LIBERTY: Ron Paul Speech and selected quotes

Monday, July 2, 2007

http://blog.lewrockwell.com/lewrw/archives/013892.html

July 01, 2007
Ron Paul Speech in its entirety
Posted by Nick Bradley at July 1, 2007 11:57 PM

***Begin Quote***

Uploading it to Google Video degraded the video quality a bit, but the sound is good.

***End Quote***

Ron Paul nails a bunch of the political sacred cows.

Nick Bradley blogged the following quotes.

*** begin quote ***

“You cannot have liberty without life, and you cannot have a decent life without liberty.”

“Government’s only function is to protect life and liberty…that the genius of the Constitution. But today we have a monolithic system, when we should solve our problems at the local level.”

“A fetus has legal rights; how can you allow a woman to kill her child a minute before birth, but throw her in jail for killing her baby minute after?”

“The welfare-warfare state introduces the notion that we do not own ourselves — it undermines the entire principle of liberty and the right to life. The worst part of our system is the notion that the Federal Government owns 100% of our government and merely chooses to allow us to keep part of it — let’s get rid of the income tax! (applause).”

“we don’t even own our own property — you have to get 25 permits to do anything on your own property; the concept of private property has been seriously undermined.”

“Get rid of the selective service! (applause)”

“We are facing an economic crisis — the government tells us everything is wonderful: deficits don’t matter, inflation is low, etc. etc. But if you look at your own financial situation, we are not nearly as wealthy as we think we are or foreigners see us as.”

“We are beyond our means. We China stops loaning us money, prices will go up. When our baker cuts us off, our interest rates will shoot up like in the 1970s.”

“We have accepted the notion of perpetually increasing welfarism.”

“If we do not soon get rid of this notion, we will go bankrupt.”

“We need to get rid of the Federal Reserve System (massive standing ovation).”

“You know what? The idea of paper money is so silly and dangerous — that the people allow the government that the do not trust to print funny money; and we wonder why we have problems. The Founders knew what was wrong with fiat money – they were very familiar with the collapse of the Continental; they declared that only gold and silver can be used as legal tender. There as never been a paper currency that lasted for a long time.”

“When they debase our currency, they are stealing our money!”

“Who suffers the most when the price is going up? Government — no. The middle class and the poor pay the inflation tax. Somebody is literally stealing 10% (10% real inflation) of our real income every year. Inflation wipes out the middle class. Just look at Mexico. Maybe if Mexico had a sound currency we wouldn’t have an illegal immigration problem.”

“The Federal Reserve causes the Business Cycle. We have no savings, yet interest rates are low. In a free market, if savings rates are low, interest rates are high.”

“The booms and the busts, the Great Depression, etc. all this cannot happed without the Federal Reserve System. We have to get rid of it.”

“The Fed enhances the growth of government.”

“Banks create credit our of thin air. Special interests who benefit from this want to preserve the Federal Reserve System. As president, we will not have this system.”

“We are set up for hyperinflation. We are not immune. We need more people like you when our system collapses so we can get back to the basics of a sound monetary system.”

“War is the health of the state. Up in a debate with ‘that mayor from New York City’ (hisses from the crowd), I said that they are over here because we are over there. (applause).

“We need to realize why these attacks happen, because when there is a Pearl Harbor or 9/11, we have to retaliate.”

“I was against the war 15 years before it started (the Gulf War.”

“It was in 1998 when I really started opposing the war, when Congress voted for regime change.”

“Unfortunately, I didn’t persuade a lot of people. I did my best, but it was not enough. I told the international relations committee that if they thing that going to war is such a good idea, they should declare war (massive applause).”

“One member of Congress told me that the declaration of war section of a Constitution is an anachronism. It falls on Congress to go to war. They delivered this responsibility to the President — they were amending the Constitution. They are now squirming over their stance a few years ago.”

“There is a strong history of non-interventionism in the Republican Party — let’s remind them of that (applause).”

“The Party is now stuck in the position of having to defend the indefensible. There is now way to continue to do well without resolving this.”

“In 2000, I thought ‘a humble foreign policy sounds good’, but that is not what we got.”

“Life is precious. But many in the right-to-life movement agitate for selective service and foreign wars. I told them that ‘you care more about your guns than you care about your kids’. We should never forget about the Christian Church’s teaching about ‘Just War.’ I do not have to accept passivism, and the second amendment protects me on that (applause). And under the constitution, we have a right to protect ourselves against threats. The problem is when we go to far and spread ourselves thin, we undermine our national security.”

“We need to bring the troops home to protect the border (massive applause).”

“In Just War theory, we have to follow a set of reasonable standards. It must only be in defense, it must be proportional, and it must be declared by the proper authority. But now we send our boys over there to enforce UN Resolutions. The best thing for us is to get out of the United Nations (standing ovation).

“We are in worse shape than when Woodrow Wilson was president. Today we are told that the war is endless. The war on terrorism is not a war — it is a tactic. Once we are told by our gov’t that the war is perpetual, they say that we must be willing to send our children anywhere in the world — that must end now! (applause)”

“After 9/11, they immediately started planning a war in Iraq. Talk about an interventionist foreign policy backfiring — we had Iran in check with their arch-enemies, the Taliban and Saddam Hussein and we get rid of them. What if they come to the conclusion that we inadvertently helped the Iranians. We need to quit.”

“There is preparation going on for a war on Iran. We don’t have enough troops to invade, so it will be different. Other candidates in our party are willing to launch a nuclear first-strike on Iran. We need to come back to our senses.”

“We are capable of defending ourselves. We have a policy designed that literally rewards those with nuclear weapons. Pakistan gets a nuke, and Musharraf overthrows a democratic government, and now they’re our friends. Pakistan is harboring bin Laden, and we send them money — and Pakistan sends nuclear technology to North Korea too. Let’s stop subsidizing them.”

“It’s not like WWII, where these measures can be repealed after the war — this war is perpetual!”

“Today, the president can declare an insurrection — only congress has the right to declare martial law. Americans can be held as enemy combatants without due process, without habeas corpus. These laws are designed to protect the state, when the state is designed to protect you! (applause)”

“Our country was founded as a republic. Natural Rights are not up for majority vote. Empire contradicts the notion of a Republic.”

“Down in Arizona, my supporters were talking about a Revolution. And I like Revolution, but a non-violent one. I want to go back to the Constitution, and today that IS Revolutionary. Historically, Revolutions are started by a select few, and are ignored by the mainstream for a long time — until they can no longer be ignored. That point has passed, and they can ignore us no longer.”

“They try to ridicule us for standing up for principle. We are moving gently over into the next stage, when they directly fight us — a philosophic fight of course.”

“They want to silence us — but they now fail to invite us to their little parties, so we now have our own, bigger parties (massive applause). Those same individuals who undermine our democratic process at home are the same who send your money and your kids overseas to build democracy in the middle east.”

“In the end, you win (revolution).”

“The purpose of politics should be simple — the promotion of liberty. All I have to do is fulfill my office, and obey the Constitution.”

“The exciting about the campaign is all the young people, they’ve been tipped off that they’re getting the bad end of this deal — massive debt, loss of liberty, invasion of privacy. They know this!”

“Maybe, just maybe, will be the ones who are on our side for the preservation of liberty — and that is exciting!”

“True principles are outdated. You know what is outdated? Tyranny! Authoritarianism! (massive applause).”

*** end quote ***

# # # # #


GUNS: Immigration Bill Dead For Now

Sunday, July 1, 2007

Immigration Bill Dead For Now
— Gun owners unheralded in media, but played a huge role in the defeat of bill

Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
http://www.gunowners.org

*** begin quote ***

Friday, July 29, 2007

Well, the American public has spoken.

If you ever wondered whether your activism pays off, then look no further than the immigration debate. The bill went down in flames yesterday by a vote of 53-46.

And good thing too, because this bill was packing more than just immigration stuff — it also contained anti-gun language as well.

But what else would you expect from a Ted Kennedy bill?

In addition to denying many law-abiding gun owners their right to find a job or buy a gun, the bill could have put every major gun shop out of business, something which the anti-gun left has been trying to do for years.

*** end quote ***

# # # # #


LIBERTY: universal carding mandatory

Sunday, July 1, 2007

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?
id=2007-06-30_D8Q3A26O0&show_article=1&
cat=breaking

http://tinyurl.com/2ur726

Everyone Shows ID for Beer in Tenn.
Jun 30 02:28 PM US/Eastern
By LUCAS L. JOHNSON II
Associated Press Writer

***Begin Quote***

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) – Comer Wilson hasn’t had to show his ID to buy beer in a while. Maybe it’s the 66-year-old man’s long white beard.

Starting Sunday, gray hair won’t be good enough. Wilson and everyone else will be required to show identification before buying beer in Tennessee stores—no matter how old the buyer appears.

“It’s the stupidest law I ever heard of,” Wilson said. “You can see I’m over 21.”

Tennessee is the first state to make universal carding mandatory, says the National Alcohol Beverage Control Association. However, the law does not apply to beer sales in bars and restaurants, and it does not cover wine and liquor.

***End Quote***

Well, I think that it is a GREAT idea!

Annoy people with enough stupid laws so even the most dense can see the stupidity.

More laws to correct more problems that the laws created in the first place.

When do we realize that laws don’t prevent underage drinking, they encourage it. Prohibition demonstrated it. Being illegal, it’s kool. Being illegal, when they turn 18 or 21 or one of their friends do, it’s drunken city.

Same as all drugs. You can’t prevent it with a law. All you can do is raise the price!

# # # # #


LIBERTY: the Senate phone system crashed yesterday

Saturday, June 30, 2007

http://www.downsizedc.org/blog/2007/jun/28/victory

***Begin Quote***

D o w n s i z e r – D i s p a t c h
—————————————————————–
Subject: Victory!

The immigration bill is dead. It fell short by 14 votes. Better yet, the whole issue has become so controversial, in so many different ways, that no further action on immigration is expected any time soon.

Fox News has reported that the Senate phone system crashed yesterday, from so many calls coming in.

We call this overwhelming, inescapable, resistance numbing pressure!

But the media, as usual, is getting the story wrong. The professional reporting class seems unable to contain more than one idea or fact in their heads at any given time, so they’re all reporting that the bill’s defeat was due to its supposed amnesty provisions.

It is to laugh.

The truth is that nearly everyone, on all sides of the issue, opposed this bill, for every reason imaginable.

The truth is that hundreds of groups like DownsizeDC.org were organizing opposition to this legislation for many different reasons. And one of the biggest objections was the REAL ID provisions.

Congratulations to you for the role you played in killing this horrible bill. Now, we have a prediction to make . . .

THIS IS THE FUTURE.

Increasingly, this is how the United States is going to be governed. Congress will propose, but the people will dispose, by exerting overwhelming, inescapable, resistance numbing pressure.

The Internet has made this possible, just as printing made the Reformation and the Enlightenment possible, and TV enabled the civil rights movement.

This Big Change will mostly mean that Congress will do less, because there will usually be vast interlocking groups of opposition ready to fight, often for conflicting reasons, but usually with the same result — to say and impose a giant NO on Congressional schemes.

The pressure of the people will become the ultimate check and balance on state expansionism.

This is the future.

And we have another prediction to make . . .

The era of partisan politics and over-sized political personalities is coming to an end. Parties and personalities will matter less and less, while public opinion on individual issues and bills will matter more and more.

Many people will continue to have partisan loyalties, and many more will root for one candidate or another, for the same reason people love sports. But this contest of labels and names will matter less and less. It will increasingly become a “sound and fury signifying nothing.”

Groups like DownsizeDC,org are the future. Our strategy is the main chance.

Do you want to win? Then this is the way to do it. And frankly, we see zero evidence that there is any other way to do it.

But there’s something else involved here. If you look deeply at the public opinion polls on various issues you will see that most people want smaller government on most issues most of the time. We call this the Great Downsize DC Consensus. But . . .

You wouldn’t know about this Consensus from watching the news, because the journalistic obsession with the sports reporting of partisan politics ignores this point.

Likewise, the rigged partisan division into two Big Government parties, and two Big Government philosophical groupings, leaves the small government consensus disenfranchised, un-represented, and completely invisible.

Partisan politics isn’t the solution. Partisan politics is the problem!

DownsizeDC.org isn’t a political party. It’s a way to recruit and organize the Downsize DC Consensus free from the barriers of primitive partisan tribalism. It can also be, as our recruiting and organizing gains critical mass, a way to make the smaller government consensus VISIBLE for the first time.

We don’t think it is a matter of “if this will happen,” we think it is a matter of “when?”

After all, DownsizeDC.org is the future.

Yet part of the answer to the “when” question is up to you.

June has been one of our best months so far. We’ve recruited more than 800 new Downsizers, and sent more than 40,000 messages to Congress, plus countless phone calls. Now all we have to do is pay for it. Please help us make budget for June. We are very close.

A generous anonymous donor has pledged $1,500 for this purpose. But in order to get that $1,500 we must raise another $1,500 from other donors. We are oh so close. If you can contribute today your contribution will be WORTH TWICE AS MUCH. Plus . . .

We’ll mail a “9/11: Press for Truth” DVD to your home. Here’s how . . .

If you’re an existing monthly credit card pledger in good standing as of June 15, 2007, all you have to do is increase your monthly pledge by at least $1, and we’ll send one to you.

If you’re NOT an EXISTING monthly credit card pledger then you can start a monthly credit card pledge of at least $6, or make a one-time credit card donation of $35 or more, and we’ll send you the DVD. (Sorry, for technical reasons we cannot make this offer for PayPal pledges or donations).

Please help us make budget. You can make your contribution here.

Thank you for being a DC Downsizer.

Jim Babka
President
DownsizeDC.org, Inc.

D o w n s i z e r – D i s p a t c h
is the official email list of DownsizeDC.org, Inc. & Downsize DC Foundation

CONTRIBUTE to the Electronic Lobbyist project

http://www.DownsizeDC.org is sponsored by DownsizeDC.org, Inc. — a non-profit educational organization promoting the ideas of individual liberty, personal responsibility, free markets, and small government.

***End Quote***

Disclaimer: Financial contributor to this group.


LIBERTY: verdict wrong in one of six cases

Thursday, June 28, 2007

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?
id=070628135531.31cukrus&show_
article=1&catnum=-1

http://tinyurl.com/2hpup7

US juries get verdict wrong in one of six cases
Jun 28 09:55 AM US/Eastern

***Begin Quote***

So much for US justice: juries get the verdict wrong in one out of six criminal cases and judges don’t do much better, a new study has found.

And when they make those mistakes, both judges and juries are far more likely to send an innocent person to jail than to let a guilty person go free, according to an upcoming study out of Northwestern University.

*** AND ***

Finding a solution will be much harder to do than quantifying the problem, Heinz warned.

“The sources of the errors are quite resilient to correction,” he said.

“They have to do with all sorts of biases and the strong presumption of guilt when someone is arrested and brought to trial.”

***End Quote***

End you trust these people, the gooferment, and your fellow citizens to protect you?

# # # # #


LIBERTY: Skoolz learn them student to be victims

Thursday, June 28, 2007

http://www.survivalblog.com/2007/06/
reverse_the_public_school_brai.html

Reverse the Public School Brainwashing and Keep Your Kids Safe
by Captain Dave

***Begin Quote***

This politically correct emphasis on non-violence is really a drive to non-confrontation that teaches kids to be victims at an early age. Violence not only still exists in our schools, it is worse than ever because the system does not allow kids to counter force with force. This means that kids cannot fight back when they are harassed on the school bus, spit on in the lunch room, assaulted in the hallway, or beaten in the locker room. Teachers routinely do not intervene in bullying or one-way assaults. This bullying behavior is allowed until the target decides to fight back, at which point school rules treat both the attacker and defender the same way. I am afraid that these days, the only place bullies and their victims really meet after school to settle their differences is on television or in the movies.

***End Quote***

Gooferment skoolz are my pet peeve. Here’s another reason NOT to like them! The unintended consequences of them are just bad to all the poor children imprisoned in them.

# # # # #

 


LIBERTY: Social Security is an odd type of Ponzi scheme

Wednesday, June 27, 2007

http://www.mises.org/story/2586

What If Social Security Were Completely Scrapped?
By D.W. MacKenzie
Posted on 6/18/2007

***Begin Quote***

Social Security transfers income between generations. It does nothing to promote capital accumulation through saving, because it does not involve saving. It is true that some American, especially the earliest recipients of benefits, have gained a low positive rate of return on Social Security. However, this is only possible because other Americans, especially those presently under 30, can expect a negative rate of return. In other words, Social Security is a Ponzi scheme, contrary to what its defenders claim.

Yet Social Security is an odd type of Ponzi scheme. In the original Ponzi scheme, those who got in early enough made a high rate of return.

***End Quote***

Where no one wins!

It is supposed to protect the poor, yet it’s well documented that it discriminates against the poor. It transfers wealth from poor black men to rich white women.

But, worst of all, it robs wealth from all of us.

Only the gooferment, the politicians, and its workers gain.

Sigh, how stupid are we?

# # # # #


LIBERTY: trade and friendly relations with anybody

Monday, June 25, 2007

http://www.lewrockwell.com/reese/reese371.html

Goodbye and Good Luck
by Charley Reese

***Begin Quote***

What the knuckleheads in Washington have created is an empire of delusions and illusions. It’s time for the nation to wake up and adopt a realistic foreign policy, which is trade and friendly relations with anybody who wants it. As for those who don’t, we simply ignore them. We don’t need to be anybody’s enemy.

As for defense, defending our space is easy and cheap. As another mark of imperial stupidity, the rulers of the empire can’t even do that while they fail overseas.

***End Quote***

Only a a tank gunner could recap the DOWG’s (dead old white guy’s) wisdom so well.

http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/49.htm

FAREWELL ADDRESS (1796)
George Washington

*** begin quote ***

The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is, in extending our commercial relations to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop.

*** end quote ***

Just stop!

# # # # #


LIBERTY: Any service at the barrel of a gun … is immoral

Thursday, June 21, 2007

http://www.lewrockwell.com/alston/alston23.html

The (Postal) Empire Strikes Back
by Wilton D. Alston

 

***Begin Quote***

With kudos to Marc Stevens for originally using this metaphor, delivering any service at the barrel of a gun – which is how all government services are delivered – is immoral. (It doesn’t matter if the service is delivered directly by a government agency, or by an agency that operates under government authority and/or heavy regulation.) This issue is morally clear no matter how much anyone likes that service, or how many people ostensibly benefit from that service, or how widespread that service is, or how long that service has existed.

The bottom line is: If your service is so great, you should be willing to deliver it voluntarily, without government protection or legal requirement. Furthermore, the fact that something “good” comes of your initial act of aggression is irrelevant.

***End Quote***

I like this formulation!

# # # # #


LIBERTY: no law that does not apply equally

Thursday, June 21, 2007

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/WalterEWilliams/
2007/06/20/the_law_versus_orders

http://tinyurl.com/3ctwr3

 

The Law Versus Orders
By Walter E. Williams
Wednesday, June 20, 2007

***Begin Quote***

Twenty-five years ago, during a dinner conversation with Nobel Laureate economist/philosopher Friedrich A. Hayek, I asked him if he could propose one law that would restore, promote and preserve liberty in our country, what would that law be? Hayek answered that the law he’d propose would read: Congress shall enact no law that does not apply equally to all Americans. Hayek’s suggestion for full equality before the law was both simple and profound and would do untold wonders in fostering the liberties envisioned by our Founders. But I’m betting that most Americans would greet Hayek’s proposal with contempt after they realized that it would mean Congress wouldn’t be able enact orders and play favorites with different Americans.

***End Quote***

Well, I’m glad to see Professor Williams resume his winning ways.

He’s now redeemed himself from that last comment that could have implied he supported taxation for education. Since taxes are theft, it appeared that he was advocating something he knew was immoral. Many called him on it. (me2) He responded that one can’t get from gooferment education in one ump. He was proposing a two step. Separate operation from funding. Kill the gooferment operation. Then, kill the gooferment funding. One can legitimately question if even that can be accomplished without bloodshed.

Here, he is citing Hayek, the great economist in the Austrian style of Economics, who wrote the Road to Serfdom. And, pointing out how far the USA has strayed from it’s founding.

Sigh!

# # # # #