GUNS: Still think that gun seizures after Katrina was an abberation?

Saturday, May 19, 2007

http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/05/18/
after-tornado-fema-disarms-town-turns-away-help/

http://tinyurl.com/2trjfw

After tornado, FEMA disarms town, turns away help
By Michael Hampton
Posted: May 18, 2007 4:34 pm

***Begin Quote***

On Friday, May 4, an F5 tornado wiped the town of Greensburg, Kan., almost entirely off the map. The Federal Emergency Management Agency, along with the National Guard and local police from all over Kansas, then systematically kept out relief workers while they went house to house disarming the residents.

***AND***

FEMA’s top priority going in was clear. It was not to help people, but to establish control and cow the population. These, of course, are the same things they did during Hurricane Katrina, with much more disastrous results.

***End Quote***

Still think that Katrina was an abberation?

Sorry, no.

The gooferment is “practicing”. If they get a big enough disaster, then we are going to get never ending martial law and tyranny. Followed by the camps.

So when do we stand up and fight?

I’m a fat old guy. No much I can do, but it’s coming.

Economic crash, bird flu, terrorist incident, or who knows what the excuse will be. As soon as they get the chance, they will.

We need to stop them now.


YAHOO ANSWER: How am I ever gonna retire early?

Saturday, May 19, 2007

*** begin quote ***

How am I ever gonna retire early? I really want to but I’ll be like 35 when I finish paying for college?

PLUS, life expenses and stuff, I really am willing to SAVE UP ALOT. I’m not sure my job will have a 401K so what should I do to be able to put A LOT of money aside and retire by the time i’m 50? IRA’s kind of suck they only allow 4,000 YEARLY. And I don’t wanna gamble my money away by investing in stocks which I know absolutely nothing about. Does this have no solution whatsoever?

*** end quote ***

Well, of course it has a solution. The answer is “it depends”. It depends upon how much you want what when.

College debt, life, and then retirement.

How early do you want to retire and what do want to give up for it?

I suggest that you need a blended solution. You have three priorities to balance — college debt, life expenses, and retirement savings. One thing you’ll have to avoid like the plague is credit card debt.

My standard answer for success in the future is that you need a ruthless dedication to financial discipline (i.e., earn money, save, invest, and keep everything working for you; no lazy money), a good white collar job, a blue collar skill like plumbing, and one or more internet businesses.

Roth IRAs are fantastic. You can accumulate gains tax free.

I think you need to do debt repayment, retirement savings, then allocate whatever’s left. You can get extra work and bank the difference. It’s about tuning and discipline.

I’d suggest you use Vanguard low expense mutual funds or etfs to do you saving in. Don’t try to be too fancy. Focus on getting it into the accounts and left he market work over time.

I won’t be around to see how you make out, but stay flexible and discipline. Where ever I am (upstairs or down), I’ll be rooting for you.

# # # # #

Update 2007-05=24 at 2200: Notified this was the best answer as chosen by the asker. Happy dance time!

  avatar3.png

Me, doing my happy dance. See the moves?


LIBERTY: What did Berger do?

Saturday, May 19, 2007

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20070516-113137-9942r.htm

http://tinyurl.com/3yug9y

 

Clinton Aide Forfeits Law License In Justice Probe
– Washington Times

***Begin Quote***

Samuel R. Berger, the Clinton White House national security adviser who was caught taking highly classified documents from the National Archives, has agreed to forfeit his license to practice law.

***End Quote***

If I was the Grand Inquisitor of the Spanish Inquisition, then I’d want to interrogate all sorts of people about this.

Why?

What did Berger do?

I, of course, suspect that he was covering for Bill Clinton. (Disclaimer: I don’t like politicians of EITHER of the duplicitous duopoly!) Or worse.

Could there have been something in the ORIGINAL documents that would not be pleasant for Bill or Hillary?

Maybe we’ll never know. Maybe there will be something in the future that Berger has to “buy” his way out of by coming clean. Maybe a “copy” will show up from some one’s file somewhere. Maybe it will come out some how some where.

Argh!

# # # # #


GUNS: Helping Stop Gunman

Saturday, May 19, 2007

http://www.timesdaily.com/apps/pbcs.dll/
article?AID=/20070516/APN/705161813

http://tinyurl.com/3ao4jx

 

Carry Permit Holder Praised For Helping Stop Gunman
– Times Daily

***Begin Quote***

Chris Chappell was in a Bessemer, Ala., bank getting change on the way to his job when gunshots rang out. He drew a gun for which he has a Right-to-Carry permit, took cover by his sport utility vehicle and alerted deputies who came up. “It`s obvious he played a key role in keeping the guy there until we could get there,” said Jefferson County Sheriff`s Sgt. Randy Christian. “It`s a great testament of someone willing to take action.”

***End Quote***

Why can’t we all be “carry permit holders”? Isn’t that the essence of the Second Amendment?

# # # # #


TECH SERVICE: 2IDI silently changed it’s offering

Saturday, May 19, 2007

http://2idi.com

Intelligent Identity Information

***Begin Quote***

Just as a url is an address for a website, an i-name is an Internet address for YOU! It is a simple, secure way to authenticate your identity and to share personal data, with the assurance that it will remain private and up-to-date. Further, your identity cannot be “harvested” by spammers or other marketers without your express permission.

Contact Service

Your Contact Service is a way for you to put a link on your web pages or on your business card that allows people to contact you, without exposing your email address to spammers.

Use the menu at the left to view the messages you have received, and to inspect and/or edit your Contact Service settings.

The address for other people to reach your Contact Page is http://2idi.com/contact/=reinkefj.

***End Quote***

I signed up with this a while ago. So long ago, I don’t remember when. I bought it because I could put the link on any website and it would send me a non-spam email. (Neat! Still haven’t seen such elsewhere.) The identity claims I haven’t seen any great benefit for, but, I did get a good service.

It always worked flawlessly from http://public.2idi.com/=reinkefj

BUT

yesterday, a contact tried to use it and via different channel told me it wasn’t working. Upon testing, I found he was right. (Thanks!) SO I pinged every where I could find, and got the response, “where did that url come from”. Huh? From youse guys. Did you think I could make that up on my own.

From this I learn that the inet, even when you pay for something, ain’t set it and forget it.

I need a process where I check components to ensure they are working. Especially when I paid for a service.

NOW, I have to find all the places I put it and update them. Thanks a good trick. Maybe Google?

Argh!

# # # # #


WRITING: Advertising effectiveness

Friday, May 18, 2007

***Begin Quote***

It seems that “advertising”, especially to the inet or to the high value execs, is ineffective at best and a negative at worst. Advertisers are seen as the equal of used car salesmen.

Cute doesn’t cut it.

If anything, the expert’s blog, with the built in reputation of that person, cuts to the head of the line in the buyer or exec’s perception.

That’s why you are seeing the A-list bloggers getting tremendous support from businesses. Enough support to pay like a full time job. It’s like the guide role on a safari.

I think that is how the model is morphing right under everyone’s nose. Traditional ads are less effective; bloggers are guiding the conversation.

***End Quote***

I’d like to think that I have some influence. How’s that for self-delusion?

# # # # #


RANT:Leadership’s ignorance

Friday, May 18, 2007

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/column.aspx?
UrlTitle=presumptions_of_the_left&ns=ThomasSowell&
dt=05/16/2007

http://tinyurl.com/yqgakj

Presumptions Of The Left
By Thomas Sowell
Wednesday, May 16, 2007

*** begin quote ***

If you start from a belief that the most knowledgeable person on earth does not have even one percent of the total knowledge on earth, that shoots down social engineering, economic central planning, judicial activism and innumerable other ambitious notions favored by the political left.

If no one has even one percent of the knowledge currently available, not counting the vast amounts of knowledge yet to be discovered, the imposition from the top of the notions favored by elites convinced of their own superior knowledge and virtue is a formula for disaster.

***AND***

Yet what the political left, even in democratic countries, share is the notion that knowledgeable and virtuous people like themselves have both a right and a duty to use the power of government to impose their superior knowledge and virtue on others.

***AND***

The ignorance of people with Ph.D.s is still ignorance, the prejudices of educated elites are still prejudices, and for those with one percent of a society’s knowledge to be dictating to those with the other 99 percent is still an absurdity.

*** end quote ***

Yup, dumb is dumb.

NO matter how many degrees or years that person has. The central command can’t possibly be as in control as the person on the front line.

That’s why the free market does so well. Many distributed agents all evaluating options and making choices. Important decisions with skin in the game. The consumer has all the information, the scarce resource allocation unit aka money, and the needs to be satisfied. What better person to be in charge of making decisions.

The free marketplace is at the same time the arbiter of all these conflicting demands for scarce resources and the judge that makes sure everyone’s needs are satisfied to the extent. Think of it as a giant calculating agent that totals up the score.

That’s why the socialist, fascist, and statist will always fail. There is no way for them to make that instantaneous calculation.

I learned that in injineering skool. Using a slide rule, you could very quickly get answers to a few significant digits. Or, you could use the computers to get a very “precise” answer with lots of meaningless digits that you’d throw away anyway because of “insignificance”. More meaningless digits didn’t make the answer better than the fast one from the analog slide rule. Most injineers in my day preferred the slide rule because it was fast and it made you think about significant digits. I saw the change as computer became more available and those injineers would write down long strings of meaningless digits as the answer. In civil engineering we learned to compute the answer and multiply be ten or a hundred as a safety factor. (That’s why buildings don’t fall down.)

So how does a leader avoid his ignorance?

He puts systems in place that put the decisions as close to the action as possible. Think Nordstroms. Think IBM sales person. Think the small individual business owner.

Fast decisions, close to the action, with complete accountability.

You won’t see that in stogy big companies or the gooferment.


LIBERTY: A great victory for the Democratic Party and Big Gooferment!

Friday, May 18, 2007

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070518/D8P6PHL80.html

Sen. Kennedy Defends Immigration Bill
May 18, 8:13 AM (ET)
By JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS

 

***Begin Quote***

The bill, which conservatives immediately attacked as an “amnesty” program, would provide a pathway to citizenship for some 12 million immigrants now in the United States illegally. It also would mandate tougher border security and workplace enforcement and provide for a guest worker program.

***End Quote***

Of course, Senator kennedy would defend this nonsense. The Democrats win big. California, Arizona, Texas, and Florida become permanent “Democratic” states. And, the Republicans and hugely unpopular Administration will also hail it as a great victory.

For who?

Why the advocates for big government! That’s who, silly peon.

They’ll need more forms, more checkers, more government powers, of course.

Bottom line, this does nothing to end the incentives for immigrants and “citizens” to be on the dole. Business, citizen, and immigrant alike are feasting on the backs of fewer and fewer workers.

This doesn’t do anything but accelerate the careening out-of-control gooferment over the proverbial cliff. When we hit the canyon floor below, there’s going to be a lot of breakage.

What we need, is a President Ron Paul, to stop the trip.

Baring that, we need: an end to the dole for EVERYONE; honest money; separation of Gooferment form Education; open borders; end the war on drugs; and reduce the Gooferment to a much smaller Constitutional government again.

Until that happens, this deal will solve nothing but how to get more Democrats elected.

By the way, where does an illegal immigrant get the 5k$ to pay the “tax” to get a z visa?

# # # # #


MONEY: Is online stock trading advisable? imho, no!

Friday, May 18, 2007

via Chris Pirillo President at Lockergnome and Owner, Lockergnome.com

*** begin quote ***

Dear Network: I received this letter from a reader. Thought I’d throw it out to you to help her with an answer…..

“Dear Chris,
My husband got me a fake Gucci bag for Mother’s Day, and I really appreciated the sentiment, but had a revelation. I’m tired of the knock-offs…I want to be able to afford the real thing sometimes. Do you have any advice for me about how to invest my money? (I earn $60K annually). How do I find an investment advisor? Is online stock trading advisable? Thanks for any advice you can send my way!”

Shirley S.
Seattle, Washington

*** end quote ***

Chris,

With all due respect, this is a train wreck. And, you’re in the middle. This person is going to be disappointed, unless she’s wildly lucky to pick the next Microsoft / Google / Berkshire Hathaway, and subsequently be mad at you for bum advice. The market is a rigged game, and online trading is a fast path to the poor house.

Earning 60k per year, the person probably can’t (shouldn’t) even get a trading account because of “suitability rules”. There’s a reason why traders in big firms get paid lots of money and for an amateur to think they can compete is absurd. I’d suggest that they shelve this idea as a path to wealth.

If the writer wants to be truly wealthy, they need to give value to others in a way that is unique to them. It could be buying real estate and renting it. She will have to have a laser like focus on value and positive cash flow. Perhaps she can own her own side business. Maybe she can provide a service.

At 60k per year, I’d urge her to put her discretionary income into a tax deferred savings plan like a RothIRA in Vanguard Mutual Funds, and seek to increase her earning power. In thirty years, she may not be buying Gucci bags, but she won’t be eating dog food either.

I believe that the model for success NOW is: (1) ruthless financial discipline to capture part of your earnings while making every dollar work hard; (2) seek a white collar job; (3) have a blue collar skill; and (4) create one, or hopefully more, profitable web based businesses.

Then, she might become truly wealthy. If she has a husband who tried to make her happy, then she’s already blessed. Part of being wealthy is not having more “stuff”. It’s valuing what the Universe has given you. It’s not about having what you want; it’s about wanting what you have.

imho

# # # # #


TECHNOLOGY: the Laws of Identity

Thursday, May 17, 2007

http://www.identityblog.com/stories/2004/12/09/thelaws.html

Kim Cameron
Identity and Access Architect
Microsoft Corporation
May 2005

***Begin Quote***

Understand the dynamics causing digital identity systems to succeed or fail in various contexts, expressed as the Laws of Identity. Together these laws define a unifying identity metasystem that can offer the Internet the identity layer it needs.

***AND***

1. User Control and Consent:

Digital identity systems must only reveal information identifying a user with the user’s consent.

2. Limited Disclosure for Limited Use

The solution which discloses the least identifying information and best limits its use is the most stable, long-term solution.

3. The Law of Fewest Parties

Digital identity systems must limit disclosure of identifying information to parties having a necessary and justifiable place in a given identity relationship.

4. Directed Identity

A universal identity metasystem must support both “omnidirectional” identifiers for use by public entities and “unidirectional” identifiers for private entities, thus facilitating discovery while preventing unnecessary release of correlation handles.

5. Pluralism of Operators and Technologies:

A universal identity metasystem must channel and enable the interworking of multiple identity technologies run by multiple identity providers.

6. Human Integration:

A unifying identity metasystem must define the human user as a component integrated through protected and unambiguous human-machine communications.

7. Consistent Experience Across Contexts:

A unifying identity metasystem must provide a simple consistent experience while enabling separation of contexts through multiple operators and technologies.

***End Quote***

In looking at LinkedIn and my “who’s been looking at my profile” kvetch, here’s Cameron’s ground-breaking laws of identity. I think the new LinkedIn “feature” is bending Laws #1 and #3.

Comments?

# # # # #