TECHNOLOGY: The search engines rewrite history

Saturday, December 12, 2020

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/12/no_author/google-youtube-is-erasing-all-evidence-of-election-fraud/

Google/YouTube Is Erasing All Evidence of Election Fraud
By Andrea Widburg
American Thinker
December 11, 2020

*** begin quote ***

Google/YouTube didn’t try to be subtle. It announced on Wednesday that it would delete any videos that so much as mentioned the word “fraud” in connection with Joe Biden’s patently fraudulently ascension to the top of the ticket in the days after the November 3 election. The implications of this are so enormous that it’s currently difficult to assimilate all of them, let alone understand what needs to be done to hang on to American liberty.

*** end quote ***

The control of “history” belongs now not only to “the victors” but to the corrupt “lame stream media” and the tech giants who control the search engines.

Hopefully, “We, The Sheeple” will not forget. 

But that is asking a lot for the asleep, the dumb, and the distracted.

Argh!

—30—


POLITICAL: Will SCOTUS punt or stand up for honest elections

Friday, December 11, 2020

https://reason.com/volokh/2020/12/11/can-the-supreme-court-unite-to-decimate-texas-original-jurisdiction-case/#comment-8632660

Can the Supreme Court Unite to “Decimate” Texas’ Original Jurisdiction Case?
 — Could the Chief bring everyone together for a single merits ruling in a short time?
JOSH BLACKMAN | 12.11.2020 5:35 PM

Tom Goldstein writes that the Supreme Court should do more than dismiss Texas’s original jurisdiction case in a summary order. He says that the Supreme Court should “decimate” the motion with a written opinion.

It is perfectly ordinary and appropriate for the justices to write an opinion explaining the various reasons why they are rejecting Texas’ request. . . A simple five-page per curiam opinion genuinely could end up in the pantheon of all-time most significant rulings in American history. Every once in a long while, the court needs to invest some of its accumulated capital in issuing judgments that are not only legally right but also respond to imminent, tangible threats to the nation. That is particularly appropriate when, as here, the court finds itself being used as a tool to actively undermine faith in our democratic institutions — including by the members of the court’s bar on whom the justices depend to act much more responsibly.

# – # – # – # – #

Disclaimer: I’m not any kind of a lawyer. As a little L libertarian, I don’t like either the d’s or the R’s, but I have followed the anecdotal stories and the statistical analysis of the 2020 Election carefully.

If SCOTUS doesn’t address the blatant fraud in SOME fashion, I fear we will never have an honest election ever again. Why shouldn’t the “political parties” lie, cheat, and steal in ANY election they can? NO ONE is ever held to account, especially the rich and powerful politicians and bureaucrats. Maybe a few peons will get their wrist slapped but that’s about it.

Corrupt elections have been a national joke since the JFK’s dad stole the Presidency from Nixon. We joke about the “graveyard vote”, non-citizens voting, and all sorts of scams around registering to vote. Never mind, “harvesting” the nursing homes, homeless, and felons. And don’t forget the “walking around money” that gets distributed.

No, if SCOTUS punts on this, then it sends the wrong message to the power players to clean up their act. If SCOTUS was to disqualify the five or so States from sending electors, then that, by itself, would send a STRONG message about “law and order”. Anything less, means that the Republic is lost until the next revolution.

—30—

UPDATE 2020-Dec-11 1846 

SCOTUS punted!

—30—


ECONOMICS: Focus on the downside

Friday, December 11, 2020

Guns are a big part of my life… they make me money, they keep me safe, they encourage a particular set of values and lifestyle….but sometimes it gets difficult to remember that there are other aspects of preparedness that may actually be more paramount.

Source: Focus

# – # – # – # – #

If someone asked me what to do to increase resilience for 2021 I’d say “Wargame a scenario where you lose your job and can’t find another one at all or at the same wage and prepare for that”. That means clear debts as quick as you can, and start holding cash. Sure, you’ll lose some to inflation but I don’t see a Wewimar-esque hyperinflation coming yet. If you want to hedge your bets, split it among cash and metals. Here’s what I wold not do: I would not buy big ticket items just because I can, I would not buy anything on credit, I would not plan any expensive vacations, and I would not plan on having kids (because do you really want to take the hit of three months without a paycheck  and have the added medical expenses and the additional stresses all at a time when things are so uncertain?)

# – # – # – # – #

Yeah, it’s easy to be an optimist, and if you’re lucky, it’ll always work out for you.

But when planning for contingencies, assume the worst, and all surprises will be to the up side.

When as the Big Fat Old Turkey couselling Fat Old White Men, who were laid off or fearing for “their” job — even though “your job” is really NOT yours — I would urge them to figure out their “burn rate” of mandatory monthly expenses and depending upon their situation of age, education, savings, debts, and skills — hot in great demand or not — then realistically plan for how long they would be out of work.

Sometimes the answer was that they’d never get another job like their last one. It’s a brutal honest truth that comes to all of us sooner or later. (In my case, it was later; I’ve see some who just turned 50 and were stunned to be unable to find work at all.)

So a word to the wise, be prepared.  In this economy, an emergency fund of two years burn rate is NOT out of the question.

AND, YOU MIGHT NEED MORE.

YMMV.

—30—


BIGOTRY: The secular religion is predominating the woke culture

Friday, December 11, 2020

https://www.intellectualtakeout.org/sippin–starbucks-no-more/

Sippin’ Starbucks No More
By Paul Gottfried 

*** begin quote ***

The fate of Betsy Fresse, an evangelical Christian who refused to don a gay pride shirt in accordance with instructions from her manager in a Starbucks store in New Jersey is explained with remarkable concision in a recent Reuters article:

*** and ***

Let’s imagine that the dissenter was a homosexual activist being forced to wear a shirt stating marriage is between a man and a woman. This assertion would not have caused the slightest scandal up until about 25 years ago, because it would have expressed what everyone across the political spectrum had always believed—or was expected to believe.

*** end quote ***

Seems that we can see the “truth” when we put the shoe on the other foot.

Mostly, the question begging for an answer is: “Why do all these corporations suddenly get involved in politics?”

I don’t understand it.

Focus on selling your over-priced coffee, please.

—30—


HEALTH: On the Reaction to Covid-19

Thursday, December 10, 2020

(Don Boudreaux) Tweet Here’s a letter to a new correspondent: Ms. Tolbert: I did indeed see my friend and former colleague Omar Al-Ubaydli’s recent op-ed decrying what he believes to be humanity’s under- estimation of the seriousness of Covid-19.

Source: On the Reaction to Covid-19

*** begin quote ***

as I read the evidence, it tells me three things: (1) lockdowns do not work to reduce Covid deaths; (2) lockdowns fuel other healthproblems, including ones that are fatal; (3) lockdowns create enormous economic hardships for hundreds of millions of people.

*** end quote ***

Yes, it seems that the “experts” don’t know as much about the WuFlu as they proclaim they do.

That’s all right.  Now that Sleepy Joe has stolen the election, we will see if my prediction that Covid disappears in the next 90 days.

Its only purpose was to defeat the “Bad Orange Man” and having done that, it’s no longer need in the narrative.

Argh!

—30—

 


GOVEROTRAGEOUS: Now many fraudulent votes do you have to have before that’s evidence

Thursday, December 10, 2020

FROM TWITTER

Charlie Kirk
@charliekirk11
 
In Georgia Alone, sworn testimony alleges:

2,056 felons illegally voted
66,248 under 18 voted
2,423 weren’t registered
1,043 used a PO Box to register
10,315 died before the election
395 voted in 2 states
15,700 moved out of GA
40,279 changed county & didn’t re-register to vote
 
5:57 PM · Dec 6, 2020·Twitter for iPhone

# – # – # – # – #

Certainly seems like fraud to me!

Shake a haystack and needles fall out, then there MUST be more in there.

—30—


GOVEROTRAGEOUS: When can you sue about elections?

Wednesday, December 9, 2020

FROM TWITTER

*** begin quote ***

Robert Barnes
@Barnes_Law

Courts, before election: you can’t complain about illegal votes that may not even happen! Too soon to sue!

Courts, after election: you can’t complain about illegal votes that already happened! Too late to sue!

*** end quote ***

Seems like a valid complaint!  Especially in Pennsylvania!!!

—30—


POLITICAL: SCOTUS wiffs on the fraudulent election in PA!

Tuesday, December 8, 2020

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9032445/Supreme-Court-REJECTS-Republican-demand-overturn-Joe-Bidens-victory-Pennsylvania.html

Supreme Court REJECTS Republican plea to overturn Joe Biden’s victory in Pennsylvania without even hearing it – as Donald Trump’s campaign admits his only chance now is to get Congress to void Electoral College

  • Supreme Court rejects Republican bid to void the Pennsylvania election result out of hand without even hearing it 
  • Republican U.S. Rep. Mike Kelly of northwestern Pennsylvania and other plaintiffs pleaded with the justices to intervene after the state Supreme Court turned away their case
  • The Republicans argued that Pennsylvania´s expansive vote-by-mail law is unconstitutional because it required a constitutional amendment to authorize its provisions
  • Case was slammed by Pennsylvania in its submission to justices, with its AG calling it ‘one of the most dramatic, disruptive invocations of judicial power in the history of the Republic’
  • Justices rejected it just after Texas’ Republican AG, Ken Paxton, launched lawsuit to try to void the popular vote in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia
  • Hail Mary to Supreme Court asks the justices to rule that mail-in ballots in the states were ‘illegal’ on constitutional grounds 
  • Supreme Court does not have to consider the move, which comes after stream of defeats for Trump and his allies
  • Paxton is under FBI investigation over bribery and abuse of his office for a donor and has also admitted affair with a state senate aide
  • One Texas law professor called suit ‘insane’ 
  • Rebuke came shortly before House ignored veto threat to pass Defense bill  

By GEOFF EARLE, DEPUTY U.S. POLITICAL EDITOR FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

PUBLISHED: 17:13 EST, 8 December 2020 | UPDATED: 20:02 EST, 8 December 2020

# – # – # – # – #

So this means that you can cheat in ANY election and there is NOTHING that will hold you to account.

Why bother voting at all?

—30—


GOVEROTRAGEOUS: The 2020 election was an oddity based

Tuesday, December 8, 2020

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/mail-ballots-trump-nevada-arizona/2020/12/06/id/1000299/

6 States Where Mail-In Ballots Cost Trump the Election
By Michael Dorstewitz    |   Sunday, 06 December 2020 11:14 PM

*** begin quote *** 
 
The 2020 election was an oddity based, in no small part, on the unusual spike in mail-in ballots.

*** end quote ***

Sorry but this itemizes the concerns with the election results.

—30—


PEACE: Withdraw the ALL Troops From Somalia!

Monday, December 7, 2020

https://news.antiwar.com/2020/12/04/president-trump-orders-to-withdraw-the-majority-of-troops-from-somalia/

President Trump Orders to Withdraw the ‘Majority’ of Troops From Somalia
The Plan will reposition troops to neighboring countries to allow for ‘cross-border operations’
Dave DeCamp Posted on December 4, 2020

*** begin quote ***

The Pentagon announced on Friday that President Trump ordered the withdrawal of the “majority” of US troops from Somalia.

“The President of the United States has ordered the Department of Defense and the United States Africa Command to reposition the majority of personnel and assets out of Somalia by early 2021,” the Pentagon said in a statement.

The statement said “some forces may be reassigned outside of East Africa,” but the remaining troops will be reassigned to neighboring countries to “allow cross-border operations.”

The US currently has approximately 700 troops in Somalia. The majority of them were sent by the Trump administration. The US operations in the country consist of training local forces, covert raids, and a drone war against al-Shabab.

*** end quote ***

Let’s bring all the girls, boys, women, and men home now! We have so many politicians and bureaucrats to send in their place if it’s really needed!

—30—