GOVEROTRAGEOUS: No Gooferment bailouts for any failing corporation.

Saturday, May 2, 2026

https://nypost.com/2026/04/24/opinion/spirit-airlines-deal-threatens-another-bailout-boondoggle/

Spirit Airlines deal threatens yet another bailout boondoggle
By Stephen Moore
Published April 24, 2026, 5:13 p.m. ET

*** begin quote ***

It’s a strange conundrum: If a company gets too big and successful and dares earn too much money, the US government accuses it of being an evil monopoly and tries to break it up.

And if it loses too much money, the government swoops in and bails it out with taxpayer dollars — as we’ve seen multiple times now, from banking to the auto industry.

Rewarding failure and punishing success isn’t a very smart economic game plan.

In the latest chapter of this saga, the federal government is reportedly about to provide a half-billion-dollar taxpayer bailout to Spirit Airlines.

Aren’t you excited to learn you may become a shareholder?

*** and ***

And the politicians have a long and inglorious history of picking losers.

Think of the hundreds of millions of dollars lost under President Barack Obama’s so-called stimulus, when the government turned itself into a venture capital fund and “invested” in companies like Solyndra and Fisker Auto — celebrated solar panel and electric car manufacturers that went bust after huge infusions of tax dollars.

How many times have we been told that Amtrak and the US Postal Service are about to become profitable?

*** end quote ***

The Gooferment —  at any level — as well as any politicians and bureaucrats should not be favoring any corporation or people with “investments” from the Taxpayers’ pocket.

I still remember how upset my sainted wife was when the Gooferment bailed out GM and the bond holders got screwed.   I also remember when my favorite tax accountant got screwed when Bear Sterns was allowed to go bust but AIG was bailed out.  And remember when the Gooferment was to bail out individual mortgagees that suddenly became bailouts for the Big Banks — who promptly gave big bonuses to high-earning employees, CxOs, and directors. Sigh!  

The beauty of “capitalism” is that “the invisible hand of the marketplace” rewards those who satisfy the consumers’ needs making a profit and applies discipline to those that don’t.  All without a single Gooferment bureaucrat!

When Gooferment seeks to frustrate the marketplace: (1) it doesn’t work since it doesn’t change the leadership, management, and workers behavior that got them into unprofitability in the first place; (2) the taxpayers become the deep pockets for further losses; and (3) continues the immorality of Gooferment theft and “training’ “We, The Sheeple” that the Gooferment knows what’s best for “us”!

Bottom line: No Gooferment bailouts for any failing corporation.

Argh!

— 30 —


GOVERNACIDE: Politicians ribbon-cutting opportunities cost people’s lives and Taxpayers’ wealth

Tuesday, January 2, 2018

https://www.cato.org/blog/questions-ask-about-amtrak-501

DECEMBER 20, 2017 9:21AM
Questions to Ask About Amtrak 501
By RANDAL O’TOOLE

*** begin quote ***

The wreck of the 501–the Amtrak train that crashed near Seattle on Monday–is raising lots of questions about Amtrak operations, but they aren’t always the right ones. Here are some questions that should be asked and some of my preliminary answers. Answers from Amtrak (the operator), FRA (the funder), Sound Transit (the track owner), or WSDOT (the train owner) may differ.

*** and ***

2. Around 800 people die in railroad accidents a year. PTC would prevent only about 1 percent of these fatalities; far more would be saved by spending the same amount of money on better grade crossings and fencing of rail rights of way. Why do we put so much emphasis on an expensive technology that will do so little?

Answer: Accidents that PTC could have prevented tend to be more spectacular than people getting killed when a train hits their car at a grade crossing. This suggests that, when politicians decide where private businesses spend their money, it’ll get spent on grandiose programs rather than things that could really make a difference.

*** and ***

5. Why do so many reporters call this a high-speed train? The top speed between Portland and Seattle is 79 mph, the same as it has always been and the same as most other Amtrak routes. In technical terms, this was a conventional, low-speed train.

Answer: Though this was a low-speed train, it was funded by Obama’s high-speed rail fund. By repeatedly using the term “high-speed trains,” reporters are keeping that idea in the public consciousness, perhaps in the hopes that Trump’s infrastructure plan will include money for more such trains. (This could backfire, however, by making people think that high-speed trains are more dangerous. They aren’t–but they are a lot more expensive.)

*** and ***

Question: So are all trains obsolete?

Answer: No, only passenger trains are obsolete. Freight trains are extremely productive, and America has the finest, most advanced rail system in the world. That’s because it is mostly private and operates to produce profits, not to give politicians ribbon-cutting opportunities.

*** end quote ***

So the answer is that politicians and bureaucrats, their egos, cause the waste of Taxpayers’ wealth on their egos.

Argh!

Happy New Year; new year same as the old year.

# – # – # – # – # 


GOVEROTRAGEOUS: Isn’t “price-gouging” satisfying the neediest?

Friday, July 31, 2015

http://www.foxnews.com/travel/2015/07/24/feds-open-probe-into-whether-airline-price-increased-in-wake-amtrak-crash/?intcmp=hplnws

AIRLINES
Feds probe possible price-gouging in wake of Amtrak crash
Published July 24, 2015FoxNews.com

*** begin quote ***

Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said Friday the government has opened a price-gouging investigation involving five airlines that allegedly raised airfares in the Northeast after a deadly Amtrak crash in Philadelphia in May disrupted rail service.

The Transportation Department released letters to five airlines — Delta, American, United, Southwest and JetBlue — seeking information on Friday.

“The idea that any business would seek to take advantage of stranded rail passengers in the wake of such a tragic event is unacceptable,” Foxx said.

DOT is exploring whether the price hikes violated federal regulations prohibiting airlines from engaging in unfair and deceptive practices and asked the airlines provide information of pricing and seat availability for a time period before and after the crash.

*** end quote ***

The Gooferment’s “price-gouging” is the free market allocating scarce resources to those who need it the most.

If the price is artificially low versus the demand, then there are shortages, queues, and rationing.

If the price is unacceptably high, then the consumer will seek alternatives — driving for one thing, the bus for another, or delay / change / cancel your trip. Perhaps even carpool. 

The free market will allocate based on price to the “neediest”.

That’s the “fairest” way to handle any allocation of a scarce resource; not with a Gooferment investigation.

And, doesn’t Amtrak belong to the Gooferment!

Argh!

Perhaps they are trying to distract us from their immoral, ineffective, and inefficient “running of a railroad” to the evil private airlines.

Argh squared!

# – # – # – # – #