LIBERTY: surveillance SHOULD BE legalized, normalized or even required when the gooferment is involved!

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

http://computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=printArticleBasic&articleId=9055126

Opinion: I want to live in a surveillance society
Mike Elgan
January 03, 2008 (Computerworld) I

***Begin Quote***

There are many situations where I’d like to see surveillance legalized, normalized or even required, including:

* Interaction with police: When we get pulled over, it should be perfectly legal to openly videotape the entire conversation, as well as when we’re questioned or interrogated. They’ve got a dash cam or interrogation room camera pointed at us. We should have one pointed at them, too. (The knowledge that such cameras are allowed might prevent abuse like this.)

* Any interaction between caregiver and child: When babies and children or seniors or others who for whatever reason aren’t able to defend themselves are potential targets for abuse, it should be legal for their parents or other relatives to secretly tape encounters with caregivers and use those recordings as evidence in court.

* Anytime politicians meet with lobbyists: Why not use required surveillance to expose or prevent backdoor wheeling and dealing? When our representatives meet with special interest groups, corporate executives or other people out to buy influence, it’s not something that’s personal or private for the elected politician. There should be special lobbyist meeting rooms with cameras running 24/7. If congressmen and others meet with lobbyists outside the rooms, they go to jail for corruption. This is the people’s business, and we have the right to know all about those conversations.

* Court: It should be our right to record any public hearing or courtroom proceeding. If the public is invited, then banning video cameras and voice recorders is only to reduce the accountability of the judge (rather than, say, to protect the privacy of the accused). Why should judges be granted this protection?

* Your own phone calls: It’s legal to secretly record your own phone calls in 38 states (plus the District of Columbia). But it’s illegal in the other 12 states: California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington. You can record calls only if you get the consent of the other person on the phone. But I think all rights and protections involving your home (such as the right to keep security cameras and other cameras running without announcing the fact to visitors) apply to your home phone as well — and your cell phone, too, for that matter.

***End Quote***

Seems only fair. How can we “prove” their misconduct? And, they always misbehave.

# # # # #


LIBERTY: Gooferment skools are youth propaganda camps

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

http://www.lewrockwell.com/suprynowicz/suprynowicz78.html

***Begin Quote***

California’s 2nd District Court of Appeal on Feb. 28 declared the parents of most of that state’s 166,000 home-schooled children to be outlaws, ruling the law requires parents to send their children to full-time state-certified public or private schools or else have them taught at home by “credentialed” tutors – which most home-school parents, presumably, aren’t.

“California courts have held that … parents do not have a constitutional right to homeschool their children,” Justice H. Walter Croskey said in the 3-0 ruling, which makes it clear those parents can be criminally prosecuted for failing to comply.

And did Judge Croskey and his black-robed ruling-class pals say this was because the home-schoolers weren’t doing as well at teaching reading, writing and ‘rithmetic?

Of course not. They couldn’t say that, because tests consistently shows home-school kids, taught by parents without state “certificates” or licenses, score 30 to 37 percentile points higher than their public school peers across all subjects.

So why ban home-schooling, if the academic results are far better?

Judge Croskey obligingly explained: “A primary purpose of the educational system is to train school children in good citizenship, patriotism and loyalty to the state and the nation as a means of protecting the public welfare.”

***End Quote***

Oops, did the judge let the cat out of the bag?

Gooferment skools are youth propaganda camps. Stalin and Mao would be so proud. And, Kruschev was right. The Communists won!

# # # # #


WRITING: TEOTWAWKI fiction — “Percy’s Mission”

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Percy’s Mission BY Jerry D Young
http://www.survivalistboards.com/showthread.php?t=9217

# # # # #