LIBERTY: Cure poverty by getting gubamint out of the way!

Thursday, August 31, 2006

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200608/POL20060831b.html

‘Throwing Money’ at Poverty Won’t Solve Problem, Expert Says
By Monisha Bansal
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
August 31, 2006
***Begin Quote***

Ron Mincy, professor of social policy and social work practice at Columbia University, said the government must take action to increase earnings if anything is to be done about poverty, at the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C. Tuesday.

***End Quote***

OH OH I KNOW! Let’s have a war on poverty. We can pass welfare programs with lots of rules and bureaucrats.

Oh yeah, that’s right, we’ve done that!

(For those edukated in gubamint skool, let me remind you of Lyndon Johnson’s War on Poverty.)

Well if I was the devil, then here what I’d do to make people poorer:

* Create a system that devalues the value of money. That strategy worked to bring down the French Monarchy.

* Increase taxation, have lots of different taxes. Make it complicated so that experts will have to be hired. And, hide them so no one really knows what they are paying in taxes. Make them waste their time with meaningless tax exercises like saving receipts to see if you exceed the medical deduction threshold.

* Grow the government. Every regulator needs a citizen to regulate. Like that joke about the Agriculture Department employee crying because “his” farmer died.

* Criminalize everything. Make drugs expensive. Make everything as difficult as possible. Make people seek permission from various levels of government and agencies so that they can make the applicant figure out deadlocks of conflicting requirements.

* Impose criminal sanctions of victimless crimes, imaginary crimes, “conspiracy”, racketeering, or lying to the government.

OH yeah, that’s the way things are!


LIBERTY: “Fair”, “Flat”, or plain old … it’s still a tax … immoral!

Thursday, August 31, 2006

http://www.freemarketnews.com/Analysis/118/5872/fair.asp?wid=118&nid=5872

THE “FAIR” TAX IS A WELFARE SCAM
Monday, August 28, 2006

***Begin Quote***

The “Fair Tax” is at least as bad as the income tax in every way, and worse in some ways. It’s not a tax cut. It’s not a tax elimination. It’s just a strengthening of the tax system by linking it to a welfare program — just like Social Security, which has been a “third rail” issue in American politics for half a century precisely because millions of Americans have a vested interest in keeping the checks coming.

***End Quote***

Oh just what we need is another “dole”! Fair tax, Flat Tax, Income Tax, or Estate Tax is just tax. More of the same piled higher and deeper.

Taxes are an immoral theft of both people’s time and their past, present, and future effort. It’s an ineffective way to accomplish things. It’s inefficient in both how much it costs to collect them (i.e., we pay for the IRS and we spend time filling out stupid forms) and how much it misses (i.e., underground economy).

Let’s start getting out of this hole now!


LIBERTY: Debunking the English terrorist threat … sounds like F troop doing chemistry! Very funny imho.

Thursday, August 31, 2006

http://www.file.sc/7575f2/

As you probably know, I listen to Free Talk Live (http://freetalklive.com) on a pretty regular basis when I’m commuting via podcast.

[No, not because it’s free!]

It’s an entertaining pro-liberty show. Recently they did a rendition of a Register article that went into the chemistry of the recent English threat.

Having attempted to make explosives in high school chemistry, (hey who knows why; the nerd herd thought it would be a kool if we could blow up the darn place; that’s why I think of any school — public or private — as a prison!), I KNOW it’s not as easy as one might think. Thermite is pretty easy. (And a hoot, when the good brother teaching chemistry singed his arms putting out the fire we created. Accidentally, of course.) Phosphorous burns nicely as well. (Note, don’t throw water on that fire. I remember the same Brother panicking, doing it, and creating a nice steam cloud. Whatta hoot!) Leaving the bunsen burners open just sets off the gas alarm; no boom. Oxygen in a bottle is lame; unless you can put it under pressure, but Boyle’s Law works against you.

So, I listened with a big chuckle as Ian read the article about how do actually do the chemistry in an airplane’s lavatory (laboratory). It his a chord ’cause I know first hand that blowing stuff up isn’t as easy as it looks on TV or james bond movies.

Any way, I snipped it out and put it on a free site for your enjoyment. Yell if you need it done differently.


PROD: Thinking about how we DON’T have repeatability in life. Sigh.

Wednesday, August 30, 2006

http://www.mises.org/story/2289

The Economics of Groundhog Day
By DW MacKenzie
Posted on 8/30/2006
***Begin Quote***

In Groundhog Day Bill Murray plays Phil Connors, a man who relives a particular day — Groundhog Day — many times. In the first instance Phil Connors lives through this day quite imperfectly.

***AND***

The lessons we learn each day are at best only partially valid for the next day. Consequently we can at best hope for only a gradual improvement in our lives as we keep pace with but never overtake changes in our surroundings. Our reality is to live our lives as Phil Connors did the first time he lived through Groundhog Day, not the last time. We are all speculators and our every action is innovative.

***End Quote***

This fellow helped me understand why I like this dumb movie so much. It works in so many dimensions.

(1) We don’t get to do life over. First time thru is our only time thru.

(2) How many times do we get to know what someone really thinks is important? In one the iterations, he discovers what the girl likes to drink. Next integration, he passes that hurdle only to fail on French Literature. It reminds me of the JoHari window. A ton of information is in the two quadrants we can’t see.

(3) Perfect information is NEVER available. So, now we have to recognize that not only are there no silver bullets (i.e., easy solutions), but we probably can’t even see the targets, nor recognize the bullets.

(4) We can deduce a good method from the film. The power of iteration gets you where you want to go. If we can “run the hand twice”, like the poker pros do on tv, then we can get a Phil Colling “do over” . It certainly makes objective setting, followed by small rapid iterations of quick improvements to approach our goal in measurable steps. It ignores the “Hail Mary” pass of breakthrough discoveries method.

(5) It certain argues persuasively that we need to focus on values and process which maximize our ability to make good decisions.

And, it made me laugh.


MONEY: “Cheap will” scam

Wednesday, August 30, 2006

I’m the administrator of an estate. Lucky me! So I went and had the will admitted to probate. The clerk and I was chatting and she told me about an entertaining barely-legal scam going on in the poorer section of Middlesex County.

Nearby the clerk’s satellite office, a lawyer has a sign offering a $25 simple will. She didn’t go into details as to what constituted simple. But the scam was that wills in nj can be written with what is called a “self-affirming affidavit”.

Basically the lawyer and witness all state under oath at the time the will is made that these are their signatures and that of the person making the will. It’s not required to be a valid will. The catch is that if it’s not there than after the person dies, the witnesses have to affirm that it is their signature on the will.

Back to our 25$ will lawyer. He writes the will for $25 but doesn’t make it “self affirming”. The when the poor family tried to probate the will, for which no lawyer is needed, especially on small estates, with simple wills, they need his affidavit affirming his signature. They gotta have it.

You can guess what happens now … … right.

Yup, that signature costs them $350!

So much for a cheap will!

HE must be politically connected, because if he wasn’t, he’d be disbarred.

Makes me wish I went to law school so that when I retire I could go “compete” with him. I do wills for $25 just to meet people. Oh well! Arghh!!


LIBERTY: What is “gubamint”?

Tuesday, August 29, 2006

The “gubamint” is the oppressive government.

It’s the logical sum of all government at all the levels. It includes the bureaucracy that serves it. As well as all the things that it creates, usually to hide in plain sight, like the NGOs, the Fed, and the cartels it “recognizes”.

It’s the patriot’s pejorative term for the federal leviathan, huge bloated states, and nosey intrusive local governments that have far exceeded their Constitutional limits. It’s that regulating rule-making taxing gang that can always find a way to screw you, and goes out of their way to do so. Backed up by the SWAT team, it “rules” us with force. It’s the complete opposite of freedom and liberty. It’s the thing that the dead old white guys were so afraid of. Remember that genocide goes hand-in-hand with gubamint. It’s the ultimate expression of force.

It’s guestimated that one in four people work directly for gubamint, or are dependent upon it. That includes those that suckle at the gubamint teat, like the military – industrial complex, the “government school construction” industry, and the “political / legal” consulting industry. And, doesn’t count but doesn’t ignore all those dupes, sheep people (i.e., sheeple), who draw a “welfare” check (like “social security”).


TECH: Open Source is preferable to activation schemes

Tuesday, August 29, 2006

http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=06/08/14/202229&from=rss

Open Source
Why proprietary software is dangerous for business-critical applications
Monday August 28, 2006 (05:00 PM GMT)
By: Robin ‘Roblimo’ Miller
***Begin Quote***

But the real point here is that an entire medium-sized company’s executive staff has learned a hard lesson about the dangers of proprietary software, and members of that staff who previously resisted open source are now ready to consider it — and for business continuity reasons rather than as a money-saving measure, no less.

***End Quote***

So to summarize: (1) ALL “activation” schemes limit your recovery ability. (2)  ALL proprietary software is dangerous. (3) Open Source Software give you maximum flexibility. (4) Copyrights, as well as copy protection scheme, don’t protect bit do make life difficult for anyone who’s honest.


RANT: NJ State is STILL a grave robber

Sunday, August 27, 2006

I was really annoyed a few years ago when my aunt died. after a life of very modest earnings, leaving a small estate to her sister and paying the State of New Jersey 15% for the privilege of dying here. Well it happened again! Another relative had the poor judgement to die while a resident of New Jersey and will also pay 15% to the grave robbing gubamint. Where’s my pitchfork and torch?


LIBERTY: Getting back to the Constitution repeal the 17th (Direct election of Senators)

Sunday, August 27, 2006

http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_bartlett/bartlett200405120748.asp

May 12, 2004, 7:48 a.m.
Repeal the 17th Amendment
It’s where big government begins.

***Begin Quote***

There is only one time when a U.S. senator is really free to speak the truth — when he’s announced his retirement. Since he no longer has to worry about raising money, pandering to voters, or retaliation from his colleagues, he can say what he really thinks about issues no other member of the Senate will discuss. For this reason, it is worth listening to Sen. Zell Miller, Democrat of Georgia, who recently spoke a truth that no senator except a retiring one would dare say.

On April 28, Sen. Miller, the last genuinely conservative Democrat we will likely ever see in the Senate, laid the blame for what ails that august body at the door of the 17th amendment to the Constitution. This is the provision that provides for the popular election of senators.

***End Quote***

Sounds like a good idea to me! Where do we start?

#####


LIBERTY: “Eminent Domain” … yet another … another gubamint crime!

Sunday, August 27, 2006

http://www.njeminentdomain.com/state-of-new-jersey-eminent-domain-fines-eviction-and-videotape.html

***Begin Quote***

Under the threat of a $4,000 per day fine from Superiour Court Judge James Hurley, the Halpers vacated their 75-acre farm peacefully.

***End Quote***

Wave good bye to your Fifth Amendment!


LIBERTY: “well-meaning” Congressman … asks … “problem with a federal program”? YES!

Sunday, August 27, 2006

http://www.lifetrekcoaching.com/creativity/cy060827.htm

> My well-meaning Congressman sent his constituents a pamphlet announcing his upcoming Open
> Door Meetings. Upon opening it, I found the question “Do you have a problem with a federal
> program or agency?” in bold letters

OK! You hit my hot button!

Yes. The government steals our money in a variety of ways (i.e., inflation, direct taxes that we pay, indirect taxes that others pay for us, shoddy services, services that are imposed, unintended consequences) and then expects us to be grateful to them for “protecting” us. Please, stop! The litany could go on for pages, but, let’s hit three that might resonate here.

Taxes

I assert it IS everyone’s largest single unavoidable unknown variable expense. The Federal Reserve inflates the currency robbing us of (we can argue EXACTLY what the rate is) between 2.5 and 12% per year. Your dollars are rotting in front of your eyes. The direct taxes (sales, income, and estate) steal every time you buy something, earn something, or die. The indirect taxes (i.e., the gasoline tax) is factored into everything you buy hiding it from identification. No one knows for example what portion of that loaf of bread is tax. It’s not all profit for the baker. I have seen plausible estimates that the US tax bite is in the 80% range. You need some complex math to unwind all the hidden taxation. A good proxy is government spending (at all levels) since that has to come from somewhere. Guess where? Remember only people truly pay taxes. Businesses either pass them along or go broke!

Medicine

Medical care in the US, while “better” than the universal coverage schemes elsewhere, is screwed up by gubamint involvement. “My” government and my insurance company have more to say about my wife’s medical care than I do. Example, she has some problems. Testing in and of itself was risky. I “hear about” full body scan. The insurance doesn’t cover it. And, the gubamint barely approves of it. But for 2k$ and a half hour, I was able to eliminate a laundry list of things the docs wanted to test for with zero risk. (Now the docs are trying to think of new zebras to test for!) Those risky tests would have been just dandy with the gubamint and the insurance company would pay for them. See the problem. It’s the golden rule. (He who has the gold makes the rules!) I remember when my Mom had to pay $185 for my appendectomy when I was a kid. It was a LOT of money. (We weren’t rich. I think the family passed the hat.) But there were only a few forms. Insurance was after the fact between her and the insurance company. But it was the model of speed and efficiency. As a matter of fact, I know the family doc gave her choices of who and where with prices and recommendations! Now we are in a health care model that is one step from the Soviet Union. Take it or leave it. And, it costs!

Drugs and the war on drugs

The FDA. Need I say more? It guarantees that people will die. It enforces a medical monopoly that is a tacit conspiracy between the gubamint, the politicians, the doctors, lawyers, and drug companies. Example, if a new drug cures cancer, then it won’t be available for decades of “testing”. Can some one explain to me if someone is dying of say terminal hangnail and I have essence of guano that cures it, then why do we need testing? At one time in this country, we didn’t look to gubamint for protection. Why ain’t people dying of faulty electronic appliances? Underwriters Laboratory. No government involvement. Yet, I can remember the last case of something happening. WalMart protects me by NOT selling anything without a UL label. Just in case I forget to check. Why do I have to go to the doc for a government permit (aka prescription), beg for an insurance company to cover it in their formulary, then find a licensed drug dealer to sell it to me?

The war on drugs is a joke. In the name of protecting us, they are killing and imprisoning us. No one can stop anyone from putting what they want in the body. It’s immoral. It’s ineffective. And, it’s inefficient. If we are free and have inalienable rights, then there is no moral basis for the drug war. People have to be free to make bad decisions and learn from their mistakes. It’s ineffective. They can’t keep drugs out of prisons. How can they keep them out of society? Didn’t we learn from Prohibition? Can’t be done. Even in the USSR, they still had black markets. Where there is a demand, there will be a supplier. It’s economics.  And, the gubamint goes to all sorts of excesses, in the name of “protecting” us. Yet children get killed in rival drug gang shoot outs. When was the last time you saw a shoot out between Bud and Miller? Yup, during Prohibition. Want to end the drug violence, eliminate street dealing, let WalMart do it. Legalize everything. The marketplace will figure out what to do. And no dumb gubamint age rules either. Have you seen how many kids smoke and drink? Eliminate the kool factor and you’ll eliminate they trying this stuff. And, even if they do, they would die from uncut drugs or drugs cut with rat poison. Finally, it’s inefficient. ALL these “controls” add to the cost and delay in the marketplace. It’s guesstimated by people far smarter than me that illegal drugs would be as cheap as aspirin. (Not sure that it would be THAT cheap, but certainly an addict wouldn’t have to rob and hurt people to feed a habit.) The money wasted on attempting to “control drugs” could be better served by “treating” it. And, we wouldn’t have the Drug War nonsense endanger us or our liberties.

— end rant —

Let me just throw in that the gubamint is a study in “unintended consequences”:

=> Federal Reserve  institutionalizes inflation destroying the saving ethic
=> Income Tax makes everyone a slave to the government
=> Prohibition leads to explosion in organized crime
=> Social Security ponzi scheme setups intergeneration & racial sex funds transfer
=> Social Security destroys the multi generational family support structure and puts kids in day care
=> WW2 Wage & Price controls destroy the direct connection between payer and medical provider
=> Medicare inserts the gubamint in every senior citizen’s medical care at a huge cost
=> “minimum wage” interferes in the peaceful exchange of labor for value; impacts the poor worst!
=> “War on Poverty” destroys the Black family and Black Churches
=> “Urban Renewal” destroys stable neighborhoods to create “vertical slums”
=> “War on Drugs” imprisons minorities and destroys our rights
=> “War on Terror” further destroys our liberty

My challenge is “Name ANY government program that works?”

SO the “well meaning” Congressman should be met not with “appreciative inquiry” but citizens with pitchforks, torches, tar, and feathers! No politician is anything but a (most charitable) dupe, con artist, or (least charitable) stupid.

My suggestions (I don’t just talk about it!):

(1) Get and stay mad. Vote against every incumbent. Demand lower taxes (axiomatic improvement) and ending programs.

(2) Investigate and support the Free State Project (Liberty lovers move to NH for freedom!)

(3) Muck up the system. Don’t cooperate. Remember Gandhi. Non-violent non-cooperation.

(4) Go enthusiastically to jury duty. Vote “not guilty” on bad laws.

(5) Support voluntary true grass roots efforts to solve problems. Avoid “big” charity, like the United Way.

(6) Engage others in discussions of free market solutions. Effective compassion. And, do something, not kvetch!

If you have to use force to get someone to do something, it’s – by definition – a bad idea.

IMHO,
Fjohn


TECH: PRINTERANYWHERE feedback given to the author on a minor flaw.

Sunday, August 27, 2006

I use printeranywhere successfully. However, at night, when I hibernate my note book, the next morning it doesn’t “reconnect” printeranywhere. If I stop it and restart it, then it picks up like a champ. If I just do my usual morning routine and flip it open, it doesn’t relogon. If I go to the “show” and then to “relogon”, it doesn’t’ seem to remember my userid or password despite the remember me setting. Since it is in it’s own little world, I have to look up the userid and password. (Who remembers these things?) Then everything is hunky dory. Please fix this little dementia that the program has.

They said they would.


TURKEY: ATTENTION KMART SHOPPERS the rules have changed! (There. Now you’ve all been told.)

Sunday, August 27, 2006

http://www.escapefromcubiclenation.com/get_a_life_blog/2006/08/requesting_quic.html

***Begin Quote***

Chapter Two: Why corporations today cannot provide job security, no matter how hard they try
Anyone who thinks that taking a job as a corporate employee today is more stable than generating their own income is in for a rude awakening. Corporate jobs can be tremendous training grounds for learning about business and management, as well as providing temporary income streams. But if you look for a long-term, till-retirement-do-us-part work relationship, you are in for intense heartbreak. This chapter describes what has made corporations constitutionally unstable (such as radically changing marketing conditions, outsourcing, mergers and acquisitions, frequent top management changes and pressure from globalization). I will include tips for getting the most from your corporate experience while you are still there (some from my “Open Letter to Employees”).

***End Quote***

As I have ranted before, the “rules” have changed on us. We’ve gone thru several iterations of them. But the 50’s illusion of going to work for a big company, like AT&T as I did in the late sixties, working for fifty years and getting lifetime security (the rules were spelled out: don’t be drunk, don’t dip you pen in company ink, and don’t steal) with a pension and financial security at the end of the yellow brick road, are OVER! That worked for my Mom; it will NOT work for us!

ATTENTION KMART SHOPPERS the rules have changed! (There. Now you’ve all been told.)

New rules:

(1) You’re only as secure as the last paycheck that cleared!

(2) You’re only value is what you are PERCEIVED to produce! (Note: Not what you actually produce; that’s irrelevant.)

(3) You better save your pennies because at the end of the road that’s all you’ll have. (IRA, 401k, tbills, etfs)

(4) The rules, even these rules, are subject to change without notice, without logic, and on a whim. (Pay careful attention to deduce these new rules!)

(5) Old and gray, although smart and wise, is not respected, valued, or employable.

(6) Having multiple revenue streams, (i.e., a white collar job, a blue collar skill, rental properties, an ebay business, an investment portfolio, and some “mad” money), means that the loss of one stream will not materially effect your happiness. (Or your marriage, which is in case you haven’t realized it, your most important asset!)

[Feel free to add your own. I’d be interested to learn what you add! Please tell me I can be a little dense sometimes.]

FJohn
The Big Turkey
looking for “rules” in all the wrong places


RANT: Certain behaviors are rude!

Saturday, August 26, 2006

http://www.gadgetspage.com/pda-phone/six-gadget-ettiquette-tips.html

Six Gadget Ettiquette Tips
PDAs and Phones
***Begin Quote***

Gadgets go with us everywhere now. Our cell phones are cameras, gaming devices and even Internet portals. Some of us have a utility belt full of gadgets and they can interfere with our life in ways that ettiquette gurus would have never thought of twenty years ago. Here are six gadget ettiquette tips to keep you from making common mistakes:

1. Only have cell phone conversations in private.

When you are talking on your cell phone, you are not in a phone booth. The conversation can be so involving that you may not realize that there are other people around you, but I assure you, they are. If you are in a public place, the best option is to find a private place to have a conversation. If that is not possible, make sure you keep your voice low and cut the conversation off as quickly as possible (”Look, I’m on a bus and I can’t talk right now. Let me call you back.”).

***End Quote***
Almost as annoying as drivers talking on the cell, is being in a meeting when everyone is playing with the berry, or being on a conference call; hearing the keyboard tapping away, or on that same conference call, when someone’s participation is needed, and the moderator calls out the name, only to hear “sorry what was that i was multitasking”.

It’s all rude!


LIBERT: A “ceasefire” ain’t a good solution.

Saturday, August 26, 2006

I commented at:

http://channel-surfing.blogspot.com/2006/08/israel-lebanon-and-south-brunswick.html#comments

Specifically to the cease fire concept.

As with most hard questions, the truth is somewhere hard to find. A cease fire, while laudible in saving lives, settles nothing. A pause allows BOTH side time to regroup, reorg, and resupply. There is something to be said for knock down drag out fight that ends when one says “uncle”. At least something gets settled.

Perhaps, as the Egypt Israeli Six Day showed the way, it can lead to “peace”. As we see from WW1, the “armistice” (a glorified cease fire), setup WW2 and it’s abuses. Whereas McArthur’s unconditional surrender, led to Japan being our “buddy”.

For my own policy, I say the US policy should be MYOB. Stay out of other people’s fights. A lot of the problems there are due in a large part to America’s almost-random interventionist policy. First we like Sadam, then we topple him. Taliban good to oppose the USSR, bad when we don’t need them.

Free trade with everyone; troops stay at the water’s edge.

And, it’s “your paper” run it as you see fit. Anyone who doesn’t like it should set up a competing effor and see how easy it is. In this country, we seem to have a lot of Monday Morning Quarterbacks. To them I say “quit griping and do something about it”! When I have had enough, I won’t subscribe any more. That’s the American way. The free marketplace. Where everyone gets to vote with their pocketbook!

P.S. I still have a gripe with the use of the word “democracy” as anb ideal. Democracy is two wolves and lamb voting on what’s for dinner. A republic means that everyone has INALIENABLE RIGHTS! Let’s be worthy of what those dead old white guys created for us. “A repulic if you can keep it!” We haven’t done so well since 1860. And it’s really gone down hill since 1913. And lately, it been dropping like rock in a well.


TECH: NIKON COOLPIC P2 … don’t buy it for the wireless feature

Saturday, August 26, 2006

http://www.nikon.ca/products/coolpixp2/

I have come to the conclusion after wasting a lot of time on the “time saving” wireless network connection of the camera that: playing with it, depending upon it, or even buying the camera for it (which I did) was dumb. I bought it thru Amazon (and got screwed on the Amazon Credit Card discount, but that’s another story!) because of the positive user ratings. Now I wonder if I was scammed. The camera works, but the wireless hasn’t worked for a long time. I continue to play with it stupidly believing that as an injineer, I can make anything work. The software feels like a beta version written by amateurs. The camera sits there trying to connect and doesn’t. I’m now installing version 1.1.1 of the utilities. I think I’ll tell everyone I know about my non-wireless wireless camera. Arghhh! PS the canadian site is easier to use and faster than the us one. go figure? Double Argh!


PROD: OUTLOOK is pia to setup the way I want to work

Friday, August 25, 2006

It should be easy to put email handling rules in place. Outlook, or as I love to call it, LOOKOUT doesn’t make this easy. I guess it all comes down to what you want out of email. For certain people, represented by one or more email addresses, I want to collect their mail in one foolder and get alerted. You have to do this one by one by one. Arghhh!


TECH: AMAZON the grid and storage computing vendor. They’ve executed IBM’s concept?

Friday, August 25, 2006

http://weblog.infoworld.com/udell/2006/08/24.html#a1513

This will turn the “world” upside down.

From a strategic planning perspective, internal large IT organizations — could / might / possibly / actually — run “stuff” (i.e., testing, labs, prototyping, trials) in this “rental” space probably cheaper and faster than building our own.

We, as an “insider”, need to be better, faster, cheaper, six sigma than this “outside competition” lest our own business people do it without us.

Wow, the world just got harder!


TECH: PRINTERANYWHERE feedback given on another site

Thursday, August 24, 2006

http://www.downloadsquad.com/2006/08/24/printeranywhere-enough-said/

I’ve been playing with it.

https://reinkefj.wordpress.com/2006/08/24/tech-printeranywhere-shaping-up-nicely/

https://reinkefj.wordpress.com/2006/08/15/tech-printeranywhere-looks-like-it-could-be-useful/

There’s some key issues:

(1) Who do you trust? Non-private stuff.

(2) Some cosmetic issues that they are working on (laptop resume undoes the share)

(3) And, it has some specific uses (fax elimination)
and some non-uses (if you’re on a lan already you don’t need it).

(4) Please one hting that needsfixing (I forgot to tell them) that they should show email addresses.

All in all a good things especially iof you need it.

I’m in no way connected to the offering, other than it came in handy in a pinch, so I used it. This is my way of saying thanks.

(I’d be a raving fan if it was open source!)
****

One comment says there’s no way to protect from printing junk. I think you can require your OK to use it.

***


LIBERTY: Free to … … elect who “they” say you can!

Thursday, August 24, 2006

http://www.economist.com/world/na/displaystory.cfm?story_id=1099030

Congressional redistricting
How to rig an election
Apr 25th 2002 | WASHINGTON, DC
From The Economist print edition

***Begin Quote***

In a normal democracy, voters choose their representatives. In America, it is rapidly becoming the other way around

***End Quote***

The article says don’t look at the voting machines for fraud. Look at gerrymandering.

I think we have to look at both.

imho we have to become more like a republic and less like an oligarchy.

I think we need to only vote for our local politicians and hold them accountable to everyone else. So in NJ, the municipality should elect the county, the county should elect the state. If you’re interested in proportions, then just throw the census number in for weighting. The State Assembly can be elected by the municipalities on a one for one basis and the State Senate can be elected by the counties.

Then we would only have to gripe at our local politicians.

So to for taxing. Only the local municipality can tax. And, only fees. No taxes.

Gubamint would be forced to offer competitive services that people would want. What a novel idea!


TECH: PRINTERANYWHERE shaping up nicely

Thursday, August 24, 2006

This utility allows you to “share” someone else’s printer.

Doesn’t make sense (to me) if you’re on a lan with a printer. That is, if I am home and want to print on my home office’s printer from my laptop in the living room, then I can share without this utility.

BUT if I want to print on that home office printer when I am at work say so my wife can read something, then this fills the niche.

It would also seem to eliminate the dreaded fax machine. I can print on my friend’s printer in North Carolina if he wasn’t such a Luddite. Rather than try to fax something to him.

That’s not to say this isn’t without drawbacks.

Clearly, it routes thru a server outside of my control, so I wouldn’t use it for anything I wouldn’t want to see int he newspaper. But, then that describes email and the internet as well. It would seem easy to have the two stubs at each end negotiate a public private key pair allowing the architecture to stay the same but the security to be bullet proof. Then when I “fax” my order for dinner tonight, I wouldn’t have to be concerned that anyone will know what I was having.

That pki implementation would also prevent eavesdropping, and serve as a model for peer to peer encryption.


TECH: MEEBO, and the MEEBOME widget,

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

http://www.meebo.com

This is an IM aggregator. It makes it possible to watch several IMs at the same time. That didn’t know my socks off.

Now they have a widget that you put on your web page and it allows a visitor to IM you. Hey now that’s interesting.

I put it on my personal webpage and let’s see if anyone uses it.


TECH: 1AND1 blog option shoots me in the foot

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

This critique is obsolete. See comments below.

When the 1AND1 hosting provider offered free blogs, I tried it.

I was singularly unimpressed when it turned out to be nothing more than a free WordPess blog like this one. Why was I fooled into thinking that there be something substantive behind it? No big deal. No harm. Nothing but some wasted time and effort.

Today, blundering about with MEEBO, I realized that my web page was down.

And, know one told me. Show’s you how popular I am! Arghh!!

I used FIlezilla to ensure that all my files were in tact there. Phew, that could have made me depend on my LUGGABLE to get them all back in place. OR, my backups. But, now need to pull the fire alarm … yet.

It appears that 1AND1 redirected the webpage to the blog unbeknowst to me. Double Arghhh!

I deleted the test blog, and eventually … … after ten anxious minutes … … it refreshed everything to where it should be.

Lessons Learned: Watch for the unintended consequences.

Updated 2007-04-07

1and1 has a new blog destination from it administration page. It now gives you a blog that appears to be a hosted version of WORDPRESS. It know longer throws you to the free WORDPRESS DOT COM site. That’s both bad and good. Good in that you can use javascript if you can figure out how. Bad in that the free WORDPRESS site has lots of assumptions that you can use without knowing too much. I pinged 1and1 support and they have no doc, no faq, and no real support for what they have deployed. (Dangerous?) They said it would be out RSN (Real Soon Now)! You, and so will Christmas. Any way this critique is no longer applicable. But I’d suggest caution in proceeding with the offering.THe reward MAY be worth the risk.


TECH: “YouOS” an “interesting concept”. Not really an OS, but something else. What I don’t know?

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

http://www.youos.com

It certainly has made me think. (Always a dangerous proposition!) I may quibble about it as an OS. IMHO an OS brings bare metal to life. YouOS stands on the shoulders of whatever OS is installed on one’s hardware. Having said that, it “feels” like an OS. Maybe if I write an app, I may have another thought, or two. Certainly congrats and kudos are in order for an “interesting” implementation.


LIBERTY: How to get the gubamint, and their “regulated” utilities, to respond … media!

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

This morning on Jim Gearhart’s show on 101.5, he reported on the results of his airing of a listener’s trouble getting a utility pole repaired. Jim recounted the man’s ordeal trying to get help from JCPL, followed by attempt to get the BPU, who “regualtes” it, to do something. Ten months of frustration get fixed in one day due to Jim’s recitation. Everyone was falling all over themselves to get out of the limelight.

Lessons Learned: (1) Involve Jim sooner in your plight. Maybe eventually he’ll run for guv! (2) Recognize that the cozy relationship between the regulator and the regulated has NOTHING to do with satisfying you the taxpaying consumer. (3) There is no free market in regulated services. Just as we identify a tax by whether or not you can avoid it (i.e., tax unavoidable / fee avoidable), so to we can identify a free market as one in which you have a choice (i.e., any choice no matter how absurd or unpallitable is at least a choice). The interesting question is: If the gubamint madates that I have no choice, is that not in effect a tax? Sure seems that way to me.


LIBERTY: “FREE TO CHOOSE” … … about the proper role of gubamint!

Tuesday, August 22, 2006

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8058189042056883618&q=free+to+choose

Now hte internet is really demonstrating it’s power. Here’s a snapshot of Milton Freedman and in 1980 discussion predicts pretty accurately the expansion of government into all sectors and the loss of freedom we would suffer. True true.

I especially liked his description of the fate of minorities in elections. Everyone is force to conform to the majority. Where in the marketplace everyone is uniquely satisfied. He correctly finds that gubamint “takes over” corporations and politicians then “milk” them for contributions.