LIBERTY: One more thing the gubamint shouldn’t be involved in!

Wednesday, October 18, 2006

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/17/AR2006101701263_pf.html

No Death Benefits for Studds’s Spouse
Wednesday, October 18, 2006; A19

***Begin Quote***

BOSTON, Oct. 17 — The federal government has refused to pay death benefits to the spouse of former congressman Gerry E. Studds (D-Mass.), the first openly gay member of Congress.

Studds married Dean Hara in 2004 after same-sex marriage was legalized in Massachusetts. But Hara will not be eligible to receive any portion of Studds’s estimated $114,337 annual pension because the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act bars the federal government from recognizing Studds’s marriage.

***End Quote***

Watch how fast this gets changed now.

My question would be: Why is the gubamint involved in pensions anyway? Why is it involved in marriage — gay or straight? Why are they involved in all sorts of things, other than defending the States and maintaining order among the States (It’s supposed to be the United STATES of America!)?

There should be ZERO federal employees! Zero pensions! And, zero taxes!


LIBERTY: Gubamint IS the problem! It’s the thief that kills people.

Tuesday, October 17, 2006

http://bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aef6sR60oDgM&refer=home

Bono, Preacher on Poverty, Tarnishes Halo With Irish Tax Move
By Fergal O’Brien

***Begin Quote***

Oct. 16 (Bloomberg) — Bono, the rock star and campaigner against Third World debt, is asking the Irish government to contribute more to Africa. At the same time, he’s reducing tax payments that could help fund that aid.

***End Quote***

Personally, I see nothing wrong with that move. I don’t think ANY taxes should be paid. It’s theft. Anything you can do to keep a robber from taking stuff is justified. The gubamint is just robbing him.

If I had a critique of him, and all the other so-called liberals, as opposed to the Classical Liberals who wanted Liberty, it would be to advocate the use of tax money at all for anything, even worthwhile things like poverty relief. After all, if it’s a good idea, then people will do it willingly. Loot at charity, disaster relief, telethons! Why send money to the government, incur a handling cost of say half, to have them send it to the charity? Go direct and avoid the middle man.

I think that poverty around the world is universally caused by governments. Just as in nature, an animal gets a parasite that eventually kills them, humans have this mental parasite called government. And, it kills.

Like the balance of good and bad bacteria in our bellies, we need government to preserve the peace and maintain order. (A joke in today’s world.) When it oversteps that simple mission, it causes all sorts of havoc.

Corrupt government, dictators that loot the treasury, and theocracies that enforce beliefs are all examples of impoverishing governments.

It’s further humorous, in a sad sort of way, that people are starving and we are talking a dealing with their governments as if they were legitimate. We should have a list of those countries that are impoverished and punish those governments with ostracism. Too many people in your country starving, you’re not invited to the next state dinner. If our businessmen can not trade with their counterparts in your country, then you can’t buy anything for yourself personally here. Loot your country’s treasury, don’t plan on buying investments here. Kill your citizens, and don’t look for our protection from their relatives. Maintain peace and order like a civilized government should, hey the door’s open, pull up a chair, how can we help you?

It’s government that impoverishes society, oppresses their minorities, and kills their citizens. Stamp out that plague of gubamint.


LIBERTY: Your right to just compensation, as recognized Fifth Amendment, not applicable here

Monday, October 16, 2006

http://www.njeminentdomain.com/state-of-new-jersey-eminent-
domain-date-of-valuation-blight-declaration-and-constitutional
-considerations.html

Eminent Domain: Date of Valuation, Blight Declaration and
Constitutional Considerations
State of New Jersey

***Begin Quote***

In the case before Judge Costello, the gap between the declaration of blight and the filing of the complaint was 18 months (April 12, 2004 – October 21, 2005). The Court felt there was no substantial time delay in pursuing the condemnation process. Therefore, no constitutional implications were raised by the use of a significantly earlier date. The Court referenced the New Jersey Supreme Court case Jersey City Redevelopment Agency v. Kugler, 58 N.J. 374 (1971), where the gap between the declaration of blight and filing of the complaint was 9 years.

***End Quote***

I think that this whole thing STINKS!

The dead old white guys would be taking down the long guns from over the mantle and strolling down to the Town Green to form the militia.

I think that the gubamint should have to get permission from the people to use eminent domain. It’s a blunt tool that is too easy to abuse.

For their friends, they condem and pay top dollar for a toxic waste dump to put schools on. For their enemies, they’ll condem your house for any reason. And the Intelligent Designer will have to have mercy on you, if your property is wanted by a campaign contributor.

We need to stuff this genie back in the box!


LIBERTY: 60MINUTES may not be above reproach but they did put some fuel on the fire

Monday, October 16, 2006

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/10/11/
60minutes/main2082140.shtml

Duke Rape Suspects Speak Out
60 Minutes’ Ed Bradley Talks To The Accused Lacrosse Players,
Who Have Never Before Been Interviewed

***Begin Quote***

The three players are white, and come from wealthy families; the accuser is black, a local dancer hired to perform at a team party. Over the past six months, 60 Minutes has examined nearly the entire case file, more than 2,000 documents, including police reports, witness statements and medical records. The evidence 60 Minutes has seen reveals disturbing facts about the conduct of the police and the district attorney, and raises serious concerns about whether or not a rape even occurred.

***End Quote***

I wasn’t there. Innocent until proven guilty.

And, it does sound like the DA used the case for politics.

What a surprise, the gubamint abused it power.


LIBERTY: Another area of our lives in which the gubamint has no business being in.

Friday, October 13, 2006

http://channel-surfing.blogspot.com/2006/10/expanding-marriage.html#comments

Friday, October 13, 2006
Expanding marriage
South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick
posted by Hank Kalet @ 3:05 PM

***Begin Quote***

Gov. Jon Corzine has finally come straight out and defended gay marriage. This is good news for those of us who believe that gays and lesbians deserve the same rights as the rest of us.

***End Quote***

At 7:15 PM, Libertarian at 08824 said…

And, why is the government involved in regulating marriages anyway? We know it was originally to keep the races from marrying so why continue the practice at all.


LIBERTY: Your DNA? Please don’t be silly. Everything is the gubamint’s!

Friday, October 13, 2006

http://www.epic.org/privacy/medical/

Supreme Court Ignores Appeal in DNA Database Case

***Begin Quote***

The Supreme Court this week chose not to hear the appeal of a
Washington, D.C. resident who argued that the collection of his DNA for
a federal database violated the Fourth Amendment. EPIC filed an amicus
brief in support of Lamar Johnson’s petition and emphasized three
particular flaws within the DNA collection program. First, the DNA
profile stored in CODIS contains more information than the unique
identifier the government claims. Second, the DNA database allows for
partial profile searching that implicates relatives of profiled
individuals. Third, the retention of the blood sample from which the DNA
profile is generated presents an opportunity for future privacy
violations.

***End Quote***

Like the gun records that weren’t supposed to be kept for more than a few days, the government lies!

Police State?


LIBERTY: Support the troops by bringing them home NOW!

Wednesday, October 11, 2006

http://www.ncc-1776.org/tle2006/tle388-20061008-03.html

One Answer to Vance’s “Supporting the Troops”
by James Glaser

***Begin Quote***

At the end of Vance’s column he says another thing that I and all veterans can get behind.

And when they are all home—from Iraq and everywhere else in the world—I support using the troops to actually patrol our coasts and guard our borders. I support the troops so much that I don’t want them sent to fight any more foreign wars.

***End Quote***

Return to the original intent of the Constitution. No entangling alliances. We aren’t, shouldn’t be, and can’t be the world’s policeman. Nor can we afford it.

imho


LIBERTY: You have to like someone who can make you think

Wednesday, October 11, 2006

http://darianworden.tripod.com/prop/posters.html

I particularly liked “PATRIOTISM: America was created by people who always obeyed the government”

SAFE FOR WORK

SAFE but UNSETTLING


LIBERTY: In a Libertarian America … …

Tuesday, October 10, 2006

In my Libertarian American, you’ll have:

  • gold coins to use (no federal reserve),
  • get your whole paycheck (no taxes), and
  • keep all you ever earn (no inheritance taxes).

You’ll be busy though, because you’ll be making lots of choices:

  • how to educate the children; no state skool.
  • what drugs to buy at WalMart; no gubamint permission required to buy medicine.
  • what to do with all that extra money; there will be many private charities appeal for some of your surplus.
  • what type of ammo to buy for your gun; self-defense.
  • what insurance company to contract with for police services; no thugs in uniforms from the central committee with diktats.
  • what fraternities / sororities, clubs, and associations you will join for various benefits (Consult http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexis_de_Tocqueville for how it was); no gubamint free goods to lull you into slavery, poverty, or stupidity.

Ahh, it will be great.

Remember in post-Civil War to WW1 America, the economy was booming and there was a gradual decline in prices. Life expectancy surged. The rising tide lifted all boats.

The spirit of the Statue of Liberty was in the land.

We can be there again.


LIBERTY: When do we pull the plug on “publik eddycation”?

Sunday, October 8, 2006

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig7/norwood1.html

Public Schools Have Flunked Out
by James Erwin Norwood

***Begin Quote***

Public schools have stayed in business, in spite of their bad results. Their failures have not been punished by bankruptcy or loss of jobs. Their failures have been rewarded with more money, which has operated as a perverse incentive to fail again and again.

***End Quote***

So when does the plug get pulled?