POLITICAL: Negative rights and free condoms

Saturday, March 3, 2012

http://www.keywestlou.com/2012/03/weather-yesterday-was-fantastic-once.html

Saturday, March 3, 2012

*** begin quote ***

The hit topic was Rush Limbaugh’s abuse of a Georgetown University female student. Sandra Fluke. Sandra testified before a Congressional committee earlier in the week in support of birth control. She believed it should be available free to women under Obama health care.

Limbaugh referred her as a “slut” and “prostitute.” His theory basically was that if  Sandra wanted her contraception pills paid for by another, she wanted to have her sex paid for. Any woman who wanted her sex paid for was a prostitute.

*** end quote ***

Sorry, but I agree the sun has affected your legal mind. Negative rights?

If I have to pay for this woman’s birth control, then I am slave. The only rights a human is entitled to is negative ones. (Like John Locke said.) No one can prevent me from speaking; they don’t have to listen, but they can shut me up.

Positive rights — a “right” to healthcare, condoms, unionize — enslave some one to some extent. DO the doctors have to work 50% for free? Do the condom makers have to give away their product? Do workers have be enslaved to a Big Union and a Big Company at the same time? Positive rights create a requirement that someone provide them. Who?

Sorry, but imho, you are just flat wrong.

# – # – # – # – #


POLITICAL: Sebelius is off the reservation

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/it-is-not-per-se-a-tax-sebelius-contradicts-administrations-legal-defense-of-obamacare/

Government ‘It Is Not, Per Se, a Tax’: Sebelius Contradicts Administration’s Legal Defense of Obamacare
Posted on February 28, 2012 at 8:23pm by Mytheos Holt

*** begin quote ***

In a stunning video from a hearing before the House Ways and Means Committee today, Kathleen Sebelius contradicted the Obama administration Department of Justice’s official stance on the individual mandate by denying that the mandate was a tax.

*** end quote ***

These folks in the District of Corruption can’t ever get their stories straight.

# – # – # – # – #


POLITICAL: Obamcare, Why So Many Waivers

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

http://www.lifenews.com/2011/05/19/if-obamcare-is-so-great-why-are-so-many-waivers-approved/

If Obamcare is So Great, Why Are So Many Waivers Approved?
by Robert Morrison | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 5/19/11 12:56 PM

# – # – #

Good question. Why?

# # # # #


POLITICAL: Care and compassion?

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

http://web.docuticker.com/go/docubase/63883

February 15, 2011 22:24
UK: Care and compassion?
Report of the Health Service Ombudsman on ten investigations into NHS care of older people

*** begin quote ***

Sadly, of the ten people featured in this report, nine died during the events described here, or soon afterwards. In accordance with the legislation, my investigations were conducted in private and their identities have not been revealed.

I encourage Members of both Houses to read the stories of my investigations included in this report. I would ask that you then pause and reflect on my findings: that the reasonable expectation that an older person or their family may have of dignified, pain-free end of life care, in clean surroundingsin hospital, is not being fulfilled. Instead, these accounts present a picture of NHS provision that is failing to respond to the needs of older people with care and compassion and to provide even the most basic standards of care.

*** end quote ***

And, we expect Obamacare to deliver something better?

If you believe this, I have a bridge for sale!

# # # # #


RANT: Obamacare was ill considered; here come the UCs

Friday, October 1, 2010

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703431604575522413101063070.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection

   * HEALTH INDUSTRY

   * SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

McDonald’s May Drop Health Plan

By JANET ADAMY

*** begin quote ***

McDonald’s Corp. has warned federal regulators that it could drop its health insurance plan for nearly 30,000 hourly restaurant workers unless regulators waive a new requirement of the U.S. health overhaul.

*** end quote ***

UC = Unintended Consequences

Wasn’t this supposed to cover everyone with insurance?

It would have been cheaper to put everyone, without insurance, on the Federal payroll.

Thanks, FDR, for your Wage / Price controls of WW2.

Sorry, but why is term life insurance cheap and medical insurance expensive?

Gooferment!

# # # # #