TECH SERVICE: FEEDBLITZ missed three posts yesterday

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

ARGH.

***Begin Quote***

1933 2007-05-13 7:32:43 am
TECHNOLOGY: My 5 reasons to start a Blog
https://reinkefj.wordpress.com/2007/05/13/technology-my-5-reasons-to-start-a-blog/
http://tinyurl.com/25yavb

1929 2007-05-13 6:14:00 am
MONEY: Panama Has Thrived Without A Central Bank
https://reinkefj.wordpress.com/2007/05/13/money-panama-has-thrived-without-a-central-bank/
http://tinyurl.com/2kvhpt

1932 2007-05-13 6:07:36 am
LINKEDIN: My “granfalloon” won a prize in the recent “group hug” about LinkedIn
https://reinkefj.wordpress.com/2007/05/13/linkedin-my-granfalloon-won-a-prize-in-the-recent-group-hug-about-linkedin/
http://tinyurl.com/2cx3kn

***End Quote***

The guy form FEEDBLITZ support suspects it has to do with preloading content by playing with the time stamps.

(You DO know I have a real job right?)


RANT: Off to jury duty

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

The gooferment has enslaved me. I am commanded by force to serve it. It’s not enough that it makes me a partial slave by stealing my money via inflation, taxes, fees, and economic friction. It steals the most precious think I have … my time and attention. Argh!


GUNS: Response from Assemblywoman Greenstein

Monday, May 14, 2007

***Begin Quote***

Dear Mr. Reinke:

Thank you for your thoughts on A3701. The Assemblywoman will keep them in mind should the legislation come up before the full Assembly. In the interim, please do not hesitate to contact me if I can be of assistance on this or any other matter.

Sincerely
Scott Crass
Constituent Services Director
ASW Greenstein

———-

From: reinkefj
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 7:07 AM
To: Baroni, Asm. D.O.; Greenstein, Asw. D.O.; Inverso, Sen. D.O.
Subject: Proposed Gun Legislation

Dear Assemblyman Bill, Assemblywoman Linda, and Senator Peter:

Please impress on your colleagues that this anti-gun bills are: (a) un Constitutional; (b) immoral; (c) ineffective; and (d) inefficient. And, vote that way.

Clearly, the Second Amendment precludes Government from regulating guns. Slice it and dice it any way you want the Dead Old White Guys were right on. When you take guns away from the People, or at least try to, that sets the stage for tyranny. Just remember Nazi Germany. Disarm the citizens; death camps in the 30’s and 40’s. Governments kill people in massive quantities. I can repeat all the bumper stickers, because they are all true. But let’s stick to the one most on point. When you outlaw, guns, only outlaws will have guns. Look to England with home invasions on the rise and they still have gun killings. Criminal don’t obey laws.

It is immoral to remove the People’s Right to Self-defense. I know you’d all love to live in a world where nothing bad ever happens. But, that’s not real life. The murders on the VT campus were a DIRECT result of creating a “gun free zone”. Guess it wasn’t do “gun free”? While we can’t ever know that there would have been an armed person there if that diktat was not in effect, we KNOW positively that there wasn’t even a possibility of one with it in effect. Even a young girl or an old teacher might have been able to stop the slaughter when the nut had to reload. But the politicians and bureaucrats ensured that the shooter would have no worries about armed resistance. John Lott’s studies show the power of guns in the hands of law abiding people. It’s immoral to deny the People the protection of “sprinkling a few sheepdogs among the sheep”. Recognize that good law abiding people will defend themselves, their families, their neighbors, and even complete strangers if give a fighting chance. Only the very bravest, or the foolish, will attempt to take on a shooter unarmed. But, given a weapon, how many of those VT dead an injured would have be able to defend themselves.

Gun Laws are ineffective. The NJ Legislature has passed how many gun laws. And, taxes on guns. And, restrictions. And, and, and. Still criminals shoot people. Do you think that all the laws in the world aren’t going to help? So for example, see any 50’s being used in crimes? Oh but let’s pass a law. What’s next, “if it saves one child”? You can’t legislate a solution. Go ahead and continue to try, but it’s futile. Good people will still be good; bad bad. When you pass a gun law, you shift the balance. Less good people with guns; more bad people with guns. When the law is exceptionally stupid, you might even turn “good people” into “criminals”. Stop the insanity. Every time you pass “gun laws”, you make the People less safe. Let’s take a Rutgers co-ed. Bright young girl. You have effectively made it impossible for her to defend herself. She get raped. Who’s fault? YOURS! You didn’t trust her to know when and how to defend herself. I do. Do I think that she will suddenly lose her mind and begin blowing people away. Not likely. Might some amorous young man get threatened. Could be. One thing is for sure that young girl will be in control. And, it’s a self-nominating thing. No one says she has to carry; she can choose to. With out you legislators playing God with her life. I trust women to know when they need to use deadly force. Don’t you? I trust all my fellow citizens to know when to use deadly force. Don’t you?

The gun laws are inefficient. The costs of ownership are artificially increased by legislation. Economics teaches us that when you raise the cost, the supply demand curve shifts. Raise the taxes and fees and you deprive the poor of the good. They can’t afford it. Now I know the political elite, the rich, and the celebrities all have all the armed security they need. I’m sure that the politicians and bureaucrats get all the gun permits that they could want. How about the poor minority woman who has to walk from the bus stop to her home at night? She doesn’t deserve to be able to protect herself. She doesn’t even show up on anyone’s radar. When you eliminate cheap guns or raise their cost, exactly whose hands are you taking them out of? Not the criminal’s. Not the elite’s. Yup, that poor person is at risk.

So in summary, I urge you to vote against ALL gun regulations everywhere anytime. The criminals won’t obey. And, the law abiding, who would, aren’t the problem.

Now, would you like to talk about the “drug war”? Would you believe it too is (a) un Constitutional; (b) immoral; (c) ineffective; and (d) inefficient.

If you have to make laws, make them limiting government. You guys don’t even fasten your own seat belts, but make us.

*** begin quote ***

New Jersey Update On Gun Ban Legislation!

On Thursday, May 10, the New Jersey Assembly Law and Public Safety Committee decided to take no action on Assembly Bill 3494, sponsored by Assemblywoman Pamela Lampitt (D-6) and Assemblyman Peter Barnes (D-18). A3494 would drastically raises all firearm license and permit fees and would allow the Superintendent of State Police the discretion to annually reconsider fees for a manufacturer or dealer license, a carry permit, the firearms purchase I.D. (FID), and the pistol purchase permits.The committee also voted 4 to 2 to amend Assembly Bill 3998, sponsored by Assemblymen Reed Gusciora (D-15), Michael Panter (D-12), and Robert Gordon (D-38), which would ban the possession of all .50 BMG rifles by declaring such items to be a destructive device.

*** end quote ***

# # #

We’ll see if it makes a difference. I’m not hopeful.

# # # # #


YAHOO ANSWER: new blog … better

Monday, May 14, 2007

*** begin quote ***

I have a new blog…which are things I can do to make it better??

*** end quote ***

You might want to ditch the pop unders. Most people have them blocked and they make you look like a used car salesman. The site has a hodge podge of add ins down the right side that I found distracting. You might want to review the various A list bloggers, who blog on blogging. The first thing that caught my eye was that you don’t have you own domain. (neither did I at first) That’s something you need if you ever want to move, control your content, or own the “word” on the net.

# # # # #


LIBERTY: You are the homegrown terrorist threat

Monday, May 14, 2007

http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/05/13/
you-are-the-homegrown-terrorist-threat/

http://tinyurl.com/25aoc7

You are the homegrown terrorist threat
By Michael Hampton on Virginia

***Begin Quote***

Ogre also put together a nice interactive quiz which you can use to determine if you are a domestic terrorist. I scored a 70, which apparently means there’s a cell with my name on it in Guantanamo Bay.

***End Quote***

The test is at:

http://www.quizilla.com/score/display.php?item_id=4833864

and I scored a 65%.

I guess I’ll be picked up right after Senor Hampton. I’m reminded of the poem attributed to Pastor Martin Niemoller.

*** begin quote ***

First they came for the Jews
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Jew.

*** end quote ***

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Niem%C3%B6ller

Speak up now or forever hold your piece.

# # # # #


YAHOO ANSWER: Wireless Limited Connectivity

Monday, May 14, 2007

*** begin quote ***

Wireless Limited Connectivity/ Local Access Only???

the last few days every time I try to use any public internet connection that previously worked fine….my computer will connect only with limited connectivity or local access. any tips? also I get the message “connecting to the network is taking longer than usual” sometimes when I try. If I run diagnostics it either says resetting the adapter might help or it says there is no problem OR it says cannot ping dns server (remote host). the wierd thing is no matter what public server I try it wont work. help!!

*** end quote ***

You didn’t say what OS you were running but let’s assume some version of Windoze XP. If not, please ignore what follows. WXP has a component called WirelessZeroConfig. When WXP “loses its mind” about wireless network restarting this service sometimes help. I have also had success in uninstalling the networking interface, and other “stuff” and letting WXP “rediscover” it all again. One tip. Always reboot COLD (i.e., power completely off for five minutes. not 4:59) TWICE (i.e., no joke two completely down cycles). Some times WXP needs a good enema to clean itself out. When I help colleagues, coworkers, or others with connectivity issues, I like to have a “dork” (i.e., a plain old working system so I know it’s not the network, but it’s the platform I’m working on that has the problem) with me. At home, I have an ancient thinkpad that barely runs WXP to be my “dork” when I have real problems on my real notebook. Hope this helps.

# # # # #


RANT: Staples website only works with IE

Monday, May 14, 2007

Lost me as a customer. I don’t do IE.


JOBSEARCH: Your resume is NOT your UVP

Monday, May 14, 2007

FROM AN EMAIL EXCHANGE WITH A NEW TURKEY

***Begin Quote***

Your resume is NOT your UVP.

The resume is an expression of your Unique Sales Proposition.

I believe that your UVP is a distillation of your elevator speech. It’s what you can uniquely do that is of value to you, and someone who will pay you.

For example, my UVP is that “I solve complex technical and business problems in large scale IT infrastructures.” That’s not on any resume, but that’s the message.

See the diff? (welcome to the big turkey’s vision of the world).

I like seekers to have one simple declarative sentence.

In marketing they teach product should “own a word”. Volvo safety. Cheerios Ohhs. Goodyear tires. Goodrich not-Goodyear. You get the idea. In jobsearch, I teach seekers to have at least one sentence that expresses their value to anyone.

In TurkeyLand, the process goes:

  • First you discover all / most / some of your Value Propositions. (I have pages of them; blogging ain’t one of them!)
  • Then, you refine them to UNIQUE VPs (i.e., Anyone can flip burgers).
  • Then, you sort them by how marketable they are, how saleable they are (note there is a BIG difference), and/or how interesting they are to you.
  • You, then, develop how you “market” / “sell” it (i.e., find the target audience & the sales proposition).
  • Finally, you develop the collateral material like resumes and cover letters and other stuff that support the USP.

OK, that’s how it is done in “turkey land”. In the real world, how do you do it?

***End Quote***

I cleaned it up for general consumption, but that was the thrust.


TECHNOLOGY: My 5 reasons to start a Blog

Sunday, May 13, 2007

http://www.lytebyte.com/2007/05/12/link-o-byte-4/

Link O! Byte cited

***Begin Quote***

http://www.whoismadhur.com/2007/05/10/top-5-reasons-to-start-a-blog/

Top 5 reasons to start a Blog

For all the people who are still reading blogs and still wondering whether to start a blog or not, Madhur has listed Top 5 reasons why you should be starting a blog.

***End Quote***

People bandy the word “top” around a lot. If one had “research”, “evidence”, or “facts”, then I wouldn’t be writing this. What the blooger had was really “His Top 5 reasons”. No research, evidence, or facts to substantiate that title.

So, I’ll just give my opinion which is just as valid. Maybe less so, since no one reads me, except 3 relatives and 3 friends. (Yes, I have three friends — OLDEST, OLDER, and just OLD!) Oh, and yeah, that nice spammer who keeps placing all those excellent comments wanting to enlarge a body part that polite people don’t discuss. (Think he will get the idea since ZERO of his comments have slipped thru moderation. Has to be a bot; no one is that persistently annoying. Not even me! Even so, running a bot has to cost something.)

My Top Five Reasons To Start A Blog

(5) You have nothing else to do. Just as “a boat is a hole in the water into which you throw money”, so to “a blog is just a hole in the internet into which you throw time”. (Made that up all by myself!)

(4) You think that you can earn a buck drawing readers and selling advertising.

(3) You can sell your version of the “great american invention” for 19.99 if people would just listen.

(2) You can have that next great job served to you on a silver platter when an employer read your witty insightful drek.

(1) If the Universe is truly one song, then you want to sing yours in such a way that it is never lost. Each of us has unique insights that we have a moral obligation to pass along. Sort of like the frozen mountain climber’s body on Everest warning the next climber of danger. The internet is the closest thing to immortality that we’ll ever have. The pharos had their pyramids. The Eskimos had their totem poles. We have blogs. Your words will live forever,

# # # # #


MONEY: Panama Has Thrived Without A Central Bank

Sunday, May 13, 2007

http://www.masternewmedia.org/information_access/
central-bank-federal-reserve/panama-has-no-central-bank-20070512.htm

http://tinyurl.com/25db5o

May 12, 2007
The Federal Reserve – Who Needs It? How Panama Has Thrived Without A Central Bank
David Saied is head of National Public Policy for the Government of Panama
and also directs the National Competitiveness Program.

***Begin Quote***

The Federal Reserve is America’s Central Bank, owned by an unnamed corporate cartel, given a license to print money, and holding significant sway over the national government and economy. If it were dissolved tomorrow, the average tax-payer would doubtless be a lot better off. But we couldn’t do that, could we?

The Republic of Panama has managed just fine without a Central Bank for over a hundred years, and in actual fact, if you compare the rate of inflation between Panama and the USA over the last twenty years, Panama comes out a lot better off every step of the way.

***End Quote***

I’m just an injineer; not one of them there highly educated highly compensated ekkynonnymists. BUT, it seems to me, that you are tying yourself to the USA Federal Reserve Bank Note and the rate that they choose for inflation. That “tying” can become a hangman’s noose when “helicopter ben” starts dropping FRBNies from the sky. ALSO, it would seem that shifting from the “US Dollar”, which is really the FRBN not a real Constitutional Dollar, to a gold / silver standard for a Panamanian currency could make you the darling of all the gold bugs in the world. A national currency redeemable in gold might well be a great growth industry. But then, I’m just an injineer.

# # # # #