LIBERTY: Biometrics Social Security Cards

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

http://www.wired.com/politics/onlinerights/news/2007/05/biometric

National ID: Biometrics Pinned to Social Security Cards
Ryan Singel Email 05.15.07 | 2:00 AM

***Begin Quote***

The Social Security card faces its first major upgrade in 70 years under two immigration-reform proposals slated for debate this week that would add biometric information to the card and finally complete its slow metamorphosis into a national ID.

***End Quote***

Great, then when the gooferment loses the data, we can have REAL identity theft. How long before you’ll be able to buy a “biometric national id”. Or the whole kit to go into business with on ebay? Can I get “one week” in the pool. If it’s such a great idea, why does it have to be “mandated”?


JOBSEARCH: A new set of “rules” — adding the the Web-based biz!

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

http://www.prairietumbleweedfarm.com

ATTENTION KMART SHOPPERS!

I think the “rules” are changing again. If you’ve been down to my “turkey farm”, then you know that I think there have been four “rule changes”.

http://home.comcast.net/~v2y2r0n27rhj6y/TURKEY/index_Page369.htm

Unlike that TV show “wife swap” — yeah I watch too much tv — there was NO rules change ceremony.

I wish I had a dime for every seeker who stops in for help that is working with the old pair of dimes.

<<You know paradigm. Way of thinking. Glass half-full half-empty. Your mental model. Your meme (i.e., mental gene).>>

I’ll still meet folks using the “gold watch” paradigm and wondering why they are getting screwed, broke, busted, disgusted, and killed in the employment marketplace. They believed the “barbara streisand” that their employer peddled until it was too late. They were a freshly axed turkey!

But, back to my point, about the “rules”.

I am sensing a new rule. As with most change, it is sneaking up on us. It’s actually adding to my “Three Part Harmony” description. A fourth item is being added.

The Web-based biz!

It is trivial for you to form a Nevada corporation. (I just did it for about $1200!) It is trivial for you to assemble a web-based store. (I’m in the process of doing it now for under $250) And, if this lady can sell tumbleweed, then surely you have something to sell. I think the key thing to notice is the available click at the top of the website that displays the site in Japanese!!

So, the model for success HAS officially changed! Henceforth and forever more, the model is “Four Tined Fork”. That is: (1) Ruthless financial management — get it, keep it, make it work; (2) White Collar job; (3) Blue Collar skill; and (4) one or more Web-based businesses.

Don’t say you didn’t get the memo. Here it is. A wake up call.

(Surely, if she can sell tumbleweed to the Japanese, you can do better!)

# # # # #


JOBSEARCH: 29 per cent of all US jobs are be potentially offshorable

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml;jsessionid=
BQABRED1US4NPQFIQMGSFGGAVCBQWIV0?xml=/opinion/
2007/05/13/do1301.xml

http://tinyurl.com/32s4l2

 

New York – the new Venice?
By Niall Ferguson, Sunday Telegraph
Last Updated: 12:01am BST 13/05/2007

***Begin Quote***

Looking closely at which activities are most vulnerable as Asian competition ascends the value chain from manufacturing into services, Blinder estimates that “somewhere between 22 per cent and 29 per cent of all US jobs are or will be potentially offshorable within a decade or two”. That could be one in four jobs.

***End Quote***

Not a good omen for the future.


TECH SERVICE: FEEDBLITZ missed three posts yesterday

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

ARGH.

***Begin Quote***

1933 2007-05-13 7:32:43 am
TECHNOLOGY: My 5 reasons to start a Blog
https://reinkefj.wordpress.com/2007/05/13/technology-my-5-reasons-to-start-a-blog/
http://tinyurl.com/25yavb

1929 2007-05-13 6:14:00 am
MONEY: Panama Has Thrived Without A Central Bank
https://reinkefj.wordpress.com/2007/05/13/money-panama-has-thrived-without-a-central-bank/
http://tinyurl.com/2kvhpt

1932 2007-05-13 6:07:36 am
LINKEDIN: My “granfalloon” won a prize in the recent “group hug” about LinkedIn
https://reinkefj.wordpress.com/2007/05/13/linkedin-my-granfalloon-won-a-prize-in-the-recent-group-hug-about-linkedin/
http://tinyurl.com/2cx3kn

***End Quote***

The guy form FEEDBLITZ support suspects it has to do with preloading content by playing with the time stamps.

(You DO know I have a real job right?)


RANT: Off to jury duty

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

The gooferment has enslaved me. I am commanded by force to serve it. It’s not enough that it makes me a partial slave by stealing my money via inflation, taxes, fees, and economic friction. It steals the most precious think I have … my time and attention. Argh!


GUNS: Response from Assemblywoman Greenstein

Monday, May 14, 2007

***Begin Quote***

Dear Mr. Reinke:

Thank you for your thoughts on A3701. The Assemblywoman will keep them in mind should the legislation come up before the full Assembly. In the interim, please do not hesitate to contact me if I can be of assistance on this or any other matter.

Sincerely
Scott Crass
Constituent Services Director
ASW Greenstein

———-

From: reinkefj
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 7:07 AM
To: Baroni, Asm. D.O.; Greenstein, Asw. D.O.; Inverso, Sen. D.O.
Subject: Proposed Gun Legislation

Dear Assemblyman Bill, Assemblywoman Linda, and Senator Peter:

Please impress on your colleagues that this anti-gun bills are: (a) un Constitutional; (b) immoral; (c) ineffective; and (d) inefficient. And, vote that way.

Clearly, the Second Amendment precludes Government from regulating guns. Slice it and dice it any way you want the Dead Old White Guys were right on. When you take guns away from the People, or at least try to, that sets the stage for tyranny. Just remember Nazi Germany. Disarm the citizens; death camps in the 30’s and 40’s. Governments kill people in massive quantities. I can repeat all the bumper stickers, because they are all true. But let’s stick to the one most on point. When you outlaw, guns, only outlaws will have guns. Look to England with home invasions on the rise and they still have gun killings. Criminal don’t obey laws.

It is immoral to remove the People’s Right to Self-defense. I know you’d all love to live in a world where nothing bad ever happens. But, that’s not real life. The murders on the VT campus were a DIRECT result of creating a “gun free zone”. Guess it wasn’t do “gun free”? While we can’t ever know that there would have been an armed person there if that diktat was not in effect, we KNOW positively that there wasn’t even a possibility of one with it in effect. Even a young girl or an old teacher might have been able to stop the slaughter when the nut had to reload. But the politicians and bureaucrats ensured that the shooter would have no worries about armed resistance. John Lott’s studies show the power of guns in the hands of law abiding people. It’s immoral to deny the People the protection of “sprinkling a few sheepdogs among the sheep”. Recognize that good law abiding people will defend themselves, their families, their neighbors, and even complete strangers if give a fighting chance. Only the very bravest, or the foolish, will attempt to take on a shooter unarmed. But, given a weapon, how many of those VT dead an injured would have be able to defend themselves.

Gun Laws are ineffective. The NJ Legislature has passed how many gun laws. And, taxes on guns. And, restrictions. And, and, and. Still criminals shoot people. Do you think that all the laws in the world aren’t going to help? So for example, see any 50’s being used in crimes? Oh but let’s pass a law. What’s next, “if it saves one child”? You can’t legislate a solution. Go ahead and continue to try, but it’s futile. Good people will still be good; bad bad. When you pass a gun law, you shift the balance. Less good people with guns; more bad people with guns. When the law is exceptionally stupid, you might even turn “good people” into “criminals”. Stop the insanity. Every time you pass “gun laws”, you make the People less safe. Let’s take a Rutgers co-ed. Bright young girl. You have effectively made it impossible for her to defend herself. She get raped. Who’s fault? YOURS! You didn’t trust her to know when and how to defend herself. I do. Do I think that she will suddenly lose her mind and begin blowing people away. Not likely. Might some amorous young man get threatened. Could be. One thing is for sure that young girl will be in control. And, it’s a self-nominating thing. No one says she has to carry; she can choose to. With out you legislators playing God with her life. I trust women to know when they need to use deadly force. Don’t you? I trust all my fellow citizens to know when to use deadly force. Don’t you?

The gun laws are inefficient. The costs of ownership are artificially increased by legislation. Economics teaches us that when you raise the cost, the supply demand curve shifts. Raise the taxes and fees and you deprive the poor of the good. They can’t afford it. Now I know the political elite, the rich, and the celebrities all have all the armed security they need. I’m sure that the politicians and bureaucrats get all the gun permits that they could want. How about the poor minority woman who has to walk from the bus stop to her home at night? She doesn’t deserve to be able to protect herself. She doesn’t even show up on anyone’s radar. When you eliminate cheap guns or raise their cost, exactly whose hands are you taking them out of? Not the criminal’s. Not the elite’s. Yup, that poor person is at risk.

So in summary, I urge you to vote against ALL gun regulations everywhere anytime. The criminals won’t obey. And, the law abiding, who would, aren’t the problem.

Now, would you like to talk about the “drug war”? Would you believe it too is (a) un Constitutional; (b) immoral; (c) ineffective; and (d) inefficient.

If you have to make laws, make them limiting government. You guys don’t even fasten your own seat belts, but make us.

*** begin quote ***

New Jersey Update On Gun Ban Legislation!

On Thursday, May 10, the New Jersey Assembly Law and Public Safety Committee decided to take no action on Assembly Bill 3494, sponsored by Assemblywoman Pamela Lampitt (D-6) and Assemblyman Peter Barnes (D-18). A3494 would drastically raises all firearm license and permit fees and would allow the Superintendent of State Police the discretion to annually reconsider fees for a manufacturer or dealer license, a carry permit, the firearms purchase I.D. (FID), and the pistol purchase permits.The committee also voted 4 to 2 to amend Assembly Bill 3998, sponsored by Assemblymen Reed Gusciora (D-15), Michael Panter (D-12), and Robert Gordon (D-38), which would ban the possession of all .50 BMG rifles by declaring such items to be a destructive device.

*** end quote ***

# # #

We’ll see if it makes a difference. I’m not hopeful.

# # # # #


YAHOO ANSWER: new blog … better

Monday, May 14, 2007

*** begin quote ***

I have a new blog…which are things I can do to make it better??

*** end quote ***

You might want to ditch the pop unders. Most people have them blocked and they make you look like a used car salesman. The site has a hodge podge of add ins down the right side that I found distracting. You might want to review the various A list bloggers, who blog on blogging. The first thing that caught my eye was that you don’t have you own domain. (neither did I at first) That’s something you need if you ever want to move, control your content, or own the “word” on the net.

# # # # #


LIBERTY: You are the homegrown terrorist threat

Monday, May 14, 2007

http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/05/13/
you-are-the-homegrown-terrorist-threat/

http://tinyurl.com/25aoc7

You are the homegrown terrorist threat
By Michael Hampton on Virginia

***Begin Quote***

Ogre also put together a nice interactive quiz which you can use to determine if you are a domestic terrorist. I scored a 70, which apparently means there’s a cell with my name on it in Guantanamo Bay.

***End Quote***

The test is at:

http://www.quizilla.com/score/display.php?item_id=4833864

and I scored a 65%.

I guess I’ll be picked up right after Senor Hampton. I’m reminded of the poem attributed to Pastor Martin Niemoller.

*** begin quote ***

First they came for the Jews
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Jew.

*** end quote ***

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Niem%C3%B6ller

Speak up now or forever hold your piece.

# # # # #


YAHOO ANSWER: Wireless Limited Connectivity

Monday, May 14, 2007

*** begin quote ***

Wireless Limited Connectivity/ Local Access Only???

the last few days every time I try to use any public internet connection that previously worked fine….my computer will connect only with limited connectivity or local access. any tips? also I get the message “connecting to the network is taking longer than usual” sometimes when I try. If I run diagnostics it either says resetting the adapter might help or it says there is no problem OR it says cannot ping dns server (remote host). the wierd thing is no matter what public server I try it wont work. help!!

*** end quote ***

You didn’t say what OS you were running but let’s assume some version of Windoze XP. If not, please ignore what follows. WXP has a component called WirelessZeroConfig. When WXP “loses its mind” about wireless network restarting this service sometimes help. I have also had success in uninstalling the networking interface, and other “stuff” and letting WXP “rediscover” it all again. One tip. Always reboot COLD (i.e., power completely off for five minutes. not 4:59) TWICE (i.e., no joke two completely down cycles). Some times WXP needs a good enema to clean itself out. When I help colleagues, coworkers, or others with connectivity issues, I like to have a “dork” (i.e., a plain old working system so I know it’s not the network, but it’s the platform I’m working on that has the problem) with me. At home, I have an ancient thinkpad that barely runs WXP to be my “dork” when I have real problems on my real notebook. Hope this helps.

# # # # #


RANT: Staples website only works with IE

Monday, May 14, 2007

Lost me as a customer. I don’t do IE.