INTERESTING: IDK that there is episodic and semantic memory

Saturday, February 7, 2026

https://nautil.us/new-study-throws-a-wrench-in-our-understanding-of-memory-1264259/?_bhlid=e0d3c18d795d8b8a3c70ffdcc28c270df227359f

Neuroscience
New Study Throws a Wrench in Our Understanding of Memory
Some types of memories may not be stored as differently as we thought
By Jake Currie January 28, 2026

*** begin quote ***

Traditionally, explicit long-term memory (the intentional, conscious recollection of things and experiences) is divided into two subcategories: episodic memory and semantic memory. Episodic memory, as its name indicates, is the recollection of experiences—places, time, and the emotions associated with them. Semantic memory, on the other hand, is the recollection of general facts and information.

To put it simply, you rely on semantic memory to win a game of bar trivia, but you rely on episodic memory while recounting the story of your victory to friends. Or at least that’s what psychologists believed. New research from the School of Psychology at the University of Nottingham and the Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit at the University of Cambridge published this week in Nature Human Behavior is blurring the lines between the two.

*** end quote ***

I find the whole lack of understanding of “humans” quite amazing and quite unfathomable.  We know so little about how we perceive “reality”.  And, the more is learned about quantum mechanics, the less of what we know is correct.  Newton’s Laws of Motion are “wrong” when in “quantum mechanics”.

Birds see colors that we can’t; dogs hear what we can’t; and we can’t even understand “intelligence” in other species.

Sigh!

— 30 —


GOVEROTRAGEOUS: Stuff that is “incorrectly weighed” needs a consumer watchdog incentive

Friday, February 6, 2026

https://brobible.com/culture/article/walmart-meat-weight/

Georgia Man Picks Up 5-Pound Ham At Walmart. Then He Checks It On The Scale: ‘This Is The Second Time With The Kentucky Legend’
by Braden Bjella — January 27, 2026 6:00 pm

*** begin quote ***

In this video, which currently has over 6.4 million views, Wrigg looks over the refrigerated section with Kentucky Legend ham. After just a few seconds, he’s able to identify several hams that have significantly incorrect weights listed.

Bringing them all to the scale, Wrigg first demonstrates the scale’s accuracy by placing a 2-pound weight on it. Then, he weighs the hams. Consistently, each ham is around 3.1 pounds lighter than it claims to be on the package.

In a later video, Wrigg voices his concerns to an employee. The employee then verifies that the meats were incorrectly weighed.

*** and ***

In a TikTok DM exchange, Wrigg told BroBible neither Walmart nor Kentucky Legend has reached out to him about his videos. In the meantime, he has reached out to reached out to the Georgia Department of Agriculture Weights & Measures.

“I want is an explanation on why [there] were not better controls in the grocery department,” he said. “I have three videos and three different Walmarts with three different meats and three different brands; I found all of it in under seven minutes in each store. They seem to have no care to be surveying and checking their prices, whether they’re marking them or not.”

He further expressed a desire for procedures to be put in place to prevent this from happening. Wrigg added that, in his view, these procedures should have been added after the $45 million settlement.

*** end quote ***

How come in Japan, companies are scrupulous that the picture must match the product?  But here in the USA, it’s like everything is “optional”.  The best way is to put the consumer in charge of “quality control”.  How about a Gooferment diktat that if a consumer can find a defect in labeling, then they get the item free and a check for 100 times the price.  

In the cited example, that $25 ham would cost the company $2,500.  I bet that would make their eyes water and they’d find a way to solve the problem.  Maybe a second offense, could add a zero to the end of the multiplier.  And so forth and so on.

Hello, at a 10,000 mutiplier, I’d be at the store with my own scale.  More profitable than Bitcoin mining!

It’s all about incentives.  And neither Gooferment or their “Corporations” have the right ones in place.

Argh!

— 30 —


INTERESTING: They believe that their “ancestors descended from the clouds”

Thursday, February 5, 2026

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-15503013/tomb-cloud-people-discovery-Mexico.html

Lost tomb of the mysterious ‘cloud people’ unearthed after 1,400 years in ‘discovery of the decade’
By STACY LIBERATORE, US SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY EDITOR
Published: 14:57 EST, 27 January 2026 | Updated: 17:14 EST, 27 January 2026

*** begin quote ***

Archaeologists in Mexico have uncovered a 1,400-year-old tomb in the Central Valleys of Oaxaca that had been lost to history.

The stone structure, built by the Zapotec culture, known as Be’ena’a, or ‘The Cloud People’, is adorned with sculptures, murals and carved symbols that suggest ritual significance.

The Zapotec believed their ancestors descended from the clouds and that, in death, their souls returned to the heavens as spirits.

At the entrance sits a massive carved owl, its open beak revealing the face of a Zapotec lord, a symbol the National Institute of Anthropology and History said represented death and power.

*** end quote ***

Another demonstration of how little we humans “know”.

I’d never heard of these people.  Nor, do we know much about them or why they “disappeared” as a civilization.

Interesting to me is the “ancestors descended from the clouds”.  Is that more alien conspiracy theory?  Interesting in that it keeps coming up over and over again.

Sigh!

Anyway a great read and I hope some more dikw (i.e., data, information, knowledge, wisdom) comes out of the research effort.

— 30 —


INSPIRATIONAL: Happiness … …

Wednesday, February 4, 2026

… … this quote reminded me of an incident in my life.

“When I was 5 years old, my mother always told me that happiness was the key to life. When I went to school, they asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up. I wrote down ‘happy.’ They told me I didn’t understand the assignment; and I told them they didn’t understand life.” — John Lennon

I was in Katholick Skrule don’t remember what grade —  probably 4th or 5th —  and there was a lot of “pro-life” stuff going on.  Some factual; some propaganda.  Facts were facts, but propaganda was “opinions”.   The Catholic News, sermons form the pulpit, and some school lessons were about abortion. Anyway, long story short, at some point in time, we were given a test and the “question” was “what is YOUR opinion about abortion”.  And, I remember struggling with that.  Anyway, I had formed an opinion that it was horrible and anyone who did it must be under terrible metal duress.  Either crazy or hopeless.  I knew from Heinlein’s Science Fiction (“Beyond This Horizon”) that survival of the species is the Prime Directive, adaption / improvemnt was good, and eugenics was a really tricky subject.  <<Yeah, I was a reader of stuff far beyond my age appropriate stuff and my peers!>>. 

So, to answer the question, I wrote (and I remember it VIVIDLY): “In my opinion, abortion is morally wrong, but someone must be crazy or under duress to do it.  In any event, it’s not my place to judge.”

When the test came back, I got a #$%^&# F!

I protested to the teacher and the principal But got no where.

When I took it home to get my Mom’s signature, she was very disappointed.  But when I asked her: “How can my opinion be wrong?  Did I not understand my opinion or lied about it?”.  

She was speechless.  (I believe my uncles were laughing in the background.)

I said: “The question wasn’t “what the Chruch’s opinion was”, the Pope’s, the Principal’s, or what was Cannon Law.  (Yeah we had heard about that too!)

So Monday morning, she went into work late and took me to the Principal’s office and had me repeat my argument.  Maybe she being there made a difference, you was a feisty gal in her prime.  But my grade went from F to A since there was no objective measure of “correctness”.  (In fact everyone got some relief as the question was thrown out and rewritten to what the Church’s position was.)

Ever since then, I have never treated “arguments from authority” (one of the logical fallacies)  with anything but an opinion subject to verification.

Guess that counts for my crankiness?

— 30 —


NEWJERSEY: Criminal aliens roaming the USA should be as rare as a three dollar bill!

Tuesday, February 3, 2026

https://nj1015.com/dhs-detainer-hernando-garciamorales/?alef=&lh_aid=84349&lh_cid=tm089907ey&di=ed5c64d00383abf01e061e10dd05b8c7

nj1015.com
‘Sanctuary state failure’: Trump administration targets NJ after bus rock attack suspect stayed free
Dan Alexander Published: January 26, 2026

  • DHS has a detainer on the man accused of throwing a rock at a school bus
  • Hernando Garciamorales was charged with burglary in 2006 but remained free
  • DHS blames New Jersey’s sanctuary policies for allowing the suspect to remain free

*** begin quote ***

Hernando Garciamorales, a Mexican national, confessed to police that he threw a rock at the school bus carrying students from the Yeshivat Noam Jewish school home from a class trip on Jan. 4. The rock seriously injured the skull of a schoolgirl

During his detention hearing, prosecutors said Garciamorales had been charged with burglary in 2006 and was not taken into custody on the charge until 2023.

Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin blamed New Jersey for being a “sanctuary state,” which she says allowed Garciamorales to be released multiple times. It’s not known when Garciamorales entered the United States.

“ICE has lodged an arrest detainer against this monster, and we hope New Jersey’s sanctuary politicians will help us keep him off American streets for good. Under President Trump and Secretary Noem, criminal illegal aliens have no place in the U.S.,” McLaughlin said.

*** end quote ***

I’ve always said that Gooferment is at all levels immoral, ineffective, and inefficient. As well as untrustworthy.

Here’s a classic example, an illegal alien charged in 2006 and free to roam for “forever”.  Until he commits a shocking hate crime, do all the politicians and bureaucrats get into gear.

Argh!

Criminal aliens roaming the USA should be like pink elephants, jumbo shrimp, and free lunch, nonexistent!

Anywhere in the USA but also in the Pepuls Republik of Nu Jerzee!

— 30 —


DISCOURAGING: Still no Hippocratic oath for architects

Monday, February 2, 2026

https://jeffjacoby.com/31233/the-drawing-that-killed-my-father-family

The drawing that killed my father’s family
by Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe
January 25, 2026

*** begin quote ***

Unlike the medical profession, which established the Nuremberg Code in the immediate wake of the Nazi doctors’ trials, architecture resisted establishing ethical standards for decades. Not until 2020 — nearly 80 years after Dejaco drafted the whiteprint that paved the way to the Final Solution — did the American Institute of Architects adopt new ethics rules. But those rules specifically address execution chambers and torture facilities. They say nothing — certainly nothing explicit — about designing concentration camps, deportation infrastructure, or industrial-scale crematoria like those Dejaco created.

“There is still no Hippocratic oath for architects,” van Pelt told me.

I went to Los Angeles wondering, as I so often have, how educated professionals — architects, engineers, lawyers, railway administrators — could have facilitated the Holocaust. The whiteprint doesn’t answer that question, of course. It underscores it: an artifact of how ordinary professionalism can be bent to monstrous ends.

There is no evil so monstrous that people cannot be induced to do it, or to avert their gaze while it is being done, if it serves their professional, social, or ideological interests. Dejaco’s drawing is evidence. So is everything that happened afterward.

*** end quote ***

“There is no evil so monstrous that people cannot be induced to do it”?

Yet, usually on Facebook, I read stories where ordinary people took great person risk to save people they didn’t even know.

The Greek Island where the Bishop and the Mayor gave the Nazis the demanded “list of all the Jews” with only their two names on it. 

Or the woman who smuggled Jewish babies out of the ghetto.

Or the fellow who pretended to be a Spanish consul to write out passes.

Or the Japanese guy who wrote passes in direct disobedience to his superiors.

Or the priest who turned a seminary dorm into a hide out.

Maybe there are a few good souls that can be counted on?

— 30 —


HEROIC: Without Branch Rickey and Charles Thomas, Jackie Robinson never gets the chance

Sunday, February 1, 2026

FROM FACEBOOK

*** begin quote ***

A young Black man sat crying, rubbing his hands, wishing they were white. One man never forgot that night. And it changed America forever.

In 1909, a college baseball coach named Branch Rickey faced a moment most people would have forgotten within a week.

His team was on a road trip to South Bend, Indiana. One of his players — a talented young Black man named Charles Thomas — was denied a hotel room. Not because of anything he had done. Simply because of the color of his skin.

Rickey argued with the hotel manager. Got nowhere. Finally negotiated a compromise: Thomas could sleep on a cot in Rickey’s own room.

That night, Rickey was woken by a sound he would never forget.

Thomas was sitting on the edge of the cot, weeping. His hands were clasped together, rubbing frantically, desperately, as though trying to wash something away.

“What’s wrong?” Rickey asked.

Thomas looked down at his own hands and said through tears: “If I could just make them white. If I could just make them white.”

A talented young man, hating his own skin because the world had told him — every single day — that he was less than human.

Branch Rickey was twenty-seven years old. He carried that image with him for the next thirty-six years.

By 1945, Rickey had risen to become president and general manager of the Brooklyn Dodgers. He held one of the most powerful positions in professional baseball. And baseball, America’s pastime, had been racially segregated for over sixty years.

There were no written rules banning Black players. Just a quiet agreement among owners — a so-called gentleman’s agreement — that no one would sign them. Breaking that agreement meant becoming the most hated man in the sport.

Everyone told Rickey it was impossible. Owners would turn against him. White players would refuse to cooperate. Fans in certain cities would boycott. His career could be destroyed.

But Rickey was not a man who made decisions based on comfort.

He was deeply religious. As a young man, he had promised his mother he would never play baseball on Sundays. He kept that promise his entire life — as a player, a manager, and an executive — even when it cost him. His faith was not something he wore on Sundays and set aside the rest of the week. It guided everything he did.

And his faith told him that segregation was a moral failure. A stain on the game he loved. A betrayal of everything America claimed to believe about equality and opportunity.

So Rickey began to act. Quietly. Carefully. Strategically.

He sent scouts into the Negro Leagues to watch Black players. He studied reports. He gathered intelligence. But he was not simply looking for talent. Any number of Black players could play at the major league level. What he needed was something far harder to find.

He needed someone with the temperament to survive what was coming.

Because Rickey understood something crucial: the first Black player in modern Major League Baseball would not simply face skepticism. He would face systematic, daily, relentless cruelty. Pitchers would throw at his head. Runners would spike him deliberately. Teammates might refuse to speak to him. Hotels would deny him rooms. Restaurants would turn him away. Fans would scream the worst words imaginable.

And if that player ever fought back — if he ever lost his composure — segregationists would use it as proof that integration had failed.

Rickey needed someone strong enough to absorb all of that hatred and refuse to return it.

He found Jackie Robinson.

Robinson was twenty-six, playing for the Kansas City Monarchs. He was talented — an exceptional hitter, a brilliant base runner, a sharp and intelligent ballplayer. But what set him apart was everything else. He was a UCLA graduate. A former Army officer. A man with discipline, intelligence, and a quiet, controlled intensity that suggested he could carry an impossible burden without breaking.

In August 1945, Rickey brought Robinson to his office in Brooklyn. What followed was one of the most extraordinary meetings in American sports history.

For three hours, Rickey tested Robinson. He role-played every scenario Robinson would face. He pretended to be the racist hotel clerk. The opposing pitcher throwing at his head. The teammate who refused to acknowledge him. The fan screaming from the stands.

Rickey shouted at Robinson. Provoked him. Pushed him to the edge of his patience — deliberately, methodically — searching for the breaking point.

At one moment, Robinson looked at Rickey and asked directly: “Mr. Rickey, are you looking for a Negro who is afraid to fight back?”

Rickey leaned forward and said: “I’m looking for a ballplayer with guts enough not to fight back.”
Robinson understood. He signed.

He joined Brooklyn’s minor league affiliate in Montreal in 1946. Then, on April 15, 1947, Jackie Robinson stepped onto the field at Ebbets Field and became the first Black player in Major League Baseball in over sixty years.

What followed was exactly as brutal as Rickey had predicted.

The Philadelphia Phillies’ manager, Ben Chapman, led his entire team in shouting racial slurs so vile that other white players — on both teams — were visibly shaken. Opposing pitchers aimed for Robinson’s body. Runners slid into him with their spikes raised, trying to wound him. Some of his own teammates signed a petition asking to be traded rather than play alongside a Black man.

Hotels in certain cities refused him. He ate alone in separate locations from his teammates. He endured threats against his life.

Robinson bore all of it. He played. He competed. He excelled.

And he was so undeniably, brilliantly good that every argument against integration collapsed under the weight of his talent and his character.

Robinson won Rookie of the Year in 1947. He helped lead Brooklyn to the National League pennant.

Within years, other teams began signing Black players — not out of moral conviction, but because they realized they simply could not compete while excluding an entire population of talent.
By 1959, every team in Major League Baseball had integrated. The color barrier was gone.

When reporters asked Rickey why he had done it — why he had risked everything — his answer was simple and direct: “Someday I’m going to have to stand before God, and if He asks me why I didn’t let that Robinson fellow play, I don’t think saying ‘because of the color of his skin’ would be a good enough answer.”

Branch Rickey died in 1965 at the age of eighty-three. Jackie Robinson died in 1972 at just fifty-three, his body worn down by years of extraordinary stress. But Robinson lived long enough to see his number honored in ways no one could have predicted.

Today, the number 42 is retired across every team in Major League Baseball — the only number with that distinction. Every April 15, on Jackie Robinson Day, every player in the sport wears 42.

Robinson is remembered as a hero. Rightly so.

But here is what the story often forgets.

Jackie Robinson was brave. Jackie Robinson was talented. Jackie Robinson changed the game.

But without Branch Rickey, none of it happens.

Rickey was the one who saw the moral failure. Rickey was the one who risked his reputation, his career, and his standing in baseball to fix it. Rickey was the one who planned for years, who found the right man, who tested him, who defended him when the entire sport turned against them both.
Not for fame. Not for competitive advantage. Not for publicity.

Because one night in 1909, he watched a young man cry and try to wash the color from his own hands. And he decided that if he ever had the power to make sure no one had to feel that way again, he would use it.

Branch Rickey proved something that history keeps teaching us, if we are willing to listen: the people who change the world are not always the ones who make the headlines.

Sometimes they are the ones who simply decided, quietly and at great personal cost, that doing what is right matters more than anything else.

*** end quote ***

Without Branch Rickey and Charles Thomas, Jackie Robinson never gets the chance to break the “color barrier”!

Like all the stories about the Righteous Among the Nations at the Yad Vashem, the World Holocaust Remembrance Center, we never seem to remember the great heroes of humanity.

“The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world that it leaves to its children.” — Dietrich Bonhoeffer

I’d say that instead of “celebrities”, we should celebrate and emulate “the saints” that we don’t hear enough about.  I think Branch Rickey is an exemplar to the type of human that we need to learn about;

I hope all my moral challenges are little ones.  I’m not sure that I could answer big ones.

— 30 —  


INTERESTING: Does chronic exposure to ‘low-frequency electromagnetic fields’ cause health issues?

Sunday, February 1, 2026

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/nfl/article-15497681/Super-Bowl-teams-NOT-use-49ers-facility-investigation.html

Super Bowl teams will NOT use 49ers’ facility as investigation into electric substation theory continues
By ALEX RASKIN, US SPORTS NEWS EDITOR and OLIVER SALT, US ASSISTANT SPORTS EDITOR
Published: 09:41 EST, 26 January 2026 | Updated: 09:55 EST, 26 January 2026

*** begin quote ***

Neither the New England Patriots nor the Seattle Seahawks will use the San Francisco 49ers’ practice facility ahead of Super Bowl LX in Santa Clara, which might prove advantageous if injury concerns linked to a nearby electrical substation hold any validity.

Just as the NFL did a decade earlier when Santa Clara’s Levi’s Stadium hosted its first Super Bowl, the AFC and and NFC champions will once again practice on the Stanford and San Jose State campuses, respectively.

*** and ***

The theory is grounded in the litany of health concerns the team has faced over the last decade or so. In 2025 alone, the Niners lost a staggering $95million in salary cap value to injuries – more than any other NFL team.

And according to researcher Peter Cowan, a board-certified quantum biology practitioner, San Francisco’s injury issues may be the result of chronic exposure to ‘low-frequency electromagnetic fields’ from the electrical substation located right next to their stadium and practice facility.

*** end quote ***

I find this interesting because there have been many tin foil hat’s asserting that electricity can cause health problems.  As usual, they were always dismissed as kooks, crazies, or “tin foil hats”.  

But now that the NFL’s “livestock” (i.e., high priced players) seem to be hurt, now “everyone” is really concerned?

If I was one of the “livestock”, then I’d be very concerned.  Just as I should be about head trauma and CTE.

Argh!

— 30 —

— 30 —