INTERESTING: What has Obama done?

Thursday, August 2, 2007

HILLARY GOOFED IN DEM DEBATE
By Dick Morris and Eileen McGann
July 30, 2007

***Begin Quote***

The polling is in and Hillary made a big mistake in her sharp disagreement with Obama over whether the president should meet with leaders of rogue nations. According to the Rasmussen Poll, Democrats agree with Obama over Hillary by 55%-22%. Without a poll to pretest her comments, Hillary instinctively took the “insider” position that the president should only meet with such leaders after extensive probing by subordinates to assure that the meetings would be productive. But she was wrong. Democrats want the president to meet with leaders of such nations without pre conditions.

***End Quote***

Interesting. I’d think that H would just keep emphasizing that O hadn’t done anything. But, then maybe that’s a two edged sword. Neither has she.

# # # # #


INTERESTING: Why, or how, I think Ron Paul could win

Tuesday, July 31, 2007

FROM A RECENT EMAIL

>I did just read an article on that asked- Can Ron Paul Really get the Republican Nomination? Interesting article and an interesting guy.

I say “yes”. For those not educated in gooferment skool, the Republican Party up to Bush41 was the party of “settling wars started by the D’s”. The Taft (after Ohio-ian Robert Taft) Wing of the Republic Party was the fiscally-sound morally-pure non-interventionist part of the Party. As opposed to the Rockefeller Wing (Nelson Rockefeller), that was the fiscal-looser socially-liberal interventionist foreign policy side. When Goldwater was badly beaten by LBJ, on the war issue, where that “nuclear commercial” misrepresenting where he stood on the war, (despite the fact that the D’s expanded the Vietnam disaster), the Taft wing was pretty badly beaten up. Ron Paul is from that Taft tradition.

Can he win?

The nomination, quite possibly. He energizes the Taft wing. He’s alone as being solidly against the war, unlike all the R’s and D’s.

He wins the nomination if the people really support him. The power brokers in the Republican party are, at their heart, greedy men. Is it better to be on the winning side of a potentially small government guy who will need you to get anything done. OR, on the losing side, waiting for your turn at the trough in 4, 8, or 12 years? I think if he looks like a winner, they’ll take the Ron Paul side that bet.

The Presidency is a better possibility. Assuming he gets the Republican nomination.

The war may split the D’s vote.

The fiscal discipline of Ross Perot brought out 30% of the vote (20M votes) which represented a substantial part of those who never vote. About 10% R’s, 10% D’s, and 10% of the never voting.

If you you look at the eligible to vote as the whole population (i.e., 100%), about half don’t vote. The D’s get about 50% of the 50% that do vote so they have 25%. The R’s get about 40% of the 50% that do vote so they have 20%. If the D’s split on the war, they could give RP 12.5% and say Hillary 12.5%. If the R’s split, it will be into into the Tafts and the Rockafellers. The Taft R’s should give Ron Paul their whole 10%. The Rockefeller R’s should split 5% to RP and 5% for Hillary. The unwashed 50% are awakened to come out and vote in the same proportion as Perot that give RP say 16%. That gives him 12.5+10+5+16 = 43.5% versus Hillary 17.5% on the high side. If the D’s don’t split it’s RP 10+5+16=31% to Hillary 25%. That doesn’t take into account that Hillary has the highest negatives ever seen (i.e., will people come out just to vote against her?).

> I’m still not sure why he doesn’t just run as an independent and forgo the Republican Party altogether.

As a Republican candidate, unlike when he ran as a libertarian, there’s no “wasted vote” argument. The “wasted vote” argument is a Democratic Party tactic. In a three way race, Ron Paul elects Hillary. Just as Perot elected Clinton. Perot was a democrat before he ran as an independent. The fix was in.

You can see the same scenario setting up now with Bloomberg. He’s a RINO like Perot. He is in title a Republican mayor of a very liberal NYC. He would have ran as a democrat but was block by the Democratic Party Bosses. Since he was the only chance that the Republic Party had at the mayorship, they rolled over an gave it to him. Now, with the Presidential election coming, the Democratic Party can use this “useful idiot” (who is a very smart fellow; little nuts; but a determined veteran of Wall Street. Who I met on two occasions.) to “Perot” the Presidential election.

In a McCRomneyGulliani – Hillary race, Hillary’s high negative might elect a “hold your nose” Republican. Throw a RINO Bloomberg in like a Perot and she wins in a heartbeat! It’s not even close.

>

But, if the Republicans nominate Ron Paul, that RINO Bloomberg strategy does nothing for the Democrats. As a matter of fact, Ron Paul is “deal breaker”. Take all the common wisdom and toss it out the window. He’s a straight shooter with a bullet proof voting record. And, if he energizes just three components to vote for him — the disaffected non-voters, the anti war Democrats, and the fiscally conservative Republicans — then hello, it’s a landslide that will eclipse the all past ones. It could easily be a popular sweep that would unify the country. In 2000 was Bush 271 electors with 50M votes versus Gore 266 electors with 51M votes. I’d predict Ron Paul runs the table with 450 electors leaving Hillary CA=54 + NY=33 for 87 electors. The popular vote would be even worse imho, when the silent majority comes out. Ron Paul 75M, Hillary 25M.

It’s possible. It’s about a candidate who breaks all the molds, rules of thumbs, and past precedents. If he can energizes the anti-war D’s, the fiscal conservative R’s, and get the disaffected to come vote, then he’s the President.

Now watch for the dirty tricks, because neither side — D’s or R’s — wants this racket to end. It will end. The only question is if it can be a “soft landing” with a Ron Paul Presidency, or a “harder landing” when all these “problem” chickens come home to roost.

# # # # #


INTERESTING: Tom Snyder Dies At 71

Monday, July 30, 2007

http://www.knbc.com/entertainment/13779880/detail.html

Broadcaster Tom Snyder Dies At 71
His Smoke-Filled Interviews Were Late-Night Staple
POSTED: 6:14 am PDT July 30, 2007
UPDATED: 7:06 am PDT July 30, 2007

***Begin Quote***

SAN FRANCISCO — Talk show host Tom Snyder, whose smoke-filled interviews were a staple of late night television, has died after a struggle with leukemia. He was 71.

***End Quote***

That’s sad. I always like him. He was from what I call the “Johnny Carson – Pat Sajack” school of broadcasting. Just came across as a nice. never took himself too seriously and remembered his roots. I have no way of knowing if perception matched reality. But I’ll add his name to my “no I lay me down to sleep” list.

# # # # #


INTERESTING: Robert A. Heinlein’s Legacy

Saturday, July 28, 2007

http://opinionjournal.com/la/?id=110010381

Robert A. Heinlein’s Legacy
As they say on the moon, “There ain’t no such thing as a free lunch!”
BY TAYLOR DINERMAN
Thursday, July 26, 2007 12:01 a.m. EDT

***Begin Quote***

In 1958, in response to what he saw as a liberal effort to weaken America’s military, he set aside the “Sex and God” book on which he had been working and wrote “Starship Troopers.” This was probably his most controversial book. In it he imagines a future society in which the right to vote must be earned by volunteering for service, including service in the military. In response to claims that the book glorifies the military, he wrote: “It does indeed. Specifically, the P.B.I., the Poor Bloody Infantry, the mudfoot who puts his frail body between his loved home and the war’s desolation–but is rarely appreciated.”

***End Quote***

I read that in high school, and I still think that the “right to vote” should be earned. The book makes the point that only vets understand. Everybody else is “debating society” (quoting from memory). I know one thing. If only vets were voting, then there would be far fewer wars! I’m a legatee of Heinlein. And, I grok liberty!

P.S.: The reviewer forgot the ants quote.

A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.

None of which can be done by any graduates of gooferment schools these days.

# # # # #


INTERESTING: what can we reasonable expect to accomplish in a solidly “Democratic” state

Friday, July 27, 2007

FROM AN EMAIL TO THE MEETUP GROUP

*** begin quote ***

Hi Fred, and all the others here at Edison aka Ron_Paul_Edison_MeetUp,

Of course as a little L libertarian, I’m wildly interested in supporting Ron Paul. (I’ve sent him two modest contributions.) However, given that NJ is a solidly “Democratic” state, what can we reasonable expect to accomplish?

The NJ primary is late in the season; so the issue of nomination should be decided by the time we get to vote. I’d suggest that probably the “best” that we achieve is to split the anti-war dems from their machine. We can also probably drive a wedge between the grass roots republicans and their machine. In terms of the electoral map, I don’t see that there’s much that can be done. NJ votes Democratic and there’s not a lot that can be done about that. Even if we split the people on the war issue, AND we could surprise with the vote (That’s a big if!), so what! (If NJ was to go for Ron Paul, then he’s already won by the time it gets to us.) So how can we help get this past where the NJ vote even matters. (If Ron Paul needs NJ to get nominated or elected, he’s probably “duck soup”.)

I’m not a defeatist, “woe is me” type fellow. Just practical.

So what I would propose is that the single most effective thing we can do is fund raise for Ron Paul.

Follow that up by “out reach out of state” to have NJers who are Ron Paul supporters reach out to friends, family, and others OUTSIDE of New Jersey to support Ron Paul. Finally, we can blanket the NY/NJ media, which is part of the media duopoly between LA & NYC, with Ron Paul stuff: email to outlets, letter to the editor, blog comments, other web 2.0 social networking.

That would be my suggestion for NJ Ron Paul 2008 priority efforts:

  • Money
  • Out state personal exhortations (i.e., Iowa)
  • NJ/NY media blitz
  • Building grass roots buzz

If we can do that, it might be MORE important than any failed effort to “win” NJ for Ron Paul. The buzz that we create might be a “bigger win”.

IMHO,
a frustrated NJ libertarian,
fjohn

Ferdinand J. Reinke
Kendall Park, NJ 08824

——————————————————————————–
From: ron paul edison nj @ meetup.com] On Behalf Of fred stein
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 6:54 PM
Subject: Re: [ronpaul edison] Lets get the Ball Rolling

Ron Paul is going to shock America when he wins in New Hampshire.

Fred Stein

# # # # #


INTERESTING: The state makes us pay for things

Friday, July 27, 2007

http://www.lewrockwell.com/lora/m.lora35.html

Against Cross-Subsidization, Against Socialism
by Manuel Lora

***Begin Quote***

The state makes us pay for things that we either do not want, or do not want as much of as we are made to finance.

***End Quote***

Maybe this is how we reduce the size of gooferment. But we can’t refuse to pay for services we don’t want, can’t use, or are too expensive for us.

Sigh!

# # # # #


INTERESTING: All Ponzi schemes end

Thursday, July 26, 2007

The Old Mercantilism and the New
by Gary North
http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north551.html

 

***Begin Quote***

There are hints that there is a new form of mercantilism coming. China, meaning the People’s Bank of China, purchased 9.9% of the Blackstone hedge fund in May. It paid $3 billion. The PBOC has set up a rumored $300 billion fund for purchasing foreign equities and other unnamed assets. This is a shift from debt to equity, from foreign governments’ promises to pay to actual ownership of foreign companies and assets.

***End Quote***

Does the USA’s empire end “soon”?

We converted from the Revolutionary War America in 1860 with the War of Northern Aggression. We converted from a peaceful country with a bias for isolationism with WW1 that our political class steered us into. We allowed that political class to shoot us in the foot with the Smoot Hawley tariff and mislead us by calling The Great Depression. We were robbed of our sound money by FDR with his socialist agenda. When even that didn’t work, he shoved us into WW2. With that we became an empire. Fast forward six decades later, the “rewards” of these policies, like the proverbial chickens, are coming home to roost.

Is it China that, to use a poker term, “felts us”?

Are they in such a world of hurt that we’re going to be another unfortunate casualty? Of the monetary war to come.

One can envision some of the disastrous consequences of our past excesses.

  • The social security insurance timebomb explodes and the youth can’t afford to pay the claims of the old folks.
  • The health care bills zoom even further out of sight as the lifespan increases.
  • The Arabs start selling oil in the golden dinar as opposed to fiat currencies.
  • The Chinese use their reserves to own the resources everyone needs.

The dollar plummets on a fast track to the bottom. Do we, the American people, just abrogate our agreements and return to Constitutional dollars. It would be an “interesting strategy”. I’m not sure how it really unwinds. Does some future President just declare a bank holiday and “go fishing” after making the announcement that the Federal Reserve bank Note is no longer legal tender in the USA. That’s a good strategy. Let the marketplace figure it out. Maybe the Federal Reserve can figure out how it survives without it’s monopoly on money.

So what does the local savings bank do? Run this play out. Depositors are insured by the FDIC to 100k. If the FRBN is no longer money, then the bank’s dollars are in effect worthless. It probably has stocks and bonds. So the FDIC will have to make good on deposits. But clearly everyone is taking a big haircut.

Think about the ante bellum South where you’re rich with a pocket full of Confederate dollars. Or post WW2 Germany with paper marks. Or post WW1 Germany with paper marks. Or modern day Zaire with 1000% annual inflation.

It’s really hard to envision.

How does one prepare for a fiscal tsunami?

# # # # #


INTERESTING: Women in Combat Debate

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2007/07/should_women_fight.php

Women in Combat Debate: Should Women Fight?
July 25, 2007 | By Jack Yoest
My good friend Bob Miller has a compelling article on women in combat that deserves a wide audience.

***Begin Quote***

Man’s unloving use of women in war signals an underlying enormity, a far richer and permeating disintegration of Man as male and female, along with the cultural institutions he inhabits.

***End Quote***

A paradigm challenge that will really twist your shorts or panties!

In Israel, where there is no “front line”, women have no choice when your survival is on the line.

In the USA, where we have the pond to create a protected rear area.

The article challenges our thinking about the proper role of women and the family in a civilized society.

Yesterday, I blogged about how in Iran, they have “fashion police”. I remember seeing Nazi propaganda from pre-WW2 Germany where women had the role model of the Mother of the Reich.

There has to be some way to align the liberty of humanity and a recognition of the essential roles of men and women. The Judeo Christian religious emphasis on the family has shown us the basic building block of human society.

Our challenge is to figure it all out. Just because something CAN be done, does not mean that it is a good idea.

We know that gooferment, and it’s use of force, has bad results and unintended consequences. Having it dictate, or decide, the memes of society, or worse legislate something, is a really really terrible idea.

# # # # #


INTERESTING: Save “our” celebrities from the gooferment

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=entertainment&id=5505426

Lindsay Lohan Arrested for DUI, Again
Bail Set at $25,000
KABC ENTERTAINMENT

***Begin Quote***

SANTA MONICA, July 24, 2007 (KABC-TV) – According to the Santa Monica Police Department, Lindsay Lohan was arrested early Tuesday morning for DUI, driving on a suspended license and possession of narcotics.

***End Quote***

In a Libertarian America, this would be between her and her insurance company. If they wanted to indemnify anyone she injures, that would be up to them. I bet that they would be able to “communicate” with her better than the “law” does.

But even in today’s America, possession of narcotics isn’t a crime. You own your body. (And, if you don’t who does?) And, what you put into it is your business. Not mine.

OTOH — DUI, as evidenced by a accident, is threatening harm on others. As such, even to this old little L Libertarian, there has to be restitution and some punitive action to dissuade her from such an initiation of force in the future.

The celebrity community and the media that adores it need to exercise a little “union discipline”. Perhaps an embargo on any stories about a celebrity would be a good place to start. Say a 90 day embargo as agreed by all the media for a first offense. 180 for second; 360 for third. That could be a career killer. These folks need the PR for their Q rating and the big bucks.

OK, I’ll start here. I sentence LL to a 90 day embargo here at my blog. LL will not be mentioned for ninety days. That’ll show her that the media is a force to be reckoned with. ;-)

# # # # #


INTERESTING: All mighty empires eventually fall into the hands of idiots

Monday, July 23, 2007

http://www.lvrj.com/opinion/8648611.html

Jul. 22, 2007
VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: Satanic manipulators of demonic brilliance?
Las Vegas Review-Journal

***Begin Quote***

All mighty empires eventually fall into the hands of idiots. And that’s precisely when the beneficiaries of empire may finally realize how short-sighted they were to sweep aside all those corny old “checks and balances.”

***End Quote***

Local control of small states seems like the best way to prevent empire builders in the first place.

# # # # #


INTERESTING: no one should depend on the authorities

Monday, July 23, 2007

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article2120922.ece

From The Times
July 23, 2007
Looting, panic buying – and a water shortage
undefined
Valerie Elliott

***Begin Quote***

Food and drinking water shortages, panic buying and the threat of looting have followed the worst flooding to hit England in 60 years.

***End Quote***

with the comment:

*** begin quote ***

Instead of spending money on non-essentials, such as cable, video games, big TVs, etc., people should always have stockpiled 2 weeks worth of canned food, DRY milk, 10 gallons of drinking water per person, diapers, etc. for babies, canned formula, batteries, crank radio, candles and matches, large and small plastic bags, smaller garbage cans to use as temporary toilets, and here in the USA be armed to fend off those who would take it from a family. In England, of course, the GOOD people have been disarmed, only the thugs have guns. Here in our USA home, we have enough emergency rations for 4 to 6 weeks, and drinking and flushing water and everything we need. Catastrophes, either natural or man-made can and do happen, and no one should depend on the authorities, but only themselves! The civilized world is becoming a a bunch of wimps who have lost all survival skills.

anne bright, Lyme, USA Connecticut

*** end quote ***

And, evidently, their version of FEMA isn’t doing very well either.

No, the best defense is self-defense.

And, depending upon the gooferment is a good way to get yourself killed.

# # # # #


INTERESTING: no one should depend on the authorities

Monday, July 23, 2007

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article2120922.ece

From The Times
July 23, 2007
Looting, panic buying – and a water shortage
undefined
Valerie Elliott

***Begin Quote***

Food and drinking water shortages, panic buying and the threat of looting have followed the worst flooding to hit England in 60 years.

***End Quote***

with the comment:

*** begin quote ***

Instead of spending money on non-essentials, such as cable, video games, big TVs, etc., people should always have stockpiled 2 weeks worth of canned food, DRY milk, 10 gallons of drinking water per person, diapers, etc. for babies, canned formula, batteries, crank radio, candles and matches, large and small plastic bags, smaller garbage cans to use as temporary toilets, and here in the USA be armed to fend off those who would take it from a family. In England, of course, the GOOD people have been disarmed, only the thugs have guns. Here in our USA home, we have enough emergency rations for 4 to 6 weeks, and drinking and flushing water and everything we need. Catastrophes, either natural or man-made can and do happen, and no one should depend on the authorities, but only themselves! The civilized world is becoming a a bunch of wimps who have lost all survival skills.

anne bright, Lyme, USA Connecticut

*** end quote ***

And, evidently, their version of FEMA isn’t doing very well either.

No, the best defense is self-defense.

And, depending upon the gooferment is a good way to get yourself killed.

# # # # #


INTERESTING: all we have to show for it are 3,600 graves

Saturday, July 21, 2007

http://www.lewrockwell.com/reese/reese379.html

The Republican War
by Charley Reese

***Begin Quote***

The Iraqis are killing us on the cheap with secondhand AK-47s, rifle grenades and homemade bombs created out of old artillery shells. We are using the most expensive weapons in the world, wielded by the most expensive army in the world, to kill them by the small handful. I don’t know what the insurgency has cost, but the Republican War has cost us half a trillion dollars, and all we have to show for it are 3,600 graves, several thousand wounded, a civil war and a corrupt, ineffective civilian government. The Iraqi supply line stretches around the corner; ours stretches 7,000 miles. The Iraqis know what their mission is; our soldiers don’t have the foggiest notion of why they are still there.

***End Quote***

Leave it to an old tank driver to put it bluntly.

I can’t think of a better way to say it.

Get the troops home. Now!

# # # # #


INTERESTING: I get an insertion in Risks Digest again

Friday, July 20, 2007

***Begin Quote***

RISKS-LIST: Risks-Forum Digest Thursday 19 July 2007 Volume 24 : Issue 74

ACM FORUM ON RISKS TO THE PUBLIC IN COMPUTERS AND RELATED SYSTEMS (comp.risks)
Peter G. Neumann, moderator, chmn ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy

***** See last item for further information, disclaimers, caveats, etc. *****
This issue is archived at <http://www.risks.org> as
<http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/24.74.html>
The current issue can be found at
<http://www.csl.sri.com/users/risko/risks.txt>

{Extraneous Deleted}

Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:32:42 -0400
From: Fred Reinke <reinkefj@reinke.cc>
Subject: “Microsoft Copy Protection Cracked Again” and who’s surprised?

{Begin Quoting an AP story}

Jessica Mintz, AP, 17 Jul 2007
Microsoft Copy Protection Cracked Again
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=2007-07-17_D8QEFI3O1
<http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=2007-07-17_D8QEFI3O1&show_article=1&cat=breaking> &show_article=1&cat=breaking

Microsoft Corp. is once again on the defensive against hackers after the
launch of a new program that gives average PC users tools to unlock
copy-protected digital music and movies.

The latest version of the FairUse4M program, which can crack Microsoft’s
digital rights management system for Windows Media audio and video files,
was published online late Friday. In the past year, Microsoft plugged
holes exploited by two earlier versions of the program and filed a federal
lawsuit against its anonymous authors. Microsoft dropped the lawsuit after
failing to identify them.

The third version of FairUse4M has a simple drag-and-drop interface. PC
users can turn the protected music files they bought online-either a la
carte or as part of a subscription service like Napster-and turn them into
DRM-free tunes that can be copied and shared at will, or turned into MP3
files that can play on any type of digital music player.

{End Quoting an AP story}

Like an arms race, the DRM folks are spending a lot of cycles on a failing
paradigm.

Like putting lipstick on the proverbial pig, it annoys their paying
customers and is pretty ugly! Some of my biggest irritations, in my
computing career, have been at the hands of “copy protection”. Couple that
with bad, or non-existent, support and you have the seeds of a revolt.

I now don’t buy content online — music or other kinds — if it has copy
protection.
I have a lot of expensive 8 tracks, cassettes, and cds of
“content” that are unusable. Add to that “software”, which has stopped
working, stopped being supported, or otherwise orphaned.

My most recent experience was with MusicMatch JukeBox being acquired by
Yahoo and forced to “upgrade”. This was one of my last purchases, excuse me
“licensing” — what “barbara streisand”!! — before my new policy of “no
more”.

“No more” locked content. “No more” buying software, excuse me licensing it,
from vendors who are one step below used car salesmen. “No more” operating
systems that require “activation”
and have “self-help” provisions.

I look to the open source software makers and happily “donate” to their
projects.

I’m calling out the content makers, “software” licensors, and the entire
Microsoft empire as the hucksters they are. At least the snake oil sales men
of yesteryear didn’t try and make you “license” the bottle!
A plague on all
their houses.

Imagine how I’ll be when I get old and crotchety!

Ferdinand J. Reinke, Kendall Park, NJ 08824 http://www.reinke.cc/
blog http://www.reinkefaceslife.com/ http://www.reinkefaceslife.com/

——————————

{Extraneous Deleted}

***End Quote***

Twice in one year! Maybe I’m getting older and wiser. :-) Either that or PGN is getting lax?

# # # # #


INTERESTING: A visit from the “state-ist” relatives

Friday, July 20, 2007

What a joy, relatives, in-laws actually have come to visit. They’re big gooferment proponents. They work for the gooferment. So how can the gooferment be bad? They listen to me rant and rave. But, at dinner, with a slew of in-laws, it was amusing to hear them all talk about property taxes. One of the local in-laws pulled out her property tax “statement”, and reported that 63% of the property taxes went to “education”. And, from there the fun began. I got my digs in often about taxes being theft. It was great to see all the statists squabble about high taxes being whose fault. I, of course, mentioned that they should imagine what they could buy if they could keep their own money. People can’t believe that we ever had no taxes. Wow! What fun.

I have to remember the lipstick on the pig. It doesn’t make the pig any prettier and annoys the pig.

# # # # #


INTERESTING: exception to an amendment to strike money in a spending bill

Thursday, July 19, 2007

http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/0707/North_to_Alaska.html

July 18, 2007
North to Alaska

***Begin Quote***

Rep. Don Young attacked his fellow Republicans on the House floor Wednesday, as he defended education funds allocated to his home-state of Alaska.

“You want my money, my money,” Young stridently declared before warning conservatives that, “Those who bite me will be bitten back.”

Young took extreme exception to an amendment by Rep. Scott Garrett (R-N.J.) to strike money in a spending bill for native Alaskan and Hawaiian educational programs.

***End Quote***

I think this sums it all up. It’s the politician’s money; not yours!

# # # # #


INTERESTING: equal treatment under the government

Thursday, July 19, 2007

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCNqgLkAx0g

***Begin Quote***

Yay, let’s all have equal treatment under the government! What would that be like?

***End Quote***

The way America is supposed to be?

# # # # #


INTERESTING: Why They Won’t Impeach

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

http://www.lewrockwell.com/shaffer/shaffer160.html

Why They Won’t Impeach
by Butler Shaffer

***Begin Quote***

The interests of Democratic and Republican officials alike are best served by the maximization of political power. If “government” is defined as an agency enjoying a monopoly on the lawful use of force within a given territory, what politically ambitious person would not want to enjoy as much of that power as he or she can muster? And since such a purpose not only suits the interests of the ruling establishment, but defines its existence, a symbiotic relationship between these two groups is easily fashioned.

***End Quote***

It just exposes the sham of the “two party system”. It’s a system all right. A scam. A racket. Tweedle dum and Tweedle dee.

# # # # #


INTERESTING: they’ll bemoan they were just a few votes

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

http://cernigsnewshog.blogspot.com/2007/07/governance-as-theatre.html

Monday, July 16, 2007
Governance as Theatre

***Begin Quote***

I have to congratulate Senator Harry Reid for having the common sense and the uncommon gumption of forcing an actual filibuster on the Reed-Levin amendment on a phased withdrawal of most combat formations from Iraq by April of 2008. The procedure that Sen. Reid will use will require sixty votes to end debate and if the debate is not ended, then at least thirty more hours of debate before another cloture attempt can be made.

***End Quote***

Interesting for the D’s to not realize that they can use this lever. Then, when the elections come, short. Silly, the Constitution vest considerable power in the minority.

# # # # #


INTERESTING: Immigration is a smokescreen for the welfare warfare state

Saturday, July 14, 2007

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/WalterEWilliams/
2007/07/11/illegal_immigration

http://tinyurl.com/ywxo3u

Illegal Immigration
By Walter E. Williams
Wednesday, July 11, 2007

In this I’m going to try interspersing my comments in the article.

WW> I’d like to raise some ordinary non-rocket-science questions to the pro-amnesty crowd, many of whom are my libertarian friends.
WW>
WW> Do people, anywhere in the world, have a right to enter the United States irrespective of our laws pertaining to immigration?

No, “right” implies that I have a duty. But, it has nothing to do with “laws”.

WW> If your answer is “no,” one does not have a right to enter the U.S. irrespective of our laws, what does that make a person who does so?

Just a person. Maybe they are just lost.

WW>I was summoned for jury duty some years ago, and during voir dire, the attorney asked me whether I could obey the judge’s instructions.

Jury tampering by the system to ensure it gets the verdicts it wants.

WW>Needless to say, I was dismissed from jury duty.

Lucky you weren’t held in contempt! Probably poisoned the whole pool. Good job!

WW>While our immigration laws are overly cumbersome and in urgent need of streamlining, they do not violate human rights and should be obeyed.

Your immigration laws are cruel, immoral, ineffective and inefficient. They clearly are at odds with the founding documents. And, seek to empower and enhance the welfare state.

WW>we can’t prevent every rape and murder

Maybe if we got rid of all the “victimless crime laws” and shrink the gooferment down to Constitutional size, then maybe we could.

WW>People who are here illegally should be denied access to any social service such as Medicaid, public education and food assistance programs.

I’d suggest we end the dole for EVERYONE! It’s only provided by the theft from productive people.

WW>The United States is a nation of immigrants from all over the world.

So, let’s go back to the immigration rules that cherished the Statue of Liberty.

WW>Because there was no welfare state, we were guaranteed that they’d work as opposed to living off the rest of us.

Bingo!

WW>They’ve announced that they seek to take back parts of the U.S. that were formerly Mexico.

Local determination. Peace. Mutual respect. As recognized by the Constitution, and the other great document of civilization.

# # # # #


INTERESTING: discontinues support

Saturday, July 14, 2007

Maybe I’m just irritable, but I find this and it’s tone “arrogant”. “You may have heard”? If “markets are a conversation”, these folks are having a monologue. Needless to say, communications like this, reinforce my commitment to Open Source Software whenever and where ever possible. And, are there other kinds of users? Other than “business” that is. Maybe it’s me. Adios, I’m not coming along.

***Begin Quote***

From: Ceryph [mailto:do_not_reply@ceryph.com]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 2:50 PM
To: Ferdinand Reinke
Subject: CmapTools – IHMC discontinues support of business users

You received this email because you are a registered user of IHMC’s CmapTools concept mapping software. If this email reached you in error, please remove yourself from our user list.

As you may have heard, IHMC will no longer provide CmapTools software, upgrades, bug fixes and technical support to business users. See IHMC’s new policy for details.

IHMC and Ceryph have partnered to ensure that business users of CmapTools continue to have access to world-class technical support. Ceryph created a commercial version of CmapTools called “Ceryph Insight” to facilitate this support. Our Insight customers will receive technical support and access to future upgrades through Ceryph.

Visit us at www.ceryph.com or contact sales@ceryph.com to learn more about Insight.

We look forward to serving you.

Bryan Clark
CEO
Ceryph
bryan.clark@ceryph.com
www.ceryph.com

***End Quote***

# # # # #


INTERESTING: Democrats have the unilateral power to end the war

Friday, July 13, 2007

http://blog.lewrockwell.com/lewrw/archives/014090.html

July 13, 2007
The Democrats’ Charade
Posted by James Ostrowski at July 13, 2007 10:28 AM

***Begin Quote***

Let’s be clear on this. The Democrats have the unilateral power to end the war. Don’t believe any of the malarkey such as this article in the Washington Post that suggests they need enough votes to override a veto to end the war. That’s what they want us to think.

The Democrats were elected, not because of their sicko domestic polices, but because people thought they would end the war. Now that they can, they won’t because they don’t want to be blamed for “losing” a war that was lost before it began. That’s right, they continue to fund a war that is killing thousands so they will win future elections and stay in power so they can act like monsters in the future too.

All they need to do is stop the funding, by majority vote, in either house.

***End Quote***

Even Dick Morris agrees. And, he throws in that many R’s will join them.

But the D’s want to get a lock on power and so are content to pretend that they are helpless.

Yeah, right. It’s all a shell game between two side of the same coin.

A pox on them all!

# # # # #


INTERESTING: the question from a certain level

Thursday, July 12, 2007

http://www.meansofinquiry.org/

Means of Inquiry

***Begin Quote***

Means of Inquiry is devoted to effective inquiry of concepts and institutions, for the purpose of identifying and resolving complex contradictions, for the result of advancing knowledge and the effectiveness of beneficial human activity.

***End Quote***

Often the question presupposes the answer. Or, the question once answered spawns a new question. Or, the question from a certain level of understanding can’t be answered without improved understanding (i.e., the Einstein quote).

# # # # #


INTERESTING: Translating the “silent revolution” to what you see

Thursday, July 12, 2007

http://changethis.com/36.05.Dramatic
http://changethis.com/pdf/36.05.Dramatic.pdf

***Begin Quote***

Dramatic Impact: The Effect of “The Silent Revolution”
By You, our ChangeThis readers

We asked you, our ChangeThis readers, to submit brief manifestos of 250 words to describe the impact of “The Silent Revolution” as defined in Elizabeth Haas Edelsheim’s earlier manifesto on the continuing influence of Peter Drucker on business.

***End Quote***

This is a slap upside the head, harder than any V8 commercial, that the rules are again changing silently. Right under our feet. People rule! The value of intelligent cooperation in the creation of value should be what we are seeking. Objections will consign organizations to the dust bin of progress.

# # # # #


INTERESTING: Balancing Church and State

Wednesday, July 11, 2007

FROM AN EMAIL IN MY HIGH SCHOOL FORUM

***Begin Quote***

Between their violence (as a generic proxy for all the “violence” in Catholic schools), and the later priestly pedophilia scandals, the Church in the USA is a mere shell of it’s former glory. I also made a similar observation in my blog of how the Church has lost the youth.

And, in a sense, the global Church has fallen away from whatever role it had in balancing the power of the State. The Church versus godless Communism probably freed Poland, and definitely had a lot to do with the fall of the USSR. It created the tipping point. Too bad. We could use and ally in wresting the American Gooferment from the current Socialists (both D’s and R’s) that are destroying Liberty here.

***End Quote***

Yes, the Church offset the power of the Kings of old to oppress the people. One has to wonder. Was it a direct conspiracy of the Socialists to destroy the Church? Anyone who studys history can see the classic role of the Church as the arbiter of good and evil. Was it necessary to destroy the Church, all Churches, as a refuge of oppressed people? So let’s examine what the Social Progressives have done.

  • Catholic Schools, gone, a casualty of gooferment education.
  • Catholic and Christian family solidarity anchored by grandparents in or near the family, gone, a casualty of Social Security checks.
  • Catholic and Christian family solidarity anchored by mothers in the home raising children, gone, a casualty of high gooferment taxes and “women’s liberation”.
  • Catholic Charities, gone, a casualty of gooferment welfare.
  • Catholic Hospitals, gone, a casualty of gooferment health care.
  • Catholic Moral Leadership, gone, a casualty of “Catholic in name only” politicians.
  • Catholic traditional marriage, gone, a casualty of the “free love” “let’s just shack up” trend.
  • Catholic Sanctity of Life, gone, a casualty of “women’s rights”, “reproductive freedom”, and “privacy rights”.
  • Catholic Missions to the Poor, gone, a casualty of the gooferment’s high taxes and “foreign aid”.
  • Catholic doctrine of the “Just War”, gone, a casualty of the “War on Terror”.
  • Catholic & Christian Christmas, gone, a casualty of the gooferment’s “winter solstice holiday”.
  • Catholic & Christian Easter, gone, a casualty of the gooferment’s “spring fling”.
  • Catholic, Christian, and Black Churches with their strong emphasis on Family and community, crippled, another casualty of the gooferment welfare.
  • Catholic protection to “illegal” immigrants, gone, a casualty of the War On Immigration.
  • Catholic Fraternal Orders, gone, a casualty of gooferment regulation on insurance and Social Security.
  • Catholic Churches (the buildings themselves), gone, a casualty of gooferment “social engineering” cause wholesale demographic changes.
  • Catholic financial support of the Church as an institution, gone, a casualty of the gooferment high taxes including inflation.
  • Catholic endowments, shrinking, a casualty of inflation.

To steal Walter Williams formulation, “if the Head Socialist wanted to completely destroy the Church — a generic label for all the moral institutions regardless of denomination Catholic, Christian, Jewish, Pentecostal, or any other intuitions that believes in absolutes like good and evil — as a counterbalance to the power of the oppressive State, then they could not have designed a better system to do it than the out of control gooferment of the USA.”

# # # # #


INTERESTING: Random sad thoughts

Tuesday, July 10, 2007

Reflections upon a death, funeral, and some sad observations

On Independence Day, Frau received word that an aunt had died. That shook her, since she had wanted to visit her, but Frau’s own health problems precluded it. It took the immediate family a little time to get organized, and she waited impatiently anxiously for the arrangements to be published. She was concerned that her own health would preclude her participation in saying good bye, and seeing again people from the good times long past. Eventually the arrangements were announced, and she prepared for the sad days ahead. Today was the last of those days.

As a blogger, I captured a few thoughts and observations. Some silly. Some funny. Some poignant. Some insightful. You’ll sort out which are which.

We attended the wake, the funeral Mass, and the final service.

* The wake has to be one of the more barbaric legacies of the past. The body is displayed and everyone remarks how “good” or “bad” the deceased looks. Duh. They are dead. Often after having undergone some of the most horrendous “medical procedures” of their life. Hard to look “good” in death.

* The deceased is dressed by relatives, who I guess think that the Final Judge will be impressed by a business-like attire as our life’s worth is assessed. I always remember another of Frau’s relatives who dressed the deceased in a “heavy metal” t-shirt so the widow exclaimed, proclaimed, and explained to any who would listen that “he would always be comfortable in the afterlife”. By contrast, it made as much sense. In this case, the attire was traditional.

* I had the inspired idea, probably from reading the “name tag” guy’s blog, that at the wake, the funeral home (now there is a strange appellation to hang on a business) should have color coded name tags for the arriving mourners. (Black for immediate direct family. Red for relatives on the deceased mother’s side. Blue for the father’s side. Green for the co-workers. Purple for real friends. Magenta for acquaintances. Pink for those barely known. White for strangers off the street. You can tell I had too much time on my hands during this session. But it was probably a more acceptable idea than my others — booklets listing all relatives and friends like a baseball program, introductions like at a wedding where the bridal party is announced, or a photo session with each visitor by the casket. Like I said, too much time on my hands.)

* Another relative pointed out to me that there were some people who scan the obits on a daily basis, see people who they “know”, and drop by to the wakes. Now that’s one bizarre concept of a “hobby”. It’s like the criminals that read the obits and go burglarize the homes of the deceased and grieving during the wakes and funerals. I was also told that the police put the addresses on special watch lists for extra attention. (As an anti-statist, I find it had to believe that the gooferment could be that pro-active. I’d more likely believe that they can’t read and if they could they’d be the one’s doing the crime. But then I’m jaded.) I just nodded with interest, thinking I had to get this in my blog!

* The funeral Mass spawned another whole set of musings. The old priest gave a interesting homily about the “church desert lady, who always told people after dinner to save their forks, because the best was yet to come”. A little hokey. If your dessert was so good, wouldn’t you give people clean forks to eat it with? But, he was just trying to make a point, I guess. (Again too much time on my hands. I was always taught to pay attention when some one was speaking since they may have a good idea to share. I did observe some of the old folks nodding and some young folks texting. But, he was interesting.)

* The priest admitted he never met the deceased. But, then later proceeded to say some things as if he knew her. Obviously prepped by someone. Wasn’t too outlandish. Unless you actually listened to what he was saying. But he was trying to be comforting. At least he was concise.

* Had the mandatory use of incense. Makes me sick. And, I guess it has some metaphoric (or maybe meteoric) meaning that escapes me.

* Had three “alter boys”, two of whom were NOT boys. Only the middle girl seemed to know the drill. She kept the other two prompted as the priest patiently waited for them to catch up. The youngest girl’s bejeweled beach flip flops caught my eye, and led to this observation.

* Leaving aside all the feminist observations about the Catholic Church, and the pedophile controversy that has stripped priests and religious of any deference, it’s a far cry from the alter boys of my youth. In those days, there were tests and auditions. And, you — if you were into that sort of thing — had to earn your way onto the “first team”, and you had to be “certified” to assist at Mass, Weddings, or Funerals. And, you could lose your status if you botched it up. There was even the Pastor’s circle, where the premier alter boys were listed. In those days, it was a lucrative hobby, since the alter boys received tips or a cut of the take from an event. Today it just looks lame. Like a dying beached whale.

* In the details of the Funeral Mass, it’s obvious who’s practicing and who’s lapsed. Maybe it’s the advent of the gooferment skoolz teaching secular progressivism. Maybe it’s the feel good generation that thinks that they can do whatever they want. Maybe it’s the a fore mentioned scandals. Maybe it’s the lack of an oral tradition. Maybe it’s “education”. Teaching evolution and that we are just smelly dirty hairless monkeys. But it was clear that it’s the religion of the old and not the youth.

* Every young girl in the deceased’s family had a visible tattoo. (Not a value judgment. Just a stunning observation.) Two of the six had visible piercings. (Ouch, just looking at them, hurt. Reminds me of my now deceased father-in-law who made a rare familial rule “if God had wanted you to have holes in your ears, he’d have provided them”. To which Frau would respond “so we should be going around naked then”. But she never got her ears pierced. On a theological level, it made perfect sense to me with my four years of D’s in theology. If you believe that we are made in the “image and likeness of God” then it’s impertinent to mess with his creation. Don’t the Jews ban from their consecrated cemeteries, any deceased with tattoos? And the Orthodox Jews want spilled blood buried with the deceased. Interesting to us forensic anthropologists.)

* As the funeral procession left the Church for the next stop, I noticed with interest that at one intersection a man tipped his hat. And, along the way an older woman blessed herself as we passed. (Yeah, I know too much time on my hands, but we were going slow. 15 to 20 mphs! I had lots of time to avoid hitting any one.)

* We went to the cemetery. The deceased was to be cremated so it was “interesting” to go to the cemetery. The funeral director led us in the side road that ended with “dead end” sign just in front of the open cemetery gate. I thought that was very funny. But in keeping with the occasion, I didn’t laugh out loud. (But inside I was ROFL!)

* One other observation, in the repast, various people chatted with Frau. One told us that she was never getting married. (I think she had children.) And another proclaimed that the deceased was thrilled when she told of the teller’s wedding plans and that teller wasn’t pregnant. (Again not a value judgment. An interesting perspective on marriage in the modern society?) (I remember that in my youth the Nuns would put special attention on the religious formation of the girls. The young girls got special propaganda sessions on religion and familial values. I never got a straight answer why from any priest, nun, or brother. But a cantor once explained to me that in the religious traditions of the Jews, the woman was the home maker. And, practically, if you had the hearts of the girls, then they would bring the boys into line. Seems logical. If that’s the case based on the evidence I saw today, the Churches have lost the war.)

Maybe I’m just an old fuddy duddy.

So this was the last of two sad days. I thought the deceased was a sharp witted lady who was in her own way very daring. She always “hung” with us at wakes, and kept things lively with her thoughts and chuckles.

I’ll miss her.

# # # # #