If Hunter can get a pardon, why not Ian Freeman, Snowden, Assange, and all the J6-ers?
—30—
If Hunter can get a pardon, why not Ian Freeman, Snowden, Assange, and all the J6-ers?
—30—
https://sonar21.com/why-is-the-cia-hiding-the-jfk-files-for-62-years/
Why has the CIA been Hiding the JFK Files for 62 Years?
24 November 2024 by Larry C. Johnson
*** begin quote ***
Now that all of the principals who were alive when John Fitzgerald Kennedy was murdered in Dallas, Texas on November 22, 1963 are dead, there are only two reasons — neither mutually exclusive — to explain why the complete files have not been released — 1) The CIA is implicated in the assassination and/or 2) A country with influence in the United States is implicated.
While many have speculated that the CIA is hiding evidence that Cuba was involved, the CIA has no reason, in my judgment, to withhold evidence of Cuba’s guilt. I have shied away from pursuing the various JFK assassination theories, but I recently came across a video by Ryan Dawson that suggests a credible reason for keeping the files from the public — Israel is implicated.
What!!!??? That was my first reaction.
*** and ***
This does not prove that Israel or some of its agents helped kill Kennedy, but there is circumstantial evidence warranting further investigation. This would not be the first time that Israel attacked the United States. Just ask the survivors of the USS Liberty. However, this provides one reasonable explanation for why the CIA wants to keep the files locked away.
Keeping the files secret no longer makes sense. President Trump is now on the record, vowing to release the files. Let’s see if he keeps his promise.
*** end quote ***
Let the chips fall where they may. Perhaps the USA’s relationship to Israel needs some “sunshine” on it?
—30—
Major warning for hikers as apex predator thought to be extinct for a century is spotted in California park
By ALEX HAMMER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
Published: 11:55 EST, 24 November 2024 | Updated: 12:51 EST, 24 November 2024
*** begin quote ***
n the past 100 years, there have been fewer than 30 documented attacks by wild wolves on humans in not only the US, but North America as a whole – with only two dying after contracting rabies from bites suffered in Alaska in the 1940s, according to reports.
Still, carrying a canister of bear spray is advised, officials said – as the animal can become aggressive towards parties it views as competition to its food source.
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife, meanwhile, has yet to release more information on the sighting.
*** end quote ***
While I’m happy that the wolves are back and I wonder what changes they will bring with them. Yellowstone experienced a lot less moose damage by the rivers and streams when the wolves came back there.
But if, by some twist of fate, I went hiking in the woods, then bear spray be damned. Too many two legged and four legged hazards for my taste. I’d want at least 45 caliber sidearm for my personal protection. If the varmints don’t like loud noises, I’d fire a warning shot. If possible. Otherwise, center of mass, baby. And keep firing until the threat is no more. Reload if need be.
No excuse for being unprepared.
—30—