GOVEROTRAGEOUS: When the Gooferment dosn’t stand up for property rights …

Saturday, August 16, 2025

https://voxday.net/2025/08/06/a-conquered-people/

A Conquered People

*** begin quote ***

The British people still haven’t figured out yet that neither their police nor their government represent them or are on their side. And they’re still too “law-abiding” and respectful of “authority” to take matters into their own hands, even when their homes are literally being occupied by foreigners. From 4chan:

*** and ***

My husband wants to break in and throw them out with his brothers. I’ve told him not to do this.

*** and ***

If you won’t even defend your homes, your wives, or your daughters, you are a conquered people. You WILL be dispossessed and no one will shed any tears for you. Notice that the wife has actively dissuaded her husband from doing the only thing that will recover their home in a reasonable amount of time.

*** end quote ***

How many times in the past few years have we read about “squatters” (usually illegal immigrants) taking over someone’s property?  And, all attempts to get them out have failed.  “Squatters” magically become “tenants” with “rights” and “due process”.  And, if and when they are tossed out, the places is in ruins.  That’s just not right.

  • Why if they present a “false document” are they not immediately arrested for fraud? (Maybe leases have to be filed with the courts like deeds for a small recording fee?  On a blockchain to be easily seen by authorities?)
  • Why when they do get tossed are they not held liable for damages?
  • And, if they are illegals, why are they not IMMEDIATELY deported?
  • Why is such behavior tolerated by civil society?

In short, the Gooferment is lax in their protections of property.

Argh!

— 30 —

Leave a Comment » | GOVEROTRAGEOUS | Tagged: , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by reinkefj

POLITICAL:Can the President Kill You?

Friday, March 16, 2012

http://lewrockwell.com/napolitano/napolitano44.1.html

Can the President Kill You?
by Andrew P. Napolitano

*** begin quote ***

Can the president kill an American simply because the person is dangerous and his arrest would be impractical? Can the president be judge, jury and executioner of an American in a foreign country because he believes that would keep America safe? Can Congress authorize the president to do this?

Earlier this week, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder attempted to justify presidential killing in a speech at Northwestern University law school. In it, he recognized the requirement of the Fifth Amendment for due process. He argued that the president may substitute the traditionally understood due process – a public jury trial – with the president’s own novel version of it; that would be a secret deliberation about killing. Without mentioning the name of the American the president recently ordered killed, Holder suggested that the president’s careful consideration of the case of New Mexico-born Anwar al-Awlaki constituted a substituted form of due process.

Holder argued that the act of reviewing al-Awlaki’s alleged crimes, what he was doing in Yemen and the imminent danger he posed provided al-Awlaki with a substituted form of due process. He did not mention how this substitution applied to al-Awlaki’s 16-year-old son and a family friend, who were also executed by CIA drones. And he did not address the utter absence of any support in the Constitution or Supreme Court case law for his novel theory.

*** end quote ***

Can you say: “star chamber” or “kangaroo court”?

Obviously, the answer is yes. It was “yes” at Waco, Ruby Ridge, and the Pihilly AIM house.

“We, The Sheeple” let “them”, politicians of both flavors, get away with it.

When do “we” stand up and say, “stop”!

# – # – # – # – #  2012-Mar-08 @ 21:19

 

 

 

 

Leave a Comment » | Political | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by reinkefj