RANT: COX TV — strike one; it’s out

Sunday, June 10, 2012

Thank you for choosing Cox Communications. A representative will be with you shortly.
You are now chatting with ‘Louis’.

Louis: Welcome to Cox Live Chat Support. I will be assisting you throughout this Chat session.

ferdinand reinke: “temporarily off air”?

Louis: I understand you are experiencing inconveniences with your cable service. Am I correct?

ferdinand reinke: all tv is “off the air”?

Louis: I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Louis: To better assist you, I will need the following information:

Louis: 1. The 10-Digit Phone Number as it is listed on the account.

Louis: 2. Your full name as it is listed on the account.

Louis: 3. Your complete home address where the service is located.

Louis: 4. The last four digits of the Social Security Number, or the four-digit Cox PIN if you are a former or current Cox Digital Telephone subscriber.

ferdinand reinke: is it or is’t it?

ferdinand reinke: {Privacy Invoked}

Louis: Thank you for your information.

ferdinand reinke: Is all tbv KO-ed or is just me?

Louis: Just a moment, please.

Louis: I have verified with my resources:

Louis: Unfortunately, Cox is experiencing some inconveniences with our services in your area.

Louis: Cox technicians are aware of this issue, and are working towards a resolution. Although there is no official estimated time of repair at this time, we are hopeful this issue will soon be resolved, and normal operations restored.

Louis: I do apologize.

ferdinand reinke: FYI! It’s not an inconvenience. It’s an outage.

Louis: Thank you for your information.

Louis: Is there anything else I can help you with?

ferdinand reinke: nope!

Louis: Thank you for choosing Cox Communications as your friend in the Digital Age.

Thank you for chatting with us. Please click the “End Chat” button on the top right of the chat window to tell us about your experience today.

# – # – # – # – #   

Your feedback is important to us! Please take a few moments to answer a few questions about how we did today.

Were we able to answer your question during today’s chat session? *
Yes – the issue was resolved
Partially – need more information
No – the issue was not resolved

{NO}

How would you rate the service you received from your Cox Representative? *
Excellent
Great
Good
Fair
Poor

{FAIR}

In the future, when you want to reach Customer Service, would you prefer chatting instead of calling in? *
Yes
No
Maybe

{YES}

In the future, when you want to reach Customer Service, would you prefer chatting instead of emailing in your question? *
Yes
No
Maybe

{YES}

Would you recommend chat to family, friends, and colleagues? *
Yes
No
Maybe

{NO}

Please provide us with any positive feedback and/or suggestions for how we can serve you better:

“Keep the service operational. I’m expected to pay for what I don’t get?”

# – # – # – # – #  2012-Jun-10 @ 20:05  


TINFOILHAT: Is BHO44 a “paper man”?

Sunday, June 10, 2012

http://ncc-1776.org/tle2012/tle673-20120603-02.html

THE LIBERTARIAN ENTERPRISE
Number 673, June 3, 2012
“This is the strangest era ever,
in American politics. So far.”

Paper Man
by L. Neil Smith
lneil@netzero.com

Bookmark and Share

Attribute to L. Neil Smith’s The Libertarian Enterprise

*** begin quote ***

Although details are a bit hazy after forty years, in Paper Man, a small handful of college kids gets tired of eating dormitory food and yearns for the finer things in life. They decide they need a credit card, and invent what we would call a virtual person to apply for one. They use the campus mainframe’s primitive networking ability to give their creation—they call him “Henry Norman”—credentials: birth certificate, educational background, employment history, banking record, and so on. They receive their credit card and start to enjoy it.

Until they begin to die, one by one, apparently killed by Henry Norman.

*** and ***

So I suppose it’s altogether appropriate that Henry Norman has shown up again—as America’s first Paper President. Barack “Barry” Hussein Obama—or is it Soetoro?—is an individual whose personal history, from the very moment of his birth, is no more than a collage of contradictory lies and hidden truths that may never end up sorted out.

Where was he born? He and the entire progressive establishment claim it was Hawaii, but name two different hospitals, neither of which has records of it, as the location of the Blessed Event. One of his grandmothers says (or said—I think she’s conveniently dead now) that Barry was born in Kenya, and that she was right there when it happened.

Nobody can prove that his mother and his alleged father, a British subject, were ever married (some investigators believe Obama’s real father was Frank Marshall Davis, another old commie, who took naked pictures of Barack’s mommy), or had anything more, fundamentally, than a one-night stand, although it’s claimed that face-saving divorce papers were eventually filed, which Obama Senior ignored—he already had a wife back in the Old Country. We do know that little Barack’s step-father signed him into school as an Indonesian citizen and a Muslim.

What do we know about this man who thinks he owns us and that he can kill one of us at any time he likes, for any reason he cares to offer?

We certainly have no idea who he is. His famous birth certificate—legally a matter of public record—has been “sealed” away and may not be inspected or investigated. Even little baby Barack’s baptismal record has apparently become a matter of national security. Obama’s original signed, embossed paper “Certificate of Live Birth” is also hidden away, and the cybercopy offered in its place so incompetently forged it wouldn’t fool a three-year-old. We do know that he isn’t a front man for the FBI, the CIA, NSA, or Army, Navy, Air Force, Coast Guard, or Boy Scout Intelligence—their fakes would have passed muster.

We also have no idea what Obama is. Here’s an essentially penniless son of a penniless single mother whose mother and father (who raised the boy more than his mom did) didn’t have much money, either.

And yet the left wing money machine that I described in my speech “You Can’t Fight A Culture War If You Ain’t Got Any Culture” somehow came through and sent him to an expensive private school in Hawaii, then to Occidental College—those records are sealed—then to Columbia College—records also sealed along with Barack’s Master’s thesis—and then to Harvard College where his records are also sealed.

Obama apparently went to college (and paid tuition) as a foreign student, and used a foreign passport to visit Pakistan in 1981. His Selective Service records are sealed. His Social Security number— issued by a state he never lived in and actually belonging to a guy who’s dead—reeks of fraud. His medical records are sealed. For ten years he was carried as Kenyan-born by his literary agency. His Illinois State Senate schedule and Illinois State Senate records are sealed, as is his Law practice client list. For some unexplained reason he and his wife Michelle turned in their law licenses in Illinois.

He can’t make a coherent speech without a teleprompter.

I can’t help thinking of that movie Paper Man and coming to the bizarre but unavoidable conclusion that Obama is just a little nobody that his mentors—his creators—employed as a wire-frame to hang item after item of false credentials on, credentials so incompetently manufactured that they must now be kept hidden away to avoid expert scrutiny.

*** end quote ***

I think this raises the great issues that the brithers, proofers, and whateverers try to articulate. Before they get hooted down as tin foil hats.

I have no idea what BHO44 is or is not.

This is either the biggest hoax ever pulled OR one sloppy mess of random coincidences since the JFK assasination!

# – # – # – # – #   


INTERESTING: Taylor Swift “does” WalMart and imho makes a rare blunder

Saturday, June 9, 2012

http://www.theimproper.com/40997/justin-timberlake-taylor-swift-work-walmart-watch

Justin Timberlake, Taylor Swift Go to Work for Wal-Mart (watch)
TheImproper.com
By TheImproper, June 2nd, 2012

*** begin quote ***

Justin Timberlake and Taylor Swift were Wal-Mart employees for a day, but you can bet they made more than minimum wage without health benefits. The duo and other stars were paid to perform at the retail giant’s annual …

 *** end quote ***

I’m surprised for a social media maven, Miss Swift, who made her mark by pioneering on MySpace / Facebook / Twitter AND who usually has great rapport for her fans, lets her “label” block this video.

It is a stunning failure.

Let’s not kid anyone, she’s the prize “cow” in their “barn”. You tell me if she pitches a hissey fit — which I have never heard of her doing — that they won’t do what she wants?

Unbelievable!

Just doing that ONCE for the FIRST time would even make a bigger impact on the “label”. Bet that would be online in two shakes of an inet admin in one hand and graphic artist in another. THe label head would be grabbing huevos to please the prize “cow”!

Please!?! <<making a real prune face in disbelief!>>

I also read that the “label” was concerned that performing for WalMart might damage her “image”. I think trying to “kinda partially hide” is a bigger dent.

She has slipped a couple of notches in this old Swiftie’s estimation. She’s generally pretty astute and comes across as caring. I’ve no way of knowing, but that’s the image that they seek to project.

Restricting the video is contrary to that image.

imho …

… but then I’m just a fat old white guy injineer, who thinks that WalMart for all it’s faults and flaws ain’t Amerika’s biggest problem. (Politicians are!)

Come on, Miss Taylor, free the video.

p.s., We now know why she couldn’t go to that sick kid’s prom. Boy! Have some WalMArt marketing execs missed a HUGE opportunity? I can think of a half dozen ways to spin this into a BIG win for everyone!

Dumb seems to be going around lately.

# – # – # – # – #   


FUN: BBT “This is going to look great next to my retraining order from Leonard Nimoy” — The Excelsior Acquisition 03/01/10

Friday, June 8, 2012

LOL!

# – # – # – # – #   


INTERESTING: Pineapple; an interesting chemical?

Thursday, June 7, 2012

http://www.whfoods.com/genpage.php?tname=foodspice&dbid=34

The World’s Healthiest Foods

The George Mateljan Foundation, a not-for-profit foundation with no commercial interests or advertising, is a new force for change to help make a healthier you and a healthier world.

Pineapple

*** begin quote ***

Potential Anti-Inflammatory and Digestive Benefits

Bromelain is a complex mixture of substances that can be extracted from the stem and core fruit of the pineapple. Among dozens of components known to exist in this crude extract, the best studied components are a group of protein-digesting enzymes (called cysteine proteinases). Originally, researchers believed that these enzymes provided the key health benefits found in bromelain, a popular dietary supplement containing these pineapple extracts. In addition, researchers believed that these benefits were primarily limited to help with digestion in the intestinal tract. However, further studies have shown that bromelain has a wide variety of health benefits, and that many of these benefits may not be related to the different enzymes found in this extract. Excessive inflammation, excessive coagulation of the blood, and certain types of tumor growth may all be reduced by therapeutic doses of bromelain when taken as a dietary supplement. Studies are not available, however, to show these same potential benefits in relationship to normal intake of pineapple within a normal meal plan.

Bromelain extracts can be obtained from both the fruit core and stems of pineapple. Potentially important chemical differences appear to exist between extracts obtained from the stem versus the core fruit. However, the practical relevance of these differences is not presently understood. Most of the laboratory research on bromelain has been conducted using stem-based extracts, however.

Although healthcare practitioners have reported improved digestion in their patients with an increase in pineapple as their “fruit of choice” within a meal plan, we haven’t seen published studies that document specific changes in digestion following consumption of the fruit (versus supplementation with the purified extract. However, we suspect that the core fruit will eventually turn out to show some unique health-supportive properties, including possible digestion-related and anti-inflammatory benefits.

*** end quote ***

Fascinating stuff.

“Important chemical differences” appear between the extract from the stem and core.

What a wonderful world we live in. 

Imagine what could be possible if “we” could get ourselves organized.

Argh!

# – # – # – # – #   


INSPIRATIONAL: Anyone remember the Sixth of June?

Wednesday, June 6, 2012

http://www.ddaymuseum.co.uk/d-day/d-day-and-the-battle-of-normandy-your-questions-answered

D-Day and the Battle of Normandy: Your Questions Answered

*** begin quote ***

How many Allied and German casualties were there on D-Day, and in the Battle of Normandy?

“Casualties” refers to all losses suffered by the armed forces: killed, wounded, missing in action (meaning that their bodies were not found) and prisoners of war. There is no “official” casualty figure for D-Day. Under the circumstances, accurate record keeping was very difficult. For example, some troops who were listed as missing may actually have landed in the wrong place, and have rejoined their parent unit only later.

In April and May 1944, the Allied air forces lost nearly 12,000 men and over 2,000 aircraft in operations which paved the way for D-Day.

The Allied casualties figures for D-Day have generally been estimated at 10,000, including 2500 dead. Broken down by nationality, the usual D-Day casualty figures are approximately 2700 British, 946 Canadians, and 6603 Americans. However recent painstaking research by the US National D-Day Memorial Foundation has achieved a more accurate – and much higher – figure for the Allied personnel who were killed on D-Day. They have recorded the names of individual Allied personnel killed on 6 June 1944 in Operation Overlord, and so far they have verified 2499 American D-Day fatalities and 1915 from the other Allied nations, a total of 4414 dead (much higher than the traditional figure of 2500 dead). Further research may mean that these numbers will increase slightly in future. The details of this research will in due course be available on the Foundation’s website at http://www.dday.org. This new research means that the casualty figures given for individual units in the next few paragraphs are no doubt inaccurate, and hopefully more accurate figures will one day be calculated.

 *** end quote ***

In my life, I’ve met few D-Day vets. When you could induce them to talk about it, the memories were vivid.

The Sixth of June, how many will remember it at all?

# – # – # – # – #   


MONEY: Recovery or Collapse?

Tuesday, June 5, 2012

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=30960

Recovery or Economic Collapse? Bet on Collapse
The Financial Crisis could Destroy Western Civilization
by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
Global Research, May 21, 2012

*** begin quote ***

With an eye on the approaching dollar crisis, which will wreck the international financial system, the presidents of China, Russia, Brazil, South Africa, and the prime minister of India met last month to discuss forming a new bank that would shield their economies and commerce from mistakes made by Washington and the European Union. The five countries, known as the BRICS, intend to settle their trade with one another in their own currencies and cease relying on the dollar. The fact that Russia, the two Asian giants, and the largest economies in Africa and South America are leaving the dollar’s orbit sends a powerful message of lack of confidence in Washington’s handling of financial matters.

It is ironic that the outcome of financial deregulation in the US is the opposite of what its free market advocates promised. In place of highly competitive financial firms that live or die by their wits alone without government intervention, we have unprecedented financial concentration. Massive banks, “too big to fail,” now send their multi-trillion dollar losses to Washington to be paid by heavily indebted US taxpayers whose real incomes have not risen in 20 years. The banksters take home fortunes in annual bonuses for their success in socializing the “free market” banks’ losses and privatizing profits to the point of not even paying income taxes.

In the US free market economists unleashed avarice and permitted it to run amuck. Will the disastrous consequences discredit capitalism to the extent that the Soviet collapse discredited socialism?

Will Western civilization itself survive the financial tsunami that deregulated Wall Street has produced?

Ironic, isn’t it, that the United States, the home of the “indispensable people,” stands before us as the likely candidate whose government will be responsible for the collapse of the West.

*** end quote ***


RANT: A personal EMP; I love it

Monday, June 4, 2012

http://www.alt-market.com/articles/799-low-tech-solutions-to-high-tech-tyranny

Low-Tech Solutions To High-Tech Tyranny
Thursday, 24 May 2012 06:35 Brandon Smith

*** begin quote ***

Electronic Surveillance In General

Whether it be a CCTV camera, or a body scanner, sometimes the best option is not to evade or disguise, but to pull the plug entirely. At least, that was James’ point of view after the control grid went into overdrive and he couldn’t walk his dog without a blue-shirted Swedish agent fondling him on the sidewalk or forcing him to stroll through a body scanner. Finally, he had had enough, and so, decided that if they wanted to track every move of every person, it was going to cost them.

Using commonly available parts, James built a personal EMP device. Its range was dependent on the size of the power supply he tied to it, but when used properly, it would zap anything with a circuit within several feet of him:

http://www.amazing1.com/emp.htm

The Body Scanners were useless. RFID tags went blank. CCTV cameras shorted. They would eventually be replaced, but the cost would be high, and as long as he didn’t get caught, James could experience, at least for a short time, the America of the past…

*** end quote ***

“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? . . .” — Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Just have to make it expensive and dangerous to be a tyrant!

# – # – # – # – #   


FUN: “sheldon tried to steal the ring and i punched him — that’s my girl.” — The Precious Fragmentation 2010-03-28

Sunday, June 3, 2012

ROFL! She’s the consummate actress. Taylor be careful! She could bump you out. And she’s got muguppies. LOL!

# – # – # – # – #   


SAD: Always liked him and his performances

Sunday, June 3, 2012

http://news.yahoo.com/family-feud-tv-host-richard-dawson-died-142027262.html

‘Family Feud’ TV host Richard Dawson has died
Associated PressAssociated Press – 5 hrs ago

*** begin quote ***

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Richard Dawson, the wisecracking British entertainer who was among the schemers in the 1960s sitcom “Hogan’s Heroes” and a decade later began kissing thousands of female contestants as host of the game show “Family Feud” has died. He was 79.

*** end quote ***

Sad. He’s was always entertaining.

# – # – # – # – #  2012-Jun-03 @ 16:02  


POLITICAL: Marriage — MYOB

Sunday, June 3, 2012

http://lewrockwell.com/lazarowitz/lazarowitz44.1.html 

The Right To Marry
by Scott Lazarowitz

*** begin quote ***

Once, again, the “gay marriage” or same-sex marriage distraction is in the news and on the talk shows. Some people say it is a societal or cultural issue that government must address, and others say it is a religious issue.

The same-sex marriage issue is a private issue. And yes, the individual has a right to marry.

Who the hell is the government to allow or forbid private people to establish their own voluntary associations, relationships, contracts and marriages?

Regarding the right to marry, while the Bill of Rights does not mention that specifically, the Ninth Amendment does state that “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”

There are an infinite number of rights that human beings have. Each individual has an inherent right as a human being to one’s life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, as long as one doesn’t interfere with anyone else’s same right.

Based on this right of self-ownership, each individual has an absolute natural right to do with one’s life, one’s person and property as one wishes, as long as one is peaceful. Unfortunately, statists and politicians do not understand this.

*** end quote ***

As pro-life pro-choice little L libertarian, I think marriage is between a man and woman for the purpose of raising children. (Yeah, yeah, I know all the arguments about that.)

BUT, I also think that what anyone else does is NONE of my business. 

Communities, Churches, and individuals can form their own opinions. Without my help or the Gooferment’s force.

Peace.

No one should ever be forced to do or abstain from anything.

So to the Gooferment should not be picking winners and losers via tax or benefit policies. 

Just stay out of the bedrooms and all the rooms.

While there is some modest State interest in ensuring that “children” are provided for, they are the future citizens. At some point in their “life”, they have God-given rights. We recognize “rights” as a way to maintain peaceful cooperation amount equals.

The essence of all human problems seems to originate with the meme that one human can “force” another to do, or not do, something.

The proof is drugs in prison.

So too is the meme that “marriage” is any concern of the State.  

MYOB!

# – # – # – # – #   


ECONOMICS: My financial team says …

Saturday, June 2, 2012

This fellow leads the group that manages my portfolio (Four years? Average north of 10% for each or the years. One year over 20+%!). While I disagree with him about the long term prospects (i.e.,gold versus the US$), he’s been much “right-er” than I have over the last few years. I think he gives good advice — those four principles — for investors and savers of all sizes.

FWIW!

As usual, the talking heads, politicians, and bureaucrats have, and have had, the “story” all wrong.

Congress causes “bubbles” by messing with stuff it doesn’t understand!

* Either in “moving water from end of the pool to another” it sets off ripples that drown everyone (all of us in the pool). For example, “bailouts”. Failures, even big gigantic enormous ones, are GOOD!

Imagine that instead of enriching Big Labor UAW, the President / Gooferment had the huevos to say:

*** begin quote ***

“Well guys, that’s just too <Expletive Deleted> bad.

We’ll put extra folks on at the Unemployment Office and …

… remember “We, The Sheeple” guarantee your pensions up to 35k/per year just like we did for the Delta pilots.

Executives, we think WalMart needs help. 

And, hey, all you other executives that are running big companies, we want to help you focus — so effective First of Next Month — all salaries in the USA can NOT be more than mine / the President’s. You can’t believe your job is harder than his and hence worth more.

Boards of Directors, you can award more comp to your execs but it has to be in the form of a 25 year equal step ladder of your UNINSURED corporate bonds. I’m sure Treasury Secretary Little Taxcheat Timmy Geitner can explain the concept! (25M$ equals 25 1M$ bonds dated in successive years). By the way BoD’s, your comp regardless of amount will be structure the same way.

That should focus everyone on the big picture.

Thanks for playing “Capitalism version 2.0”

*** end quote ***

* By changing rules, they don’t understand. Example, Glass Stegal, Community Reinvestment Act, and my personal favorite “the short seller’s uptick rule” that allow bear raids on publicly listed companies.

(Note Bene: The “uptick” rule says you can ONLY sell short — borrowing the stock — after an uptick in the sale price of the stock. That means you can put in lots of short sale orders to drive the prices down all by yourself. And, that rule cause the brokers to charge lot’s more for the trade. I know it was at one time 10x the regular trade price at Merrill. They had whole parts of trading desks that managed short sales. Made lots of money doing it. And, when the genius changed that rule, those folks lost their jobs and corporations found themselves under attack (i.e., good companies perceived as weak were subject to bear raid, the stock price was driven down, they were taken over, privatized at that low price, the ordinary players got killed, and the raiders would reap big profits for moving paper.)

* By imposing MEANINGLESS regulations and laws (e.g., GBLA, SOX, Graham, Dodd, etc.) that were supposed to prevent abuses and (a) didn’t plus (b) made everything more expensive by increase admin.

* Finally, by excessive spending and borrowing, they robbed the money of its value. “King Dollar” is a great strategy for the poor and those on fixed incomes because their “money” retains its purchasing power. For example, three silver dimes int he late Fifties Early Sixties bought a gallon of gas; now those same three SILVER dimes can be sold for their melt value and buy 1½ gallons of gas. The politicians point blame at the EVIL oil companies, but IN FACT, gas is “cheaper” now. It’s the money that’s worth less.

At least in the days of King Richard and the Sheriff of Nottingham, the Gooferment had to send the Sheriff’s men out to rob the poor serfs. Or, shave the coins. That’s why coins originally had milled edges; so you could tell if they had been altered.

Argh!

So bottom line:

Ric says: today’s news is better than you’re lead to believe.

This fat old white guy injineer say: “The PAST was MUCH WORSE than you’ve been lead to believe. AND, structurally, you should be upset because the same problem makers are in charge! Still as clueless as they have ALWAYS been.”

Argh! to the N-th power.  

 

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Edelman Financial Services <client@ricedelman.com>
Date: Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:37 PM
Subject: Market Update
To: XYZXYZXYZXYZ@reinke.cc

Edelman Financial Services

Dear John:

I’ve heard about “A Tale of Two Cities,” but this is ridiculous! Indeed, rarely have we seen such a huge disconnect between the stock market and the economy.

To illustrate, allow me to share some facts with you.

In the past six months, one million Americans who were out of work have found jobs, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The unemployment rate remains too high, but the BLS says the rate is currently at its lowest level in more than three years, despite this week’s “gloomy” news that 69,000 additional Americans found work last month.

Inflation (as measured by the Consumer Price Index) is running at the unusually low annual rate of 2.3% as of April 30. By comparison, inflation has averaged 3.2% since 1926. And I can remember when inflation was 15% back in 1980. (Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.)

The price of a barrel of oil fell below $90 last week, reaching its lowest price since October 21, according to the Department of Energy. Stockpiles are at a 22-year high, reports the Energy Information Administration.

Home sales in all four geographic sectors of the U.S. were 10% higher in April than a year ago, says the National Association of Realtors. And the Commerce Department reports that home prices are up 5% from this time last year. Moody’s Analytics called these reports “a genuine rebound” for the housing sector. No wonder that, as Investor’s Business Daily reports, homebuilder sentiment is at a five-year high. And mortgage rates have hit another all-time low, just 3.78% for the 30-year fixed, according to Freddie Mac.

Consumer debt is dropping rapidly. Equifax’s April National Consumer Credit Trends Report and TransUnion have reported:

A 52% decline in the number of write-offs compared to April 2009. We’re now at a level comparable to the pre-recession level of 2006 and the trend continues to improve.
Home finance balances have decreased $1.2 trillion since October 2008, posting the fourth consecutive year of decline.
Home equity revolving balances are $560 billion, down $115 billion from three years ago.
Foreclosures on home equity revolving credit have dropped 37% from a year ago. It’s the lowest in two years.
Auto loans at least 60 days overdue have declined 27% from last April. Meanwhile, Ford’s credit rating was raised by Moody’s to investment-grade for the first time in seven years.

The nation’s banks earned $35 billion in the first three months of 2012. That’s the biggest quarterly profit since 2007, according to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Two out of three banks reported higher profits than for the same period a year ago. Meanwhile, bank losses on failed loans fell to the lowest level in four years and the number of troubled banks fell for the fourth consecutive quarter, says the FDIC. And the National Credit Union Administration says credit unions have granted nearly $12 billion in business loans, setting a new record.

The banks aren’t the only businesses making money. After-tax corporate profits (as a percent of the nation’s GDP) were 9.75% as of December 31, 2011 – compared to just 5.7% in Q4 1999, at the height of the dot-com craze. (Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Department of Commerce). Corporate dividends are on pace for an all-time high, reports Standard & Poor’s, and American corporations have accumulated a record level of cash – $1.2 trillion, according to Moody’s Investors Service.

A new report by educational firm Financial Finesse on employee financial stress says that only 16% of employees now report “high” or “overwhelming” financial stress levels, down 30% from two years ago. And consumer sentiment, measured monthly by the University of Michigan, is now at the highest level since October 2007.

As these facts illustrate, the U.S. economy is continuing its recovery from the depths of the Credit Crisis of 2008, and in many areas we’ve returned to pre-crisis levels. And indications are strong that our nation’s recovery will continue for years to come.

Such positive news would suggest that stock prices should be soaring. And indeed they were for the first three months of this year (the Dow Jones Industrial Average1 gained 8.8% through March 31). And although the economic data continues to be good (as described above), the stock market was flat in April and fell sharply in May. (The Dow dropped 5.8% in May. That might not sound like much, but May produced only five daily gains; the last time a single month had so few daily gains was in 1968! And the last time we experienced a month with just four days of gains occurred – are you ready for this? – in 1903!)

Some folks might say that a pullback makes sense and that stock prices can’t be expected to continue rising at the pace set earlier this year. But that sentiment belies the facts. While the S&P 500 Stock Index2 is at the same level as it was in 2000, the current operating profits of the 500 companies that comprise the S&P 500 are 1.8 times higher than they were then. If prices in 2000 were accurate based on profits, then today’s stock market – based on that math – should be 81% higher than it is. In other words, the Dow Jones Industrial Average should be at 22,431, not 12,293 (which was Thursday’s actual close).

Consider this: the earnings yield on the S&P 500 is 8.7%; the yield on the 10-year Treasury Note is 1.6%. The last time the spread was this wide was 1967! This statistic from Standard and Poor’s, like all the others I’ve shared, is completely at odds with May’s performance.

And there’s more. Since October 2007, when the stock market last attained an all-time high, investors have yanked $420 billion from stock mutual funds. They’ve withdrawn $31 billion this year alone, through May 23, according to the Investment Company Institute. So there is no question that, despite gains in consumer confidence and robust corporate profits, investors are displaying no stomach for stocks. They’d rather own just about anything else, even if it means earning nothing (such as bank accounts and money market funds that pay 0.01% annually), losing money in a desperate effort to avoid, well, losing money (gold prices are down about 15% since the highs reached last August according to The Wall Street Journal, despite the claims of many that gold is a “safe haven”), blindly (and foolishly) chasing some get-rich-quick fad (ever hear of an IPO called Facebook?) or incorrectly thinking that long-term bonds are a safe haven (have you read my Special Report warning about “this most dangerous of assets”? If not, ask us to send you a copy).

We all know why investors are so averse to investing in stocks: their attitudes range from fear (Europe, the U.S. federal deficit and state pension-fund shortfalls top the list) to anger (about our do-nothing Congress, incompetent federal regulators and greedy Wall Street banks and brokerage firms) to confusion (conflicting news reports that are inflicted upon us moment by moment in a never-ending media frenzy, made worse by the fact that this is an election year). None of those sentiments cause one to feel confident about investing in stocks.

So, I’m stumped. Every week, Branderson and I talk to a million people on the radio, trying to explain to them why they shouldn’t be full of fear about today’s economy. Together with our colleague, Financial Educator Keith Spengel, we have talked to thousands of people this year in seminars and webcasts on the same subject. And, of course, all the advisors here at Edelman Financial talk daily with hundreds of people. In each instance, we try to show how much money American companies are earning, and how well positioned we are as a nation to confront, withstand and overcome the many serious challenges that we face. And most importantly, we try to help consumers understand that the key to their future financial security lies not in the actions of Congress or leaders of the Eurozone, but in their own personal actions. We want people to realize that it’s how they handle their money today that will be the key determinant for how much money they will have in the future – that what matters to them personally has more to do with how much they are personally saving and where they are saving it than with whatever new law or regulation comes out of Congress next month or next year.

Unlike the masses, you get it. I know you do. You understand that the key to investment success is found by following four simple rules: diversify extensively3 (so that disarray in the stock market won’t cause you too much harm), focus on your long-term goals (because today’s worries, no matter how severe they appear, will be nothing more than distant memories in the future), rebalance your portfolio (to benefit from short-term volatility by capturing profits and buying shares that are relatively low in price) and keep your costs low (by purchasing investments that are sharply lower in cost than most others). These four rules serve as the basis for your investment in the Edelman Managed Asset Program®, and they serve you well. I know you get it.

Still, it is frustrating when stock prices fall in the short-term due solely to absurd, illogical behavior. It’s disturbing when investors let their imaginations run wild, focusing on what might happen instead of what actually is happening.

So, yes, stock prices in May were down. Not only did U.S. stocks decline, as noted earlier, but it was even worse for foreign stocks. (The EAFE Index2, a measure of foreign stocks, fell 9.4% in May, or twice as much as the S&P 500 – reflecting current angst about Europe.) Despite May’s dreary results, we remain confident, and you should too. Current prices merely reflect the fear, anger and confusion of the moment. Those sentiments will pass, and when they do – as investors realize that they (once again) have been focusing on all the wrong things – we expect prices to rebound with a resurgence that will surprise a great many people.

How close are we to such times? No one knows of course, but consider the chart below: it shows each week’s average recommended stock allocation of the chief market strategists at six large financial firms (Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Bank of Montreal, Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan Chase, Oppenheimer and UBS). Currently, these “experts” are recommending that investors place only 51% of assets in stocks! That low an amount is practically unheard of. In fact, it’s occurred only twice in the 22-year history of this weekly survey. And those two other times were in May 1997 (immediately followed by a 77% gain in the NASDAQ over the next 24 months) and in March 2009 (immediately followed by a 100% gain in the S&P 500 over the next 25 months). If history is any guide, the bearishness of these “experts” is foretelling a major market upswing!

Wall Street Allocation Stock

In the meantime, though, rough markets are likely. As we’ve witnessed several times in the past few years, political leaders and natural disasters can create short-term havoc in the financial markets. Those who panic and sell during such times risk financial devastation, but those who keep their heads, stay focused on their goals and remain committed to their investment strategy discover that they can weather the storm with less volatility than others and potentially emerge with quicker recovery and the achievement of all-time-high account values faster than they might otherwise expect.

Storm clouds surround stock prices, but in our opinion, they are not accurately reflecting the true value of companies both in the United States and abroad. Don’t be surprised at your May statement, and don’t place too much emphasis on it. We certainly aren’t. All the advisors here at the firm still have our own money invested in the Edelman Managed Asset Program®, just like you, and we aren’t changing a thing.

To be sure, market volatility (meaning daily price movements) has been very low for the past six months. But as events continue to unfold in Europe, and as our election approaches, it would not be surprising for the markets to experience a resurgence in volatility, similar to what was experienced in 2011. Don’t assume that volatility is bad, or predictive of anything. High winds often accompany big storms, but in the end, the sun always returns, shining brightly. If you have any questions or concerns be sure to talk to your Edelman advisor.

As always, we’ll keep you posted.

Best,
Ric Edelman
Chairman and CEO

1The Dow Jones Industrial Average is an index that shows how 30 large, publicly owned companies based in the United States have traded during a standard trading session in the stock market.

2An index is a hypothetical portfolio of specific securities, the performance of which is often used as a benchmark in judging the relative performance of securities. Indexes are unmanaged portfolios and should only be used as comparisons with securities with similar investment characteristics and criteria. It is impossible to invest in an index. The performance information for any of the indices does not take into account any taxes imposed on, or any fees, expenses, commissions or other charges which may be incurred by portfolio management or the investor for such a portfolio. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

3Diversification does not assure or guarantee better performance and cannot eliminate the risk of investment losses. There are no guarantees that a diversified portfolio will outperform a non-diversified portfolio.

Copyright © 2012 Edelman Financial Services. All rights reserved.

Ric Edelman is Chairman and CEO of Edelman Financial Services, a Registered Investment Adviser, and CEO, President and a Director of The Edelman Financial Group (NASDAQ: EF). He is an Investment Adviser Representative who offers advisory services through EFS and a Registered Principal of (and offering securities through) Sanders Morris Harris Inc., an affiliated broker/dealer, member FINRA/SIPC.

If you would like to manage your email preferences, please ….

This message was sent by Edelman Financial Services – 4000 Legato Road, 9th Floor, Fairfax, VA 22033 – (888) 752-6742.

# – # – # – # – #   


FUN: BBT “My (super) power is the ability to pretend like I give a damn about your pidley ass problems” — The Pants Alternative (3/22/10)

Saturday, June 2, 2012

ROFL!

# – # – # – # – #   


SURVIVAL: PrepareHub, a not-for-profit

Saturday, June 2, 2012

http://www.preparehub.org

Welcome to PrepareHub.org

We beta-launched this site on Saturday, May 26, 2012, as part of our celebration of EMPact America’s third anniversary.

You are welcome to sign up as a member now and start looking through the site and the Citizens’ Exchange(TM) — which is what we’re calling the online store.

Founded in 2009

EMPact America is a not-for-profit that was incorporated in New York State on May 26, 2009. PrepareHub.org is EMPact America’s latest venture, intended to be a place where people concerned about EMP can interact.

Celebrating Our Third Anniversary

We hope you will explore the various features our site has to offer. We created this online space for you to log on and create a dynamic member profile, collaborate on projects, share your ideas and expertise – and, most important, connect with others who are interested in and involved with preparedness efforts.

# – # – # – # – #   

[TIP ‘o’ the HAT to: Jim Rawles http://survivalblog.com/2012/05/notes-from-jwr-472.html ]

# – # – # – # – #   


FUN: BBT “OK the (Schrödinger’s) cat’s alive. Let go to dinner” –The Tangerine Factor

Friday, June 1, 2012

After a terrible drive north, I got a good laff out of this.

# – # – # – # – #  2012-Jun-01 @ 22:40  


INTERESTING: History’s dictators have always hated cats

Friday, June 1, 2012

http://ncc-1776.org/tle2012/tle670-20120513-03.html

Cats and Dogs
by L. Neil Smith
Attribute to L. Neil Smith’s The Libertarian Enterprise

*** begin quote ***

I find it endlessly fascinating that with one exception, history’s dictators have always hated cats, who, as independent creatures and nature’s libertarians, are not the best pet for someone who thinks he owns everybody else’s lives. Some individuals appear to resent their independence. For me, it’s the main characteristic that makes cats attractive.

The exception (I’ve pondered over this like a puzzle, for years) was Vladimir Ilich Lenin, who made a point of being photographed with his cat (I have its name around here somewhere) on more than one occasion.

It may not tell the whole story—nothing does—but the next time you wonder about a politician, or a potential employee or boss, or even that redhead you find intriguing, find out how they feel about cats. Come to think of it, I wonder where Obama, Romney, and Ron Paul stand.

It may tell you how they feel about individual liberty.

*** end quote ***

Hmm, one of my co-workers rescues dogs and has four. 

Wonder what that says about her.

Maybe I should get a cat?

Hmmm!

Seems like there’s a Big Bang episode that covers that.

# – # – # – # – #