POLITICAL: Thomas Sowell overlooked Ron Paul

Thursday, December 27, 2007

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MDllMTU2YmMxNjg2YzM4ZDQ3MDk5ZTNlNTcyMmE1MTU=

Unpromising Times
Primary elections and secondary candidates.
By Thomas Sowell

*** begin quote ***

Apparently there is nobody among either the Democrats or the Republicans who is going to cause a runaway stampede like that which toppled all the Republican front-runners in 1940, when the convention delegates began loudly chanting “We want Wilkie!”

*** end quote ***

Guess Tom — who is my second favorite ekknonnymist after Walter Williams — overlooked Ron Paul.

Tsk, tsk.

There was no way to interact with the author or the site to call attention to their oversight. No email address. No comment section. No social network.

But what does one expect from a dead tree venue attempting to make the leap to the net?

Tom, I expected better from you.

# # # # #


LIBERTY: Thinking about cleaning stables?

Thursday, December 27, 2007

FROM AN EMAIL TO THE RON PAUL CAMPAIGN

***Begin Quote***

In the spirit of public service, I’d like to suggest that Doctor Paul begin to assemble a list of “dollar a year” men in various fields. I have always been impressed when people serve The People without expectation of glory or gold. To take apart washington in a sensible, meaningful, and timely manner, he’ll need all sorts of people with the appropriate credentials and philosophically aligned with his principles. As a donor, I’ve put my money where my mouth is. As an IT professional and an Internet savvy executive, I’d like to put my name on that list. I’m near retirement so I’d have no greater pleasure that ending my career by helping to clean up the mess. Even if it only paid a dollar a year! Put up a web page and let people organize it for you.

***End Quote***

I’m dead serious. It’s going to be a hard job cleaning that “stable”. What better way to do it than with “stable boys” who will do it for free!

# # # # #


RANT: The “Fair Tax” debate distracts us from our problems!

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

FROM MY FAVORITE LUDDITE’S COMMENT ABOUT THE FAIR TAX

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119863013677849835.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries

COMMENTARY
FairTax Facts
By LEO LINBECK
December 26, 2007; Page A10

*** begin quote ***

Much has been written lately about the FairTax, the proposal to replace the current federal income tax with a national retail sales tax. Unfortunately, much of it is wrong.

This country needs a spirited and wide-ranging debate about fundamental tax reform. But that debate is not advanced by misimpressions and distortions of the FairTax.

*** end quote ***

Let’s take on a few points.

>What emerged from this research is that a national retail sales tax
> is a preferred method of taxation
> among most Americans surveyed.

Sorry, but no one asked me! This ASSUMES that there is a moral basis for FORCING people to pay a “tax”. It’s theft. Pure and simple.

>Another is that the tax would have significant benefits for the nation’s economy.

It’s just a different way of robbing people.

>Why? Because it eliminates income taxes and payroll taxes (for Social Security and Medicare)

Does it “eliminate” them?

Assume for a minute that we overlook the moral argument about theft!

Unless the repeal of the Sixteenth precedes the implantation of the “Fair Tax”, you can rest assured that we will have every manner of taxation available.

>the FairTax would eliminate the distorting effect that
>income and payroll taxes have on the economy.

It would create it’s own set of unintended consequences.

For example, I have already been “taxed” and “inflated” on my “savings and investments”. Now, I get taxed again when I spend this money. What happens when I die? I get taxed again. :-)

>Research on the price of consumer goods reveals that up to 20% of all
>prices today represent hidden income
>taxes and payroll taxes. Once these taxes are repealed and replaced
> with the FairTax, it is likely that market
>pressure would force retail prices to fall.

All this does is rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic.

>Eliminating embedded taxes will also do something else —
> it will remove significant price disadvantages

In your dreams.

>Another benefit of the FairTax is that, unlike other sales taxes, it would not hit the poorest Americans the
>hardest. The FairTax proposal calls for sending every American a “prebate” check to offset the cost of the

So like Social Security, we will now put EVERY American on the dole.

>The FairTax rate is 23% on retail sales when calculated “inclusively,” as are income tax rates.

The tax is buried in the price of the goods being sold. Let’s at least have the stones to have it printed on the grocery receipt.

>It will, in a fairer, more transparent and less-expensive way, raise the same amount of money the federal >government now collects through the income and payroll taxes.

But, the biggest tax is inflation and it doesn’t do anything about that.

>Significantly, the FairTax eliminates all loopholes, gimmicks, exemptions and deductions from the federal tax

Yeah, right, how long will that last?

>Politically, the FairTax will only become law once enough citizens demand that it be enacted

Since when does it matter what the citizens demand. The gang in Washington is in power, regardless of which of the duopoly is the titular head, based on the voting minority. It’s a waste of time to “demand” anything.

>It is debatable whether a modern, citizen-led tax revolution is possible.

Carla Howell is leading a Income tax repeal referendum in Taxzachussetts.

>But the growing popularity (even among presidential candidates) of the FairTax suggests that

They see that they can keep the scam going and get more people to buy into the delusion that it does anything at all to CUT SPENDING!

>another Boston Tea Party may be at hand.

One can only hope.

The American Experiment ended with the War of Northern Aggression in the 1860’s. That started as a tax fight. And, the USA has been in a downward spiral ever since. Like plane heading to the ground nose first, it may well be too late to pull out. (I hope not.)

The problem I have with the whole Fair Tax movement is that it distracts us from the real problems:

0. Honest money (i.e., the banking cartel’s “federal reserve” is inflating us into poverty);

1. The dole (The non-productive people are voting themselves benefits paid for by the productive people!);

2. The gooferment public education system is brainwashing all the future voters into the gooferments paradigms (when the nazis and the communists did it we were horrified; when our own gooferment does it, that’s fine.)

3. The gooferment is imprisoning us (i.e., the “war” on drugs – poverty – smoking) and killing those who resist (Ruby Ridge – Waco);

4. We can’t afford to be the “world’s policeman” (i.e.,Repatriate the troops home);

5. We can’t afford ANY and ALL gooferments with their unintended consequences.

It’ll be the biggest crash in the history of mankind.

# # # # #


LINKEDIN: that circle-R next to the LinkedIn logo

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

http://www.trademork.com/in

12.27.07 | No Comments

On December 11, 2007, business networking company LinkedIn Corporation filed to protect the trademark in in relation to their popular business networking website.

*** begin quote ***

So, you thought that circle-R next to the LinkedIn logo was only for the whole name. Well, now it appears it applies to just the “in” part. The abbreviated LinkedIn logo (seen in the above link) is now showing up on sites across the web, including that of a prominent Presidential candidate (scroll down), and on LinkedIn’s own merchandise. Makes sense. With one little word and a cute Web 2.0 logo, everyone in the world can see that you’re “in” the club, “in” the know…and just plain “in”.

*** end quote ***

Argh!

LinkedIn groups are basically under the bulls eye.

Trust no one! Ever.

# # # # #


RANT: The Big Boondoggle!

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2007/12/the_big_dig_is_done.html

December 26, 2007
“The Big Dig” is Done
Rick Moran

*** begin quote ***

Officially launched in 1987 with an estimated budget of $2.8 billion, the project’s costs ballooned over the years, reaching a depressing $14.6 billion by the time it was complete. Wikpedia details some of the problems over the years with the project:

The Big Dig has been the most expensive highway project in the U.S.[6] Although the project was estimated at $2.8 billion in 1985 (in 1982 dollars), over $14.6 billion had been spent in federal and state tax dollars as of 2006.[7] The project has incurred criminal arrests[8][9], escalating costs, death, leaks, and charges of poor execution and use of substandard materials. The Massachusetts Attorney General is demanding contractors refund taxpayers $108 million for “shoddy work.” [10]

Just last year, a motorist died when some concrete panels collapsed. Inspections revealed substandard construction – a charge that plagued the project almost from the beginning.

The federal contribution to the project? $8.55 billion. Your tax dollars at work.

*** end quote ***

What can one say?

No surprise. No one — politician or bureaucrat — gets any adverse impact. No one pays for it but the taxpayer.

Poor stupid taxpayer!

# # # # #


POLITICAL: animals are not allowed into establishments where food and drink are served

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

http://consumerist.com/336992/which-do-you-prefer-one-cat-or-a-thousand-rats

*** begin quote ***

The New York Department of Health And Mental Hygiene objects to deli owners keeping cats around to deter rats on the grounds that animals are not allowed into establishments where food and drink are served. That’s all well and good, judging by certain infamous news clips (above), but we’re pretty sure that a few well-tended cats prowling around is more hygienic than the alternative.

*** end quote ***

Laws don’t do SQWAT!

There are “animals” (i.e., rats) around food establishments. If we have to have “animals”, I’d prefer cats!

I remember in my youth stores of all types (i.e., deli; fish; bodegas; bakeries) where cats were common place. I really never thought about why, but it’s obvious now.

Sometimes, simple solutions are the best.

Maybe the poor guy being fined can claim it’s his seeing eye cat?

# # # # #


TECH SERVICE: GReader sharing flap!

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

http://slashdot.org/~Felipe+Hoffa/journal/191246

http://groups.google.com/group/google-reader-howdoi/msg/876a2302bc71b433

GReader sharing flap!

***Begin Quote***

Message from discussion New Feature: Sharing with Friends
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful

AnnaB
View profile
More options Dec 22, 8:03 pm
From: AnnaB
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 17:03:45 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Dec 22 2007 8:03 pm
Subject: Re: New Feature: Sharing with Friends
Reply | Forward | Print | View thread | Report this message | Find messages by this author
This is going to sound like hyperbole, but this new feature has
actually RUINED CHRISTMAS for my family! I sent a share a few days ago
that I thought would only go to a few politically-like-minded friends.
I didn’t realize that because I had chatted with him in GChat, it
would also go to my brother, who is of a different political
persuasion. When he received it, he sent a snide, angry email about it
to a large group of our family members. I sent him an email (I’ll
admit, not the nicest one I’ve ever sent) asking him not to talk about
me behind my back and recommending that he stop reading my feed if the
posts were going to make him so angry. He called me a nasty name and
told me that if I can’t take a little ribbing, maybe we shouldn’t talk
anymore at all, including at Christmas Eve dinner. My whole family has
taken sides over this divisive political issue, and several of them
are not speaking. I kid you not, this is threatening to break up my
family at Christmas.

***End Quote***

In case you missed the latest GREADER “feature”, that’s what you get with web-based software — no change control; no feature control; AND it may happen without you even being aware of it.

Sigh!

# # # # #


INTERESTING: “GOTTADIGG” (ron paul) by

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

Gotta Digg

A two minute video that is exceptionally cute. These young ladies were inspiring with the novel message.

–

She’s trying to get to the Super Bowl as talent

http://www.twoweeksforkina.com/Two_Weeks_For_Kina/Welcome.html


TECH WEBSITE: strictly no photography

Tuesday, December 25, 2007

http://www.strictlynophotography.com/about.php

strictly no photography

***Begin Quote***

About us

Strictly no photography is a photo-sharing site for photographs taken where you are not allowed to take them. From the inside of the Kremlin to Kensington palace, from art galleries to war zones. Here you can see everything you’ve ever wanted to see that you’re not supposed to. There are pictures that range from the ordinary to the profound. Whatever the content or the quality though we think that each one stands as a little piece of art in itself, as a little expression of personal liberty.
Our mission

To organize the world’s forbidden visual information and make it universally accessible and useful.
Contact

Our friendly team are always ready and willing to answer any questions you might have. You can contact us here.
The magic

What you can capture in the shot that’s not allowed is unique. It can be in the surreptitious nature of it’s blur taken at speed or on the move with a long exposure. It can be in the crooked framing, taken on the skew shot from the hip or over an onlooker’s shoulder. Shoot first then aim. Intriguing things seem to happen without the overriding intervention of the logical mind. The best shots are the ones loaded with the kind of flair and spontaneity that might never have been caught if you had thought too hard about it, if you’d had longer, if you were allowed. Oh, and remember to turn off the flash.

***End Quote***

Maybe it’s my self image as a James Dean rebel coming out!

(Don’t you think I look a little like him?)

I remember seeing such a sign on the Goethals Bridge here in the Pepuls Republik of Nu Jerzee. And, I thought “where do the get off making such a diktat”.

Push back. Snap a pic and send it it.

Viva la revolution!

# # # # #


RANT: The Fair Tax ain’t fair

Tuesday, December 25, 2007

http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2007/12/end_the_irs_get_the_fairtax_an.php

End the IRS: Get the FairTax and Get Your Whole Paycheck
December 24, 2007 | By Jack Yoest

*** begin quote ***

Mike Huckabee, “is the change agent the nation most needs.” From The Dallas Morning News endorsement from delegate rich Texas.

FairTax An example of this change Huckabee advocates is ending, eliminating, closing down a government agency: the Internal Revenue Service. The beloved IRS.

Kyle Hamilton is blogging on the FairTax on mymanmitt, founded by my good friend Justin Hart. They are skeptical of real tax change. Our competitors supporting Romney do not believe that real change is possible, or maybe not necessary.

*** end quote ***

Sorry, but you’ve been duped. The Fair Tax ain’t fair. In a short comment it’s not possible to go into all the rationale for this statement, but lets just hit two points.

(1) Unless the Sixteenth Amendment is repealed prior to the implementation of the Fair Tax [and not the wimpy Congress passed law that promises to repeal it], you can be assured that we will have both the National Sales Tax / Fair Tax AND the income tax. We’ve been fooled many times — income tax only for the rich, social security will never taxable, IRAs never had RMDs at first, and many other “camels” that have stuck their nose in — why would you trust the politicians now?

(2) Taxation in any form is THEFT. By what moral authority does the majority impose this “theft”? If a tax isn’t truly voluntary, then it is coerced. This is supposed to be the “land of the free”. What a joke!

No, sorry, we are on the “road to serfdom”. The sheep are being enslaved by degrees. Our revolutionary “fore fathers” would be ashamed at what we have let happen to the American Experiment.

Sorry, but only Ron Paul is pointing the way out of this mess. You can nuke the IRS by cutting spending back to Clinton era numbers.

Without a fundamental revolution, the Fair Tax does NOTHING for the largest tax we pay — the Inflation Tax.

The Fair Tax is at best a flawed distraction — lipstick on one ugly pig — to take our eye off the ball.

Sorry, but I respectfully disagree.

# – # – #

Ahh, the Socialists are in full bloom. Trying to steal Ron Paul’s thunder — end the IRS — while maintaining the status quo.

The empty suits of both parties are just that “empty suits” who want to keep the current system going along.

If you don’t solve the problem of “honest money”, nothing else matters. If you don’t solve the problem of “Congressional spending”, nothing else matters. If you don’t solve the problem of “unfunded entitlements”, nothing else matters.

If Ron Paul doesn’t get the nod, then we are in the run away elevator to the bottom. Right next to the Roman Empire. And, all the broken dreams of freedom.

# # # # #