Did White House Commit Perjury About GM Bailout?
Posted 08/07/2012 06:55 PM ET
*** begin quote ***
Cronyism: In recent days, the scope of the Obama White House’s cronyism has become shockingly apparent. A trove of emails shows it deprived thousands of workers of their pensions to benefit unions, then lied about it.
The news site The Daily Caller has obtained internal government emails that show the U.S. Treasury Department, led by Timothy Geithner, pushed in 2009 to end the pensions of 20,000 non-union employees of GM’s Delphi auto parts unit as part of the auto bailout.
What’s truly outrageous is that, while those workers were cheated of their full pensions, union employees of the same Delphi company got their pensions paid.
This financially ruinous favoritism of union workers over nonunion workers is blatantly unfair, illegal and a violation of Constitutional guarantees of equal treatment under the law. And the reason is political.
By its own reckoning, organized labor spent nearly $400 million to get Obama elected in 2008, more by far than any other interest group. So it’s no surprise the White House punished nonunion workers and rewarded union members when it came time to “bail out” GM.
Total value of the auto industry bailout to the unions was, by one estimate, $26 billion. For the unions, their $400 million was money well spent indeed.
What’s disturbing is it now appears several White House officials may have lied about how this obvious favoritism came about. Looking at the record, Treasury and White House officials appear guilty not just of political malfeasance, but of perjury as well. On this, the Daily Caller’s email cache is damning.
*** end quote ***
Frau Reinke was always enraged about “losing” her 5k$ GM bond to the Gooferment bailout.
We knew it was a corrupt bargain, but there was no recourse.
The public, bondholders, preferred stock holders, … … everyone got <synonym for the past tense of the procreation act.>!
She didn’t loose her “lunch money”. But it still hurt her.
The pensioners lost their “lunch money”!
That’s not right.
# – # – # – # – #