POLITICAL: Republicans want to win elections

Sunday, January 6, 2008

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/018232.html

*** begin quote ***

My advice to Paul is to take direct aim at McCain. Sharpen the differences between the two camps. Show how McCain is a loser against either Clinton or Obama.

Emphasize strongly that the electorate is aiming to pick Clinton or Obama at present (this is very clear!) Then sell yourself as the only Republican who has a chance to beat them by mobilizing both young people and independents and democrats.

Republicans want to win elections, but they have lost their libertarian soul and gained a harmful war-supporting evangelical component. They must be steered away from their instinctive support of people like Huckabee and McCain and toward a more strategic view of who can beat Clinton and Obama. In a sense, go above the heads of the Republican primary voter to the general electorate.

What positions should be emphasized that will resonate with the public? Make every effort to find out, and then focus on no more than three of these issues, such as (1) ending the Iraq War and avoiding other such debacles, (2) putting the economy in order and taking down the horrendous government debt, (3) avoiding the coming crash of Medicare and bringing great medical advancements by freeing up the health care system. I do not know what these issues are, I am guessing, but any successful politician has to find and stress them.

*** end quote ***

I agree. Hit the point that only Ron Paul offers the American electorate a clear choice on these issues. And, since in Regan’s sage advice that a President can only have three objective and does well to accomplish two, focus is essential.

# # # # #


POLITICAL: How many laws were passed and sent to the President to outlaw abortion?

Sunday, January 6, 2008

http://www.covenantnews.com/abortion/archives/036770.html

January 04, 2008
A Message To Christians On The Eve Of The 2008 Election Cycle
By Pastor Matt Trewhella / The Covenant News

*** begin quote ***

Many have falsely claimed that presidential candidate Ron Paul would not support the Human Life Amendment because he simply wants to return the abortion question to the states. One lady even told me “if Paul is president and a law is passed at the federal level to outlaw abortion, he won’t sign it.” Oh, yeah, like that’s a real concern. Let’s see, the Republicans had the House, the Senate, and the Presidency for six years and how many laws were passed and sent to the President to outlaw abortion? Let’s set the facts straight on this matter. First, in his book Abortion and Liberty, Dr. Paul makes clear that he supports the Human Life Amendment.

*** end quote ***

This is probably the hardest issue for Libertarians. At best, it devolves into a shouting match. As worst, we have to divide the baby as King Solomon is reputed to have done.

http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/index.htm

*** begin quote ***

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

*** end quote ***

First principle is that government has only one mission: to protect rights. Among these are the right to life. So clearly, gooferment has some role in protecting people’s lives. We as a people have to determine what that means. But that is a completely different discussion than the one we have been having. Groups warring over who’s going to to tell who what to do.

We need a lot less “telling” and a lot more “listening”.

That phrase about the consent of the governed is very important.

What if someone doesn’t consent?

# # # # #


POLITICAL: Iran hanged 13 convicted criminals on New Year’s day

Thursday, January 3, 2008

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/01/happy_new_year_in_iran.html

January 03, 2008
Happy New Year in Iran
Ethel Fenig
While we were enjoying New Year’s day on Wednesday

*** begin quote ***

Iran hanged 13 convicted criminals on Wednesday, including the mother of two young children who had been found guilty of murdering her husband after discovering he was having an affair, reports said.

*** end quote ***

And, we are worried about these folks?

They virtually enslave half their people (i.e., women). And, they tell the other half that they are better.

What a recipe for success. Ours!

# # # # #


POLITICAL: ABC and Fox News Channel are narrowing the field

Wednesday, January 2, 2008

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/12/31/debate.limits.ap/index.html

TV cuts candidates from debates, angering Paul backers

*** begin quote ***

NEW YORK (AP) — ABC and Fox News Channel are narrowing the field of presidential candidates invited to debates this weekend just before the New Hampshire primary, in Fox’s case infuriating supporters of Republican Rep. Ron Paul.

*** end quote ***

Here come the “dirty tricks”.

# # # # #


POLITICAL: the staggering debt Washington is incurring

Sunday, December 30, 2007

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig6/scheuer7.html

*** begin quote ***

If a person chose not to vote for Dr. Paul, he or she would have to be content with the staggering debt Washington is incurring for this and future generations. While it has become a commonplace to say that our grandchildren will pay for this generation’s profligacy, it is nonetheless troublingly true. And the debt we have incurred is not one that finds us owing ourselves, but rather it is one in which Americans have knowingly indebted themselves to their enemies – the Chinese and the Saudis. There is, so far as I can tell, no candidate other than Dr. Paul who says that America should return to its pay-as-you-go traditions, and argues that it is clearly lacking in foresight, prudence, and commonsense to provide rivals and enemies with the ability to detonate a financial weapon of mass destruction that could, by simply calling in our debt, slay America’s economy and standard-of-living. Indeed, so oblivious to this danger are Dr. Paul’s fellow candidates – or so abjectly willing are they to court future economic ruin if it means electoral victory now – that they want to borrow many billions more from our foes to fund universal health care, additional foreign military adventures, college-educations-for-all, and more foreign and military aid for their overseas buddies in Egypt, Cairo, Tel Aviv, and Saudi Arabia.

*** end quote ***

We are on our way to be a third world country. Not because the third world is coming here. But because we are spending ourselves into oblivion.

# # # # #


POLITICAL: Socialism kills; Freedom is liberating

Saturday, December 29, 2007

FROM AN EMAIL ABOUT RON PAUL ON MEET THE PRESS

Had time to watch the other three parts, and I think he NAILED it! It got all his points in and, other than a few umms and ahhs, I think he did very well. Especially where he talked about the softer form of fascism. Corporatism, lobbying the government, and the regulator – regulated embrace, he was spot on. After that performance, I’m even more enthused with his chances. Nobody else talks like this directly to the American people.

Cut the government to Clinton levels and there is NO need for the income tax. FBI shouldn’t be enforcing Federal law on citizens. CIA is totally unconstitutional. They are in effect private armies that the Dead Old White Guys would have recognized as oppressive.

The People in the Sovereign State of Kalifornia passed medical mj. The feds (dea, fbi, and irs) raid the clinics — steal the drugs and money — and charge NO ONE! Why is that? To keep from getting slapped down in court.The Drug War is joke. All the “wars” are similar jokes.

When the People wake up, and hopefully they will before it’s too late, this will end by jury nullification, just like Prohibition.

:-)

Socialism kills; Freedom is liberating.

“I know not what course others may take …”

Someday, you’ll remember this election as a watershed election. Hopefully, you’ll be in my vision of America! I don’t like being in yours.


POLITICAL: Who wins with a hike in the minimum wage?

Thursday, December 27, 2007

http://channel-surfing.blogspot.com/2007/12/least-we-can-do.html

Wednesday, December 26, 2007
The least we can do

*** begin quote ***

A state panel is recommending a hike in the minimum wage and an indexing scheme that would tie it to the cost of living index — a move designed to prevent the kind of neglect that allowed the minimum wage to fall so far behind inflation in the first place.

*** end quote ***

May I point out that the BIG winner in ALL minimum wage hikes are the gooferment workers, the unions that get “parity” via pay table or linkage of some type, and the friends of politicians.

The taxpayers get killed by higher cost of gooferment as well as a slight rise in prices.

But the real victims are the marginal workers and marginal business. At the margins, some workers lose their jobs and some businesses fold hurting everyone. Teen and minority unemployment goes up.

It’s very simple. Follow the money!

On a moral basis, where does the gooferment get the authority to interfere between the freely agreed contract between employee and employer. When they put a “price floor” on labor, they ensure that the marginal worker gets to make ZERO forcing them on the dole AND at the same time depriving the business of the ability to get work performed at a price that can be afforded.

It seems so simple.

# # # # #


POLITICAL: Thomas Sowell overlooked Ron Paul

Thursday, December 27, 2007

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MDllMTU2YmMxNjg2YzM4ZDQ3MDk5ZTNlNTcyMmE1MTU=

Unpromising Times
Primary elections and secondary candidates.
By Thomas Sowell

*** begin quote ***

Apparently there is nobody among either the Democrats or the Republicans who is going to cause a runaway stampede like that which toppled all the Republican front-runners in 1940, when the convention delegates began loudly chanting “We want Wilkie!”

*** end quote ***

Guess Tom — who is my second favorite ekknonnymist after Walter Williams — overlooked Ron Paul.

Tsk, tsk.

There was no way to interact with the author or the site to call attention to their oversight. No email address. No comment section. No social network.

But what does one expect from a dead tree venue attempting to make the leap to the net?

Tom, I expected better from you.

# # # # #


POLITICAL: animals are not allowed into establishments where food and drink are served

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

http://consumerist.com/336992/which-do-you-prefer-one-cat-or-a-thousand-rats

*** begin quote ***

The New York Department of Health And Mental Hygiene objects to deli owners keeping cats around to deter rats on the grounds that animals are not allowed into establishments where food and drink are served. That’s all well and good, judging by certain infamous news clips (above), but we’re pretty sure that a few well-tended cats prowling around is more hygienic than the alternative.

*** end quote ***

Laws don’t do SQWAT!

There are “animals” (i.e., rats) around food establishments. If we have to have “animals”, I’d prefer cats!

I remember in my youth stores of all types (i.e., deli; fish; bodegas; bakeries) where cats were common place. I really never thought about why, but it’s obvious now.

Sometimes, simple solutions are the best.

Maybe the poor guy being fined can claim it’s his seeing eye cat?

# # # # #


POLITICAL: Ron Paul will restore the popularity of the USA around the world like when JFK was president

Thursday, December 20, 2007

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsDlO2Lr_cg

*** begin quote ***

My name is Gérard Hoeberigs. I’m a 25-year old historian, born and raised in the Netherlands. I have no specific ties with the USA, but I have a general interest in politics, economics and of course history. I’m currently occupied writing a thesis to complete my Master Degree in International Relations.

In the Netherlands there aren’t any libertarian politicians and since I support small and local government, I was very happy to find out that there is one politician who does share most of my ideas.

In the field of the International Relations, I usually clash with professors and students regarding sovereignty and interventions. I don’t believe that ‘peace-enforcing missions’, in which states force their system of government (democracy) upon other states, are effective. Just look at Vietnam; the USA were unable to force capitalism on Vietnam, but what couldn’t be done by coercion, did happen without American interference: decades later, Vietnam turned itself to a more capitalistic economy.

I’m also concerned about the ever-growing governments. From a historical point of view, it’s easy to notice that states have always been trying to enlarge themselves. Since the beginning of the 19th century there has been an exponential growth of state-power, taxes and civil servants. Big government is often counterproductive, but nobody is going to downscale it, because which civil servant likes to fire himself or his colleagues?

Except for that, I’m concerned about the devaluation of the dollar due to the trade deficit combined with inflation; the patriot act which undermines the rule of law (trials/lawyers aren’t necessary anymore to be put into custody) and the impopularity of the United States around the world. Not only in muslim countries, but also in Europe the USA have reached an all-time low in popularity.

When I tell my friends in Europe I support a presidential candidate most people immediately ask whether it’s a democrat or a republican. When I answer it’s a republican, people tell me I’m crazy. Yes; all over the world people have a tendency to judge on their prejudices rather than actually investigating the other point of view.

The thing is; even today most people don’t know Ron Paul. I honestly believe that if Ron Paul ends up as the next president, he will not only ensure peace, prosperity and freedom, but on top of that he will restore the popularity of the USA around the world like when JFK was president. Ron Paul being the president will not only be good for the USA, it will be in the best interest of the rest of the world as well.

That’s why I support Ron Paul.

Best regards,

Gérard Hoeberigs

*** end quote ***

A foreigner has more undderstanding of what “the American Experiment as a Republic” means that most graduates of gooferment skools.

# # # # #