INTERESTING: A “personhood” amendment would be useful

‘Personhood’ defeat not a serious setback for pro-life movement
By Benjamin Mann

*** begin quote ***

Chicago, Ill., Nov 13, 2011 / 06:23 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- Representatives of the Thomas More Society and the Pro-Life Action League say the defeat of Mississippi’s “personhood” initiative does not mark a serious defeat for the pro-life movement.

*** and ***

“Does this ‘personhood’ language have any effect in and of itself on state law? Or does this require the legislature to enact specific pieces of legislation to give it effect?” he asked.

*** end quote ***

Wouldn’t it be useful to have some common agreement about when life does begin?

Even if it was age 21 or 18, it’d be nice to know when life begins so we’d know when we CAN kill people.

Conception, birth, a day, a week, a year, a decade?

When CAN you kill some one?

Maybe it’s when they can do something? Crawl, walk, run, control their bowels.

Or is it when that person can assert their own rights?

It’ll be an interesting discussion!

# # # # #

Please leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s