TECHNOLOGY: PLAXO acts flakey tonight

Sunday, March 4, 2007

http://www.plaxo.com

I like Plaxo for it’s ability to sync my Outlook with their most current info.

One thing I do on Sunday nights is “collect” all my new LinkedIn contacts and put them into my Outlook. As part of that process, I check for their plaxo status. If they’re not in Plaxo, I send them an invite. Most times it’s ignored but about a quarter pick it up.

Tonight, Plaxo must be offline tonight. The plaxo invite mechanism did show up with every contact. I focused on the first contact as being the one with the flakeyest invitation mechanism.

Hopefully stuff will be better on the morrow. Sigh, I can break everything.


INTERESTING: Reworking the Police Profession

Sunday, March 4, 2007

Cutting out the “mickey mouse” by over enforcement?

read more | digg story

Interesting that a “private development” “owns” their own roads and the police are limited to what they can enforce.

May need a little tuning? But  a great idea. Like the roads and parking lots at Disneyland, there’s no reason why roads have to belong to the gooferment!

On a technical note: This is one of my first uses of the DIGG “blog about it” function. I’m not sure I like it, but I’ll try anything.

Your thoughts?


TECHNOLOGY: Dealing with blog comment spam

Sunday, March 4, 2007

Dear Word Press Support: I notice you’re closed again. Freeloader Ferd here with a possible suggestion. And need to catch it before I lose it. I notice that there are some invalid ips in the spam. Could that be used to snag them? Also the email address in messages seem to have a pattern and bounce where tried. Is there an email address look up function? Sort of like ping for email? At the very least the domain could be validated. Just thinking, fjohn a free user.

*** begin quote ***
Georgia | j9fvfolrd@freemail.com | IP: 202.171.135.2090
Nice site and fine content
*** end quote ***


TECHNOLOGY: DELL doesn’t wow me with their “fulfillment’!

Friday, March 2, 2007

DELL really annoyed me. I ordered a disk drive and the kit to make it a usb. And paid for it to be expressed.

DELL took the order together. Didn’t mention anything about a delay.

The next day when my stuff doesn’t arrive. I look into it.

Backorder on the drive?

It’s a standard XPS drive.

And, they just told me that they shipped the kit which is useless without the drive which may ship next Tuesday.

Argh!

When I get everything I am planning to clone the drive and reinstall XP from scratch.

Till then I’ll have to tolerate the XP lockups. Argh!

Argh!

Sigh.


XPfails – luggable – GADWIN PRINT SCREEN v3.5 – This is now the second most annoying problem

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Recap:

For some reason, after several months of use, now when I start GPS35, it doesn’t appear to “do” anything. It doesn’t splash. It takes memory. (I can see it in XP’s process list.) But, it just doesn’t do anything anymore. I’ve uniunstalled and reinstalled. Help?

Haven’t found any help. Need to dig deeper and harder.


XPfails – luggable – PLAXO acting differently

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

I was transferring my LinkedIn contact to my Outlook address book and Plaxo stopped check to to see if they were in Plaxo. Strange?

Update at 0930: plaxo has returned to operating as expected. Perhaps, their site was “down”. If not site, service? And, there’s no idication in the LookOut client that an add in is dead? Interesting that perhaps is the reason for all the non-responding stuff. 


TECHNOLOGY: Software, who owns what and how do you prove it and use it

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

I was thinking last night that the computer user is in a very weak position as opposed to the software makers.

Microsoft imposes all sorts of limitation on what I have bought and really wants me to rebuy what I already have.

There is the whole “installation” nonsense. Why does software have to be “installed”. Good software, by my definition, just runs. Copy it here, it runs. Copy it there, it runs. I like that “portable” movement.

Then, there is the who serial number, or product key, nonsense. So, I may have bout it, have the distribution media, but if I’ve lost the serial number or misplaced it, I’m dead.

Finally, there is the Activation monster. Activation, Windows Genuine Advantage, and such all conspire to make my life miserable. My personal desktop at home, TYNETOP, has been flag several times by these things. It’ sitting with a McAfee induced error in the registry which periodically offends the Microsoft Gods. I’ve had to call a few times to get it to “reactivate”. And don’t believe the barbara striesand about major changes. That pig hasn’t had any new lipstick for a long time.

So, I’m mad and have no way to discharge the madness, except by blogging about it.


TECHNOLOGY: Interesting Google problem

Monday, February 26, 2007

http://www.south-brunswick.blogspot.com/

Yesterday, I was trying to post on “the Blog of South Brunswick”. I couldn’t get Google to authenticate me. After too much tinkering, I realized that I had another GMail session open in another Firefox window. Closing that, allowed the signon to proceed and all worked fine. So, if you’re having trouble with Google authentication, look to what you’re signed on to in other windows.

p.s., I got my post in. That’s two.


RANT: Not a good day today!

Sunday, February 25, 2007

Arghhh! Maybe I’ll calm down and be able to blog about it.


TECHNOLOGY: Dealing with junk faxes

Sunday, February 25, 2007

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/
2007/02/23/BUGKCO9M0F1.DTL

*** Begin quote ***

Over the past few years, she estimates she’s received hundreds of junk faxes — each one costing her money by using up paper, ink and electricity. Weiss has tried repeatedly to opt out from receiving additional faxes.

*** end quote ***

Might I suggest either of two strategies to help the poor besieged fax receiver?

One, put a PC on the phone line and set it up to receive faxes. While it doesn’t prevent junk faxes (spam faxes might be called spaxes?), it would allow here to save paper and toner. For example, depending upon what software she was using, (I have a copy of WinFaxPro10 that I no longer use. She can have it. I moved to strategy #2), the PC would, give her a set of “files”, one each for transmission, that can be quickly “thumbed thru”. The good can be printed; the bad sent to the electronic bit bucket. Saves the paper and toner. Can dispose of the “trash” rather quickly. I even believe that it has “rules” that you can trigger from the ANI with the fax. (ANI is caller id in techie terms).

Two, she could use a service like eFax. Essentially it does the same thing, but she’d have to subscribe and change her number. (i think inbound is free?) It turns faxes into emails. The ANI is in the message subject line. Depending upon what email package she uses, again rules can send some of the junk to that bit bucket. Again, no wasted toner and paper,

If she was strapped for funds or not “into” computers , I’d use Strategy One. A technically literate friend can put this together rather easily. Even if she doesn’t have a computer, she doesn’t need much to do this. I bet the whole shebang would be under $500. Heck she have have one of my “toxic waste” computers (The one’s that when a relative out grows, they give it to me to “recycle”.) Might cost her more to get it from Jersey than buy something locally. As I said that can be put up on on almost any old one that works. Bet WalMart has something new for under 500$!

As a business person, if she’s computer literate, then I’d use Strategy Two. I think efax, and others of it’s ilk, have very modest fees last time I looked.

Either one might be cheaper and less exasperating for her. She can fax me at my free efax number 781-723-3746 if she wants some commiseration.