LIBERTY: Withdraw your consent

Tuesday, July 3, 2007

If governments draw their power from the consent of the governed, then here’s one who does NOT consent.

Dont-Tread-300

If you don’t agree, then you are saying that you support:

(1) the theft, by taxes, inflation, and regulation, of wealth from others;

(2) the endless unconstitutional wars by the gooferment;

(3) the enslavement by the gooferment of people by the unconstitutional dole for individuals and companies;

(4) the Ponzi scheme of intergenerational racist theft of “social security insurance”;

(5) the dumbing down of future voters with the gooferment running “education”.

I don’t consent. Alone, I am weak. There’s no obligation from anyone to throw themselves under the proverbial train. But, let’s not pretend that I comply for any other reason than the fear of their superior arms.

There will come a day when the “little people” will throw off their chains AGAIN. Maybe then we will be wiser.

# # # # #


YAHOO ANSWER: buy a new car

Tuesday, July 3, 2007

http:// answers.yahoo.com/question/

;_ylt=Ajc.cSp3s66dlx8NU73r
fQ6XxQt.?link=answer&.crumb=lMnTj6klwL7&qid=20070703
141234AAYpSs8&.done=http%253A%252F%252Fanswers.yahoo.com
%252Fquestion%252Findex%253Fqid%253D20070703141234AAYpSs8%25
26pa%253DFZB6NXXtFWMW0cLWwuIZ9E1xUiOtLZZnf21oAp2COKwgi5AG0Ae
8qweCD0.gx_7GKhGOHCl_FXMfdIkDPGE-%2526paid%253Dadd_watch

http://tinyurl.com/2ez3jz

buy a new car

QUESTION

Asked by “Chris L”

What is your answer?

Question

Should i buy a new car?

I have a 2004 model that went out of Bumper to bumper waranty last week. I am ahead on it about $2000. I work for a company that is contracted by an auto manufactorer and can get a discount. My car is not luxurious it’s a point a to point b and ocasionally point c kind of car. My current debt is the car and a credit card that has about 3500.00 on it. My payments are $209.00 I would like to stay in this range (which doesn’t leave much room for moving up). I worry about out of warranty repairs. the veh came with a 5/100 powertrain, and i have 1.5 years left on my loan. would it be worth it to trade and get a new vehicle?

ANSWER

Dear “Chris L”:

Well a “point a, b, c” car sounds better than some of the wrecks I drove in my youth. I had a old caddie I loved. But it used more water than gas. (Leaky cooling system. No money to fix it.) I used to travel with 10 gallons of water in the trunk. :-) Hopefully your is better than that.

Just to recap the question, you’ve a working car that’s out of warranty, have a loan with 18 months to go, but has some trade in value. You got debt but no savings. Did I get it right?

First, depending upon where you got your car loan from, you have sunken cost in your interest expense. You may not realize it but the car dealers use the “Rule of 72” for interest. It means that you pay interest in the front of the loan. Credit Unions use a more honest method. So when you refinance, you won’t get an interest refund or interest saving.

Second, you really need to have an emergency fund. You should be putting as much as you can into that fund as quick as you can. Depending upon many factors, you need between from 3 to 12 months of “burn rate” available. That can serve as your own “warranty fund”. 2004 isn’t that old. You didn’t talk about mileage. But you should be able to get 6 years and or 80k miles before you have major risks. So, I think you’re more in need of a emergency fund than a car.

Third, cars depreciate badly. Your biggest single expense is that! So, a new, or used, car is most expensive when you first get it. If you have your e-fund and a surplus, it might make sense to avoid the risk of a car repair. When you don’t, it seems like your worrying about the wrong things.

On my blog, I’ve talked about using a six year plan for car acquisitions. Finance for three years; pay for six. First three to the credit union; Second three to your savings. That’s what got me off the car treadmill. Adjust for usage. You need to make sure it doesn’t wear out before you’ve paid for it.

Get to a credit union for savings and loans. They’re “honest” (upfront about the terms) and will give you free advice you can depend upon.

Take a peek at Dave Ramsey and Suzzie Orman for the budgeting, savings, and emotions about money. They’re much better than I could ever be.

Hope this helps. I’m interested how it works out for you. Drop me a note sometime. My blog may have helpful “stuff”.

Ferdinand J. Reinke
Kendall Park, NJ 08824

SOURCE

http://www.creditunion.coop/
http://www.suzeorman.com/
http://www.daveramsey.com/
http://www.ftc.gov/
https://reinkefaceslife.com/2007/05/16/yahoo-answer-credit-unions-good-for-car-loans-not-good-great/
http://www.reinkefaceslife.com/

# # #

UPDATE: Selected best by the asker. (The best kind!)

*** begin quote ***

Asker’s Rating: star star star star star

Though the second answer was very good, this one went above and beyond, and met my expectations. i do want to make a plan to get my debt gone as soon as possible and i think that having reliable transporation that i am am paying for but have almost paid off will be my best bet.

Thanks

*** end quote ***

# # # # #


INTERESTING: The solution to the Iraq predicament

Tuesday, July 3, 2007

http://www.prometheusinstitute.net/opinion/jh103006.htm

The Iraq Solution
The truth that both sides are too afraid to admit
Justin Hartfield, for the editors

***Begin Quote***

The solution to the Iraq predicament

The only viable solution in the opinion of this organization is to install in Iraq a moderate Muslim potentate who can effectively limit, with a strong centralized force (and perhaps decentralized provincial decision-making), sectarian conflict and radical fundamentalism. This example is given by the more “moderate” Islamic states, including Turkey, Egypt, and Kuwait, who subdue terrorists while piously imposing sharia-inspired law and order.

***End Quote***

I’d suggest that we should, we should have, let each town vote for its leader. Those leaders could then align however they want. Leave people alone to decide how they want to organize themselves. Sort of like town halls in NH.

# # # # #


GUNS: Reevaluating Gun Control Laws

Tuesday, July 3, 2007

http://www.prometheusinstitute.net/opinion/joe61807.htm

Reevaluating Gun Control Laws
Support 50’s right to bear arms
Joe Holmes

 

***Begin Quote***

Reasonable restrictions are necessary. Waiting periods, though a minor inconvenience, allow for background checks and should help deter the possibility of committing a gun-crime in the heat of the moment. People with criminal records or histories of psychological problems should be prevented from owning a gun. Automatic weapons serve no reasonable purpose other than to kill mass numbers of people. These are reasonable laws to me. However, preventing me from carrying a gun in my car or on my person seems too restrictive. Believe me, I have no desire to kill someone…indeed, I desire no situation less. However, if some thug threatens my life, my family’s life, or any innocent person’s life, I believe I should have the right to protect myself and others. To restrict this ability is to take away my fundamental right to self protection and self preservation. When did this become such a crazy position?

***End Quote***

Sorry, but “reasonable restrictions” are NOT necessary. We have seen all to often of the “slippery slope”. Our rights are abridged and infringed in the name of “reasonableness”, “the children”, or some other clap trap. Why is that this non sense always winds up giving the gooferment more power? The gooferment is never given “less power”. Power is never taken back from the gooferment except in a bloody revolution.

Let’s take some of the “reasonable restrictions”:

(1) Waiting periods guarantee that you can’t react to a threat. You’re a woman. You’re threatened by a stalker, a would be rapist, or abusive partner. Waiting period? You wait; you die. Restraining order? Don’t make me laff!

(2) Background checks of records maintained by the gooferment. You think they are right or complete? And, for what purpose? Even ex-cons should have right to defend themselves. Beside where do criminals buy their guns. Clue: Not legally; not at a gun store.

(3) Automatic weapons, other than being fun, are a good way to even up the sides with biker gangs or an intrusive Federal gooferment. If their side has them, then our side should as well.

(4) Car can be carjacked. Talk to that NJ teacher who had a tape recorder in her pocket when she was kidnapped by an nutty student. Oh yeah, that’s right, you can’t, she’s dead! Guess if that recorder was a small, but illegal, 380, then she could be alive and he’d be eliminated from the gene pool.

(5) “should have the right” is wrong. You always have rights! They are inalienable. You can’t give them up. You have that right at all times. Regardless what any number of politicians or people say.

It became nuts when people forgot that the best way to protect a flock of sheep is to sprinkle in a few “sheepdogs with big teeth”.

Remember: A democracy is two wolves and sheep deciding what’s for dinner. A republic is one well-armed sheep disputing the election.

# # # # #


INTERESTING: Five Intrinsic Problems Facing Islamic Countries

Tuesday, July 3, 2007

http://www.prometheusinstitute.net/opinion/jh71106.htm

Five Intrinsic Problems Facing Islamic Countries
PI [prometheusinstitute.net]
Justin Hartfield

***Begin Quote***

1. A lack of innovation.
2. Inability to form a democratic government.
3. Abhorrence of diversification.
4. Inability to separate church and state.
5. Inability to correct errors.

***End Quote***

I’ve always thought that a society, that doesn’t allow all it’s people to accomplish all they are capable, is “throwing away wealth”. Minority, women, pariahs, or me — all have a unique contribution to make. By discrimination, that society doesn’t maximize its accomplishments.

# # # # #


LINKEDIN: consulting firm I own on my resume?

Tuesday, July 3, 2007

FROM A QUESTION TO ME

*** begin quote ***

From: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
IT Professional
Greater New York City Area

Current:
* Sr. Business Analyst, Infrastructure at Wyndham Worldwide
* President/CEO at JLS Technology USA

Past:
* Project Manager, Infrastructure at IncentOne
* Regional IT Project Manager at Iron Mountain Inc.
* Sales Counselor at Circuit City

Date: June 30, 2007
To: John Reinke

Can I put the upstart consulting firm I own on my resume? If so how do I list it in conjunction with my current FT job?

I would like to update my resume and was wondering if I can put my small consulting firm on my resume? I have done some contract work through my consulting firm but am apprehensive because i don’t know if its taboo to do, or if it has enough “OOMPH” to list on my resume.
I’m the President of the company but would this be frowned upon by recruiters, looking at it as padding my resume?

Thanks for all your help and advice in advance!

*** end quote ***

Dear X,

Well I don’t see why not? I did. Even it before it was more frequent.

I was reluctant to be “president”; I like “owner / consultant”.

I think it is important to differentiate your “daytime” and “night time” duties. You don’t want it to look like you are “short changing” your daytime employer. You also want to avoid the the appearances that you are “competing” with your employer.

I know a tech exec who moonlights as a CICS coder. I knew a security exec who did fancy banisters for staircases. I knew a CEO of a major ad agency who moonlighted as freelance writer to unwind at night.

So, LinkedIn presents some interesting challenges. You can’t customize it like a resume for a specific opportunity. So it’s one size fits all.

Argh! Tough call. My advice is to put anything that is a significant adder that doesn’t detract from your value.

I’d include President of the Little League, Library, or ASPCA for a decade. But, I’d omit the President of your AA, KKK, or Democrat/Republican chapter for the same decade.

l8r,
fjohn


INTERESTING: Ron Paul 2008

Tuesday, July 3, 2007

ron paul front version05 2

ron paul back version05 2