GUNS:The unsubstantiated word of any politician, in this case Kamala Harris, is worse than hearsay

Monday, September 23, 2024

https://bearingarms.com/camedwards/2024/09/21/what-we-dont-know-about-kamalas-gun-ownership-n1226305

What We Don’t Know About Kamala’s Gun Ownership
By Cam Edwards | 4:30 PM | September 21, 2024

*** begin quote ***

So, we still don’t know much about Harris’ handgun, if it actually exists. Even if she doesn’t want to give free advertising to a particular gun company, there are still plenty of things she could tell us about her gun ownership, including:

  • How often does she go to the range to practice and train with her gun? 
  • Is her pistol available to all gun-buyers in California, or is it an “off roster” gun available only to law enforcement? 
  • What’s the magazine capacity of the pistol? 
  • Why did she choose to purchase a firearm? Was there a specific incident that caused her to become a gun owner, or just a general need to protect herself? 
  • Why does she continue to own a gun now that she has Secret Service protection? 
  • What factors did she consider when purchasing a gun? 
  • Did she try out multiple guns before making her purchase?

 None of these are “gotcha” questions. If Harris really is a gun owner, they should all be easy to answer. 

*** end quote ***

Sorry, but the unsubstantiated word of any politician and | or bureaucrat is one step below “hearsay evidence”.  Inadmissable,  in my “court of public opinion”.  We all know that politicians and bureaucrats say all sorts of things.  Fact checked or not, I want proof.  Especially about this “gun claim”.

Argh!

—30—

Leave a Comment » | GUNS | Tagged: , , | Permalink
Posted by reinkefj

ENCOURAGING: In her digging, Sharyl Attkisson finds that Federally-Funded Study Data is hidden?

Monday, September 23, 2024

https://sharylattkisson.substack.com/p/update-on-the-amish-approach-to-covid?publication_id=2579146&post_id=148901873&isFreemail=true&r=3snn7d&triedRedirect=true

Update on the Amish Approach to Covid
As a result of my challenges, journal makes multiple corrections to scientific article
Sharyl Attkisson
Sep 15, 2024

*** begin quote ***

Can Data From Federally-Funded Study Be Kept Hidden?

In response to my request to see study supporting materials, data, and communications, which the public owns since it was a taxpayer-funded study (and the tenets of solid science require transparency so that any findings can be replicated), West Virginia University stalled and then eventually provided only heavily-redacted materials that revealed very little except that several other observers had also questioned the study.

According to Springer Nature, “Journal of Religion and Health has a research data policy which encourages authors to publish data in a public repository where possible, but does not require that they do so.”

The National Science Foundation, which used US taxpayer money to fund the questioned study, provided no meaningful information when asked.

*** and ***

And, most important of all, why were the most significant takeaways of international interest seemingly ignored including that the researchers found no evidence that the Amish suffered more harm for not having shut down schools, businesses and church; for not isolating, masking or social distancing; for not Covid testing and vaccinating; and for not having spent a great deal of public funds on various measures.

*** end quote ***

I hope, that among the many things that DJT promises to change, the “liberation” for  Federally-Funded Study Data is madated.

We already know that there is a cover up of the disastrous effects of the Covid “vaccine”.  That’s no surprise.  What is surprising is that the Amish stayed open and true to their beliefs and demonstrated that there wasn’t any adverse impact.

Argh!

—30—

Leave a Comment » | ENCOURAGING | Tagged: , , , | Permalink
Posted by reinkefj