneurs. Buy a new car – create jobs. Invest in the market – capital drives growth. Pay for your parent’s medical insurance – h ealth care improves. Enable Deadbeat Dads to come clean – or else.

Remember this is for every adult U S Citizen 18+ including the folks who lost their jobs at Lehman Brothers and every other company that is cutting back. And of course, for those serving in our Armed Forces.

If we’re going to re-distribute wealth, let’s really do it…instead of trickling out a puny $1000.00 ( “vote buy” ) economic incentive that is being proposed by one of our candidates for President.

If we’re going to do an $85 billion bailout, let’s bail out every adult U S Citizen 18+!

As for AIG – the hell (sorry about that!) with them. Liquidate it. Sell off its parts. Let American General go back to being American General. Sell off the real estate.&nb s p; Let the private sector bargain hunters cut it up and clean it up.

Here’s my rationale. We deserve it and AIG doesn’t.

Sure it’s a crazy idea that can “never work.”

But can you imagine the Coast-To-Coast Block Party that would take place!

How do you spell Economic Boom?

I trust my fellow adult Americans to know how to use the $85 Billion . We deserve the money more than the geniuses at AIG or in Washington DC .

And remember, The Birk plan only really costs $59.5 Billion because $25.5 Billion is returned instantly in taxes to Uncle Sam.

Ahhh…I feel so much better getting that off my chest.

Kindest personal regards,

*** end quote ***
But what would the poor starving plutocrats do? The strange “common sense” you find on “those inter tubes”!
# # # # #


INTERESTING: Top 25 Censored Stories for 2009

Thursday, September 25, 2008

http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/category/y-2009/

“Project censored is one of the organizations that we should listen to, to be assured that our newspapers and our broadcast outlets are practicing thorough and ethical journalism.”

— Walter Cronkite

[JR: I especially think in today’s media culture, where everyone has an agenda, we have to be careful about being manipulated!]

# # # # #


GOLDBUG: The Federal Reserve allows Congress to borrow and spend!

Thursday, September 25, 2008

http://www.bobbrinker.com/

On Sunday, I heard a caller call into Bob Brinker and point out Ron Paul’s call for the end of the Federal Reserve. Bob went off the deep end on the fellow. The fellow’s point was that Ron Paul had been right on predicting the trouble coming with all these bail out issues.

Bob misstated Ron Paul’s remedy as “Abolish the Fed and return the control of money to the Congress.”

I agree that, if that was what Ron Paul advocated, it would be a terrible idea.

What Ron Paul did advocate was not that but:

http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul53.html

*** begin quote ***

In fact, Congress’ constitutional mandate regarding monetary policy should only permit currency backed by stable commodities such as silver and gold to be used as legal tender. Therefore, abolishing the Federal Reserve and returning to a constitutional system will enable America to return to the type of monetary system envisioned by our nation’s founders: one where the value of money is consistent because it is tied to a commodity such as gold. Such a monetary system is the basis of a true free-market economy.

*** end quote ***

So, what Ron Paul advocated was a return to the Constitutional definition of money as gold.

But, no one follows the Constitution anymore.

Sigh!

Sorry, Bob, have to disagree with you on this one.

*** begin quote ***

I urge my colleagues to stand up for working Americans by putting an end to the manipulation of the money supply which erodes Americans’ standard of living, enlarges big government, and enriches well-connected elites, by cosponsoring my legislation to abolish the Federal Reserve.

*** end quote ***

The lack of any competition in the definition of “money” allows the “Sovereign” to adulterate the money supply without the bother of clipping coins, adding base metals to gold coins, or redefining the unit of account. Commodity money prevents the welfare / warfare state from writing itself a blank check. The politicians love the current system just fine. It’s the ordinary working stiff, pensioner, or other non-elite person who pays for their excess.

Wrong, Bob!

Repeal the legal tender laws and watch the free market take off as politicians have to justify the tax burden. It would be the end of their Ponzi schemes. Want to pass a perscription drug benefit, great! Where’s the money for it? Want to wage war in foreign lands, fine! Where’s the money for it?

You want accountability in Congress? Take away their “blank checkbook” given to them by the Federal Reserve!

# # # # #


LIBERTY: Fiat money ALWAYS fails!

Thursday, September 25, 2008

Ron Paul Discussing his Bernanke Confrontation 9/24/2008

Like the old Fram Oil Filter commercial, pay for it now or later. Pay now is better in the long run. Don’t bail them out. “Too Big To Fail” is an illusion. Capitalism REQUIRES us to let them fail. TO teach EVERYONE a lesson!


POLITICAL: “I vote small government. Every issue. Every time. No exceptions. No excuses.”

Thursday, September 25, 2008

Home

200809241259.jpg

# # # # #


POLITICAL: 2008 Boston Tea Party

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

http://www.bostontea.us/

The Boston Tea Party supports a constitutional amendment a) repealing section 4 of the 14th amendment; b) prohibiting future indebtedness and deficit spending on the part of the federal government; and c) repudiating all federal government debt and debt service obligations accrued prior to the ratification of said amendment.

# # # # #


MONEY: billions of dollars gets piled on top of the federal debt

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

http://episteme.ca/2008/09/19/im-not-an-economist-but/

I’m not an economist, but…

*** begin quote ***

I just read the info on the new US mortgage bailout.

I’m bothered.

I can’t figure out how this works. I mean, I get the idea – the federal government purchases (and later attempts to sell) “hundreds of billions of dollars” of bad paper.

But, if the paper is no good, it means there’s no resale value.

So, that hundreds of billions of dollars gets piled on top of the federal debt.

*** end quote ***

Well, I’m not an “eccky-nonny-mist” either, but … …

(1) Where does the gooferment get the authority to pick winners and losers in the marketplace?

(2) Where is the money going to come from for all this “saving”?

(3) Where is the end of the national debt raising?

(4) When did the Federal Reserve become the bankruptcy court?

Sigh!

Call me a “gold bug”, but I can’t afford any more of this type of “saving”. Not that they need my permission. They just do what they want.

# # # # #


NEWJERSEY: Rampant and blatant pension padding and multiple pensions

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

>Rampant and blatant pension padding and multiple pensions

Dear Trenton Dwellers,

I can’t afford you any more. I certainly can’t afford to pay all those “pensions” you’ve been voting yourself. I’m old enough to remember the original pension debate when everyone if the state gooferment whined that the private sector got pensions and they should to. And, what a plum they got.

NOW, everyone in the private sector has a 401k.

Why not Trenton?

an over taxed voter

# # # # #


TECHNOLOGY SERVICE: FACEBOOK database are often out of sync

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Funny how you can find people by “Find Friends”, but you can’t add them to a list or suggest them to others. I suspect that the various databases in use by facebook are not updated very frequently.

Hmm, maybe an “employment opportunity” for a FOWG from the days when “directories” were differentiated from “databases”.

You also can’t get a list of your “friends”. Is that to conceal lost data?

Fascinating!

# # # # #


PRODUCTIVITY: “SLUGGING”; how do we do more of it?

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

http://bentoncrane.net/2008/09/19/avego-the-new-slugging/

Avego–The New Slugging
September 19th, 2008

*** begin quote ***

I recently moved to the Washington DC area. I experimented with various different ways of commuting. I tried driving, riding the bus, and taking a train. With some help from the locals, however, I found that slugging is my ideal way to commute.

Slugging is a funny blend of carpooling and hitch-hiking. It came about over 20 years ago as a result of northern Virginia’s HOV-3 lanes. The I-95 freeway has the typical Northbound and Southbound lanes, but unlike most other freeway systems it has a third artery down the middle.

*** end quote ***

Aren’t people smart? And, without a gooferment centralize planner to ‘processize’ the process! How could that ever be?

# # # # #


LIBERTY: Calling Taxachusett’s voters — CARLA HOWELL’S OP-ED

Monday, September 22, 2008

===========================================================

CARLA HOWELL’S OP-ED COLUMN FOR THE SUNDAY BOSTON GLOBE
===========================================================

Below is Carla Howell’s final draft of her Op-Ed Column for the Sunday,
September 21 edition of the Boston Globe:

Why Haven’t You Been Told These Things About Ballot Question 1?

by Carla Howell

Why are 1,350,000 Massachusetts voters already planning to vote YES on
Question 1 to end the state income tax?

First let’s look at what happens if you join those YES voters – and what
happens if you don’t.

If you vote YES, we end the state income tax, let 3.4 million workers
get back an average of $3,700 each, every year, and roll back annual
state government spending to $34.7 billion.

If you vote NO, we keep the state income tax, require those workers to
keep paying an average of $3,700 each every year, and maintain state
government spending at $47.3 billion.

Which choice, which vote is better for the 3.4 million workers and
taxpayers of Massachusetts? Let’s look at some key Massachusetts
government numbers.

The $28.2 billion “budget” figure tossed around is only part of it –
called the Statutory Budget. There are three other parts of the complete
budget: NON-Budgeted Spending, Capital Spending, and Expendable Trust
Spending(1). These four budgets come to $47.3 billion in state
government spending for this year.

Massachusetts cities and towns are spending $27+ billion(2) this year.

That totals $74.3 billion in Massachusetts government spending. Subtract
$5 billion in state funds given to cities and towns (to avoid double
counting) and subtract another $12.6 billion from the state income tax.

What’s left? $56.7 billion for city, town and state governments AFTER we
end the income tax – way more than needed to fund every essential
government service.

Government waste is one reason why so many voters already plan to vote
YES on Question 1. Last April, Fabrizio Surveys asked Massachusetts
voters this question: “How many cents out of every dollar you pay in
state taxes would you say is wasted by the state government?” Their
average estimate was “41 cents.”

Ending the income tax will cut state spending by just 27%, leaving
billions of dollars in state government waste still to cut – without
even touching the waste in local government spending.

There’s one more number that will make you feel at home if you’re
inclined to vote YES on Question 1.

45% of Massachusetts voters already plan to vote YES on Question 1 –
according to three polls, approximately the same number that polls show
will vote against Question 1. With a November 4th voter turnout of 3
million, that comes to a whopping 1,350,000 votes to end the state
income tax.

The numbers show we can easily afford to end the income tax and how many
voters want it. But it’s the benefits to the people of Massachusetts
that make a YES vote on Question 1 a real winner.

Voting YES will give back over $3,700 each, on average, to over 3,400,
000 Massachusetts workers and taxpayers. That’s a $3,700 pay hike for
each of them, not just once, but every year.

It will take $12.6 billion out of the hands of Beacon Hill politicians –
and put it back into the hands of the men and women who earned it. Every
year.

In productive, private hands this $12.6 billion a year will create
hundreds of thousands of new jobs in Massachusetts.

This tax cut will force the state legislature to streamline and cut the
waste out of the Massachusetts state budget.

It will force the state legislature to get rid of the failed, flawed
government programs that don’t work – and often make things worse.

It will make the state legislature accountable to Massachusetts workers
and taxpayers – instead of the government employees, lobbyists, and
special interests who profit from high government spending.

With less government and no income tax, Massachusetts will become a
magnet to private, productive businesses and individuals. This will
bring the state more good jobs and more good workers.

A YES vote will enable Massachusetts families to pay off their mounting
bills and debts – and save thousands of them from home foreclosures and
bankruptcy.

By making the Massachusetts total tax burden more affordable, we’ll
allow more of our young people to stay in Massachusetts near their
family, their friends, and their home.

These are the reasons why you should vote YES on Question 1 to end the
income tax. It’s not just what’s best for you. It’s what’s best for 3.4
million Massachusetts workers and taxpayers – and their families.

(1) (http://www.mass.gov/Aosc/docs/reports_audits/SBFR/2007_SBFR.pdf
Pages 308 – 312)

(2)(http://www.mass.gov/?pageID=dorterminal&L=3&L0=Home&L1=Local+Officia
ls&L2=Municipal+Data+and+Financial+Management&sid=Ador&b=terminalcontent
&f=dls_mdmstuf_aag_aagindex&csid=Ador , See Fiscal Year 2007 Schedule A,
Actual revenues/expenditures for each town. Adjust up $1.3 billion for
all towns to bring budget current.)


LIBERTY: Abortion is a “third rail” issue; laws by the gooferment aren’t the answer!

Monday, September 22, 2008

http://ncc-1776.org/tle2008/tle485-20080921-02.html

Abortion: An Excerpt From Hope
by Aaron Zelman and L. Neil Smith
Attribute to The Libertarian Enterprise

*** begin quote ***

“Abortion,” Alex said, “will remain legal. But not one red cent of federal tax money will ever be spent on it again, and I will do my level best to persuade the authorities at the state, county, and municipal levels to follow my example. As you know, gentlemen, I can be pretty persuasive.”

*** end quote ***

A national disaster. MYOB Let folks find their own way to the truth. Certainly, the gooferment shouldn’t be involved, pay for it, or stick its nose into a very painful personal process. It appears that a “roe v wade” industry has grown up around the government paying for this. That’s a industry that has to go away. Let’s have those, that feel abortion be free to the woman, put up their bucks to pay for it. Let’s have those, that want to save every life, put up their bucks to pay for it.

It’s a moral outrage to rob either side to pay for the programs of the other side.

See that’s what politicians do: They get us arguing among ourselves by framing the question wrong. In each one of these tough issues, we should always be asking: “Why is the gooferment involved in this?”

99% of the time the answer is “It shouldn’t be!”

Argh!

# # # # #


NJ: Taxpayers robbed for RU athetics!

Sunday, September 21, 2008

http://wcbstv.com/local/rutgers.scarlet.knights.2.822287.html

Sep 21, 2008 12:35 pm US/Eastern
Report: N.J. Lawmakers Aiding Rutgers Athletics
Sports Program Reportedly Receives Special Grants

*** begin quote ***

TRENTON (CBS) ― New Jersey lawmakers have reportedly been approving special grants to the Rutgers University athletics program even as academic aid is being slashed.

The Star-Ledger of Newark reports that Trenton lawmakers have approved $2.25 million in grants so far by tacking on earmarks to the state budget.

*** end quote ***

Shame on the poor reporting. The “NJ Lawmakers” are not “aiding” RU athletics. Makes it sound like the passed the hat. They’ve agreed among themselves to steal from the NJ taxpayers (I.e., us fools who can figure out to hide from the outlaw thieves, highwaymen, and con artist masquerading as “public servants”!) … … argh!

# # # # #