MONEY: Deploying a CD ladder isn’t easy

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

Interesting, that the local bank where we are placing Frau’s ira cd ladder, has some special problems.

They have some lame offering schedule (i.e., 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 month terms).

snip121

[Obviously my feed back from the last visit fell on deaf ears. What a surprise. I’m shocked! A la Casablanca. A bank not listening. Maybe that’s my next career opportunity.]

Note: there is no 9 month offering. And the underlying interest rate is flat between 24 and 36.

Then, they have 9, 11, 13, and other “special offerings”.

snip122

So, it is very interesting to construct, or fill in, a ladder.

SNIP122A

So I was king, or at least running the bank, and you came in and asked for a ladder. I’d ask you what would make you happy. You want the 4 quarters over 5 years to all have an equal amount. POOF! That’s what I would offer. If you wanted them to all come due on the 13th of the month. Poof! That’s what I’d do. If you wanted them printed on pink paper. poof! (yeah it gets old!) That’s what I’d do.

I’d also rationalize my rates to give every longer duration a time premium preference. That’s no two time periods alike. (Hey, they are making big bucks off cds.) And, I’d offer automagic roll over. You just give me your money and I’ll take care of everything for you. AND, I’ll give you the best interest rate I can afford to pay.

And, if your account goes over the FDIC insurance cap, I’ll set up the overflow with my competitor down the street.

You just come to me and all your concerns will be addressed.


RANT: Press mischaracterizes Imus response

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

http://www.nypost.com/seven/04102007/news/nationalnews/
imus_gets_the_old_heave_ho_national
news_john_mazor_and_david_k__li.htm?page=2

I think you erred in your article.

Imus didn’t get the “heave ho”.

(I’ve gotten the “heave ho”. And, it felt like being fired and there was no “ho” in the heaving.)

Imus got a “time out” in the popular parlance.

And, even that was “delayed”.

Wonder what Nanny911 would say to that?


MONEY: The Federal Reserve Monopoly over Money

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2007/tst040907.htm

The Federal Reserve Monopoly over Money
April 9, 2007
Ron Paul
2008 Republican Presidential Candidate

***Begin Quote***

Recently I had the opportunity to question Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke when he appeared before the congressional Joint Economic committee. The topic that morning was the state of the American economy, and many of my colleagues raised questions about how the Fed might better “regulate” things to ease fears of an economic downturn. The tenor of my colleagues’ questions suggested that Mr. Bernanke’s job is nothing less than to run the U.S. economy, like some kind of Soviet central planner.

Certainly it’s true that Mr. Bernanke can drastically affect the economy at the drop of a hat, simply by making decisions about the money supply and interest rates. But why do members of Congress assume this is good? Why do we accept without objection that a small group of people on the Federal Reserve Board wields so much power over our economic well-being? Is centralized, monopoly control over our money even compatible with a supposedly free-market economy?

Few Americans give much thought to the Federal Reserve System or monetary policy in general. But even as they strive to earn a living, and hopefully save or invest for the future, Congress and the Federal Reserve Bank are working insidiously against them. Day by day, every dollar you have is being devalued.

The greatest threat facing America today is not terrorism, or foreign economic competition, or illegal immigration. The greatest threat facing America today is the disastrous fiscal policies of our own government, marked by shameless deficit spending and Federal Reserve currency devaluation. It is this one-two punch– Congress spending more than it can tax or borrow, and the Fed printing money to make up the difference– that threatens to impoverish us by further destroying the value of our dollars.

The Fed’s inflationary policies hurt older people the most. Older people generally rely on fixed incomes from pensions and Social Security, along with their savings. Inflation destroys the buying power of their fixed incomes, while low interest rates reduce any income from savings. So while Fed policies encourage younger people to overborrow because interest rates are so low, they also punish thrifty older people who saved for retirement.
The financial press sometimes criticizes Federal Reserve policy, but the validity of the fiat system itself is never challenged. Both political parties want the Fed to print more money, either to support social spending or military adventurism. Politicians want the printing presses to run faster and create more credit, so that the economy will be healed like magic- or so they believe.

Fiat dollars allow us to live beyond our means, but only for so long. History shows that when the destruction of monetary value becomes rampant, nearly everyone suffers and the economic and political structure becomes unstable. Spendthrift politicians may love a system that generates more and more money for their special interest projects, but the rest of us have good reason to be concerned about our monetary system and the future value of our dollars.

***End Quote***

Any doubt why I support his bid for the Presidency.


RANT: Obama trying out for “quarterback”; let’s meet the “coach” who’ll be calling the shots?

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

http://www.drudgereport.com/flash1.htm

LETTERMAN TO OBAMA: WILL HILLARY BE YOUR VP?
Mon Apr 09 2007 19:50:21 ET
To air Monday Night on CBS ‘LATE SHOW’:

*** begin quote ***

Obama: “You know, I think all the candidates are in to win and one of the things about the process is by the end of it, after having gone through all the debates and all the campaigning out in various states, people get a pretty good sense of who various candidates are and, but I think we’re all on the same team. We’re all Democrats. I think most of us want to see a healthcare system that provides coverage to everybody. Most of want to see an education system that gives opportunity to every kid. All of us think that we’ve got to start getting our troops out of Iraq, and so really what we’re doing is we’re trying out for quarterback…”

*** end quote ***

If he thinks he’s trying out for “quarterback”, then who is the “coach”? That’s the fellow we should be interviewing for the job as “president”.


RANT: Imus’ hateful words rebuked

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

http://www.wnbc.com/news/11602539/detail.html?dl=headlineclick

Rutgers Team To Weigh In On Imus Comments
Rutgers Press Conference Set For 11 A.M.
POSTED: 7:16 am EDT April 10, 2007

*** begin quote ***

Members of the Rutgers women’s basketball team and coach C. Vivian Stringer planned to offer their feelings Tuesday on the gathering storm.

*** end quote ***

When I first heard this bozo’s comment, I was shocked. I thought he was trying for ratings. And, he got them. Everyone is talking about him and his comments.

For my part, I never liked the “shock jock” genre. Hence, I give no of them any of my valuable attention.

For the RU women, as a season ticket holder, I remind them “sticks ‘n’ stones”. Gratuitous opinions don’t make me what I am or am not. As far as their image, that is their responsibility. As far as how Imus sees them, that’s his problem.

I see strong young women who are finding their way in a difficult world. As far as their hairdos, I wish I had jet black hair again. As far as their sexual orientation, habits, or propensities, that’s no one’s business but theirs.

The comments of a clown should be “rewarded” with social ostracism. If all the moral outrage was turning off his show, his ratings would administer the ultimate rebuke. For my part, since I don’t listen to him and don’t like him, I can’t participate in the “turn off”. I can tell anyone who admits to listening that his comments reflect badly on them. When you fill your mind with trash, what would you expect?

I think that the marketplace should administer a strong lesson to Imus, MSNBC, and CBS Radio. For our part, we should ignore all of them until they DEMONSTRATE a change of heart.

I urge the RU women to take the high road. I’d just ask “what could he have been watching as they busted their collective butts to accomplish something”. I certainly didn’t see what he sees. And, I’ve been to a lot more games than he has.