RANT: The sleeze will steal the retirement money if they hit the debt ceiling

Monday, April 11, 2011

http://www.federaltimes.com/article/20110405/BENEFITS02/104050306/

Treasury may borrow federal retirement funds in debt emergency
By SEAN REILLY | Last Updated: April 5, 2011

*** begin quote ***

The government could temporarily tap tens of billions of dollars from two federal employee retirement programs if Congress fails to raise the federal debt ceiling next month, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told lawmakers.

The government expects to hit a $14.3 trillion debt ceiling on May 16 or before, Geithner said in a Monday letter.

Geither implored Congress to extend the debt ceiling by that deadline and said that if Congress does not, Treasury will be forced to borrow money from the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund, and the Thrift Savings Plan’s Government Securities Investment Fund, or G Fund, both of which are invested in U.S. Treasury securities. Those two moves could free up $142 billion through early July.

*** end quote ***

Talk about brazen!

I’m not a fan of Gooferment workers, but stealing their retirement money. Someone should be in jail!

# # # # #


RANT: The most murderous institution in human history; time for a new meme?

Sunday, April 10, 2011

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/84684.html

Oppose DC? You Must Hate Mankind

Posted by Thomas Woods on April 4, 2011 03:27 PM

*** begin quote ***

Would it have been wrong for the states to try to nullify the internment of the Japanese in the 1940s?

Was it wrong for Wisconsin, expressly citing the Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 and 1799 (which introduced nullification into the American political lexicon), to oppose the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850?

Is the federal war on drugs just A-OK, even though it’s been called the new Jim Crow, just because it happens to be carried out by our wise overlords in Washington rather than by the states?

Would it have been easier or more difficult for the totalitarian regimes of the 20th century to carry out their atrocities against vulnerable minorities (whether Jews or Ukrainian “kulaks” as the case may be) had those countries instead been loose confederations of states?

In other words, although states at all levels are capable of great enormities, why is the moral benefit of the doubt given to the most murderous institution in human history, instead of to those decentralizing forces that seek to limit its predatory behavior?

*** end quote ***

Why do we tolerate the Gooferment?

# # # # #


RANT: Maybe secession is the only alternative?

Saturday, April 9, 2011

http://www.dickmorris.com/blog/its-no-deal-its-a-sellout/

IT’S NO DEAL, IT’S A SELLOUT By Dick Morris And Eileen McGann 04.9.2011

*** begin quote ***     

John Boehner has just given away the Republican victory of 2010 at the bargaining table. Like the proverbial Uncle Sam who always wins the war but loses the peace, he has unilaterally disarmed the Republican Party by showing that he will not shut down the government and will, instead, willingly give way on even the most modest of cuts in order to avoid it. He now has no arrows left in his quiver.

Having failed to stand firm for just $61 billion in cuts in a budget of $3.7 trillion, how can we expect him to stand firm over the debt limit extension or the 2012 budget?

*** and ***

In short, we have accomplished nothing by our hard work in 2010.

Except we have learned a lesson.

And the lesson is this: We need to purify our party and purge it of the likes of John Boehner and all those Congressmen who vote for the budget sellout. The Tea Party must take the lead in this purifying fire. We must not let the RINOs win!

*** end quote ***

Argh, maybe secession is the only alternative?

# # # # #


RANT: Involuntary servitude?

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2011/04/06/2011-04-06_verdict_yer_a_joke_judge_forces_woman_to_eternal_jury_duty_after_racist_remarks_.html

Judge gives ‘Juror No. 799’ indefinite jury duty after she makes racist remarks on questionnaire

BY JOHN MARZULLI DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

Wednesday, April 6th 2011, 4:00 AM

*** begin quote ***

An incensed federal judge sentenced a racist Brooklyn woman to indefinite jury duty on Tuesday after she trashed the NYPD and minorities.

“This is an outrage, and so are you!” Federal Judge Nicholas Garaufis told the woman, holding up her bile-filled juror questionnaire.

Juror No. 799, an Asian woman in her 20s who said she works in the garment industry, was up for jury duty in the death penalty trial of Bonanno crime boss Vincent (Vinny Gorgeous) Basciano.

*** end quote ***

Isn’t this slavery?

Mundanes must serve at the pleasure of the elite?

Didn’t Lincoln free the slaves?

Where is the woman’s rights? Surely this violates the Fourth and Fifth Amendment?

Argh!

Gooferment, politicians and bureaucrats.

Secession and revolt!

# # # # #


RANT: Shut it down

Monday, April 4, 2011

*** begin quote ***

The Hill newspaper reports Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has effectively issued an ultimatum with a threat to shut down the federal government unless House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) agrees to continue long-term funding of Planned Parenthood, the nation’s #1 abortion provider, with your tax dollars.

*** end quote ***

Time to try a new meme.

# – # – # – # – # 2011-Apr-04 @ 21:35


RANT: “Where’s the Birth Certificate?”

Monday, April 4, 2011

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCKT4OJ9tuU&feature=player_embedded

*** begin quote ***

Two-time No. 1 New York Times bestselling author Jerome Corsi, a Ph.D. in political science from Harvard and a senior staff writer at WND, has written a new book that promises to be a game-changer on the issue of Barack Obama’s eligibility.

It’s called “Where’s the Birth Certificate? The Case that Barack Obama is Not Eligible to Be President.”

The result of more than two years of solid investigative research by Corsi and a team of WND reporters and editors, this book is destined to be a huge bestseller and change the dynamics of the debate over eligibility – IF, of course, the book is not spiked by the hostile establishment media.

Advance orders for this book from retailers across the U.S. already suggest it will be Corsi’s third No. 1 New York Times bestseller – probably bigger than the previous two. Imagine how that will change the character of the debate on this critical constitutional issue.

*** end quote ***

As I’ve blogged and said before, I am NOT a “birth-er”. Those folks believe that BHO44 was not born in the USA. To me, that’s as irrational to believe that he was born in the USA. Neither belief has ANY evidence to back it up. Hence I am a “proof-er”.

The short form certificate produced by the DNC was an obvious kludge. You couldn’t get a passport, driver license, or such with it.

And, what about all the other “paperwork” that is being suppressed.

At a cost of millions of dollars.

What’s being hidden?

It’s always the coverup that’s worse than the disclosure.

The American Sheeple have a right to know the truth. We can handle it.

What is it, who knew it, and when did they know it?

# # # # #


RANT: And, maybe the whole thing is a bad idea?

Sunday, April 3, 2011

The other night, I couldn’t believe my ears. Two IT execs, both of whom I like and respect, advocated a return to the draft. Each for different reasons, but both advocated for it.

I was speechless.

… but only for a few minutes.

Having been drafted, had my life, and the live of my loved ones, ripped apart by the Viet Nam war — may Presidents IKE, JFK, and LBJ have a special ever lasting reward for their role in it — and seen loved ones inalterably changed by it. I saw a country ripped apart. Families divided. Old friends lost forever. And not just by battlefield deaths. I’ve seen at least one set of sweethearts ripped apart, never to marry, and never to have been what they could have been. Next to Lincoln’s War, what I call the War of Northern Aggression, can I imagine a more “natural disaster” type devastation on the USA. WW2 wasn’t as corrosive to the American spirit.

Any way, snapping back to reality, I took up the opposition.

# – # – #

Point #1 — the draft would stop foreign wars because the American public would have their sons in any war; the all volunteer service means that the poor minorities fight the wars.

This was Charlie Rangel’s idea. The draft didn’t keep us out of Viet Nam. And, the big Gooferment war hawks don’t seem to be kept out of anything in the way of a foreign war. I believe the Dead Old White Guys knew that a standing army was dangerous. Too likely to be used. The Constitution calls for the Army to be around for only two years. How did we let it become an eternal institution? Only the Navy as an ongoing entity is “constitutional”. If you want to prevent wars, and Presidents who think they are above the Constitutional requirement for Congress to declare war, your going to have to impeach one or two to get the message across. And, the voters are going to have to back up that action.

Of course, when women get their act together, they can unilaterally stop offensive wars. “Yes, when we get out of here. We’re going to have to fix that. You know we control something that can get it done. Not the ballot box, but the other box. (A giant sucking sound as pure Miss Marie used that very rude idiom.) We can end war.” — character “Marie” being anti-war in CHURCH 10●19●62 Volume 1 Page 262

# – # – #

Point #2 — the draft and boot camp would be good for the young; teaching them discipline and needed life skills. And, an unspoken “benefit” was to create a common bond that would transcend “culture”. (Omitted because of the racist overtones.)

This is the height of ego. I know what’s good for you young whippersnappers. Why in my day we walked (insert absurd number) to and from school. Uphill both ways.

If in fact, there was NO army, then, and only then, would there be an argument that every yungster might be called on to defend the homeland. Think Israel where every girl and boy does a tour in the Army; they have a Civil Defense problem. Or, Switzerland, where every man gets trained and a military grade rifle and ammo to take home; with follow up drills every so often.

But, to say “You have to go to basic because it’s good for you” is absurdly trivial. To quote a modern clergyman recently in the news: “Who the hell do you think you are?”

You have no right to force me to do anything.

If we had a culture of self-defense, then maybe you might say that as condition of voting, you have to be capable of defending the USA.

And, maybe it’s in the form of a voluntary summer camp for ten weeks the summer after your 16th birthday. And, maybe it’s a one shot opportunity. And, maybe it’s justified. And maybe there are different ones for boys and girls.

And, maybe the whole thing is a bad idea?

# – # – #

http://www.house.gov/list/press/ny15_rangel/CBRStatementonDraft02142006.html

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
February 14, 2006
Contact: George Dalley
(202) 225-4365


RANGEL REINTRODUCES DRAFT BILL

WASHINGTON – Lawmaker Says Volunteer Military May be Overwhelmed by Military Challenges in Iran, North Korea and Syria requiring more troops who will have to be drafted

Congressman Charles Rangel today introduced new legislation to reinstate the military draft that will include draftees up to 42 years of age.

“Every day that the military option is on the table, as declared by the President in his State of the Union address, in Iran, North Korea, and Syria, reinstatement of the military draft is an option that must also be considered, whether we like it or not,” Congressman Rangel said. “If the military is already having trouble getting the recruits they need, what can we do to fill the ranks if the war spreads from Iraq to other countries? We may have no other choice but a draft.”

The bill would mandate military service for men and women between the ages of 18 and 42. Deferments would be allowed only for completion of high school up to the age of 20, and for reasons of health, conscience or religious belief. Recruits not needed by the military in any given year would be required to perform some national civilian service.

# # # # #


RANT: You really don’t expect justice in the Gooferment’s courts?

Saturday, April 2, 2011

http://ncc-1776.org/tle2011/tle612-20110327-03.html

Many of the Most Awake Have Been Most Touched by Government
by Jim Davidson

*** begin quote ***

It used to be said, in the early 1990s in my hearing and presumably before that, amongst students of the law that “a grand jury is a tool of the prosecution.” It might once have been that a grand jury was actually a group of concerned members of a community brought together to seek an actual truth. But in current times, if the prosecutor wants to conceal information from them, he does, and they are too ignorant, being mostly public schooled, to know it. If the prosecutor wants them to acquit, they will. If the prosecutor wants them to indict, they will.

Nowadays, jurors are prevented, often forcibly, with violence, from being informed that they have an ancient and legitimate right to rule that the law is unjust, as well as to consider whether the law was broken.

*** and ***

So it has become the case that a jury is now a tool of the prosecution. Federal judges lie, they prevent jurors from hearing the truth, they instruct juries falsely, and they work to serve the system which oppresses the rest of us. They are, in fact, no damned good at all.

*** end quote ***


RANT: The biggest borrowers were foreign banks!

Friday, April 1, 2011

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-01/foreign-banks-tapped-fed-s-lifeline-most-as-bernanke-kept-borrowers-secret.html

*** begin quote ***

The biggest borrowers from the 97-year-old discount window as the program reached its crisis-era peak were foreign banks, accounting for at least 70 percent of the $110.7 billion borrowed during the week in October 2008 when use of the program surged to a record. The disclosures may stoke a reexamination of the risks posed to U.S. taxpayers by the central bank’s role in global financial markets.

*** end quote ***

You HAVE to be kidding me!

# – # – # – # – # 2011-Apr-01 @ 10:45


RANT: Gooferment ‘virginity checks’

Saturday, March 26, 2011

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1369259/Egypt-protests-Women-forced-virginity-checks-arrests-Tahir-Square.html

Secret shame of Egypt’s army: Women protesters were forced to have ‘virginity checks’ after being arrested in Tahrir Square
By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
Last updated at 10:10 AM on 24th March 2011

*** begin quote ***

Women arrested by the Egyptian police during protests in Cairo’s Tahrir Square were subjected to forced ‘virginity tests’, according to Amnesty International. Eighteen demonstrators were detained after army officers cleared the square on March 9 at the end of weeks of protest. Amnesty today said that the women had been beaten, given electric shocks and then subjected to strip searches while being photographed by male soldiers. They were then given ‘virginity checks’ and threatened with prostitution charges if medics ruled they had had sex, according to the charity.

*** end quote ***

Disgusting.

And, so much for the “religion of peace”.

I’m speechless.

And, because I’m a little L libertarian, I don’t initiate force. But what I would do is select 18 Egyptian diplomats at random and make the Persona Non Grata.

And, why do we have foreign aid? This seems like a good case for revoking it.

Could it happen here?

# # # # #