RANT: Menedez response is unbelievable. Argh!

Monday, March 1, 2010

I GRIPED ABOUT RAISING THE DEBT.

*** begin quote ***

Dear Mr. Reinke:

Thank you for contacting me to express your concern for raising the debt limit of the federal government. Your opinion is very important to me, and I welcome the opportunity to respond to you on this issue.

As a member of the Senate Budget Committee, as well as the Senate Finance Committee, I share your concern about the long-term financial health and viability of our nation. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB), the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) have all agreed that over the long-term, the federal budget will continue down an unsustainable path if there are no changes to address current federal fiscal policies. It is critical, then, that our short and long-term fiscal policies address the large increase in our national deficit.

I understand your anger, anxiety and frustration as the economy continues to recover. We have emerged from a year in which the threat of a second Depression forced the need for recovery programs, which both conservative and liberal economists have credited with helping to keep our economy afloat. It is important to note how detrimental it would be if the United States defaulted on its debt- it would undermine our nation’s credit worthiness, badly weaken our economy and put Social Security and veteran’s benefits at risk. It is also important to note that increasing the debt limit does not authorize a single penny of new spending- it only allows the government to pay bills already incurred.

Throughout my tenure in Congress I have supported provisions that would bring down our deficit. You will be pleased to know that I voted in favor of Senate Amendment #3305 to House Joint Resolution 45, increasing the statutory limit on the public debt. The amendment will re-impose the statutory pay-as-you-go (PAYGO) budget rules. Under PAYGO, legislation that increases direct spending or reduces revenues must be fully offset, to avoid increasing the deficit. Additionally, I voted for Senate Amendment #3302 – which did not pass- would have created a Bipartisan Task Force for Responsible Action. I am encouraged that the President has signed an executive order creating the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform. This is an important step in finding solutions to combat the national deficit.

During such difficult economic times it is vital that we make sound and solid investments that will stimulate the economy. Please be assured that I stand committed to working with my colleagues in the Senate to ensure that we make sound fiscal policy that invests in our future and gets our economy moving again so that we can establish a financially secure future for our nation’s children.

Again, thank you for sharing your thoughts with me. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I may be of more assistance. I invite you to visit my website (http://menendez.senate.gov) to learn of other important issues to New Jersey.

*** end quote ***

AND, the bozo says I’ll be pleased cause when he voted to approve it, he put some “lipstick” on!

Argh!

# # # # #


RANT: How to answer the census!

Saturday, February 27, 2010

“A census taker once tried to test me. I ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice Chianti.”
Hannibal Lecter played by Anthony Hopkins
in The Silence of the Lambs 1991

# – # – #

SO this is how we should answer the Census!

# # # # #


RANT: ONLY REAL PEOPLE PAY TAXES

Monday, February 22, 2010

http://channel-surfing.blogspot.com/2010/02/driving-rich-away.html

Thursday, February 04, 2010

Driving the rich away

Hank Kalet

FROM THE COMMENTS

# – # – #

Dear Anonymous:

>we should reduce taxes on businesses and corporations because it will create jobs.

Help me understand something: A business sells “stuff”. It adds up all its costs, tacks on some profit, and people but that “stuff”. A corporate tax is just ANOTHER cost. The business actually EITHER passes it along to the consumer OR goes out of business.

Right?

(Ignore for the moment that if it reduces its obscene profit to cover the tax so as not to pass it along. It still is passing that tax along by accepting a lower profit.)

So, we should have a ZERO corporate tax for NO OTHER REASON than it conceals exactly how much we are paying in taxes.

ONLY REAL PEOPLE PAY TAXES.

Jobs has nothing to do with it! Honesty does.

If I buy a can of beans, I have NO way of knowing how much “tax” I am paying in the price of that can of beans.

On April 15th, the tax I paid on that can of beans isn’t in what I pay as “my taxes”. It’s hidden.

I think if people knew what they were paying, really and truly, bottom line number, there would be a GIANT revolt. Make the Tea Parites of last summer look like a gardent tea party.

It’s actually much worse than we can intuit. When a company makes a capital good that other companies use to make “stuff” we have taxes on top of taxes being hidden. Buried hip deep in obfuscation.

And the congresscritters like it just that way. Keep the rubes dumb about what they are actually paying for this class of a “new priesthood” in the District of Corruption and other “capitols”!

Argh!

# # # # #


RANT: Tiger’s apology; not looking too good

Saturday, February 20, 2010

He’s a private citizen, who is a media star. The billions of bucks he makes off the rubes was at risk by his bad behavior. His image needed to be re-shined. I suspect that what this is all about.

BUT! But, I could care less.

Rosie O’Donnell has made me skeptical of media icon, who have a persona, that hides their true spirit.

So, this may be sincere; time will tell.

Already I’m suspicious. “No domestic violence.” Well, who broke the windshield with the golf club?

As some wag said, “Apparently, the only person who can beat Tiger Woods with a golf club is his wife.”

So after promising to lead a better life, he, or rather his writers, told a whopper!

Argh!

We’ll see.

There’s a Chinese Proverb: “Talk doesn’t cook rice.”

# # # # #


RANT: “Queen of Nice” calls Rush Limbaugh a junkie

Friday, February 19, 2010

http://www.irishcentral.com/story/news/people_and_politics/rosie-odonnell-calls-rush-limbaugh-a-junkie-84750982.html

Posted on Thursday, February 18, 2010 at 09:53 PM
Rosie O’Donnell calls Rush Limbaugh a junkie

*** begin quote ***

Rosie O’Donnell was on the Janeane Garafolo show letting off steam about conservatives in general and Rush Limbaugh in particular. Her remarks will not endear her to the Tea Party Titan.

The two liberal ladies got to musing about Rush Limbaugh and his enormous influence on the right. They also were quite cutting about those on the right Here is a brief clip.

O’Donnell : ….And how is it that he’s able to be a junkie, literally, and sort of still have reverence, respect, and be heralded as the leader of these, you know…

GAROFALO: Well, look at who he’s talking to.

O’DONNELL: I know.

GAROFALO: Look at who he’s talking to.

O’DONNELL: Those are the kind of people who if it was a junkie, right? What, because he buys the Oxycontin from a doctor?

*** end quote ***

And, this from the “lady” who, when she needed the viewers, billed herself as the “Queen of Nice”. Sure fooled me and a lot of others. Sadly, I henceforth and forever more dismiss her to the dustbin of “nasty people”. Please ignore her as well. Until she earns our attention. Garofalo too.

# # # # #


RANT: No cuts without blood on the payroll

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

http://channel-surfing.blogspot.com/2010/02/colorado-springs-and-future-of-american.html

Wednesday, February 03, 2010
Colorado Springs and the future of American government
Hank Kalet

*** begin quote ***

And it is here and has been for quite a while. And yet, everytime we talk about making tough decisions, we flinch. We think we can balance our books by eliminating waste and corruption, as if waste and corruption make up more than just a tiny fraction of our structural deficit. We have no interest in making real sacrifices — though we are willing to have others sacrifice on our behalf (the suburbs want spending on the cities cut, for instance, while many seniors are willing to skimp on school spending and so on).

*** end quote ***

Please don’t fall for the sucker punch. The FIRST thing that entrenched politicians and bureaucrats do is cut services to the people. It is a sham. A pretense. A fraud. Did they cut the internal costs? How many honchos and hangers on did they nuke.

When I worked on (Wall) Street, I had to cut my budget 50%. Part of my submission was to cut my service to my internal customers. My boss called me on the carpet to explain to me that I must have been “smoking funny cigarettes”. I was to keep my service at its then exceptional level and still cut my budget by half. Ominously, he told me “to wise up” otherwise he’d do it without me. With sweat running down my leg, I went back to my office and “figured it out”. We had to redesign every business process we used, but I “figured it out”!

Soooo, let’s hold these bozo’s feet to the fire. Same rules: keep services at current level and still cut the budget as needed. If you can’t do it, resign!

Like my comment about the bailouts to Wall Street, if there was no bail out, the bozos on Wall Street would have (as if by magic) would have figured out how to save their skins.

No bailout was needed.

Similarly, no cuts to customer-facing services UNTIL we have resignations accepted!

# # # # #


RANT: Freedom and the Audi commercial

Sunday, February 14, 2010

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2010/02/14/big_brother_out_of_control/?rss_id=Boston+Globe+–+Jeff+Jacoby+columns

The Boston Globe

Big Brother out of control

By Jeff Jacoby

Globe Columnist / February 14, 2010

*** begin quote ***

Of course, the notion of an environmental police state terrorizing citizens for not being sufficiently “green’’ is just parody meant to be laughed at. Or is it? On its website, Audi USA earnestly describes its Green Police as “caricatures’’ created to “help’’ consumers “faced with a myriad of decisions in their quest to become more environmentally responsible citizens.’’ And what better way to “help’’ them than with scenes of ruthless Greenshirts handcuffing hot-tubbers whose water is too warm, or raiding the home of residents who threw a used battery into the wrong trash bin?

*** and ***

Nothing in the Constitution authorizes the federal government to take charge of “revamping the way American children eat and play.’’ It is only our passivity that makes such an encroachment possible. This used to be the land of the free. Is it still?

*** end quote ***

Jeff Jacoby hit the nail on the head. We are no longer free. Nor brave.

Why else do we let the gooferment propagandize children — future voters — in what they call schools?

# # # # #


RANT: Politicians lie; we suffer

Saturday, February 13, 2010

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/13/us/politics/13obama.html

Obama Making Plans to Use Executive Power

By PETER BAKER

Published: February 12, 2010

*** begin quote ***

Already, Mr. Obama has had to reconcile his campaign-trail criticism of Mr. Bush for excessive use of so-called signing statements to bypass parts of legislation with his own use of such tactics. After a bipartisan furor in Congress last year, Mr. Obama stopped issuing such signing statements, but aides said last month that he still reserves the right to ignore sections of bills he considers unconstitutional if objections have been lodged previously by the executive branch.

*** end quote ***

Argh! Forked tongue.

# # # # #


RANT: Ipods are stimulating?

Friday, February 12, 2010

http://www.baynews9.com/content/36/2010/2/11/582040.html

UPDATE: Polk Schools won’t proceed with iPod incentive

Thursday, February 11, 2010

*** begin quote ***

POLK COUNTY (Bay News 9) — The Polk County school district has decided to suspend a program that would have given away iPods to some parents.

The school district was going to use the device to reward parents of children with disabilities who filled out a 10-minute online survey.

The money was going to come from a federal government program for developmentally disabled students. About $150,000 would have been spent on the iPods.

The money from the federal government program cannot be used for salaries or bonuses, but must go towards other expenditures.

   * Press release from Polk County School District

Correction: Our original story incorrectly said money for the iPods was from federal stimulus funds. The money the district was going to use is from the federal government and is to be used specifically for programs for developmentally disabled students. It is separate from federal stimulus dollars.

*** end quote ***

Argh!

This is typical of the way the Feds spend our money!

# # # # #

# # # # #


RANT: Schools and the Fourth

Thursday, February 11, 2010

http://www.thestatenj.com/engine/2010/02/do-constitutional-rights-end-at-the-schoolhouse-door/

Do Constitutional Rights End at the Schoolhouse Door?

John Witherspoon February 4th, 2010  

*** begin quote ***

This week, the NJ State Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion upholding the ability of a school administrator to search a student’s car parked on school property using a reasonableness standard of proof, rather than the more stringent, probable cause standard that would apply to a police officer’s search.

*** and ***

Another nugget of fact appears from a close reading of the opinion. The Egg Harbor Township High School, where the events leading up to this case occurred, utilizes a school resource officer, employed by the Egg Harbor Township Police Department. After the school administrator searched the student’s vehicle, the officer took possession of the evidence and transported the student to the police station. So the officer was available to take the student into custody, but couldn’t be available to perform the search. Is that because the officer would be held to a higher standard of proof before he could perform the search?

*** end quote ***

Unfortunately, if we were being true to the Constitution, then the school, which is the gooferment disguise, MUST observe the Constitution’s Fourth Amendment!

Why do we have gooferment skrools again?

To allow the gooferment to propagandize the yutes so they always vote the “right” way!

Silly sheeple, just do what your betters tell you to do. Or, else!

# # # # #