INSPIRATIONAL: One hill; one marine

Monday, October 26, 2009

http://www.lvrj.com/opinion/in-1942-it-came-down-to-one-marine-65931412.html

VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: In 1942, it came down to one Marine

*** begin quote ***

It’s hard to envision — or, for the dwindling few, to remember — what the world looked like on Oct. 26, 1942, when a few thousand U.S. Marines stood essentially stranded on the God-forsaken jungle island of Guadalcanal, placed like a speed bump at the end of the long blue-water slot between New Guinea and the Bismarck Archipelago, the most likely route for the Japanese Navy to take if they hoped to reach Australia.

On Guadalcanal, the Marines struggled to complete an airfield. Japanese Adm. Isoroku Yamamoto knew what that meant. No effort would be spared to dislodge these upstart Yanks. Before long, relentless Japanese counterattacks had driven supporting U.S. Navy vessels from inshore waters. The Marines were on their own.

As Platoon Sgt. Mitchell Paige and his 33 riflemen set about carefully placing their four water-cooled .30-caliber Brownings, manning their section of the thin khaki line that was expected to defend Henderson Field against the assault everyone expected on the night of Oct. 25, 1942, it’s unlikely anyone thought they were about to provide the definitive answer to what had previously been a mainly theoretical question: How many able-bodied U.S. Marines does it take to hold a hill against a desperate attacking force of 2,000?

*** and ***

Is the lesson that we should fund a permanent expensive worldwide empire of military occupation? I don’t think so — doesn’t seem compatible, somehow, with a republican government of limited powers. Overstretched empires have a tendency to collapse from the center, anyway. In fact, our forces were pretty far-flung, as it was, in 1941 — though their apparent strength, in places like the Philippines, proved hollow.

But once, 85 long years ago, the arrogant victorious allies quibbled about whether bankrupt Germany should be made to pay them $4 billion or $10 billion in reparations over the next 60 years, as frustrated German veterans in Bavaria grew fed up and marched down to join the German Workers’ Party, an outfit that promised them a rebirth of Aryan glory, a “New Deal,” if you will.

Once, those who sought “peace, peace at any price” sold scrap steel to the Japanese, attended “peace conferences,” stood by and hoped for the best as Hitler re-militarized the Rhineland and then grabbed Austria and the Sudentenland in what we now know were a series of huge bluffs — the fuhrer started out using “tanks” that would barely have stood up to a cap pistol.

We gave away our advantages, one by one, based on our trust in the good will of man. Till it came down to one Marine.

Shall we have to cut it that close, again?

*** end quote ***

One Marine?

Is this like the Texas Ranger slogan, “one riot; one Ranger!”?

We have a lot to learn. And, peace at all costs is a losing strategy. As Heinlein said: “An armed society is a polite society.” That goes for the community of nations as well.

Requiescat In Pacem Marine Corps Col. Mitchell Paige.

Where will we find more of men like him? In the playstation generation?

Not bloody well likely.

# # # # #


MONEY: The dollar is done

Monday, October 26, 2009

http://www.lewrockwell.com/schiff/schiff53.1.html

Dollar Forced to Abdicate by Peter Schiff

*** begin quote ***

To save our currency, the Fed must get very aggressive with interest rate hikes and reign in the supply of dollars that have flooded the world over the past few years. The federal government must also do its part by cutting spending, which means no more stimulus and no more bailouts. Undoubtedly, these actions will have unpleasant economic and political consequences. A student who studies harder may have to miss a party or two. A simple analogy, but unfortunately it is that simple.

*** end quote ***

BUT, (there is always a big butt), it will never happen.

The “patient” (i.e., the dollar) is a “dead man walking”. The only question is when.

The congress critters killed it. And, us.

Like the line from the movie “Red October”, “You killed us, you arrogant ass!”

Only in this case, it’s the political class.

# # # # #


INTERESTING: Gooferment goof for liberty

Sunday, October 25, 2009

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125597721400194603.html?mod=yhoofront

EUROPE NEWS
OCTOBER 21, 2009
Did Brinkmannship Fell Berlin’s Wall? Brinkmann Says It Did
Reporter Claims He, Not an Italian Competitor, Caused an Apparatchik to Err and Open Border
By MARCUS WALKER

*** begin quote ***

Pressed on the meaning of the new travel policy — When did it come into force? Did it apply to West Berlin? Did people need a passport? — the flustered apparatchik rustled his papers and gave confusing answers that led the news media to believe the border was open, with immediate effect.

The result, once East Berliners had seen that night’s news on West German television, was chaos at border crossings across the city.

At Bornholmer Strasse, one of the main checkpoints in central Berlin, confused border guards couldn’t get clear orders on how to deal with the crush, and debated whether to open fire. Instead, they opened the barrier, and the Berlin Wall was history.

*** end quote ***

I love a good “gooferment” story. Especially when it means a victory for liberty! LOL!!

# # # # #


INTERESTING: Earhart

Sunday, October 25, 2009

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amelia_Earhart

Saw the movie. Swank did a good job and even looked like her. Hollywood made her into an adulteress. (I don’t know if she was, but never speak ill of the dead.) Gere was a distraction.

All in all “interesting”.

# # # # #


NEWJERSEY: Mob rule in SBTWP

Saturday, October 24, 2009

http://centraljersey.com/articles/2009/10/21/opinions/doc4adf8e896a7e2524530393.txt

DISPATCHES: Power to the people
Farm’s preservation shows that engaged citizens can effect change
Wednesday, October 21, 2009 6:47 PM EDT
By Hank Kalet, Managing Editor

*** begin quote ***

The lesson of all these efforts is fairly simple: If you want members of your local town council, county freeholder board, state Legislature or Congress to act on your behalf, you can’t sit on your hands. You have to get involved.

*** end quote ***

Ahh, the madness of crowds.

There is no way that the individual can stop the mob frenzy to do “something”.

Preserved farmland. How can someone be against that.

Too bad if you are, because your taxes have been used for it. You write as if these “governing bodies” have assets to “invest” in “preserving” farm land. They don’t. They only have that which was taken by force from one’s fellow taxpayers. TO pay for someone’s pet project.

Argh!

If those involved were to form a non-profit and raise money by donations to pull this off, then I’d be impressed.

Perform a mental experiment. How do you think effort would go? Would people VOLUNTARILY chip in? In the amounts you needed to pull this off.

(We both know he answer to that!)

No, see, all you can do is steal what you could not raise voluntarily. And, then the robbers — some of whom may not even realize what they have done — expect kudos for doing it.

Then, you go an urge us to do more of it.

Argh!

The Dead Old White Guys were very right to fear the mob rule of democracy.

Throwing in “health care” is just more of the same. In this case, you and the rest of the mob are stealing from future generations — just as the socialists did with Social Security. And, it is all not going to end pleasantly as the socialists are destroying the country.

# # # # #


TECHNOLOGY: $500 Mapleseed Drone

Saturday, October 24, 2009

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/10/video-500-mapleseed-drone-takes-flight/

Video: $500 Mapleseed Drone Takes Flight
    * By Noah Shachtman
    * October 21, 2009

*** begin quote ***

Last year, the Pentagon’s mad science arm let expire a Lockheed contract to build a mini-drone in the shape of a maple seed. Lord knows how much the project costs. But it’s a good bet the Lockheed ‘bot had a price tag several orders of magnitude higher than this $500 maple-drone, put together by students at the University of Maryland.

*** end quote ***

Neat. Pioneering work done by a grad student team?

# # # # #


JOBSEARCH: Rejection

Friday, October 23, 2009

AN EMAIL I RECEIVED

*** begin quote ***

This email address is used for outgoing messages only. Replies will be undeliverable.

Thank you for your interest in employment with Prudential! On September 30, 2009, Prudential upgraded to a new electronic job application system.

If you would like to be considered for a position at Prudential, please create a new profile. Any job applications, resumes, and/or cover letters that you submitted to Prudential prior to September 30th, were not converted to the new system. Going forward, you can check the status of your application by logging in at any time.

Thank you.

Prudential Staffing

*** end quote ***

(1) Don’t you just love the “caring”. It just screams “we control the monologue”.

(2) Not me. I haven’t applied there in a long time. Bet everyone got the same date.

(3) Create a new profile? Ya gotta be kidding. It takes a half hour to answer all the screens. No, not that desperate for rejection.

(4) “Thank you”. My data wasn’t important enough for you to migrate. Some thanks.

Why would anyone want to deal with them?

Just wait until the economy turns around and the good candidates are scarce again. (Assuming the gooferment gets out of the way!) People have long memories.

# # # # #

# # # # #


POLITICAL: Fixing healthcare? Not gonna happen with the gooferment involved

Friday, October 23, 2009

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig10/scott-m1.1.1.html

Your Doctor Serves The State, Not You
by Michael Scott, MD

*** begin quote ***

While I agree that physicians commonly order tests and perform procedures that are medically unnecessary, this fact is due to two main reasons the author completely fails to mention: first, the tort system, which terrorizes doctors in their practices on a daily basis, and second, that patients have minimal if any financial stake in their care. As a consequence, they demand everything in excess, and are often angry when we suggest a desired test or treatment is not indicated, no matter how much time we spend trying to educate them. When people don’t pay for something with their own money, they hardly care about costs. They just milk others for all they’re worth, because after all, that’s what they perceive everybody else is doing to them, too.

*** end quote ***

Clearly, the current insurance system is broken. And, isn’t going to get fixed anytime soon.

We clearly have to get the lawyers out of suing the doctors for everything that goes wrong. They are docs ; not gods.

We clearly have to return to the days of yesteryear, when insurance was insurance. Car insurance doesn’t insure oil changes. And, patients have to pay a percentage of the true cost; not a “co-pay”!

We have to make health care insurance like auto or life; disconnected from employment.

Finally, we have to get the gooferment OUT of health, health care, and health care insurance completely. They can’t do anything right. It’s in their nature. (I still haven’t heard of then doing ANYTHING effectively. Never mind efficiently!)

Argh!

# # # # #


RANT: Why wait for a flawed concept?

Thursday, October 22, 2009

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=113483

Where’s the health-care bill?
Posted: October 21, 2009
Joseph Farah is founder, editor and CEO of WND

*** begin quote ***

After all, who can object to a bill that hasn’t yet been written? When someone objects to provisions of the legislation, you can always say, “That’s not in the bill.” And, of course, you would be right. Nothing’s in the bill. The bill doesn’t exist. It will be written after approval.

*** end quote ***

It’s all well and good to say “wait till we see something”, but by then it will be too late. And, I think this may be the watershed event, like during the Vietnam war, that brings the Fat Old White People, (as opposed to the Dead Old White Guys), out to the streets in revolt. The gooferment has steadily eroded our rights, like the DOWG’s feared, and may have actually stepped over the Rubicon. Add to their criminal actions with subprime, GM / Chrysler, takeover the banks, and one and on. Maybe The People will rise up and smite them. Maybe I’m a “tin foil hat”, but I think it’s going to get messy. Perhaps, even worse. That’s why I don’t think we can wait to see the bill. The bill really doesn’t matter. It’s the whole concept that is flawed.

# # # # #


POLITICAL: Afgan, the graveyard of empires?

Thursday, October 22, 2009

http://www.lewrockwell.com/gaddy/gaddy70.1.html

The Real Reason for More Troops in Afghanistan by Michael Gaddy

*** begin quote ***

Financially crippled due to our continued wars for empire and the printing of billions of new dollars to repay political cronies in the financial world has left us in a precarious position in Afghanistan. We will try to counter the financial prowess of China, to whom we owe billions and their military ties to Russia with the blood and lives of tens of thousands of new US military forces. When China calls in our financial markers, and they will if challenged, what will become of our country? We are about to escalate a war we cannot win. How long will it be before Americans care more for the lives of their children than they do for the state and refuse to participate in the madness?

*** end quote ***

Maybe I do have a permanent “tin foil hat”, but when politicians talk I look for the lies. There are always some: commission, omission, obfuscation, spin, what’s in it for me, how can I punish my enemies, and on and on.

Maybe more troops would protect “our” troops that are already there, but do you think these politicians worry about that?

Maybe more troops would allow “victory”, but that’s never been defined. So how would we know?

If the Soviets fought and lost in Afghanistan for a decade, what make us think that Iraq-style surge would work?

No, like Viet Nam, Republic of, we’ve been beaten again, by an enemy playing of a different “field”. In Viet Nam, it was our “Third Generation” military facing off against a “Fourth Generation” guerilla army. In Afghanistan, it was our “Third Generation” military facing off against a “Fifth Generation” stateless individual insurgency.

(I have a theory of what the Sixth Generation conflict will look like. Citizens against their own “government” like 1957 Hungry.)

Whatever the case, we can be sure we are not getting anything near the “truth” from our politicians.

# # # # #