POLITICAL: The “Repeal Amendment”

Friday, September 24, 2010

http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=12144

The case for a “Repeal Amendment”
Cato Institute
by Randy Barnett and William J. Howell

*** begin quote ***

“In its next session beginning in January, the legislature of Virginia will consider proposing a constitutional ‘Repeal Amendment.’ The
Repeal Amendment would give two-thirds of the states the power to repeal any federal law or regulation. Its text is simple: ‘Any
provision of law or regulation of the United States may be repealed by the several states, and such repeal shall be effective when the
legislatures of two-thirds of the several states approve resolutions for this purpose that particularly describe the same provision or
provisions of law or regulation to be repealed.'” (09/16/10)

*** end quote ***

Good luck!

Many decades too late.

Secession is the only option!

# # # # #


POLITICAL: Fighting Wilson’s influence

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

My exchange with a fellow alum about Woodrow Wilson

*** begin the target trigger quote ***

You are not here merely to make a living. You are here in order to enable the world to live more amply, with greater vision, with a finer spirit of hope and achievement. You are here to enrich the world, and you impoverish yourself if you forget the errand. -Woodrow Wilson

*** end quote ***

My first comment

*** begin quote ***

Have you read much about Wilson? He’s not a guy I’d like to see anyone quoting. Ran as the “peace candidate”; immediately got the USA in WW1. Signed the Federal Reserve Act. Income tax. And was a racist, elitist, and a Progressive (Socialist). He’s in my second tier of worst Presidents.

*** end quote ***

The response

*** begin quote ***

I’ll describe what (little) I know of Wilson as a measure of context.

Wilson’s presidency is perhaps one that gets the most airtime in high school-level classrooms (if only because it seems that classes never progressed beyond WWII). However, his proponents must have written those textbooks because he was always presented in a favorable light.

Theoretical socialism does not bother me – the haphazard application of interesting ideas is enough to cause anyone to pause. I do not know much about the impact of the Federal Reserve Act, and can only ascertain that like any other major legislation, he had a slew of followers and critics, along with a range of those who were sitting on the fence, ignorant, or wholly disinterested.

Specifically, I am deeply disappointed by his inaction against the Jim Crow laws and any discriminatory practices encouraged during his administration. However, I appreciate his applauded footwork during WWI (I understand it as having been a necessary act), the fact that he was the first U.S. president to have a doctorate degree, and his straightforward writing approach in the well-known Fourteen Points…there is not much fondness to be mentioned about his League of Nations, but it was a respectable, if ineffective attempt.

In any case, I felt it proper to cite the source of the quotation, because plagiarism still isn’t acceptable on Facebook. I was first introduced to the following book by a peer as an undergraduate at Manhattan College, which contains the quote. I try to encapsulate its underlying message in my professional endeavors as a demonstration of positivity and good will: http://www.amazon.com/Woodrow-Wilson-Essential-Writings-Scholar-President/dp/0814719848

*** end quote ***

To which I responded

*** begin quote ***

>Wilson’s presidency … … in high school-level classrooms

Remember that the current “education meme” is imported from preWW1 Prussia. It’s purpose was to make the population more pliable to the elite. Specifically, they wanted cannon fodder for the army, good factory workers, and a subservient electorate that could be led by the elite. Where do politicians send their children? It dumbs down future voters.

>Theoretical socialism does not bother me –

Ouch, it should. They say: Any one, whose not a young socialist, has no heart; any one, who is not an old conservative, has no brain. Unfortunately, socialism is a nice way to say “force”. Redistribution requires force. The little L libertarian was of saying it is: “Where is the gun in the room?” And, “theoretical socialism” always gets down to killing, brutality, and poverty.

>I do not know much about the impact of the Federal Reserve Act

Well, hindsight is 20/20. We can channel our inner Andrew Jackson about the evils of central banking. The Federal Reserve Bank, which is not Federal, Reserves nothing, and isn’t a “bank”, is a banking cartel that allows the banks to monopolize the creation of money. It’s a license to steal. In exchange, it allows the politicians, of both parties, to spend “money” without taxation or borrowing. There’s the silent tax of inflation. I’ve ranted about it on my blog. Basically, it can be summed up in two parts — ONE: What’s a dollar? It used to be a fixed amount of gold or silver until FDR stole everyone’s gold in 1932. Now it’s what? A piece of paper signifying nothing. — TWO: Since its creation in 1913 (thanks WW), the value of a dollar (purchasing power) has declined 95+% between 1913 and 2000. That wealth has been stolen by politicians and bureaucrats for expanding the Gooferment.

>inaction against the Jim Crow laws and any discriminatory practices

That’s consistent with his racist beliefs!

>However, I appreciate his applauded footwork during WWI
>(I understand it as having been a necessary act)

WW1 was a disaster. American was non-interventionist and Wilson ran as a “peace candidate”. Almost immediately, after his election, he sought to get us into the WW1. The Lusitania was carrying munitions in violation of the Geneva Convention. It was another step in moving the USA from a peaceful stay at home to a global power. It is generally conceded that the USA’s entry into WW1 prolonged the conflict, allowed the French and English to gain the upper hand, force the Germans to accept a terrible armistice, and sowed the seeds for Hitler and WW2. The Dead Old White Guys warned us about becoming involved in “Europe’s petty squabbles”.

>his League of Nations, but it was a respectable,

It was Global Governance that would, like the UN, put the elite in charge of the planet. Doesn’t work out so well if you’re one of the serfs. You’ll find that, like the UN’s Human Rights Committee which is populated by the worst Human Rights violators, Global Governance is a cesspool of corruption, theft, violence, and fraud. And the USA pays for it! Argh!

>demonstration of positivity and good will

Well, I don’t think a quote is plagiarism. Might want to chat with one of the many lawyers about “fair use”.

My problem with the quote is … … it’s essentially socialism. You are here to make living. And, you have the right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”. In pursuing your own crass economic best interest, you will by definition “enrich the world”. Greed is good. Because it induces everyone to cooperate. The only way you can morally get lots of “certificates of appreciation” is to satisfy the needs of your fellow man. Satisfy enough needs and you get lots of them there “certificates”. You’ll recognize them right away. They’re green and you can exchange them for other stuff. Some even call them money.

Note, those green Federal Reserve Banknotes, which little L libertarian label FRBies — furbies, haven’t been “money” since FDR took us off the gold standard.

“Money is a matter of functions four, a medium, a measure, a standard, a store.” He repeated that four times like poetry. “Six Characters in Money: Portable – Durable – Divisible – Uniformity – Limited Supply – Acceptability.” CHURCH 10●19●62 (Vol 1) 978-0-557-08387-9 page 110

It’s no longer “money” because it’s not a standard or store. It also fails because it doesn’t have limited supply. The FED can print as much as the need.

>

I’m sure that you have better things to do than think about … history. Unfortunately, this stuff has direct application to today’s conditions. It’s what the Tea Parties are yelling about. And, youths like yourself have to deal with the mess that you’re being left. Yours, reportedly, is the first generation that isn’t as well off as previous generations.

One last point, then I’ll stop bending your eye.

Don’t believe anything any politician says. Any one, any time, on any topic. If some person stands up and says they promise the sun will rise tomorrow, they’re lying. They all have a angle. At the very least, they are spinning the fact to match their need.

And, don’t listen to fat old white guy injineers that are alumni. Their tin foil hats are on too tight.

*** end quote ***

And the finish

*** begin quote ***

Haha, no, I appreciate the discussion and the time you’re taking to share your views.

I certainly wasn’t thinking about history or allying myself to any president’s cause when I chose the quote – it was selected (and yes, I’m aware that quotations can be taken out of context to suit others’ needs and propaganda) simply because it resonated something truthful for my vocation, nothing less or more (although, in a sense, there’s always more to it).

“Don’t believe anything any politician says. Any one, any time, on any topic. If some person stands up and says they promise the sun will rise tomorrow, they’re lying.”

Of course, politicians lie – they want to get voted in, after all. I would rather give each candidate a fair shot, but my generation has been criticized as being more than slightly apathetic – a completely dangerous stance – (aside from the ‘Rock the Vote’ campaign), because mine “reportedly, is the first generation that isn’t as well off as previous generations.” Yet, I believe that every generation had its struggles – we’re faring better than those during the Great Depression, and others who suffered before and during the initial start of the civil rights movement, to name a couple. A single politician (administration included) cannot be expected to run a nation perfectly – something is always going to go wrong in taking on the burden from one’s predecessor, choices have to be made, and there are too many people to please who will never be satisfied.

To put it into perspective, I was in kindergarten when George Bush Sr. was elected into office. In a poorly constructed, clichéd metaphor, members of my generation can’t drink the kool-aid readily when we are 1) on a diet or jaded by a constant stream of reality tv meant to placate and numb us or 2) already saw others before us do it with dire consequences.

I understand the quote as socialist in nature when sipped from the source, sure, but I’ve appropriated it into the values instilled by my Lasallian education to support the betterment of those around me, my future clients and the Jaspers I work with on a daily basis. There are not that many people who pursue an education or social services-related field to obtain wealth; I merely hope to share my skills to help empower others. MC has adopted the motto “The Work is Ours” from Br. Luke Salm’s book on St. De La Salle, entitled “The Work is Yours.” I believe there has to be self-awareness, reflection, and intention in completing one’s work.   

*** end quote ***

# # # # #


POLITICAL: Carter speaks; to get out of the doghouse?

Friday, September 17, 2010

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/09/16/60minutes/main6872344.shtml

Sept. 16, 2010
Jimmy Carter Slams Ted Kennedy On Health Care
Tells “60 Minutes” Comprehensive Care Would Be In Place Had The Late Senator Not Killed His Bill

*** begin quote ***

(CBS) The late Sen. Ted Kennedy, champion of the recent health plan legislation, actually delayed comprehensive coverage for Americans for decades, says former President Jimmy Carter. It was Kennedy’s actions to kill Carter’s own health care bill that made Americans wait more than 30 years for meaningful coverage, says Carter in an interview with “60 Minutes” correspondent Lesley Stahl.

*** end quote ***

Well, if he wanted Carter-care, then I’ll have to praise Saint Teddy. Right result for the wrong reasons is still the right result.

Perhaps, Carter senses that Obama is trying to displace him as the worst most-inept President in “modern times”. Jimmy, for all his faults, can’t come close to Lincoln as the “worst”. And, he’s not even in the second tier of “worser” — WW1 Wilson, SSI FDR, Hiroshima Truman!

And, of all the two faced politicians, Carter did send Amy to public school. Not a hypocrite like these others.

# # # # #


POLITICAL: DWI stupidity

Monday, September 13, 2010

http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/09/east_brunswick_man_crashes_int.html

East Brunswick man is charged with drunken-driving after hitting police car en route to work
Published: Monday, September 13, 2010, 11:51 AM
Updated: Monday, September 13, 2010, 12:56 PM
Tom Haydon/The Star-Ledger

*** begin quote ***

SOUTH BRUNSWICK — A man with four prior drunk-driving convictions was arrested on the same charge Sunday after he crashed into a vehicle driven by a South Brunswick police officer heading to work, authorities said.

*** end quote ***

As a little L libertarian, I think the the DWI laws are: dumb, poorly enforced, and do little to protect innocent people who share the roads.

I don’t believe in the one size fits all law that tries to use a number as the criteria for enforcement.

First of all, people are different. Their tolerance of alcohol is hugely different. I know guys and gals, who after a drink or two, shouldn’t be allowed to operate anything from a car to a cell phone. I know others, who can down prodigious amounts of beer and go on and win parlor games of strategy, dexterity, and / or concentration.

Giving the police more power to enforce an arbitrary law is an invitation to sexual / racial harassment, favoritism, and abuse. The TV commercial, aka a PSA, that shows uniformed officers stopping every car and demanding “have you been drinking tonight”, is “show us your papers”.

That being said, if one causes an “accident” that results in damage, or –heaven forbid — injury or death, then those questions and physical testing is not only appropriate, but mandatory. And, it should NOT be called an “accident”. It should be called exactly what it is “assault with a deadly weapon”. Anyone, who uses a tool, any tool, be it a car or a gun, while under the influence of any chemical, is reckless. Should damage or injury occur from reckless behavior then that is a foreseeable consequence of the choices that were made.

Choices have consequences!

So the “DWI” law needs to be tuned. There has to be an accident, injury, or death to initiate an arrest.

Also, the current tolerance that politicians and bureaucrats have for multiple DWI convictions is completely insane.

In the cited example, the man has FOUR convictions. And, he is driving? He has outstanding warrants.

I can understand some leniency for a first conviction where there is damage but no personal injury. It should be more than a slap on the wrist, but less than incarceration. A second conviction, or injury in a first conviction, demands that civil society be protected from someone who is obviously not fit to be trust to behave reasonably towards the society. A third or fourth should trigger longer “adult time outs”.

Never mind “punishment” or “rehabilitation”. We need “protection”. Someone convicted of this new tougher DWI law should be isolated and prevented from harming innocents.

Four convictions? A decade of protection might be prudent.

Cars are too ubiquitous. A convicted felon, who has served their time out, must be allowed to drive. But, as a condition of their readmission to civil society and license to share the public roads, might be required to agree to spot checks. A special license plate for those with multiple convictions, like four, would encourage police to stop and check their sobriety. A special drivers license for those with one conviction would alert police to check sobriety, if stopped for a traffic violation. In either case, it self-preservation to check those, that have forfeit their rights by harming and further endangering others.

In summary:

(1) No spot checks on drivers who have not offended in the past.

(2) Harsh treatment for whose cause damage or injury.

(3) Longer “time outs” for multiple offenders.

(4) Aggressive enforcement on multiple offenders.

Note: I oppose the Psuedo War On Some Drugs. I don’t care what my fellow Americans put in their bodies. As long as I don’t have to pay for their care. But an impaired driver, who causes harm, should be treated the same. Regardless of their chemical of choice.

imho.

# # # # #


POLITICAL: Selective Constitutionality

Saturday, September 11, 2010

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20100910/D9I50KL00.html

Calif judge to stop ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy
Sep 10, 6:39 AM (ET)
By RAQUEL MARIA DILLON

*** begin quote ***

LOS ANGELES (AP) – A federal judge said she will issue an order to halt the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, after she declared the ban on openly gay service members unconstitutional.

U.S. District Judge Virginia Phillips ruled Thursday that the prohibition on openly gay military service members was unconstitutional because it violates the First and Fifth Amendment rights of gays and lesbians.

*** end quote ***

And, the Army is Constitutionally only supposed to exist for two years after being called up. And, there’s supposed to be a RKBA. And, the Fifth says Obama couldn’t take over the GM screwing the GM bondholders.

Amazing how they pick and chose what they want to enforce.

The Anarcho-capitalist’s (AKA libertarian anarchy, market anarchism, or free market anarchism) are right: we don’t NEED Gooferment and it ALWAYS oppresses us.

Argh!

# # # # #


POLITICAL: Subsidizing politics from the public treasury!

Friday, September 10, 2010

http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2010/09/tri-c_students_recruited_to_fi.html

Home > OPEN: Ohio Politics > Energy
Tri-C students recruited to fill the seats for Obama’s appearance
Published: Wednesday, September 08, 2010, 1:30 PM
Updated: Wednesday, September 08, 2010, 1:33 PM
Karen Farkas, The Plain Dealer Karen Farkas, The Plain Dealer

*** begin quote ***

PARMA, Ohio – With less than an hour before President Obama’s scheduled speech, 75 seats remained empty in the recreation center at Cuyahoga Community College’s Western Campus. So organizers went around campus and recruited more students to fill the seats.

*** and ***

dunlopreggie September 08, 2010 at 2:40PM

How shameful that an elected officeholder flies in to town on a publicly bought jet, is escorted and secured by probably hundreds of publicly paid police, to give a speech in a publicly owned facility, and the event is not open to the public. What a sham. I hope someone is reimbursing the taxpayers for the costs of this partisan campaign appearance.

*** end quote ***

Excellent point!

# # # # #

# # # # #


POLITICAL: Police want an intrusive capability

Thursday, September 9, 2010

http://www.newsobserver.com/2010/09/08/669723/lists-of-pain-pillpatients-sought.html

*** begin quote ***

Sheriffs in North Carolina want access to state computer records identifying anyone with prescriptions for powerful painkillers and other controlled substances.

*** end quote ***

You’re gonna be in that database! What people put in the body is nobody’s business. Unless, they hurt others or expect “We, The People” to clean up after them.

Sorry, but what the economists call “the natural rate of addiction” hasn’t really changed since the Ancient Greeks. New drugs, new laws, new approaches — no difference. Even in China. where they had the death penalty for it, and they STILL have the natural rate of addiction.

And, we have to endure civil strife. End the psuedo drug laws, put WalMart in charge of selling “illegal drugs” and let’s all live in peace.

Argh!

Let’s put the various “Drug Lords” out of business! The various Czars as well!!

# # # # #


POLITICAL: Telemed abortion; telemed everything?

Monday, September 6, 2010

http://www.lifenews.com/state5383.html

Iowa Board of Medicine Creates Committee, May Study Telemed Abortion Process
by Steven Ertelt LifeNews.com Editor
August 26, 2010

*** begin quote ***

The organization contends Planned Parenthood is breaking the law because Iowa state law requires abortions to be done by physicians and a doctor is not physically present with the woman at the time she get the abortion drug. Instead, a potentially untrained or unlicensed staffer sits with the woman as she visits with the abortion practitioner, who may be out of state at the time, during a videoconfernce.

*** end quote ***

Why regulate medicine?

To make jobs for bureaucrats and drive up costs for the benefit of the monopoly suppliers. Argh!

If one can have video conference abortions, then why can’t we have video conference everything else?

Good way to ship doctor’s jobs to third world countries.

As a little L libertarian, why do we permit the Gooferment to “regulate” medicine? Not like it does anything but drive up costs.

(And, btw, how much does this “committee” cost?)

# # # # #


POLITICAL: The Just War criteria

Friday, September 3, 2010

http://irisheagle.blogspot.com/2010/09/if-this-were-war-wed-have-objectives.html

Thursday, September 02, 2010

If this were a war we’d have objectives and strategies to evaluate

*** begin quote ***

If the problems in our economy were a war the public would want to know: (a) What’s at stake?; (b) What will it take for victory?; and (c) What will victory look like? From those answers would follow the tactics we’ll be employing to win the war and a forecast as to how those tactics will play out.

*** end quote ***

I managed to get my heroic children to consider the “The Just War Doctrine” in my novel. (I tried to stuff the book with anything I learned. My whizdumb!) Reference: CHURCH 10●19●62 Volume 1 Page 326

We did discuss this in 8th Grade Grammar School (“Gentlemen, you may love war movies, but Holy Mother Church has some standards for what is a just war.”) Did it again in High School “Religion” and College “Theology”.

*** begin quote ***

The strict conditions, for legitimate use of military force, require rigorous consideration. The gravity of such a decision makes it subject to rigorous conditions of moral legitimacy. At one and the same time:

* the damage inflicted by the aggressor on the nation or community of nations must be lasting, grave, and certain;

* all other means of putting an end to it must have been shown to be impractical or ineffective;

* there must be serious prospects of success;

* the use of arms must not produce evils and disorders graver than the evil to be eliminated. The power of modern means of destruction weighs very heavily in evaluating this condition.

These are the traditional elements enumerated in what is called the “just war” doctrine. The evaluation of these conditions for moral legitimacy belongs to the prudential judgment of those who have responsibility for the common good.

*** end quote ***

At one time, I thought “Viet Nam, Republic of” satisfied all the conditions. Now that I am older and I understand that, to misquote Doctor House, “Politicians lie!”.

In considering the Iraq War, I thought that the conditions were again satisfied.

The damage point (i.e., Bush lied us into war) was really covered by the WMD.

One thing that everyone chooses to overlook is that: “We KNOW Sadaam had them.” We sold the poison gas to him in the 70’s and he used that gas on “his” minority, the Kurds. As far as not finding those weapons, there was six months to move them to Syria. Unfortunately, no one can prove that.

As a little L libertarian, there was no justification that would convince me that we should have done this.

Argh!

# # # # #


POLITICAL: BHO44’s “End of Iraq Combat Operations” speech last night

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

How do you tell when a politician is lying?

Yes, his lips moved.

I couldn’t believe how flat he was as he read this fairy tale to us.

Did ANYONE believe it?

And 50k of armed troopers, boots on the ground, isn’t “out”. It’s like so many many other places, we’re suck there.

Sorry!

It doesn’t make it true.

And, the body language. Guess he should just go back on vacation for the next two years. We’d be better off.

# # # # #