Eyewitnesses in San Bernardino: “Three Tall White Men”
By Gary North The Tea Party Economist
December 16, 2015
*** begin quote ***
The only eyewitness identifications that I can find speak of three white men.
I looked at several published timelines of the shootings. You can, too. Search for “timeline,” “Farook,” “San Bernardino.” No victim identified the two suspects immediately after the shootings, which had ended by the time the police and firefighters arrived at 11:05 a.m. The police had no clues regarding Farook and his wife. The two were shot in a firefight at 3 p.m. They were in a black SUV . . . four hours after the attack.
Four hours. What were they doing during this time? Where were they?
*** and ***
The post-shootout photo of the SUV shows the windshield riddled with bullet holes. These bullet holes came from in front of the SUV. The media report says this: they fired 76 rounds, while police fired 380.
Who did the counting? When? Who verified this?
How did they shoot at police from inside the SUV? For how long? How long would it take to fire 76 rounds with semi-automatics? This time includes replacing empty clips. We are supposed to believe that it took 380 rounds to kill them. If so, these are not sharpshooters.
The two are dead. So, there is no legal liability for naming them the killers. There is no “alleged” visible in the media. This ends all discussion. Of course they acted alone. Everyone knows this.
*** end quote ***
And again, all I have are questions.
- Where are the THREE white men?
- How did the gunmen escape?
- Where is the video from the crime scene? (I can’t believe that a Federal facility doesn’t have cameras all over the joint!)
- How did they target this SUV?
- Why wasn’t their apartment secured?
- Where are all the “official reports”?
I’m just asking.
Yet, I have a tin foil hat?
# – # – # – # – #