TECH: ROBOFORM gets a big thumbs up from me. Even if it ain’t free!

Thursday, September 14, 2006

http://blogs.pcworld.com/tipsandtweaks/archives/002703.html

***Begin Quote***

And what’s your favorite utility?

***End Quote***

http://www.roboform.com/

Roboform is a top-rated Password Manager and Web Form Filler that completely automates password entering and form filling:
* Memorizes your passwords and Logs You In automatically.
* Generates random passwords that hackers cannot guess.
* Backs up your passwords, Copies them between computers.
Where does anyone think I dig up all these long random unique character strings for email ids, passwords, and userids? Yup, roboform’s generate!


TECH: LookOut aka Outlook has an annoying behavior as it works. Does PLAXO inherit that?

Thursday, September 14, 2006

I think it is interesting that, unlike any other application that shares my platform, LookOut seizes the focus. It doesn’t minimize while it doing certain stuff, but literally ‘takes over”. When LookOut is doing its work, I like to play a game of Solitaire. (It makes me less crazed while I am waiting. Argh!) Lookout, and to some extent Plaxo, won’t let me. It insists that I watch it “work”. Sometimes it twirls an hourglass for my amusement. But, many times it just sits there “promising” me it’s working. how do I know? Argh! I notice it when PLAXO is running, but the culprit may be LookOut. I can’t wait to get to Linux and dump all this trash. Wonder how much time I’ll save?


JOBSEARCH: BUILDYOURNETWORKS … another LinkedIn augmentation site?

Thursday, September 14, 2006

http://www.buildyournetworks.com/

Value as yet unknown. TBI (To be investigated) WTP (When Time Permits)


TECH: ZIKI … has some promise in social networking. Now will it get enough participation?

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

http://ziki.com/people/reinkefj

***Begin Quote***

Ziki.com helps you control your online identity and offers everyone a new way to share, promote and monetize their content through social networking.

Welcome to Ziki.com, the new social network

* Be Found. Tag yourself with your own keywords
* Gather all your digital life in one place: blog entries, Del.icio.us links, Flickr photos, YouTube videos and more
* Share all the content you create and publish on the web
* Promote yourself, your content, your favorites, your network and your groups
* Build your own social web including your network, your favorite content, your groups, your audience – your whole digital life
* Discover people based on the tags they use to describe themselves
* Find what you are looking for in your personal content or the content of the community (coming soon)
* Connect with people, companies and groups based on what you’re looking for (e.g. jobs, selling ad space on your blog) (coming soon)

***End Quote***


TECH: GOOGLE’s PAGE CREATOR is a neat place to “throw stuff” quickly

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

http://jxymxu7sn5ho9d.googlepages.com/home

Is a throw away area that doesn’t consume my webspace? It’s from the Google Lab’s so it’s a beta beta. But it works for me. And, might for you.


TECH: “FEEDBLITZ” … will email you a daily summary of my blog … free for both of us!

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

http://www.feedblitz.com/f/?Sub=98446

Ain’t the internet great! Don’t you love free stuff?


JOBSEARCH: Recruiters, LinkedIn, Other Users, Expectations, and “Rules”

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

FROM: The LinkedIn Innovators Yahoo Group
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/LinkedInnovators/

Recruiter Networking Pushing the Limits…….
Posted by: “tamara719”
Tue Sep 12, 2006 10:52 pm (PST)
***Begin Quote***

Hello All

My name is Tamara. I am a recruiter based out of the Dallas/Ft.Worth
area.

I am enjoying my membership on Linked-in. I have found old friends,
business associates and made many new friends and contacts. I am
thankful for this resource.

However, I am becoming perturbed about Recruiters contacting
Recruiters for “referrals.” I am more then willing to aid a fellow
recruiter in a search for financial compensation. I do not work for
free (none of us do), and I will not fill positions without
consideration. I have been contacted with lures such as “if you help
me I’ll give you access to my vast network?”

Others have answered me in shock as if I had asked for something out
of this realm of existence. I have posted on my profile that I do
this for a living, having done so for over thirteen years now, and
that I am paid only if I place the candidate; or work on a retained
basis. And, I might add that in-house recruiters should not seek aid
from recruiters without compensation. If you want to utilize my
firm’s services please do so, with a signed agreement.

I am not striving to sound harsh or difficult to get along with.
However, I am being overwhelmed with requests for “who you know” or
“Can you recommend somebody for this role?” Yes, I probably can
however unless I know that you, the recruiter, will compensate me then
I will continue to work on my own openings for my own clients.

This is the nature of business. This is why all of us on Linked-in
are in business in one facet or another. To make a living; to pay our
bills, and to enjoy a certain quality of life.

Thus, I would like to be removed from the blasts asking for referrals.
Unless you intend to compensate me for my effort, which means to me:
a) Searching for a passive candidate
b) Qualifying them
c) Verifying their degree(s)
d) Checking previous employment
f) Checking three professional references

I will have to be compensated.

I have been meaning to write this a long time, and after opening
Linked-in today, I said that’s it, it is long over due for me to get
my message out to all concerned.

I love what I do. How many people in recruiting can say that? How
many people can say that about their current positions? Thus, nothing
would make me prouder or happier then to truly Link-in with other
recruiters as business partners. We can partner together to achieve
an ends to a means. I see everything right about this suggestion.

Tamara
President/Founder
Endeavor Group
Ft. Worth, TX

***End Quote***

HERE’S MY RESPONSE

>My name is Tamara. I am a recruiter based out of the Dallas/Ft.Worth

Hello, Tamara. Let me see if I can “react” to what you are saying.

>However, I am becoming perturbed about Recruiters contacting

I don’t think that LinkedIn was created for recruiters to earn money. I could be mistaken, but I thought it was about “networking”. It’s an evolving understanding, but it was to form voluntary connections between people for their mutual benefit.

>I will not fill positions without consideration

I understand that everyone has to make a buck. AND, I have run into some “interesting” tactics by recruiters to do that. But, if you don’t want to “help” then just say so.

>If you want to utilize my firm’s services please do so, with a signed agreement.

And, if you want to use the services of the average joe who’s just here to help out, please feel free to do so with a signed agreement with for example ME! You don’t get to have it both ways. Either it’s help freely offered and freely given or it’s a glorified meat market. And how do I get my “cut”?

>I am not striving to sound harsh or difficult to get along with.

Ahh, but you are. You are trying to form a business model in basically what is “supposedly” a free exchange of contact information.

Some of the more “sleezy” things I have found recruiters doing are:

(1) “taking hostages” — basically creating a profile for some one they are representing and not permitting any contact except for a fee. I found a fellow I knew in College, wanted to reconnect, and the recruiter refused unless I paid him. A plague on his house.

(2) “creating strawmen” — creating a profile for a candidate they were representing and attempting to leverage an agreement out of another recruiter to source him.

I think that both these are “immoral tactics”.

Bottom line: IMHO LinkedIn grew because of average shmoes like me wanted to bypass recruiters of all types — the corporate hr types and the retained / contingency search — and just connect on their own.

An invasion of recruiters, sensing a good thing, and “joined”. Now they are kludging up the works trying to retain value for themselves without concern to its impact on the resource. It’s akin to the tragedy of the commons argument.

>I will have to be compensated.

Me too. Don’t ask for what you are not prepared to give. It’s like the Creative Commons discussion. Share and share alike OR else.

>nothing would make me prouder or happier then to truly Link-in with other
>recruiters as business partners. We can partner together to achieve

Sure, because you are making money.

I think it is disingenuous to say on the one hand “share your information with me” under a certain set of engagement rules and then not to follow thru with your obligation.

>I see everything right about this suggestion.

I see it differently. LinkedIn asks me to join, share, and urge others to do the same. You want to join, take, but not share unless you get a cut.

Sorry, but I think that’s wrong.

Fjohn


RANT: my second favorite rant is out of state cars commuting in NJ

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

Now, I’m not talking about PA, DE, or NY. I couldn’t “prove” that they were NJ residents just trying to save a few bucks. But today 98pj90 from massachusetts and the 7signals from georgia sure looked funny. Now maybe they were consultants just in for the day, week, or month. But, I think one reason our car insurance is such a problem is “foreigners”. We already KNOW lots of people drive without insurance. I think, believe without hard evidence, that we have NJ residents use out of state plates to avoid the cost of NJ insurance. imho! arghhh!


ALUM: I like Plaxo for keeping in touch.

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

Dear Fellow Alumni,

I’m updating my address book using Plaxo. May I have your update?
Plaxo is a great free tool for keeping in sync. If you find it useful and sign up, then we will always be in sync without annoying update messages. Two Plaxo-ites don’t have to do anything to stay in sync. That’s perfect for lazy people like me! Don’t worry about strangers; to get connected in Plaxo, you must have the other person’s email address to start with.

If you don’t want to use Plaxo, I understand. But, please take a moment to share with me with your latest contact info. I try NOT to annoy people with this tool to often. Once or twice a year seems modest. When Plaxo “ages” your record or reports the email address is bouncing, then I have been known to pick up the phone and check up on people.

I hate “losing” people especially “anyone”. But I especially hate “losing” my fellow alums.

I don’t really mind if you decline, you have your good reasons, and that’s what works for you. Even if you decline, here’s my info for your use. If I can be of any help anytime, just yell. I’ve got a big rolodex that you can tap, I have contact information on about 6k of our fellow Jaspers of whom over a 1k read my weekly alumni ezine, about 500 headhunters, 800 LinkedIn contacts, and a slew of others.

I run a “turkey farm” for the unemployed, blog several notes each day, and put almost all all my stuff out on my web site for you to “steal”. My writing projects are just to bad to share. Maybe when I’m dead! Someone will publish my poetry!

Did I mention I’m a notary? Who’s a Type A.

Thanks for your patience and your time reading this. Best wishes.

A fellow alum


RANT: Creating an unhijackable plane … Is this like jumbo shrimp?

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23366509-details/Scientists+test++hijack-proof+plane/article.do

News news from The Evening Standard
London, Tuesday 12.09.06
Scientists test hijack-proof plane

***Begin Quote***

Tests have begun on a hijack-proof airliner that will steer clear of tall buildings if taken over by terrorists, according to defence giant BAE Systems.

Scientists are creating a computer system which spots suspicious passenger behaviour and can identify if an intruder is trying to take control.

***AND***

There may also be a computer which, through a sophisticated biometric system, can defy a mid-flight takeover by spotting an intruder and guiding the aircraft to the nearest airport.

***End Quote***

I agree with the prior comment (e.g., arm the pilots).

In the US, back before we went collectively nuts, pilots were REQUIRED to be armed when the plane carried the US Mail. Guess that rule was a hang over from the reaction to Jesse James robbing the mail car on a train.

The joke is that rule, like this story of the computer system to “protect” the plane, is locking the barn door after the horse has been stolen. We need to focus on future vulnerabilities; not past failures.

And it has to be simple, idiot-proof measures. Because we know the Universe just produces smarter idiots.

My vision of this system is that the pilot will be over the pond in a jugundo passenger jet with a thousand souls aboard, he gets a paper cut from his sandwich wrap, the system “detects” a stranger at the controls, and “lands” the plane immediately right next to the Titanic. Remember it was pronounced “unsinkable” by the experts; this detection software will be “foolproof” too!

Please I are an injineer of IT system and stuff happens. Let’s not kid ourselves about how things fail. they fail — when we least expect it, at the most inopportune time, and with the most impact. Or at least is seems that way.

KISS and solve future problems; not past ones. imho