http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=96590
# – # – #
What flag will you fly on Memorial Day?
While in Obama’s liberal America we still have one!
# # # # #
LIBERTY: The Betsy Ross flag
Friday, May 8, 2009
Leave a Comment » | 
LIBERTY | Tagged: Libertarian, limited government, personal liberty | 
Permalink
Posted by reinkefj
POLITICS: small government is possible™
Friday, April 3, 2009Small Government News
small government is possible™
Thursday April 2, 2009
Publisher: Carla Howell
Editor: Michael Cloud
*** begin quote ***
“Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one.”
-Tom Paine
*** and ***
Big Government must close its doors forever — and leave nothing but small government, limited to defending our lives, liberties, and property. And the prosperity produced by a thriving, booming private enterprise system, in a swiftly-growing private sector.
*** end quote ***
As a country, we have a lot of “clutter” in the gooferment. Time to clean it out. Legitimate government has only one legitimate function to protect our rights from foreign and domestic aggression.
# # # # #
Leave a Comment » | Political | Tagged: limited government | Permalink
Posted by reinkefj
RANT: Why do we have “public pensions”?
Monday, March 30, 2009http://www.nypost.com/seven/03212009/postopinion/opedcolumnists/invitation_to_a_scam_160540.htm
INVITATION TO A SCAM
HOW TO SAFEGUARD NY PENSIONS
By NICOLE GELINAS
Last updated: 2:15 am
March 21, 2009
*** begin quote ***
ATTORNEY General Andrew Cuomo has alleged vast corruption in the massive taxpayer-guaranteed state pension fund, bringing criminal charges against political consultant Hank Morris and the fund’s former chief investment officer, David Loglisci.
*** end quote ***
The more important question is WHY do we have “public pensions”?
# # # # #
Leave a Comment » | Ranting | Tagged: honesty, limited government, Tax Revolt | Permalink
Posted by reinkefj
GOVEROTRAGEOUS: Obama’s birth certificate
Saturday, March 14, 2009http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=91283
BORN IN THE USA?
What congressmen say about eligibility
Lawmakers’ letters insist ‘president was born in Hawaii’
Posted: March 10, 2009 9:29 pm Eastern
By Bob Unruh
*** begin quote ***
Hawaiian officials have confirmed they have a birth certificate on file for Obama, but it cannot be released without his permission. He has refused that permission. And Hawaiian officials have not revealed what information the certificate contains.
*** end quote ***
Well, adjust my tin foil hat and call me kooky.
I guess that makes me a “birthist”.
See the first thing that the media does is give you a label and then they can dismiss you.
My fear is that I guess, like FDR and Pearl Harbor, we’ll have to wait 50 years to find out that O was NOT a US citizen!
Just because they label you, doesn’t make you wrong.
All to often today, they denigrate people who ask, often too politely, WTF!
“Quo Warranto”
Or in my parlance, “sez who!”
See the essence of the argument is the prima facie case, “What are you hiding Mister Obama?”
Until that is answered, it is not moot. It’s a scandal!
So much for “running the most open and transparent government”!
# # # # #
Leave a Comment » | GOVEROTRAGEOUS | Tagged: abuse, Birth Certificate, demand, Gooferment, Libertarian, limited government, Obama, POTUS, POTUS08, Presidential2008, Problems, psuedo-Justice, Revolt, Rights | Permalink
Posted by reinkefj
LIBERTY: Hold the ‘Catastrophe’: Obama Says He’s ‘Highly Optimistic’ About Economy
Friday, March 13, 2009http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96SP30G5&show_article=1
Obama: Economic crisis ‘not as bad as we think’
Mar 12 05:49 PM US/Eastern
By JIM KUHNHENN
Associated Press Writer
Hold the ‘Catastrophe’: Obama Says He’s ‘Highly Optimistic’ About Economy
*** begin quote ***
WASHINGTON (AP) – Confronting misgivings, even in his own party, President Barack Obama mounted a stout defense of his blueprint to overhaul the economy Thursday, declaring the national crisis is “not as bad as we think” and his plans will speed recovery.
Challenged to provide encouragement as the nation’s “confidence builder in chief,” Obama said Americans shouldn’t be whipsawed by bursts of either bad or good news and he was “highly optimistic” about the long term.
The president’s proposals for major health care, energy and education changes in the midst of economic hard times faced skepticism from both Democrats and Republicans on Capitol Hill, as senators questioned his budget outlook and the deficits it envisions in the middle of the next decade.
But Obama, speaking to top executives of the Business Roundtable, expressed an optimistic vision and called for patience.
*** end quote ***
Well, “they” have passed the PORKULOUS bill and the various versions of TARP.
Guess they have always stampeded us into giving up more of our money and our liberty.
So much for “change”. Guess I’ll just have to “hope”.
So what are they going to repeal and cut.
# # # # #
Leave a Comment » | LIBERTY | Tagged: Bailouts, economic freedom, Gooferment, limited government, Obama, POTUS, POTUS08, Presidential2008 | Permalink
Posted by reinkefj
LIBERTY: With or against the Federal Government?
Sunday, March 8, 2009http://www.freestateproject.org/node/16405
Do you stand with or against the Federal Government?
By Russell Kanning
*** begin quote ***
The 400+ men and women that meet in the NH State House this time of year are discussing whether or not NH should remain a part of the U.S. no matter what the Feds do. A handful of reps decided to put forth a bill, HCR6 that proposes that if the government in Washington DC decides to implement measures like mandatory national service, then NH will leave the union. That seems very reasonable to me. Upon entering the US, NH like the majority of other states, left themselves room to voluntarily leave the arrangement, and this bill is patterned after similar resolutions and declarations penned by Thomas Jefferson. So I am asking you, would you prefer to stand with or against the current incarnation of the US Government?
*** end quote ***
Frankly, I don’t think it matters.
It’s like asking if the slave master will let the serf go. Ain’t going to happen.
Unless the terrorists are landing on the shore, I’d say “against”.
Looking at the Obama acts and quotes, I’d say against.
# # # # #
Leave a Comment » | LIBERTY | Tagged: Gooferment, limited government, Moral Hazard | Permalink
Posted by reinkefj
TECHNOLOGY: The Digital TV shift screwed up big time!
Sunday, March 1, 2009http://blog.wired.com/business/2009/02/how-the-governm.html
How We Bungled the Digital Television Transition By Eliot Van Buskirk EmailFebruary 20, 2009 | 2:39:09 PM
*** begin quote ***
This additional factor added to the need for this expensive delay. “Why the hell – excuse me – why in 2005 did they decide February 17th was a good time for this transition?”
*** end quote ***
It’s just another example of “gooferment”!
Never mind the Fifth Amendment violate against “takings”. Which this was pure and simple.
More money down the DC rathole!
# # # # #
Leave a Comment » | Technology | Tagged: limited government | Permalink
Posted by reinkefj
POLITICAL: Where does the Ron Paul energy go?
Sunday, February 8, 2009Where does the Ron Paul revolution (i.e., peace, nonintervention, economic freedom, personal liberty, sound money, and a drastically limited government) go?
The shell game of Republican and Democrat bigger gooferment prevents any other “choice”.
Argh!
# # # # #
Leave a Comment » | Political, Ron Paul | Tagged: Challenge, economic freedom, Gooferment, Libertarian, limited government, Nonintervention, Peace, personal liberty, Rights, Ron Paul, sound money | Permalink
Posted by reinkefj
NATIONAL: Expansion Of SCHIP Passes
Monday, February 2, 2009Expansion Of SCHIP Passes, Millions Of Kids Get Health Insurance
February 1, 2009
*** begin quote ***
The Senate has agreed with the House and has approved an expansion of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), supplying millions of low-income children with health insurance.<br /> ….Washington (dbTechno) – The Senate has agreed with the House and has approved an expansion of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), supplying millions of low-income children with health insurance.
*** end quote ***
While on the surface this seems that it’s a “great idea”, however let’s look at the “silent victim”. The taxpayer. We are getting hammered all over the place.
Is it efficient to send money to Washington in taxes? After all they take half for handling to send it to the states, the states “handle” it, and “distribute” it. What the “load” or losses do to friction of all those hands.
Is it effective to “insure” children in this manner? It’s not MY problem that parents haven’t provided for their children. I am taxed to educate them even though I had no part in the decision to have them or anything else. I’m not taxed to feed them. YET? Is that next?
Argh!
And, we are sending a message to parents that they can’t take care of their own children without the gooferment. What happens when the choices conflict? You know they will. And, the queues for service and reimbursement?
Argh!
# # # # #
Leave a Comment » | NATIONAL | Tagged: Insurance, limited government, Policy | Permalink
Posted by reinkefj
RANT: O versus L? The typical false choice.
Friday, January 30, 2009http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0109/18194_Page2.html
Are you with Obama or Rush?
By JONATHAN MARTIN
1/29/09 8:00 PM EST
Updated: 1/30/09 4:37 AM EST
*** begin quote ***
Politico has learned that tomorrow Americans United for Change, a liberal group, will begin airing radio ads in three states Obama won — Ohio, Pennsylvania and Nevada — with a tough question aimed at the GOP senators there: Will you side with Obama or Rush Limbaugh?
“Every Republican member of the House chose to take Rush Limbaugh’s advice,” says the narrator after playing the conservative talk radio giant’s declaration that he hopes Obama “fails.”
“Every Republican voted with Limbaugh — and against creating 4 million new American jobs. We can understand why a extreme partisan like Rush Limbaugh wants President Obama’s Jobs program to fail — but the members of Congress elected to represent the citizens in their districts? That’s another matter. Now the Obama plan goes to the Senate, and the question is: Will our Senator”—here the ad is tailored by state to name George Voinovich in Ohio, Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania, and John Ensign in Nevada—”side with Rush Limbaugh too?”
Asked to respond, Limbaugh had a message for his party.
“Senate Republicans need to understand this is not about me,” he wrote in an email. “It is about them, about intimidating them, especially after the show of unity in House. It is about the 2010 and 2012 elections. This is an opportunity for Republicans to redefine themselves after a few years of wandering aimlessly looking for a ‘brand’ and identity.”
*** and ***
Senate Republicans acknowledge that they’ll lose some of their members on the first vote.
“We’re in a little different spot than the House in that we have a handful of Republicans who have all but committed to supporting the package,” said a Senate GOP aide.
The aide declined to say who, but speculation on both sides of the aisle is centered on a group of northeasterners — Senators Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine, Sen. Judd Gregg (NH) and Specter.
*** end quote ***
Everyone should be real clear. The “stimulus” bill is not about stimulus, jobs, or benefits for the “folks”.
It’s about socialism, pork spending, and making future voters for the democratic party.
Rahm told you that a crisis is a terrible thing to waste.
We’ve been hustled before — the Bush pre-rebate, the TARP, and now this!
And, the ad offers a false choice — O versus L?
I’m with neither.
The Republican Party NOW, when it’s out of power wants to “brand” itself as the party of smaller gooferment again. Where were they for eight years? We have the TSA, deficits, and out of control spending. All caused by a President who wouldn’t veto anything.
And, O wants to remake America on the basis of he “won” an election. Hey, guess what, more folks didn’t vote than voted. So you were elected by 28% to 24%. That should tell you that your plurality is very small.
More than half the Americans know they are getting screwed no matter which “side” won.
Not that there is much difference between EITHER “side”!
In this case, I am against the “gooferment enlargement” package.
You want to restart the economy. Shrink gooferment — Nuke the TSA, Kill whole gooferment department and agencies, stop the psuedo drug war, pardon all non-violent drug offenders, and return to normal. Cut the corporate tax to ZERO forever. It’s a sham; only real people pay taxes. Corporate taxes hide how much the gooferment is stealing from us.
Argh!
# # # # #
Leave a Comment » | Ranting | Tagged: Bailouts, Corporate Tax, economic freedom, Economics, Gooferment, Gouging, Income Tax, limited government, Obama, POTUS, POTUS08, Propaganda, Revolt, Tax Revolt | Permalink
Posted by reinkefj
Reinke Faces Life 
You must be logged in to post a comment.