Reading Professor Williams is always challenging to my thinking.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54464
Democracy: Enemy of liberty
Posted: February 28, 2007
1:00 a.m. Eastern
*** begin quote ***
Clearly, we need government, and that means there must be collective decision-making.
*** end quote ***
Having read Ludwig and Rothfarb, I’m not sure that if I agree with that as formulated.
Government imho only has one claim to a valid existence. It should be to protect us from violence, intimidation, and fraud.
There is an often cited Supreme Court decision (which I can’t remember) that says the government has no specific duty to protect, and can’t be held to account when it or its agents fail miserably. So, that wipes out its claim to legitimacy.
So, do we really need a government. We know we don’t need the gooferment.
Does their have to be an ultimate reservoir of force? Or, is that just an open invitation to corruption?
The free marketplace always clears supply and demand.
And, it does, when allowed to work, that job very efficiently, without “checkers”.
The quality movement has taught us that “checkers” are very expensive and introduce their own set of “errors”.
So, a market, that allows one to vote with their buying decisions or buying abstentions, would be the ultimate “voting mechanism”.
Thus, it is NOT “clearly” apparent to me that we need a government that can oppress us or be the gooferment.
I hope that Professor Williams can instruct me in the error of my thinking without requiring a tuition payment?
Posted by reinkefj 







