PHILOSOPHY: I’m an injieeer; not a heavy thinker

Thursday, August 14, 2025

https://bigthink.com/thinking/the-thought-experiments-that-test-your-life-not-your-logic/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=weeklynewsletter

Thinking — August 5, 2025

The thought experiments that test your life, not your logic

Why some of philosophy’s strangest scenarios are more than mental games.

A group of people in ancient attire react to shadows cast on a wall, referencing Plato’s Allegory of the Cave.

Key Takeaways

  • Philosophical thought experiments aim to test, stretch, or even shatter our intuitions about how the world works.
  • Some reveal cracks in arguments. Others ask for more than analysis — they press us to confront existence, question identity, and reevaluate what we live for.
  • Here, philosopher Shai Tubali explores three distinct types of thought experiments, including ones that can reshape how you live life. 

Shai Tubali

*** begin quote ***

A lone figure stands at the edge of the Universe and hurls a spear into the unknown, only to find the edge wasn’t an edge after all. A demon tells a chronically ill person that every moment of their life — every high, every hardship — will repeat forever, exactly as it is. A 16-year-old boy tries to travel alongside a beam of light, hoping to catch up, but no matter how fast he goes, it never slows. Someone is offered the chance to live in a simulated paradise, but there’s a catch: Once inside, they’ll forget it isn’t real. And a human falls in love with a consciousness that has no body, no boundaries, and no need for them.

*** end quote ***

What captured my eye was in the email:

*** begin quote ***

with Stephen Johnson • Thu 7 August, 2025

Hey Big Thinkers,

“Which do you prefer?” my fiancée asked me, pointing to wedding flowers in two vases, each one thoughtfully holding the flowers in a unique arrangement. Or so I was told. To my eye, they looked the same. In that moment of indecision, I became Buridan’s ass — the dim donkey in an old philosophical thought experiment stuck between two equidistant and identical piles of hay. With no reason to choose one over the other, the donkey starves.

Buridan’s ass is meant to satirically highlight the limits of rational determinism, the idea that we always choose based on the strongest reason. In real life, you don’t wither away in analysis paralysis; you just pick something. “The left one,” I said.

Thought experiments can refine and poke holes in your arguments and intuitions. But some go much further. As philosopher Shai Tubali writes this week, one particular kind of thought experiment can transform you by challenging not your logic but the way you choose (or don’t choose) to live life.

*** end quote ***

I’d never heard of “Buridan’s ass” (i.e., the donkey starves between two equidistant and identical piles of hay).  To a fat old white guy injineer, it obvious!  You just flip a mental coin and who cares if it’s heads or tails.  

The article goes on to itemize a whole lot of philosophical thought experiments.  Some I’d heard of; some not.

  • Lucretius’ spear flung at the edge of the Universe 
  • Nietzsche’s vision of eternal recurrence
  • Einstein’s attempt to chase a beam of light
  • Robert Nozick’s 1974 Experience Machine.
  • Spike Jonze’s Her a bodiless mind.
  • Zeno’s paradox of a race between Achilles and a tortoise
  • Einstein’s elevator and train
  • Schrödinger’s cat
  • Heisenberg’s microscope
  • Plato’s cave
  • Wittgenstein’s beetle
  • Foot’s trolley problem
  • Putnam’s brain in a vat
  • Searle’s Chinese room
  • Avicenna’s flying man 
  • Thomas Nagel’s “food for other species”
  • Williams’s Makropulos’ living for 300 years

He categorizes these into: Clarifiers, Shifters, and Transformers.

The final quote is epic:

Thought experiments can walk alongside us, animating our inner lives. They aren’t merely tools of reason — they are instruments of reflection. At their best, they revive philosophy’s oldest purpose: not thinking for its own sake, but thinking that informs how we live.

This article gave me a lot to investigate. 

— 30 —


INTERESTING: Will this change how crime scenes are investigated?

Sunday, May 21, 2023

https://theconversation.com/you-shed-dna-everywhere-you-go-trace-samples-in-the-water-sand-and-air-are-enough-to-identify-who-you-are-raising-ethical-questions-about-privacy-205557?utm_source=join1440&utm_medium=email&utm_placement=newsletter

You shed DNA everywhere you go – trace samples in the water, sand and air are enough to identify who you are, raising ethical questions about privacy
Published: May 15, 2023 11.01am EDT
Jenny Whilde  — Adjunct Research Scientist in Marine Bioscience, University of Florida
Jessica Alice Farrell  —  Postdoctoral associate, University of Florida

*** begin quote ***

Ethical implications of collecting human eDNA

Our team dubs inadvertent retrieval of human DNA from environmental samples “human genetic bycatch.” We’re calling for deeper discussion about how to ethically handle human environmental DNA.

Human eDNA could present significant advances to research in fields as diverse as conservation, epidemiology, forensics and farming. If handled correctly, human eDNA could help archaeologists track down undiscovered ancient human settlements, allow biologists to monitor cancer mutations in a given population or provide law enforcement agencies useful forensic information.

However, there are also myriad ethical implications relating to the inadvertent or deliberate collection and analysis of human genetic bycatch. Identifiable information can be extracted from eDNA, and accessing this level of detail about individuals or populations comes with responsibilities relating to consent and confidentiality.

*** end quote ***

Some one I know LOVES “crime” shows.  Often, DNA can “hang” a crime on a criminal several decades after the event.  Recently, we have been seeing some “solved” by “forensic genealogy”.  The DNA from a crime scene can be linked to a family and, by diligent police work, the criminal is identified, tried, and convicted.

Some SciFi shows have said that forensic evidence can be tampered with  — even DNA.

Now with this article, maybe the air, dirt, or whatever at a crime scene can be captured and cataloged.

One of the crime shows had the police trailing a suspect to get his DNA from a discarded cigarette butt or a water bottle.  Maybe now, just test the air in the interrogation room might be all that is needed.

Shades of 1984.

—30—


[Josh Blackman] The Houston Astros Cheating Scandal and Legal Education

Thursday, January 16, 2020

Mike Barry , the Dean of the South Texas College of Law, sent an insightful message to the students and faculty concerning the Houston Astros cheating scandal . With his permission, I reproduce it here. — I long have been a fan of baseball.

Source: [Josh Blackman] The Houston Astros Cheating Scandal and Legal Education

*** begin quote ***

First, culture starts at the top. Many of you will run your own law firms. Others will rise to prominent positions in government, the judiciary, business, and the legal community. And, regardless of the role you find yourself in, you will be a leader for, at the very least, your clients and your staff. You will set the tone for those who work for you and who work with you.

*** and ***

If the manager – their on-field leader – had told the players to stop, they would have done so.  When you are a leader, your action – or your inaction – speaks volumes.  What you tolerate, you teach.  What you condone, you own.  Every leader must set not only a culture of ethical conduct, but must identify and eliminate behavior that deviates from that standard.

*** end quote ***

A wise admonition to all Information Technology executive, especially those in Information Security and Disaster Recovery.

I’ve worked in and gotten “downsized” for expressing a factual opinion that the top leadership was being mislead as to the organization’s capabilities — to resist being hacked, the capabilities / capacities of new systems, as well as the organization’s ability to recover from a catastrophic failure.

Sure, being downsized stung.  But I went to Catholic school, where I was taught a standard — would your Mother be proud of you for what you’ve done.

In my book, I observed that “Catholic school taught them that it was their obligation, and could even be a mortal sin, if you didn’t use all your talents to the greater glory of God.” — “Chapter Fifty — Samaritans going to Jericho / Monday November 5, 1962 – Church Day + 17 (continues)” CHURCH 10●19●62 Volume 1 Page 296

Can’t say I’ve always met that standard, but I’d like to think, that more often than not, I did.

It seems that we’d have a much better world if politicians, bureaucrats, and everyone observed that.  John Wooden said: “The true test of a man’s character is what he does when no one is watching.”

— 30 —