USA: sometimes one’s own wisdom comes back to haunt you

Thursday, September 13, 2007

http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/09/guess-who-said-.html

Guess Who Said This (in 1987)
By David Axe
September 12, 2007 | 1:39:59 PM
Categories: Strategery

*** begin quote ***

The Vietnam experience left the military leadership feeling that they should advise against involvement in counterinsurgencies unless specific, perhaps unlikely, circumstances obtain — i.e. domestic public support, the promise of a quick campaign, and freedom to employ whatever force is necessary to achieve rapid victory. In light of such criteria, committing U.S. units to counterinsurgencies appears to be a very problematic proposition, difficult to conclude before domestic support erodes and costly enough to threaten the well-being of all America’s military forces (and hence the country’s national security), not just those involved in the actual counterinsurgency.

*** end quote ***

Reminds me about what Greenspan said about gold BEFORE becoming the “maestro” of the FED.

This has to be the best find!

# # # # #


RANT: When do we get to the truth about Lincoln?

Thursday, September 13, 2007

http://www.lewrockwell.com/dilorenzo/dilorenzo127.html

A Fitting Tribute to a Corrupt Tyrant
by Thomas J. DiLorenzo

*** begin quote ***

Lincoln himself was a corrupt corporate insider and a lifelong mercantilist. The economic policies that he spent his entire adult life championing – protectionist tariffs, corporate welfare for railroad and road-building corporations, and inflationary central banking – were nothing but an Americanized version of the corrupt British mercantilist system that the American Revolution was fought to discard. They were all designed to use the powers of the state to benefit a small, politically powerful cabal of (mostly Northern) manufacturers, bankers, and politicians at the expense of the rest of society. They were also designed to enlarge the state by tying all of these powerful interests to it politically.

*** end quote ***

Interesting how the liberal media and the gooferment skoolz have turned this fellow into an icon. The thing I really can’t understand is awarding him the appellation “freed the slaves”. Revisionists seem to have overlooked a whole lot of facts. Glad I’m an injineer where facts matter more than opinions.

# # # # #


USA: The gooferement kills private rail

Sunday, September 9, 2007

http://www.ncc-1776.org/tle2007/tle433-20070902-05.html

 

Of Rails and Liberty
by Daniel G. Jennings
Jdangjenn@aol.com

Credit The Libertarian Enterprise

*** begin quote ***

Once upon a time, America had an efficient, cost effective transportation system technology that adequately served the needs of virtually all citizens. This transportation system utilized cutting edge high technology and didn’t run on imported energy sources like oil. Best of all this transportation was almost entirely owned and operated by private enterprise and developed without government money.

The year was 1910 and the transportation system was electric powered rail. Back in 1910 residents of most American urban areas could take an electric powered trolley car to work for about five cents. Private developers were expanding what we would call light rail networks to suburban and rural areas. Plans were even afoot for high speed electric powered trains that connected major cities similar to the Japanese and French bullet trains.

So what happened to this transportation system? Government and politicians got to work that’s happened. The politicians didn’t like rail because it was an efficient privately owned and operated transportation system that they couldn’t control. So they looked around for an alternative and found one: the automobile.

*** end quote ***

Interesting?

Gooferment creates the problem. Then, “solves” it.

Argh!

# # # # #


USA: Ron Paul’s after the debate report!

Saturday, September 8, 2007

FROM RON’S EMAIL TO THE FAITHFUL

*** begin quote ***

September 7, 2007

Has this been a hectic and encouraging time! First we got almost 17% in the Texas straw poll, an event set-up to represent the establishment, with very restrictive voting rules. That 17% of the Republican hierarchy would support our views, after a full day of pro-war propaganda, is good news. Then we won the more open Maryland Republican straw poll with 28%. In both cases, as usual, hard-working, well-organized volunteers made all the difference.

The Fox debate was a lot of fun as well. It’s true that a few of the network people are not exactly with us on foreign or domestic policy (though one famous guy whispered to me that he is a libertarian), but the audience-with lots of students from the University of New Hampshire-was definitely fair and balanced, as their enthusiastic reaction showed.

My opponents called for more war, more torture, more secret prisons, more eavesdropping, more presidential power. Some seemed to identify the government and the people as if they were one entity. But you and I know that once the government moves beyond its very limited constitutional mandate, it is an opponent of the people, a rip-off operation that takes our money and our freedom and our social peace, and gives us a mess of statist pottage in return.

The government failed miserably on 911 to protect us, despite spending trillions. So the answer was supposed to be the giant, socialist Department of Homeland Security, protecting you and me from taking our toothpaste on the airplane. I was ridiculed for saying that the airlines, which know best how to protect their property, should have been allowed to arm their pilots. But then, you and I really believe in the Second Amendment. It is not just a political slogan for us.

When I discussed the blowback that came from us intervening on the Arabian peninsula, Chris Wallace asked me if I wanted to follow the marching orders of al-Qaeda. I responded that I wanted to follow the marching orders of the Constitution, and not wage undeclared, aggressive wars that cause us only trouble. This is a mystifying to some, of course, but not to more and more Americans.

There was much talk of taxes, and a pledge not to raise rates. But as usual, I was not allowed to discuss my lifelong pledge to abolish the income tax. Just holding the line, when the government takes such vast sums through an illegitimate guilty-until-proven-innocent system, is hardly enough. We need to slash taxes and spending if we are to have a future of prosperity for ourselves and our families.

After the debate, many young people gathered around the stage to discuss our ideas and ask questions about them (and to have me sign their badges). My colleagues got no such response, and after a few moments, “security” ordered me off the stage. Can’t have any such demonstration of interest in liberty.

But the young are with us, and so are Americans of every stripe. Even party officials. When one of my opponent said it was OK to lose elections through supporting the Iraq war, that set party people’s teeth on edge, and rightly so. The Republican party is shrinking. We need new people. It’s either our ideas or President Hillary, and more and more people recognize it.

But the media, and everyone else, will be looking at fundraising totals at the end of this month. They’ll judge us by how we do. And we need help to wage what we hope will be a full-scale, 50-state campaign. Please help me head into the next quarter fully armed to do battle for freedom, peace and prosperity. Make your most generous contribution https://www.ronpaul2008.com/donate/. This Revolution is on the move, but it very much needs your support.

Sincerely,

Ron

*** end quote ***

Go Ron Paul!

# # # # #


USA: What a small DOD should do

Saturday, September 8, 2007

http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance119.html

DOD 101
by Laurence M. Vance

*** begin quote ***

The purpose of the U.S. military should be to defend the United States. That’s it. Nothing more. Using the military for anything else perverts the purpose of the military. It is not the purpose of the U.S. military to spread democracy or goodwill, remove dictators, change a regime, fight communism or Islam, train foreign armies, open foreign markets, protect U.S. commercial interests, provide disaster relief, or provide humanitarian aid. The U.S. military should be engaged exclusively in defending the United States, not defending other countries, and certainly not attacking them. Now that is real DOD 101.

*** end quote ***

I would quibble ever so slightly that providing disaster relief is a good training exercise. With a vastly reduced military necessary to defend the Constitutional US of A, they may need “stuff” to do to keep them from being “flabby”. So helping in a NOLA or a forest fire might be good “exercise”. A small quibble.

# # # # #


USA: Dick Morris skewers Hillary

Thursday, September 6, 2007

Wed, Sep 5 2007 9:57 PM
HILLARY’S HYPOCRISY
By Dick Morris Reports

***Begin Quote***

And, in the Senate, where she pretends to have developed her penchant for compromise, she still has not succeeded in passing a single major piece of legislation.

***End Quote***

As the ex-Clinton advisor, he really knows them. Over and above all the petty and major scandals she’s attached to, his most telling indictment. She doesn’t get anything done! One might tolerate a Patton when you need victories in war. I just don’t see what others see in her. Hillarycare?

# # # # #


USA: Ron Paul’s secret weapon

Wednesday, September 5, 2007

http://www.lewrockwell.com/ostrowski/ostrowski85.html

Ron Paul and the Four Horsemen
by James Ostrowski

***Begin Quote***

Finally, Ron Paul’s secret weapon, Hillary Clinton, has all but wrapped up the nomination. Obama has run out of steam and Edwards is going nowhere. The prospect of another President Clinton will focus the minds of Republican primary voters. They need to realize that only a Republican who represents a sharp break from the Gingrich-Bush-era legacy of sleaze, corruption, bloated spending and belligerence can beat Hillary in November 2008.

***End Quote***

Hillary’s enough to scare me.

She certainly would test theory that the President has a much power as the figurehead on a Viking ship to steer it.

Made she could actually out do her hubbie and get herself impeached and removed from office. She lost me a commodity trades back in AK. Now there is a felony she got away with. Just a tigers and leopards, she’ll run true to form.

# # # # #


USA: Why Liberals Should Support Ron Paul

Monday, September 3, 2007

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_karsten__070901_why_liberals_should_.htm

September 2, 2007 at 05:04:21
Why Liberals Should Support Ron Paul
by Karsten Nicholson

***Begin Quote***

This is a response to: Peace, Injustice and Ron Paul by David Swanson.

“If Ron Paul had been president for the past 6 years, a million more Iraqis would be alive, and another 4 million would not be refugees. The world would be a safer place, and Americans would have lost fewer freedoms.” — David Swanson

This is very true. Many liberals have recognized and praised Ron Paul’s courageous stance on foreign policy and civil liberties. This is a man who is not afraid to go into a Republican debate, with 9 neo-cons, in South Carolina, on Fox News, and stand up to thugs like Rudy Giuliani. In the second Republican debate to which I am referring to, Ron Paul correctly pointed out that our foreign policy is a major contributing factor to the underlying cause of 9/11. “They don’t hate us because we’re rich or we’re free, they hate us because we’ve been over there, we’ve been bombing Iraq for 10 years.” Ron Paul stood his ground, and said that with a non-interventionist foreign policy, we’d be less likely to incite hatred, and therefore more safe and more free.

***End Quote***

The writer goes into an awe inspiring litany of why Ron should be the next President.

# # # # #


POLITICAL USA: Go Ron Paul

Friday, August 31, 2007

August 27, 2007

Many political pundits from the mainstream media dismissed Ron Paul’s campaign for president from the day it started. However, when support for Dr. Paul came alive via the Internet, those so-called experts had to acknowledge (reluctantly for most of them) that there is support for Ron Paul. But then, they tried to dismiss that support as little more than an Internet craze that could not translate into “real support on the ground.”

Well, we know what they either don’t know or don’t want to admit: Americans from every state and every walk of life are supporting Ron Paul’s message of freedom, peace and prosperity.

As straw polls from around the nation are showing, more Americans by the day are deciding they want Ron Paul to be our next president.

Your donation will help us sustain this national momentum as we organize across America. See the straw poll results for yourself and then make a donation. You can now use PayPal to keep our momentum going.

List of Straw Poll Results
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/straw-poll-results/

Thank you!

Kent Snyder
Chairman, Ron Paul 2008