LIBERTY: “MEDICARE” … … another gubamint crime!

Sunday, September 10, 2006

A friend of ine sent me this:

***Begin Quote***

Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 1:02 PM
To: John Reinke
Subject: Keeping NY Medicaid Fraud under control

http://www.nypost.com/business/when_nerds_attack_business_richard_wilner.htm

***End Quote***

To which I said:

Nice … BUT …

As we know, I have a “cheaper solution”. User pays.

Why am I paying taxes (I’m being robbed) to pay other people’s medical bills. After several layers of government take a swipe at the pile? If everyone had to pay for their own medical bills, (a) taxes lower; (b) medical costs lower; and (c) everyone would be a lot freer.

So for example, if you were paying for your Dad’s Rxes for him, how likely would it be that a doc or pharmacy would get money from you after his passing?

Or even better example, the psych who visited FKW in the hospital for 7 months every day 3 questions and billed 220$ per DAY! Got 201 from Medicare, 18.50 from hbcbsnj, and had the {expletive deleted} to bill him (me) for the other 50 cents. (.5 * 7 * 30) or 105$. My answer was “sue me”!

Arghhhhh.

Great that they are trying.

Lousy that we have such a crapy system to start with.

Argh!


RANT: Greedy NJ government forges new tax policy … be afraid … be very afraid!

Sunday, September 10, 2006

http://www.lewrockwell.com/fischer/fischer18.html

New Jersey’s New Taxes by Andrew S. Fischer

***Begin Quote***

Sometimes Fate dumps a dropping in your lap and you just can’t ignore it. As it happened, this week I received a missive in the mail from the great state of New Jersey. Two missives, actually. One is a notice to all retail sellers and purchasers of fur clothing. The other outlined changes to NJ’s sales and use tax act. Why did I receive these? Apparently because my Pennsylvania financial services company employs a NJ resident. That’s the only connection. We don’t buy or sell fur – or perform any services in NJ. So NJ must have sent these out in “shotgun” fashion, to everyone in its database. An inefficient waste of postage, if nothing else.

However, there is a bit more to Fate’s little love-notes. As I wrote in a previous article, NJ has so many tax and other revenue streams that it could make your eyes glaze over. Now, it seems, the Garden State has legislated a few new ways to steal its residents’ money.

***AND***

These changes, decreed by the government of New Jersey, for the good of all New Jersey residents (whether they like it or not), go into effect on October 1st. It almost feels good to be in Pennsylvania.

***End Quote***

Just don’t get to complacent. The “good ideas” that you see in Jerzee and Taxachusetts are often exported to other states. Tax Policy is one of our most important exports. You see they try it here and when the sheep don’t object to being shorn. When the Joe Sixpacks don’t go to Trenton with pitchfork, torches, tar, and ample supply of feathers, then the politicians think they are safe. They really think they have pulled the wool over our eyes. But as the tyrant Lincoln said that you can’t fool all the people all the time.

When the parade begins, I’ll join it.


LIBERTY: A democrat “discovers” the national debt … … another gubamint crime!

Sunday, September 10, 2006

http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/alerts/105

Submitted by BuzzFlash on Thu, 09/07/2006 – 5:15am. Alerts

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
***Begin Quote***

Though the Bush Administration’s official budget lists the national debt and deficit as being incredibly high, they are actually far worse than reported, according to Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN). But don’t just take his word for it, even if Cooper is a Rhodes Scholar and Harvard Law graduate. The following figures appear in the official U.S. Financial Report, released by the Treasury Department:

* The true national debt is $49 trillion, not the $8.3 trillion Bush reported
o That’s $156,000 for every citizen, or $375,000 for every working American
o This figure has more than doubled in the past five years
o We paid $327 billion last year on interest alone
* The true 2005 deficit was $760 billion, not the $318.5 billion Bush reported
o This is 6.2% of the GDP, not 2.6%
* It’s all getting worse

What accounts for the huge discrepancy? Unlike businesses, the government uses “cash” instead of “accrual” accounting. This means that the government does not report future spending promises like Medicare and Social Security, or even future spending guarantees like veterans’ benefits and federal employee pensions.

“Cash accounting tells you what’s in your bank account. Accrual accounting tells you what’s in your bank account and what’s on your credit card statement,” Cooper told BuzzFlash in an interview. “Whether you’re promising to buy a road or something at Target, you need to know what you promised to buy. That should be a binding obligation of the government. We’ve made a world of promises to folks that we need to keep.”

But wait, there’s more! The U.S. Financial Report does not mention that if Medicare and Social Security are factored into the equation (which the Treasury Department did not), the true deficit was actually a whopping $3.3 trillion last year, over ten times more than Bush claims. And when Social Security projections are adjusted to reflect current life expectancies instead of the old 75-year mark, Cooper said the true national debt is “probably closer to $65 trillion.”
***End Quote***

All I can see is Claude Reins in Casablanca being “shocked” to find gambling going on at Rick’s!

Here’s a Democrat “shocked” to find that the Republicans are using cash accounting as opposed to accrual accounting.

Err, Representative Jim, what did Bill, or any of the other Democratic Presidents, use?

While I think its a valid criticism, it’s a criticism of big gubamint in general.

And our posterity will get stuck with the bill.


TECH: Data on paper. Lots of it. But it’s not a new idea.

Sunday, September 10, 2006

http://www.deccanherald.com/deccanherald/sep62006/cyberspace163748200695.asp

Deccan Herald » Cyber Space » Detailed Story
Paper-based storage device
Are the days for CDs, DVDs, Zip drives over? A computer whizkid is revolutionizing the computer data storage through his Rainbow Technology, reports M A Siraj.

***Begin Quote***

A student has developed a technique for portable data whereby the data can now be stored on ordinary paper. And to boot, larger amount of data can be had on lesser space. The immediate question that pops up in the mind is how to retrieve the data. Will it be as facile as feeding a floppy disc or CD into the drive and having it on the monitor? Perhaps it will be much easier than all that. The piece of paper or even plastic sheet storing the data has just to be scanned in the scanner and read over the monitor.

***End Quote***

Nah, I don’t think so. I remember a similar development a while ago. It stored data in a printable format and would scan it back to life. If never panned out. I spent a LOT of time playing with it. I could see tremendous benefit in it. But, never got it to work. And scanners were no where as popular as today.

We’ll see. But it definitely not a revolutionary discovery imho.