TINFOILHAT: BHO44’s SSN has an explanation; how true?

Monday, July 25, 2011

FROM LUDDITE

*** begin quote ***

From: Rose M
Subject: The Plot Thickens….
To: “Rose M”
Date: Monday, July 25, 2011, 4:39 PM

An intensive investigation has revealed the identity of the man whose Social Security number (SSN) is being used by President Obama: Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in France in 1890, emigrated to the United States in 1924, and was assigned SSN 042-68-4425 (Obama’s current SSN) in or about March 1977.

Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut . Because of that, his SSN begins with the digits 042, which are among only a select few reserved for Connecticut residents.

Obama never lived or worked in that state! Therefore, there is no reason on earth for his SSN to start with the digits 042. None whatsoever!

Now comes the best part! Ludwig spent the final months of his life in Hawaii, where he died.

Conveniently, Obama’s grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, worked part-time in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse, and therefore had access to the SSNs of deceased individuals.

The Social Security Administration was never informed of Ludwig’s death, and because he never received Social Security benefits there were no benefits to stop and therefore, no questions were ever raised.

The suspicion, of course, is that Dunham, knowing her grandson was not a U.S. citizen, either because he was born in Kenya or became a citizen of Indonesia upon his adoption by Lolo Soetoro simply scoured the probate records until she found someone who died who was not receiving Social Security benefits, and selected Mr. Ludwigs Connecticut SSN for Obama.

Just wait until Trump gets past the birth certificate and onto the issue of Barry O’s use of a stolen SSN. You will see leftist heads exploding, because they will have no way of defending Obama.

Although many Americans do not understand the meaning of the term “natural born” there are few who do not understand that if you are using someone else’s SSN it is a clear indication of fraud.

Let’s all start getting the word out to everybody on our mailing lists.

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/05/plot-thickens-debt-collector-obamas.html

*** end quote ***

Interesting?

# # # # #


TINFOILHAT: Eleven 9/11 Questions

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/07/11/eleven-911-questions-which-still-demand-answers

Eleven 9/11 Questions Which Still Demand Answers
by Allen L Roland

*** begin quote ***

Warburton than makes his point ~ Crystallizing this down to a few basic principles of criminal and investigative journalism you at the BBC have failed as a fact to ask these basic questions about 9/11;

  1. Where is the film footage of the Boeing striking the Pentagon?
  2. Why haven’t your journalists asked the US authorities to see it? Why is it secret?
  3. Why haven’t you interviewed people like April Gallop who stepped through that Pentagon hole after the attack and said there was no plane there?
  4. Why haven’t you interviewed firefighters who heard explosions in the Twin Towers?
  5. Why haven’t you been able to show substantial wreckage (or photos of) from the Shanksville site?
  6. Why do you only interview explosives experts that back the official version ?
  7. Why don’t you speak to any pilots from pilots for 9/11truth ?
  8. Why don’t you speak to victim’s family members who still demand an independent investigation?
  9. Why are 5 of the alleged hijackers alive and well according to your own news reporting ? Who then did hijack the planes?
  10. Why aren’t you seeking written scientific evidence to rebut the compelling Thermite explosion claims of the teams of Richard Gage and Niels Harrit?
  11. Why are your programs “conspiracy files” on 9/11 so overtly biased as to not withstand scrutiny as fair and objective ~ and why don’t they address any of the above issues ?

*** and ***

“There was a dearth of visible debris on the relatively unmarked [Pentagon] lawn, where I stood only minutes after the impact. Beyond this strange absence of airliner debris, there was no sign of the kind of damage to the Pentagon structure one would expect from the impact of a large airliner. This visible evidence or lack thereof may also have been apparent to the secretary of defense [Donald Rumsfeld], who in an unfortunate slip of the tongue referred to the aircraft that slammed into the Pentagon as a “missile” … Lt. Col. Karen U. Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former Political-Military Affairs Officer in the Office of the Secretary of Defense. Also served on the staff of the Director of the National Security Agency.

*** end quote ***

I have no answer for the unthinkable.

Anyone remember Operation Northwoods?

# # # # #


TINFOILHAT: CERTIFIGATE

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

CERTIFIGATE

Deception evidence reaches Oval Office?

Analysis says everything president, lawyers said ‘was carefully orchestrated and scripted’

Posted: July 11, 2011

By Bob Unruh

*** begin quote ***

In an allegation that pushes the dispute over Barack Obama’s presidential eligibility to a new level, an affidavit prepared to accompany a criminal complaint over the “Certificate of Live Birth” released April 27 suggests there was a plan to mislead the American public, and it went as high as the Oval Office.

“What I believe you are looking at is a classic example of an attempt at plausible deniability,” wrote Doug Vogt, who has filed a criminal complaint that charges Obama’s birth record is forged.

Vogt, who describes himself as an expert in documents, typesetting, imaging, scanners and document imaging programs and has owned Archive Index Systems since 1993, referenced the widely broadcast White House event when officials, including then-White House Counsel Robert Bauer and Obama’s communications director Daniel Pfeiffer, released the purported Hawaiian “Certificate of Live Birth.”

*** end quote ***

As usual, the cover up is what kills you.

There are an awful lot of people who should be testifying under oath in front a Grand Jury.

And, as before, it all comes down to the question: “Why?”

Followed immediately by “Who knew what? When?”

I’m convinced that “We, The Sheeple” have been defrauded, deceived, and manipulated.

Why?

# # # # #


TINFOILHAT: BHO44’s “Dreams”

Sunday, June 12, 2011

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=308781

4 curious errors in Obama’s ‘Dreams’

*** begin quote ***

Obama does not, however, make an unusual number of errors in regards to general knowledge. Let me cite the four such errors I found and explain why they deserve our attention.

Obama misquotes the Carl Sandburg poem “Chicago.” Instead of writing “Hog Butcher for the World,” he writes, “hog butcher to the world.”

In discussing radical anti-colonialist Frantz Fanon, Obama misspells his first name as “Franz.”

Obama refers to the South African city of Sharpeville, the site of a notorious massacre, as “Sharpsville.”

On another occasion, Obama misspells the name of rebel slave leader Denmark Vesey as “Denmark Vescey.”

*** end quote ***

While a pretty small TFH, it is important in my view.

We know that JFK didn’t write Profiles. And, it’s pretty obvious, that BHO44 didn’t write Dreams.

It’s interesting to peer into the souls of the plagiarizer and plagiarizee.

Why would you trust anyone who does that or cooperates in such?

# # # # #


TINFOILHAT: BOR tries to explain BHO44’s CT SSN

Friday, April 15, 2011

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=287253

O’Reilly falsely claims Conn. was residence for Obama Sr.

*** begin quote ***

In an attempt to explain why Barack Obama, who lived in Hawaii as a teen, has a Social Security number that indicates he had a Connecticut address, Fox News host Bill O’Reilly asserted the president’s father lived in the state.

But there is no evidence that Barack Obama Sr., who left Hawaii in 1962 to study at Harvard in Massachusetts and then returned to his home country of Kenya, ever lived in Connecticut.

*** end quote ***

I watch Bill O’Reilly regularly, and sometimes Glenn Beck.

BOR has been completely dismissive of the “birthers”. I agree that there is little “evidence” that BHO44 was born ANYWHERE.

Obviously, he was born SOMEWHERE. And, there is some assertions that REGARDLESS of where he was born, he’s not a “natural born citizen”. (That’s a term of art from the late 1700’s that is well defined in Blackstone’s but not in Federal Law.)

(That assertion cites the dual citizenship of BHO44’s purported father and the age of his purported mother. Or is it “alleged”?

Lately, I suspect everything. There’s a good reason for the Rules of Evidence. As opposed to the Rules of Engagement.

Anyway, I saw Bill making his argument. And, just from my casual knowledge of the assertions, I KNOW he’s wrong about the CT SSN. I think his EGO has tripped him up here.

And, expect that eventually there’s going to be a lot of “egg on face” for a lot of reporters, investigators, and pundits.

As Trump says, (and I’m no Trump fan), “He may have pulled off the scam of the century.”

Argh!

# – # – # – # – #


TINFOILHAT: Milk is a “chemistry experiment”?

Thursday, April 7, 2011

http://www.thesurvivalistblog.net/survival-food/milk-and-cancer/

The Truth Behind Milk by M.D. CREEKMORE on THURSDAY, MARCH 24, 2011

*** begin quote ***

Doesn’t anyone ever wonder why Europe won’t drink our milk? Or better yet, doesn’t anyone ever wonder why it’s okay for Americans to drink it when it’s banned in most European countries, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand? Apparently it’s because these other countries’ governments are not into lying to their citizens as much as the American government is. The reason Europe won’t drink our milk—or eat our cheese—is because our milk contains rBGH, recombinant bovine growth hormone.

*** end quote ***

And Monsanto and FDA prevent milk from being labeled.

# # # # #


TINFOILHAT: Obama’s papers?

Thursday, March 10, 2011

Wed Mar 9, 1:35 pm ET

Barack Obama jokes about ‘birther’ debate

By Rachel Rose Hartman

# – # – #

He’s laughing at us now. But why has he spent millions to prevent any disclosure of his records? His college transcript for example.

Where there is smoke, there’s fire.

I’m a “proofer”; not a “birther”. I don’t know anything. Haven’t seen any evidence.

# # # # #


TINFOILHAT: WTC7 collapse

Sunday, February 27, 2011

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/02/19/michael-fullerton-scientific-theory-of-the-wtc-7-collapse/

February 19, 2011
Scientific Theory of the WTC 7 Collapse
By Michael Fullerton
Foreign Policy Journal

http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/02/14/a-scientific-theory-of-the-wtc-7-collapse/

*** begin quote ***

On September 11, 2001 a third building came down. This building was 7 World Trade Center (WTC 7), a 47-story building about the width and length of a football field. NIST, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, was tasked with officially explaining how WTC 7 fell. Their theory is documented in the report entitled Final Report of the Collapse of Building 7[1]. Many people are under the mistaken impression that NIST’s theory of how WTC 7 fell down is a valid scientific theory. In science however, a valid theory must be the simplest theory available that best explains all the available empirical data.[2] This article will show that the NIST theory is a highly convoluted theory that cannot explain important observations.

*** end quote ***

Any more, I don’t believe anyone.

If this is plausible, then following it to its logical conclusion is like a horror film. But this is real life.

# # # # #


TINFOILHAT: Huffington, an “opportunist”?

Thursday, February 10, 2011

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/08/AR2011020805179.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns

Arianna Huffington’s ideological transformation

By Dana Milbank

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

*** begin quote ***

This transformation should come as no surprise to anybody who has followed Huffington’s remarkable career. Greek-born and Cambridge-educated, she has always been on the move ideologically, from her early squabbles with feminism to her role as a minister with the new-age Movement for Spiritual Inner Awareness, from her membership in Newt Gingrich’s brain trust to her stint as populist activist – all before her greatest act, the Huffington Post.

I say this with admiration. Huffington deserves every one of those millions she’ll be paid by AOL for creating this online sensation.

*** end quote ***

Could, perhaps, she better be characterized as an “opportunist”?

Moving her “beliefs” to what sells “best”!

I remember listening to her when she was on the tube in the “conservative role”. She just didn’t ring true. As if she was working form talking points. (You can always tell a “true believer” they have their talking points engraved on their heart. I always attributed her stumbling on points to “English as a Second Language”. It really was I’m just peddling the pablum to a willing audience.

I find that distressing. This whole episode distressing. It’s like she’s an entertainer changing roles.

By definition, she has no credibility. When you hear her spout, she’s merely repeating someone else’s ideas. I’d rather hear from the originator. Newt, Walter Williams, Rick Santelli, Bill Cosby, even the late Daniel Patrick Moynihan. Give us the original thinkers speaking in their own voice. Not regurgitated <synonym for excrement>!

Given that AOL is a shadow of its former self, relying on surviving on the ignorance of old people to pay a monthly subscription, thay have to find a source of revenue that’s not dying.

Sorry to say, I think they just pumped more money down a rathole.

Due to a good pitch by a master saleswoman.

But they shouldn’t feel bad, Adam was sold an apple by the same type of gal!

# # # # #


TINFOILHAT: More BHO44 birth confusion

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=255297#ixzz1C14DWkEZ

BORN IN THE USA?
Questions raised over Obama birth date
Was claim he was 3 months old during ‘Bay of Pigs’ a slip?
Posted: January 24, 2011 8:56 pm Eastern
By Jerome R. Corsi

*** begin quote ***

The comment, by Obama himself at a 2009 international meeting, suggested he was born eight months earlier than when his official story has claimed all along.

Freudian slip, misstatement or the truth leaking out?

It was in April 19, 2009, at a press conference Obama gave at the Port of Spain in Trinidad and Tobago, Obama commented on a 90-minute diatribe that had been delivered by Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega at the meeting the day before, and Obama suggested he was born in January 1961, three months before the Bay of Pigs invasion.

*** end quote ***

Oh boy, things just got MORE interesting.

Wonder when his brithdate is?

And, I have a tin foil hat?

A birth certificate would put this all to rest.

Be nice to have proof!

# # # # #