Obama defunds ‘snowflake babies’
Program aids in embryo adoption
By Cheryl Wetzstein - The Washington Times
Sunday, March 4, 2012
*** begin quote ***
While some observers support this move as a way to free up funds for more urgent reproductive-health concerns, supporters of embryo adoption say this is the wrong time to abandon embryos that are sometimes called “snowflake babies.”
“I think that daily we talk to people about … embryo donation and adoption, and we hear the response, ‘Really? I didn’t know that was even possible,’” said Ron Stoddart, executive director of Nightlight Christian Adoptions, which in 1997 pioneered the process of infertile couples “adopting” the extra embryos that another couple’s in-vitro fertilization process inevitably produces.
Hannah Strege, the first of these frozen, unique “snowflake” babies, was born in December 1998. Researchers think as many as 50,000 of the 600,000 cryogenically preserved embryos in the U.S. eventually could become available for adoption.
*** end quote ***
Being childless is heartbreaking.
Murdering helpless children is horrific.
The problem was setup when the decision was made to START down this path. That sets you up to have the problem of FINISHING off the journey.
We certainly can’t afford the Gooferment; so cuts are essential.
It is just pathetic that we wind up at this stupidity. Isn’t that saying “leaders lack vision and the people perish”?
I’ll drag out my favorite personal realization from the Original Adventure by Wally Crowthier. “If you kill the bird, you can’t get past the sake.” That translates to: “What if the potential person that’s killed is the next Salk who will cure cancer, the next Hawkings who will explain the Universe, or the next Mother Teresa who will comfort untold number of sufferers?”
Imagine 50,000 Jonas Salk’s or 600,000 Mother Teresa’s?
It makes me sad. I know Frau Reinke would have taken as many as she could. Sad.
# – # – # – # – #