LIBERTY: Pulling apart the myth of government aka the blue light gang

Sunday, July 13, 2008

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6tsJVLVA8Y

***Begin Quote***

In a system where all power is supposedly based on the consent of the governed, where all men are created equally, what happens when one questions the legitimacy and the very nature of government? Watch this video and find out how government solves market needs in a very different way than private companies seeking a profit.

***End Quote***

Spend thirty minutes and watch one young man throw a monkey wrench in the “blue light gang”! Some great points that even those eddykated in gooferment skool could understand!

# # # # #


LIBERTY: For laughs, FTL’s Ian pokes the property tax folks

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

http://www.freestateproject.org/node/13676

“Property Taxes” and the Consent of the Governed

What is the nature of this organization of people calling themselves the “government”?

# – # – #

Imagine asking them to prove from where there authority come! How cheeky. ROFL, next the folks from ‘mental hygene’ will come to clean up.

# # # # #


LIBERTY: Taxachussetts may revert to being Massachusetts yet!

Tuesday, July 8, 2008

***Begin Quote***

Small Government News*
Monday, July 7, 2008

Publisher: Carla Howell
Editor: Michael Cloud

===========================================================
IN THIS ISSUE
===========================================================

— Massachusetts Secretary of State Certifies END the Income Tax
Initiative for Ballot with 16,135 Signatures – Enough to Scare Off
Challenge by Teachers Union
— Help Reach and Persuade 1,600,000 Voters to Vote “Yes” to END the
state Income Tax

===========================================================
MASSACHUSETTS SECRETARY OF STATE CERTIFIES END THE INCOME TAX
INITIATIVE FOR BALLOT WITH 16,135 SIGNATURES –
ENOUGH TO SCARE OFF CHALLENGE BY TEACHERS UNION
===========================================================

Last December, just hours after we filed 76,085 validated and
certified signatures for our END the Income Tax Ballot Initiative with
the Secretary of State, the Massachusetts Teachers Union sent a swarm
of representatives to electronically scan these 76,085 into their
computer database.

They quietly set up and ran a Stealth, Boiler Room Telemarketing
Operation that telephoned signers – and asked whether their signatures
might have gotten on the petition through “fraud” or “forgery.” (Their
words.)

The Teachers Union failed to disqualify our Initiative. We moved
forward. (For more details, see the 12-19-08 and 1-03-08 issues of
“Small Government News.”)

This time, we turned in a Kevlar strength, bulletproof, challenge-
proof number: 16,135 Certified Petition Signatures – 5,036 more than
required by law.

On Thursday, July 3rd, the Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth
officially certified our END the Income Tax Initiative for the
November 4th Ballot.

Although the Teachers Union Headquarters is across the street from the
Massachusetts Elections Division – which has our petitions – the
Teachers Union hasn’t even walked over to check our petitions. They
have until this Wednesday, July 9th to file a challenge. With our
signature margin, the walk looks too daunting.

Massachusetts law requires initiative petitioners for a statewide
ballot to collect signatures both in the fall preceding the election
year and in the spring of election year. They must turn petitions in
to each of 351 cities and towns to certify voter signatures.
Petitioners must then collect the certified signatures from each town
and turn them in to the Elections Division. No more than 25% of
certified voters may reside in any one of the 14 counties in
Massachusetts.

In the fall of 2007, the Elections Division approved 76,085 certified
signatures turned in by the Committee For Small Government – 9,492
more than required by law.

Over 123,000 voters in Massachusetts signed the petition – either in
the fall of 2007 or spring of 2008 – to End the Income Tax.

In a statement to the News Media, Carla Howell said:

“Governor Deval Patrick, the state legislature, and the Massachusetts
Teachers Union no longer control the decision of whether to END the
Income Tax. The voters will decide this November 4th.”

“Our END the Income Tax Ballot Initiative is the first major tax cut
for working class and middle class Massachusetts taxpayers in 28
years. Since Proposition 2 ½.”

Two Polls of likely voters – one in January, another in May – show
that 45% of Massachusetts voters already support this ballot
initiative.

A November 4th “yes” vote to End the State Income Tax will give back
$3,600 each (average) to 3,000,000 Massachusetts workers and
taxpayers. A $3,600 tax refund every year.

A “yes” vote to End the State Income Tax will stop the job exodus from
Massachusetts. It will create hundreds of thousands of new jobs in
Massachusetts in the next 2 years. New jobs for our unemployed and
underemployed workers. New opportunities, new jobs for our high school
and college graduates.

“In the face of $4.50 a gallon gasoline, skyrocketing heating oil
costs, exploding home foreclosures, and 28 straight years of property
tax increases on Massachusetts homes – ENDing the Income Tax will give
desperately needed financial relief to Massachusetts families,” said
Carla Howell, Chair of the Committee For Small Government.

===================================================
HELP REACH AND PERSUADE 1,600,000 VOTERS TO VOTE “YES”
TO END THE STATE INCOME TAX
===================================================

We’ll probably need at least 1,600,000 “yes” votes this November 4th
to win.

To legally END the state Income Tax.

What’s the best, most cost effective way to win the hearts and minds
and votes of 1,600,000 voters – starting now?

10,000 Yard Signs and Bumper Stickers. In front of supporters homes.
On their cars.

While our opponents may spend millions of advertising dollars urging
and scaring people to vote “no”, paying more than $10 for each “no”
vote — you and we can lock in the FIRST 1,000,000 “Yes” votes for
just 4.4 cents a vote.

Are we serious? Is this really possible?

Yes.

Unfamiliarity is the biggest barrier to new ideas and proposals. Most
people initially reject the unfamiliar.

Immediate rejection. Without examination or consideration. Without
investigation or deliberation.

Reflexive rejection as immediate as pulling your fingers off a hot
stove.

That’s how most people first react to unfamiliar ideas. To the
foreign, the strange, the different.

That’s the first and biggest obstacle we’re up against with our Ballot
Initiative to END the Income Tax. Often, it’s the ONLY obstacle to
accepting and embracing a new and different idea.

Are there ways of getting around this barrier? Are there solutions to
reflexive rejection?

Yes! And one way is simple and easy to use.

It’s called: The Exposure Effect.

The more often that people are exposed to something, the more
comfortable and positive they feel toward it. The less often that
they’re exposed to it, the more uncomfortable and negative they feel
toward it.

The first time a person hears or reads something outside his comfort
zone, outside his familiarity zone, he immediately, reflexively
rejects it. The second time, he quickly rejects it. The third, he
rejects it. The forth, he treats it skeptically. The fifth, he may see
some interesting or valuable points. The sixth, a little more. And so
on, until he’s comfortable examining it — because it’s become
familiar.

Why do Yard Signs and Bumper Stickers Create an Exposure Effect?

Yard Signs Facts: 107 neighbors will drive by and notice the yard sign
an average of 22 times in the last 11 weeks of the campaign. Another
100 to 200 visitors and non-neighbors will see the sign an average of
twice. (Michael Cloud did field research in 2000 and 2002 to get these
numbers.)

10,000 yard signs X 107 neighbors = 1,070,000 voters familiar and
comfortable with open-mindedly considering ENDing the Income Tax. And
remember that UN-familiarity is the ONLY reason that over 1,000,000
Massachusetts voters are not yet ready to vote “Yes.”

Plus the 100 to 200 visitors also exposed to each END the Income Tax
Message on the yard sign. Another 1,000,000 to 2,000,000 people
exposed by the first 10,000 signs.

Bumper Sticker Facts: Less than 2% of Massachusetts cars have bumper
stickers. Only 50% of bumper stickers are political. (Michael Cloud
did this hands-on empirical research in 2000 and 2002.)

There are roughly 3,000,000 cars and trucks in Massachusetts.

2% bumper stickers on 3,000,000 cars and trucks = 60,000 cars with
bumper stickers. 50% of the 60,000 are political.

That’s 30,000 cars and trucks in Massachusetts with political bumper
stickers.

10,000 of our cars and trucks with END the Income Tax Bumper stickers
added to today’s 30,000 means that 25% of ALL political bumper
stickers will be ours.

Each bumper sticker grabs the attention of slightly over 100 drivers a
week. With bumper stickers on our supporters cars for the last 10
weeks of the campaign – that’s 1,000 Massachusetts drivers exposed to
each bumper sticker. That’s 3 exposures EACH to the 3,000,000 drivers
of these cars.

Add the millions of drivers exposed to END the Income Tax bumper
stickers to the 1,000,000 drivers repeatedly exposed to END the Income
Tax yard signs by their neighbors – and we can win over the first
1,000,000 votes with just these campaign materials.

But that’s not all.

These first 1,000,000 “Yes” voters AND the additional 2,000,000
exposed to our message will now be dramatically more receptive and
responsive to our advertising. They will be more open-minded and
willing to embrace our evidence and arguments when they read them on
the internet or in the newspapers, hear them on the radio, or watch
them on TV and YouTube.

Those multiple exposures create a persuasive “Social Proof Effect” –
as documented by Social Scientist Dr. Robert Cialdini.

They create and reinforce a persuasive “Commitment/Consistency Effect”
– empirically verified by social psychologists.

These Multiple source exposures amplify and reinforce each other.

Our first 1,000,000 “Yes” votes locked in for only 4.4 cents a vote –
and the simple and easy support of supporters.

We’ve priced and shopped the quality and cost of Yard Signs and bumper
stickers.

We can buy 10,000 2-color, 2-sided high visibility, weather proof Yard
Signs and frames – production and shipping – for only $36,000.

We can buy and distribute 10,000 2-color, bright, weatherproof END the
Income Tax Bumper stickers – for only $8,100. (The biggest cost is for
mailing them to supporters.)

$44,100 cost for winning over the first 1,000,000 “Yes” voters.

We need to put these 10,000 yard signs up as soon as we can. And get
the 10,000 bumper stickers in the hands of our supporters.

We only need 2 things: first, our official ballot question number from
the Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth. (They should give it
to us within 14 days.)

Second, we need $44,100 to pay for the signs and bumper stickers. We
must pre-pay for them. Why? Screeners and printers have been burned by
political campaigns. Not any more. They require us to pay in advance.

We get our Yard Signs 21 days AFTER we pay for them. So we need to pay
for them NOW to get them by early August. Further, signs are printed
“first come, first served,” so if it takes us 2 weeks to raise the
money – we’ll have to wait in line behind whoever got there first.
This could delay us to late August – or even September.

Delay in ordering our Yard Signs will cost us hundreds of thousands of
voter exposures – and perhaps hundreds of thousands of votes.

We need to raise $44,100 this week to get the Yard Signs on time.

If you have the financial ability to contribute $10,000 or $5,000 or
$2,500 today, and the burning desire to help make history, will you
please donate now?

Perhaps you’ve been “holding your fire” – until you could really make
an impact. If you can donate $1,500 or $850 or $550 today, will you
please do it now?

Or can you contribute $250 or $150 right now – so we can begin?

Even $5 from you will help. Will you please give your best donation
now?

Please contribute now by credit card by clicking:

https://secure.bluehost.com/%7Esavyonco/ms/sga/sga2.php

Or please write your check today and mail it to:

The Committee For Small Government
6 Goodman Lane
Wayland, Massachusetts
01778

Thank You.

Small government is possible,

Carla Howell & Michael Cloud

***End Quote***

wrote another check. How about you? You verbally deplore taxes. These folks are striking a blow for all of us against Gooferment!

?

# # # # #


LIBERTY: Give them a sign

Sunday, July 6, 2008

http://www.gratitudecampaign.org/shortmovie.php

 

***Begin Quote***

Give them a sign.

***End Quote***

They are out their on the orders of the politicians you’ve empowered.

# # # # #


LIBERTY: gooferment, the meme that kills people

Thursday, July 3, 2008

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/WalterEWilliams/2008/07/02/the_ultimate_resource

***Begin Quote***

The greatest threat to mankind’s prosperity is government. A recent example is Zimbabwe’s increasing misery. Like our country, Zimbabwe had a flourishing agriculture sector, so much so it was called the breadbasket of southern Africa. Today, its people are on the brink of starvation as a result of its government. It’s the same story in many countries — government interference with mankind’s natural tendency to engage in wealth-producing activities. Blaming poverty on overpopulation not only lets governments off the hook; it encourages the enactment of harmful policies.

***End Quote***

Yup, gooferment, the meme that kills more people than any disease.

# # # # #


GUNS: “… when they pry it from my cold dead hand!”

Friday, June 27, 2008

http://channel-surfing.blogspot.com/2008/06/thoughts-on-guns.html

Friday, June 27, 2008
Thoughts on guns

***Begin Quote***

“Because firearms are often used in crime, it is incumbent on gun manufacturers to constantly evaluate the risks to public health and safety of the products they design,” the organization says. “The industry must stop supplying the market with guns which are attractive to criminals and which have no legitimate civilian use.”

*** end quote ***

MY RESPONSE:

Excuse me. “… which have no legitimate civilian use.”

The Dead Old White Guys wanted you to have a gun so that you could exercise the ultimate restraint on the Government thugs.

Sorry to be crass, blunt, or just down right hard. But, liberals, such as yourself, seem to forget history. You need that “V8 thunk”.

A Jew being marched to the gas chamber. Cambodia’s killing fields. Stalin’s purges of the farmers. Mao leaping forward of the bodies of those who got in the way. Rawanda, Somalia, … and on and on!

When the populace is disarmed; genocide follows.

So imagine 1930’s Germany, with the first armed Jew in his apartment being extracted by a Nazi storm trooper, he gets only the first one coming in the door. He and his family are killed, but they were dead anyway. BUT, who’s going to be the first storm trooper through the next door. If every Jewish family had a gun and used it, the Nazi’s would have rapidly run out of storm troopers.

That’s what the Dead Old White Guys were trying to give posterity. The ultimate check on government!

“legitimate civilian use” is anything you can use to kill that government thug coming to take you to the death camps.

Don’t say it can’t happen here. It has. Look at the miniaturization of police, the Waco disaster, Ruby Ridge, the Japanese Internment, and on and on.

I really hope you never have the experience of being on the wrong side of this example. I may be, but “… when they pry it from my cold dead hand!”

# # # # #


LIBERTY: Either way, I don’t give a DAMN what you think your rights are.

Friday, June 27, 2008

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/WalterEWilliams/2008/06/18/airport_tyranny

Wednesday, June 18, 2008
Airport Tyranny
By Walter E. Williams

***Begin Quote***

The TSA routinely confiscates about 15,000 items a day from passengers, in addition to the hassle, rudeness and arrogance. With these kind of costs imposed on the traveling public, I’d like TSA to give an account of themselves, namely just how many hijackings or bombings they have prevented, along with the evidence. Americans have been far too compliant and that has given the TSA carte blanche to treat travelers any way they wish. I’m staying away. TSA has its rules and Williams has his, and one of mine is to avoid tyrants and idiots.

***End Quote***

My recent trip to Iowa by air gave me a close look at the TSA. And, a compliant public.

Were the Jews this compliant when they were loaded on the freight cars?

Where is the outrage?

Some incidents that my wife mentioned to me as absurd. (So you know it wasn’t just my tin foil hat being on tilt)

(1) Three little children carry almost empty drink bottles being admonished in a very hostile way to “THROW THOSE AWAY!”. The first thing Frau Reinke objected to was the tone. These were little kids who wouldn’t know a TSA rule from and AST elur! The next was the absurdity. And, finally, she thought the TSA agent should be addressing MOM; not the children.

(2) She spotted a stewardess waltz through the checkpoint with a bottle of water.

(3) The OLD old man being gone over with a fine tooth comb.

(4) Another man had a beep in his thigh. The ever alert TSA agent finally just gave up. After sticking his hand in the man’s pocket and feeling his clothes. The agent should have at least bought the fellow dinner.

(5) All the people running around in TSA garb. And the “grab assing” (Her words. I swear. And she usually doesn’t use language like that.)

Her final and best observation: “What terrorist is going to come to Omaha to takeover a plane. They would stand out like a sore thumb.”

To all her comments, I merely replied “Your tax dollars at work.” Which made her mad at me. But as a little L libertarian, I’m tired of people poke sticks in my cage. Time to pick up a gun yet? When you grab yours, I’ll be right behind you with mine. Till then, I don’t give a damn.

http://www.americanrhetoric.com/MovieSpeeches/specialengagements/moviespeechafewgoodmencodered.html

*** begin quote ***

Son, we live in a world that has walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Who’s gonna do it? You? You, Lieutenant Weinberg? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Santiago, and you curse the Marines. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know — that Santiago’s death, while tragic, probably saved lives; and my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives.

You don’t want the truth because deep down in places you don’t talk about at parties, you want me on that wall — you need me on that wall.

We use words like “honor,” “code,” “loyalty.” We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punch line.

I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it.

I would rather that you just said “thank you” and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon and stand the post. Either way, I don’t give a DAMN what you think you’re entitled to!

*** end quote ***

I have nether the time nor the inclination to explain ‘rights’ to anyone. I would rather you spoke up to the powers that be. I suggest that you pick up a weapon and defend your rights. Either way, neither I, nor anyone else, cares what you think they are if you are not going to stand up for yourself. I know I am an oppressed slave. What’s your excuse?

# # # # #


GUNS: The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm

Thursday, June 26, 2008

“The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.” – DC v. Heller, decided June 26, 2008

# # # # #


LIBERTY: Gooferment should have no role in defining marriage

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

http://news.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Am_Q6uX2hi5hKj.cyy69k25Aw_IE

*** begin quote ***

SAN FRANCISCO – Dozens of gay couples were married Monday night after California became the second state to allow same-sex nuptials, offering a preview of the euphoria and anger to come as gay couples from across the nation head west to wed.

*** end quote ***

Here’s yet another example of gooferment being in stuff where it should have no role. Marriage originated in the Church. The tax policy flowed over into the gooferment picking winners and losers. It gets people fighting among themselves as opposed to fighting the politician trying to rn everyones lives.

# # # # #


GUNS: ban the purchase, transfer, or inheritance of many popular hunting guns

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

FROM AN NRA ALERT

***Begin Quote***

New Jersey Assembly Committee to Consider Gun Ban Bill!
Bill is an Attack on Sportsmen, Collectors, and Target Shooters!

On Thursday morning, June 12, the New Jersey Assembly Judiciary Committee is scheduled to consider legislation that would ban the purchase, transfer, or inheritance of many popular hunting guns, historical American firearms, and large bore target firearms, based on alleged public safety concerns. The bill would ban any rifle with a bore diameter larger than .50 caliber, including many modern and antique hunting and target firearms.

Touted as a ban on .50 caliber and larger firearms, A2116 assaults New Jersey sportsmen by banning dozens of models of popular hunting guns, including traditional .50 caliber muzzle loaders with synthetic stocks, fiber optic sights, or scopes in lieu of sights. Such guns with sights not actually made of iron are also in question due to A2116’s unclear wording.

A2116, sponsored by Assemblyman Reed Gusciora (D-15), also bans hundreds of historical American firearms and replicas, including those from the Revolutionary War and Civil War eras. A2116 is a slap in the face to collectors, historians, and the patriots who used these firearms to win the very freedoms this legislation now seeks to take away.

A2116 also wrongly demonizes the .50 BMG rifle, which is not used in criminal activity, but which is regularly used by law-abiding citizens for precision target shooting, competition, and collection. The legislation makes the fundamental mistake of banning guns based on the size of the barrel rather than punishing criminal behavior.

Please contact the members of the Assembly Judiciary Committee IMMEDIATELY by email, phone, and/or fax and respectfully urge them to OPPOSE A2116!

Members of the Assembly Judiciary Committee:

Assemblywoman Linda Greenstein (D-14), Chair
AswGreenstein@njleg.org
Phone: 609-395-9911
Fax: 609-395-9032

Assemblyman Peter Barnes, III (D-18), Vice Chair
AsmBarnes@njleg.org
Phone: 732-548-1406
Fax: 732-548-1623

Assemblywoman Caroline Casagrande (R-12)
AswCasagrande@njleg.org
Phone: 732-866-1695
Fax: 732-866-4262

Assemblyman Reed Gusciora (D-15)
AsmGusciora@njleg.org
Phone: 609-292-0500
Fax: 609-633-2179

Assemblywoman Amy Handlin (R-13)
AswHandlin@njleg.org
Phone: 732-787-1170
Fax: 732-787-0356

Assemblywoman Grace Spencer (D-29)
AswSpencer@njleg.org
Phone: 973-624-1730
Fax: 973-589-0716

***End Quote***

Assemblywoman Linda Greenstein (D-14), Chair
Assemblyman Peter Barnes, III (D-18), Vice Chair
Assemblywoman Caroline Casagrande (R-12)
Assemblyman Reed Gusciora (D-15)
Assemblywoman Amy Handlin (R-13)
Assemblywoman Grace Spencer (D-29)

Dear Assembly Folks:

I really don’t understand. In my email today, I find:

>New Jersey Assembly Committee to Consider Gun Ban Bill!
>Bill is an Attack on Sportsmen, Collectors, and Target Shooters!
>
>On Thursday morning, June 12, the New Jersey Assembly Judiciary Committee is scheduled to consider legislation
> that would ban the purchase, transfer, or inheritance of many popular hunting guns, historical American firearms,
> and large bore target firearms, based on alleged public safety concerns. The bill would ban any rifle with a bore
> diameter larger than .50 caliber, including many modern and antique hunting and target firearms.

I urge you to OPPOSE A2116!

Last I heard even the most livid anti-gun nut makes no assertion that criminals use these weapons. I’d also call your attention to the Second Amendment. I know you all think that is “just an anachronistic piece of paper’. But, if someone applied it to printing presses, then everyone would understand. The Second is the insurance policy for the First. Every time governments disarm their citizens, genocide follows.

Please don’t count on my vote in November if you advance this bill.

F. J. Reinke

# # # # #