INTERESTING: I get an insertion in Risks Digest again

Friday, July 20, 2007

***Begin Quote***

RISKS-LIST: Risks-Forum Digest Thursday 19 July 2007 Volume 24 : Issue 74

ACM FORUM ON RISKS TO THE PUBLIC IN COMPUTERS AND RELATED SYSTEMS (comp.risks)
Peter G. Neumann, moderator, chmn ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy

***** See last item for further information, disclaimers, caveats, etc. *****
This issue is archived at <http://www.risks.org> as
<http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/24.74.html>
The current issue can be found at
<http://www.csl.sri.com/users/risko/risks.txt>

{Extraneous Deleted}

Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:32:42 -0400
From: Fred Reinke <reinkefj@reinke.cc>
Subject: “Microsoft Copy Protection Cracked Again” and who’s surprised?

{Begin Quoting an AP story}

Jessica Mintz, AP, 17 Jul 2007
Microsoft Copy Protection Cracked Again
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=2007-07-17_D8QEFI3O1
<http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=2007-07-17_D8QEFI3O1&show_article=1&cat=breaking> &show_article=1&cat=breaking

Microsoft Corp. is once again on the defensive against hackers after the
launch of a new program that gives average PC users tools to unlock
copy-protected digital music and movies.

The latest version of the FairUse4M program, which can crack Microsoft’s
digital rights management system for Windows Media audio and video files,
was published online late Friday. In the past year, Microsoft plugged
holes exploited by two earlier versions of the program and filed a federal
lawsuit against its anonymous authors. Microsoft dropped the lawsuit after
failing to identify them.

The third version of FairUse4M has a simple drag-and-drop interface. PC
users can turn the protected music files they bought online-either a la
carte or as part of a subscription service like Napster-and turn them into
DRM-free tunes that can be copied and shared at will, or turned into MP3
files that can play on any type of digital music player.

{End Quoting an AP story}

Like an arms race, the DRM folks are spending a lot of cycles on a failing
paradigm.

Like putting lipstick on the proverbial pig, it annoys their paying
customers and is pretty ugly! Some of my biggest irritations, in my
computing career, have been at the hands of “copy protection”. Couple that
with bad, or non-existent, support and you have the seeds of a revolt.

I now don’t buy content online — music or other kinds — if it has copy
protection.
I have a lot of expensive 8 tracks, cassettes, and cds of
“content” that are unusable. Add to that “software”, which has stopped
working, stopped being supported, or otherwise orphaned.

My most recent experience was with MusicMatch JukeBox being acquired by
Yahoo and forced to “upgrade”. This was one of my last purchases, excuse me
“licensing” — what “barbara streisand”!! — before my new policy of “no
more”.

“No more” locked content. “No more” buying software, excuse me licensing it,
from vendors who are one step below used car salesmen. “No more” operating
systems that require “activation”
and have “self-help” provisions.

I look to the open source software makers and happily “donate” to their
projects.

I’m calling out the content makers, “software” licensors, and the entire
Microsoft empire as the hucksters they are. At least the snake oil sales men
of yesteryear didn’t try and make you “license” the bottle!
A plague on all
their houses.

Imagine how I’ll be when I get old and crotchety!

Ferdinand J. Reinke, Kendall Park, NJ 08824 http://www.reinke.cc/
blog http://www.reinkefaceslife.com/ http://www.reinkefaceslife.com/

——————————

{Extraneous Deleted}

***End Quote***

Twice in one year! Maybe I’m getting older and wiser. :-) Either that or PGN is getting lax?

# # # # #


INTERESTING: A visit from the “state-ist” relatives

Friday, July 20, 2007

What a joy, relatives, in-laws actually have come to visit. They’re big gooferment proponents. They work for the gooferment. So how can the gooferment be bad? They listen to me rant and rave. But, at dinner, with a slew of in-laws, it was amusing to hear them all talk about property taxes. One of the local in-laws pulled out her property tax “statement”, and reported that 63% of the property taxes went to “education”. And, from there the fun began. I got my digs in often about taxes being theft. It was great to see all the statists squabble about high taxes being whose fault. I, of course, mentioned that they should imagine what they could buy if they could keep their own money. People can’t believe that we ever had no taxes. Wow! What fun.

I have to remember the lipstick on the pig. It doesn’t make the pig any prettier and annoys the pig.

# # # # #


TECH SERVICE: What is ITtoolbox?

Thursday, July 19, 2007

http://www.ittoolbox.com

***Begin Quote***

What is ITtoolbox?

A community where peers share knowledge about information technology.

***End Quote***

With some LinkedIn type features.

Hum?

As exclusive as rain, if they’ll have me as a member.

Sigh!

# # # # #


LIBERTY: Ordained by whom to enforce their wisdom?

Thursday, July 19, 2007

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/WalterEWilliams/2007/07/18/economists_on_the_loose

Economists on the Loose
By Walter E. Williams
Wednesday, July 18, 2007

***Begin Quote***

Free markets are simply millions upon millions of individual decision-makers, engaged in peaceable, voluntary exchange pursuing what they see in their best interests. People who denounce the free market and voluntary exchange, and are for control and coercion, believe they have more intelligence and superior wisdom to the masses. What’s more, they believe they’ve been ordained to forcibly impose that wisdom on the rest of us. Of course, they have what they consider good reasons for doing so, but every tyrant that has ever existed has had what he believed were good reasons for restricting the liberty of others.

***End Quote***

Professor Williams really nails this one single point. Ordained by whom to enforce their wisdom? Love it. You might be right that I “should” do X, Y, or Z. But under what system of morality do you get the right to force me? Ahh yes, you have to love them elites.

# # # # #


INTERESTING: exception to an amendment to strike money in a spending bill

Thursday, July 19, 2007

http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/0707/North_to_Alaska.html

July 18, 2007
North to Alaska

***Begin Quote***

Rep. Don Young attacked his fellow Republicans on the House floor Wednesday, as he defended education funds allocated to his home-state of Alaska.

“You want my money, my money,” Young stridently declared before warning conservatives that, “Those who bite me will be bitten back.”

Young took extreme exception to an amendment by Rep. Scott Garrett (R-N.J.) to strike money in a spending bill for native Alaskan and Hawaiian educational programs.

***End Quote***

I think this sums it all up. It’s the politician’s money; not yours!

# # # # #


YAHOO ANSWER: sue a doctor

Thursday, July 19, 2007

http:// answers.yahoo.com/question/
;_ylt=Ajc.cSp3s66dlx8NU73r
fQ6uxQt.?link=answer&.crumb=MXyeV9taV4T&qid=20070718
174128AALCZcS&.done=http%253A%252F%252Fanswers.yahoo.com
%252Fquestion%252Findex%253Fqid%253D20070718174128AALCZcS

http://tinyurl.com/2xxngh

sue a doctor

QUESTION

Asked by “curlyboy”

can u suit a doctor even if the damage wasn’t permanent and how much time do you have to do it?

3 minutes ago – 3 days left to answer. – 0 answers – Report Abuse

ANSWER

Dear “curlyboy”:

Well, I am not a doc, lawyer, nore do I play one on tv. And, I think it was Mark Twain or Will Rogers or some other cynic said that “medicine is the art of amusing the patient while the body heals itself”. Medicine is a joke! On the people who think that docs ain’t human.

As I understand your question, you’d like to sue a doc for a non-fatal not-permanent injury. Right?

Let me share what happened to me. My wife actually. She had a heart attack and was treated at prestigious Princeton Hospital. They really blew it. They pumped her full of fluids, kept her overnight, and sent her home. She literally gained 13 pounds in less than two days. And she felt like shit. I wasn’t happy so we went to our family doc, who I had never been impressed with, but recognized she was in deep kimshi (Korean smelly cabbage). He sent her right to the local ER, Don’t pass go; don’t collect 200$. They diagnosed her as in congestive heart failure with complications. A thirty day stay and a lot of testing and treatments. They never figured out what her original problem but she was walking and talking. We were pissed to put it mildly. And, consulted with our lawyer. His advice “no harm; no foul”. Non fatal; non permanent; injury debate able. And I had our GP and her cardiologist volunteering to testify because they were upset hat another doctor would make her their problem. She was retired and didn’t die, so he said we might get some “chump change” and have to pay big bux to get it into court. So, we dropped it.

My advice is to “fuggetboutit”.

You can’t possibly be as upset as I was. I’d like to go down to Pton and thrash both cardio docs within an inch of bodily arm. But, some times you just have to cut your losses.

Sorry, wish I could share a better advice, but my advice my answer, is to just move on.

Hope this helps. I’m interested how it works out for you. Drop me a note sometime. My blog may have helpful “stuff”.

Ferdinand J. Reinke
Kendall Park, NJ 08824

SOURCE

My personal experience
http://tinyurl.com/lxu93
http://www.reinkefaceslife.com/…

# # #

Note: You can go to the Yahoo Answer site and give my, or other answers, a thumbs up or down. When the question closes you can go vote for mine, or other answers, as “best”. Whatever. (Hint, hint, HINT!)

# # # # #


INTERESTING: equal treatment under the government

Thursday, July 19, 2007

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCNqgLkAx0g

***Begin Quote***

Yay, let’s all have equal treatment under the government! What would that be like?

***End Quote***

The way America is supposed to be?

# # # # #


JOBSEARCH: a job without an interview

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

http://www.ere.net/articles/db/3D129B2B49624023B18453BAFF93EF41.asp

Blow The Sucker Up?
Challenging our assumptions on finding, enticing, and hiring talent
Thursday, July 12, 2007 | by Kevin Wheeler

***Begin Quote***

Assumption #4: Each candidate has to be interviewed in person. Interviews are very poor predictors of success or performance. A good behavioral interview may improve the prediction by a bit but still not raise it much above chance. While it is in human nature to want to meet and like a person we are going to work with, this meeting should not be equated with skill or ability assessment. There are hundreds of excellent, legal, affordable tests available for more accurately screening candidates. These tools, combined with a website also designed as a screening tool, can greatly improve your ability to select candidates who have the capability, the motivation, and the skills to perform. It is possible to entirely skip the interview and get better-quality candidates than you do today.

***End Quote***

That’s a stunning concept. Get a job without an interview. That could be web-able!

# # # # #


JOBSEARCH: Be prepared to “Follow Up”

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

http://www.net-temps.com/adcgi/banner.cgi?ref=crnews&ch=2520&id=crs_2520

Here’s a Powerful Little Job Search Secret
© Written By Jimmy Sweeney
President of CareerJimmy and Author of the new, www.Amazing-Cover-Letters.com

***Begin Quote***

There are two magical words that can transform your job search. Two words that can land you more job interviews. Two words that can bring you more job offers…

Those two magical words are, “Follow up.”

***End Quote***

My added wisdom to this tip is that you just don’t just “follow up”.

You have to have the paradigm of “follow up” well integrated into your Standard Operating Procedure. When I was “out”, I used Lucht and his workbook as ONE of my tools. (Best 100$ I ever spent.) But, it was changes to my SOP that made it easy to “follow up”. And a log book.

I feel that I have a terrible memory. (It’s probably too crowded with Jeopardy answers from my own good. Name the four states who capital begins with the same first letter as the state? Done!) SO I try to compensate. I was always logging in my “job search book”. Quick what’s the name of the receptionist at the job interview at XXXXXXX on July 17, 1996. Ms. Mary Stein. (I cheated I had that factoid ready.) But, I have decades of that kind of stuff from when I’ve been “out”.

Now I have everything in text files on my notebook, backed up offline. It’s search able and usable.

My SOP is to log everything.

I grabbed business cards and anything that was being handed out. See the trick was to do it contemporaneously. Even waiting until you were out of the building was too late. I used McKay’s 66 to put as much context around the people. Ms Stein was partial to blue flowers having one on her desk and was pictured with one in a photo on her desk.

Does it matter in the grand scheme of things? I don’t know.

Another SOP of mine was to have several pre-stamped thank yous in my attache case. After meeting with any one, I’d “debrief” at a local coffee shop and write those notes. I felt I was especially tricky in that I had different looking ones for multiple interview days. (I actually had five different stock styles.) And, I would compose a “unique” note to each target. I had “stock text” printing in my bag that I copied from generics with things like <insert question form interview here>. But each target would get a customized thank you. In at least one instance, I know that the three targets compared their notes. I didn’t get the job, but did get the feed back that they were impressed. Not impressed enough though to hire me. Argh!

It’s all about having an SOP to follow. Makes it easy.

Another SOP was to send a thank you to the receptionist with something non-generic. On a repeat appearance at XXXXXXXX, the nice Ms. Stein introduced me to the interviewer, as that “thoughtful fellow I told you about”. Didn’t get the job! Argh! But maybe she was the reason I got the call back, and I was just a bad interview. Who knows!?!

Bottom line: Use SOPs that make it “brain dead” simple to follow up.

# # # # #


MONEY:Monetary Inflation

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/07/04/independence-day-3/

From a discussion with a befuddled fool who’s had the wool pulled over his eyes.title

***Begin Quote***

Author: Ace Duggery
Comment:
You’re a moron. First of all, I had to debate whether or not to even respond to a posting with dozens of grammatical errors. Obviously you’re a very smart person, your command of the written English language shows that. NO matter what you use as a currency, whether it’s a commodity or a piece of paper, somebody will have to control the issuance of such currency. Unless you want a barter economy, do you know what that is reinkefj?, you will never get true value from an exchange and there will constantly be a change in value of whatever you use for currency. If we used gold or silver, or even a note that is backed by such commodities, like the United States used to do, we would have to constantly revalue how much our currency is worth per oz. of these commodities. Do your research, this has happened several times over the course of history. And the reason we stopped using volatile commodities as a peg for our currency is that the prices of gold and silver fluctuated so much that we had to frequently change

Oh…and the dollar has not depreciated 95% since 1970. That is a blatant lie, did you make that number up?

I understand your points, and I even agree with you to the effect that the government, “gooferment”, whatever you want to call it, is, at times, corrupt. This is no perfect society, get over it. No such place exists, has ever existed, or will ever exist. There will always be shortcomings. I am not advocating that we completely ignore these problems, but let’s at least come up with a better idea than commodity backed currency. And seriously what the hell was Ron Paul talking about in the last debate? 9/11 happened because we were bombing Iraq and the middle east? Are you trying to say we “deserved” 9/11 because we were over there fighting against countries in the Middle East?

*** end quote ***

Here’s my response:

*** begin quote ***

>somebody will have to control the issuance of such currency.

No, why can’t we have a free market in currencies as we did before the legal tender laws were passed mandating that everyone had to accept these phony unconstitutional federal reserve notes.

>And the reason we stopped using volatile commodities as a peg for our currency is that the prices of gold and >silver fluctuated so much that we had to frequently change how much the paper backing was worth to the metals.

No, the reason FDR took us off the gold standard was so that he could spend as much as he wanted on welfare and warfare. And the people were to dumb to see the con.

>The dollar has not depreciated 95% since 1970. That is a blatant lie, did you make that number up?

No even the Federal Reserve will admit that the dollar has depreciated.

http://www.frbsf.org/econrsrch/econrev/98-3/3-16.pdf
between 61 & 97 2.39% per year average by the Fed’s own numbers. The math is a little tortured to minimize the impact.

However, other credible sources

http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/data/CPIAUCSL.txt
1970-01-01 37.900
2001-01-01 175.600
CPI 175 from 37 looks a lot more than 95%

http://inflationdata.com/inflation/Inflation_Rate/Inflation_Rate_Calculator.asp#results
435.49%

And no one seems to dispute the impact.

http://www.econedlink.org/lessons/index.cfm?lesson=EM168
Costs of Inflation
4. Inflation does reduce the purchasing power of money.
5. Inflation does redistribute income. On average, individuals’ incomes do increase as inflation increases. However, some peoples’ wages go up faster than inflation. Other wages are slower to adjust. People on fixed incomes such as pensions or whose salaries are slow to adjust are negatively affected by unexpected inflation.

>You’re a moron.

You’re right “Putting lipstick on a pig doesn’t make it beautiful and annoys the pig.”

One can’t reason with a “true believer”. If you wish to believe that everything in money is just peach keen, then do so in peace. But, let’s not kid around with the what is the single biggest crime of the gooferment messing with the money. It’s what brings down civilizations (i.e., Romans; Germans; English) and our turn is coming. Quickly.

***End Quote***

Which made me think of an interesting comparison.

If the CPI was 38 in 1970 and 176 in 2001, that’s a 463% increase.

If the S&P500 was 85 and 1394, that’s 1643% increase.

If the DJ was 619 and 11501, that’s 1857%.

So the markets have out performed inflation.

Using my real estate as a proxy, 55 to 350 47 to 335 40 to 350. That’s about 142 to 1035. Or, 728%.

Those are the good things.

Purchasing power has declined. SO a “depreciation factor” would make all these “paper gains” what?

$4559.73 in the year 2001 has the same “purchase power” as $1000 in the year 1970. www.measuringworth.com/ppowerus/result.php

So that’s about 79%!

But, it I think it understates it. For example, I’m paying property taxes on an inflated value. I’m paying capital gains taxes on an inflated value. And, the various taxes are all based on a percentage of inflated value.

Exponential Arghs!

One thing is for sure. You don’t want to be holding cash. Ever!

# # # # #