Automatic 401(k) options

Wednesday, May 17, 2006

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=/Nation/archive/200605/NAT20060517a.html

Bipartisan Push for Automatic 401(k) Plans
By Randy Hall
CNSNews.com Staff Writer/Editor
May 17, 2006
***Begin Quote***

(CNSNews.com) – Former vice presidential candidates John Edwards and Jack Kemp joined forces on Tuesday in Pentagon City, Va., calling on corporations to offer automatic 401(k) options in an effort to boost the financial security of middle and lower-income American families.

***End Quote***

As usual, when the two political parties agree on anything, you can be sure of one thing, it must benefit them.

Once again, the public is being "helped" by Mommy Government, backed up by the rules of Father State.

You're too dumb to save money on your own, so Mommy is going to make sure you are "signed up" from Day One. And, of course, Father State will make rules to interfere with the established employer employee relationships.

AND, it ignores the fact that "one size fits all" solutions are be their very nature not what some people need.

401ks can be subject to errors in judgement by selecting badly or failing to diversify because of restricted choice. DOn't forget that most 401k offerings come with high fees as well.
Now let's look under the covers and question why these two politicians are worried about you. Hmmm, could it be that the Ponzi scheme Social Security "Insurance" is broke and gettin' broker!

So there we have it!

We're being given something that won't work for most "for our own good" backed up by laws by a pair of politicians with something to gain. Hmmm!


MUNY: I’d prefer to have my copies online somewhere. Protected but online!

Tuesday, May 9, 2006

http://www.lifehacker.com/software/credit-card/what-to-do-if-your-identity-is-stolen-172308.php

***Begin Quote***

Be smart, have copies of your CCs in a lockbox somewhere, track your credit report etc.

***End Quote***

"have copies"

This isn't too helpful if you are on a trip somewhere. My personal preference is to have a hidden directory on my website, password protected, with an encrypted file. That file contains my credit card information AND the 800 numbers for domestic or international to report stolen cards. In another file, encrypted and password protected, are scanned images of my birth certificate, passport, and drivers license. Ditto, for poa, hcp, advanced directive, and all important paper work that I might need in a pinch.

Recently when Mom was hospitalized, and the docs were giving me a hard time, I just gave them my website and two magic words, and they were able to see my Mom's designation of me as her Health Care Proxy. End of hard time.

The next day I changed the magic words.

I have an index card with all the words scrambled in my wallet. In case, I don't have my data fob with me. If I can get an inet connect, I can get to my info.

I think that's important.


MUNY: Risk / Reward of Bonds versus Stocks? Some times the only way to win is not to play!

Sunday, May 7, 2006

http://www.boston.com/business/personalfinance/articles/2006/05/07/right_now_there_is_no_best_bet_on_the_market/?rss_id=Boston.com+%2F+Business+%2F+Personal+Finance+-+Money+Management+-+Financial+Management+-+Boston.com

Right now, there is no best bet on the market
By Scott Burns  |  May 7, 2006

***Begin Quote***

Viewed in terms of earnings yield (stock earnings per share divided by price), low-quality stocks at 18 times uncertain forward earnings have an earnings yield of 5.56 percent, slightly less than the earnings yield on five-year TIPS. High-quality stocks, meanwhile, have an earnings yield of 6.85 percent, only a small premium over no-risk Treasury obligations.

What's the bottom line?

This year is developing a really creepy resemblance to 1987. That's when both interest rates and stocks rose — until October, when stocks plunged 20 percent in two days.

***End Quote***

One has to learn the lessons of the past before they put you on your butt. A 20% drop in the market would certainly be typical of the secular bear market. A further market run up might break us out of the secular bear pattern. BUT, the economic factors around the current environment don't seem to favor that outcome. But what do I know.


MUNY: The majority of auto loans are now five years or longer.

Sunday, May 7, 2006

http://www.boston.com/business/personalfinance/articles/2006/05/07/longer_loans_defy_common_sense/?rss_id=Boston.com+%2F+Business+%2F+Personal+Finance+-+Money+Management+-+Financial+Management+-+Boston.com

THE COLOR OF MONEY
Longer loans defy common sense
By Michelle Singletary | May 7, 2006

***Begin Quote***

It appears we’ve hit another consumer milestone, and it’s not one we should be proud of either.

Last year, it was our savings rate. In 2005, for the first time since the Great Depression, the personal savings rate fell into negative territory.

This year, consumers have hit another landmark. The majority of auto loans are now five years or longer.

New vehicle loans over 60 months accounted for nearly 55 percent of loan originations, according to the Consumer Bankers Association’s 2006 Automobile Finance Study. Used vehicle loans over 60 months accounted for 40 percent of originations.

In 2000, five-year-or-longer car loans comprised just 22 percent of all such lending.

Have people lost their financial minds?

***End Quote***

Clearly so.

If one projects the “life” of a car at 100k miles, then one can calculate the accumulated depreciation. Ahh, but only businesses do that.

In the early 70’s I found Frau and I on that treadmill. Between us, we came up with an idea how to get out of that rat race. We figured the life of a car at 6 years. We’d go to the credit union for a 36 month car loan and plan to keep the car for a minimum of 6 years. We’d save for three years “painlessly” for the next car.

The credit union was the best place for a car loan since they didn’t use the rule of 78 in computing interest payments. The rule of 78 is a little know gem the auto loan people use to have you pay all the interest up front and the principal later. So if you pay off a loan early, you don’t save any interest. Credit Unions don’t use this fraud. You make your payment and your interest expense goes down. Have a windfall or a few extra bucks? You can pay it down faster and save interest expense at the credit union.

So we’d repay the car loan in 3 years and then continue making the same payment to the credit union for the next three. Our credit union encouraged this by keeping those payments separate from our checking, saving, or other loans.

Then, at the end of six years, we had a substantial downpayment for a new car. Don’t forget that for three of those years we were earning a nice interest rate. We even took CDs for the anniversary date and made a few bucks more. As we got better at it, we “settled” for cheaper cars (i.e., we didn’t get sucked into fancy accessories or “dealer incentives” or expensive options). As we got to the end of that road where we needed to borrow to buy a car, the saved downpayment often equaled the price of the car.

When we finally got out of that necessity to borrow to buy a car, in retrospect, we probably could have adopted a strategy that lowered our overall interest cost. That is take a holistic look at debt and rates and repayment terms. Saving in the car account may not have been the “best” use of credit when one, from time to time, might have had a credit card balance over a month.

But I would assert it was good “education”. It also would allow us to develop the concept of “financial silos”.

Like the early envelope system Frau used, it compartmented our thinking. Closed the water tight doors between compartments in our “financial” ship.

When the entertainment “envelope” was empty, we stayed home. We never raided the new car “envelope” for movie tickets. Not that I wouldn’t have, but she woudln’t let me. ;-)

Financial management was never taught in school, and it’s tough to learn.


MUNY: Why don’t the web sites pay more attention to bonds?

Saturday, May 6, 2006

(1) Cause it does NOT lend itself to trading and commissions?

(2) Buy the "right" bond and you get your prinicple and interest back. That's not exciting. No capital gains! No doubles, triples, or better.

(3) It ain't sexy. It's for the old folks and the poor.

For example, many many moons ago, I had some tax deferred money to roll over. When I did, I made what was in retrospect a very smart decision. I bought a bunch of those new fangled zero coupon bonds. Treasuries minus the coupons. Toxic waste they were called at the time. I bought all the broker's inventory for the year I turn 66 (don't ask). And when I still had money left, I bought some more for the following year. I remember the broker shaking his head at my insistence. They carried a high coupon. Treasuries meant little risk; as little risk as one could buy. I put them in the old brokerage account and virtually forgot about them. With treasuries now paying less than 5%, it turned out to be a dream. When I do retire, they will be worth over 200k for a 35k investment. Zero risk. No worry. Moral of the story, the broker, like your government, ain't your friend. He's a used car dealer without a good product. So bonds have an important place in a well-diversified portfolio. And, that doesn't mean bond fund. It means real bonds! Date certain maturity is the key phrase.