Reinke Faces Life

http://lewrockwell.com/orig11/scott-pd14.1.html

The Doomsday Project and Deep Events: JFK, Watergate, Iran-Contra, and 9/11
by Peter Dale Scott
Global Research

*** begin quote ***

Let me say in conclusion that for a half century American politics have been constrained and deformed by the unresolved matter of the Kennedy assassination. According to a memo of November 25 1963, from Assistant Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach, it was important then to persuade the public that “Oswald was the assassin,” and that “he did not have confederates.”70 Obviously this priority became even more important after these questionable propositions were endorsed by the Warren Report, the U.S. establishment, and the mainstream press. It has remained an embarrassing priority ever since for all succeeding administrations, including the present one. There is for example an official in Obama’s State Department (Todd Leventhal), whose official job, until recently, included defense of the lone nut theory against so-called “conspiracy theorists”71

If Oswald was not a lone assassin, then it should not surprise us that there is continuity between those who falsified reports about Oswald in 1963, and those who distorted American politics in subsequent deep events beginning with Watergate. Since the deep event of 1963 the legitimacy of America’s political system has become vested in a lie – a lie which subsequent deep events have helped to protect.72

*** end quote ***

There’s no doubt among my circle that I wear a tin foil hat. That being said, I mere point out that there are logical questions that seem unanswered. The implications of those questions upset “We, The Sheeple” and, since there is no “intellectual curiosity” about “unpleasant topics”, they accept the “jumbo shrimp”, “tooth fairies”, and such with an amazing lack of concern.

And, label all that don’t with the labels “crackpot”, “conspiracy nut”, and “weirdo”.

I remember the disparagement heaped upon my “crazy” uncle Louie, who was a little nuts (i.e., he owned a gun in even then “liberal” New York), when at the Tday feast, he’d insist to his male peers over a beer that “FDR caused Pearl Harbor”. I can remember him reciting the same five points over and over again. I wish I’d take notes. (But then I wish that about a lot of things.) It wasn’t until he was long dead and buried that I found an read “The Pearl Harbor Deception” by Robert Stinnett that made a very persuasive case that crazy Uncle Louie wasn’t so crazy. I wonder what will happen, what books will be written, that will confirm other “crazy” ideas.

In this long paper, i found one element “interesting”.

“According to a memo of November 25 1963, from Assistant Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach, it was important then to persuade the public that “Oswald was the assassin,” and that “he did not have confederates.”

Why would this be “important” to an Assistant Attorney General?

See the essence of being a tin foil hat is to find more and more threads that just, when followed, lead “We, The Sheeple” to an inevitable truth. We’ve been getting screwed by the political class for a long time. We just don’t know it.

Yet!

# # # # #

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/11/13/reason-and-rationality-in-public-debate-the-case-of-jfk-2

Reason and Rationality in Public Debate: The Case of JFK
by Jim Fetzer and Douglas Horne

*** begin quote ***

As an illustration of the depravity of the main stream media in this country today, I have been struck by the astute observations of Douglas Horne, who was the Chief Analyst for Military Records for the Assassination Records Review Board, a five-member civilian board entrusted with the responsibility for declassifying documents and records held by the CIA, the NSA, the FBI and the Secret Service, among other agencies of the government, created by an act of Congress in the wake of the resurgence of interest in the death of JFK generated by Oliver Stone’s film. They had been classified for 75 years by the Warren Commission on the ground of national security. If its conclusion–that JFK was assassinated by a lone, demented gunman named “Lee Harvey Oswald”–were true, however, there would have been NO “national security” aspect to this issue.

Moreover, by classifying them for 75 years (which just happens to correspond to the lifetime of an average American), they insured that no one who was living at the time would be available to contradict whatever those records might reveal. The House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA), which reinvestigated the case in 1976-79, likewise decided to sequester many sensitive documents, especially those in the medical arena that contradicted its own conclusions, for 50 years, which Oliver Stone emphasized in his film, “JFK”. As those of us who have devoted ourselves to the evidence in this case are well aware, Oswald could not have committed the crime and was used as a “patsy” to distract attention from the conspirators, who included the CIA, the Joint Chiefs, anti-Castro Cubans and elements of local law enforcement. An overview of what we know about how it was done, who was responsible, and how it was covered-up may be found at “Dealey Plaza Revisited: What happened to JFK?”

*** end quote ***

As a shooter, without any great credentials, the “single shooter in the depository” explanation never made sense. Yeah, I know Marines are related to William Tell and can do anything. BUT, (and there is always a BIG butt), a tough shot on a down angle on a moving target?

That aside.

Why a 75 year restriction?

Pure and simple, declassify now!

We need the truth.

# # # # #

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2039383/Relax-going-shoot-JFK-told-secret-service-agents-1960-election.html

Relax, no one is going to shoot me, JFK told secret service agents after 1960 election
By DANIEL BATES
Last updated at 12:16 AM on 20th September 2011

*** begin quote ***

President John F Kennedy ridiculed the idea of being shot – just three years before he was assassinated.

Following the 1960 election he told one of his aides that Secret Service security was excessive and he was not at risk.

Kennedy insisted: ‘They’re making me uncomfortable. Nobody is going to shoot me, so tell them to relax.’

In November 1963, however, Kennedy was gunned down by Lee Harvey Oswald in an assassination that would change the course of history.

Kennedy’s concerns emerged in a series of audio tapes made in the 1960s by his aide Kenneth O’Donnell and recently unearthed by O’Donnell’s daughter.

*** end quote ***

Ahh, the hubris of what we think we know. No one is immune.

Wisdom is knowing the boundaries of knowledge.

If nothing, this is a lesson to those charged with “security”. Part of the job is “target management”!

The tin foil hat in me asks: “Who put this idea in his head? Or reinforced his prejudice. And, what was their connection to the assassination cabal?”

# # # # #

http://www.irishcentral.com/news/Jackie-Kennedy-blamed-Lyndon-B-Johnson-for-JFK-Murder-127220093.html

Jackie Kennedy believed LBJ had her husband killed new tape shows
Interview also reveals her affair with actor William Holden
By CATHAL DERVAN, IrishCentral.com Staff Writer
Published Monday, August 8, 2011, 6:48 AM
Updated Monday, August 8, 2011, 9:51 AM

*** begin quote ***

Jackie Kennedy believed Lyndon B Johnson was behind the 1963 assassination of her husband John F Kennedy.

Sensational tapes recorded by the First Lady months after the President’s death are to be released ahead of schedule by her daughter Caroline.

In the tapes, to be broadcast by ABC, Kennedy reveals her belief that Johnson and a cabal of Texas tycoons orchestrated the murder of her husband by gunman Lee Harvey Oswald.

*** end quote ***

Still think that there’s nothing to be found?

Smoke and fire.

# # # # #

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/07/25/124159/

Who’s telling the truth: Clint Hill or the Zapruder film?
Agent’s reports contradict JFK film, autopsy X-rays and other crucial photographs
Jim Fetzer

*** begin quote ***

The limo stop—during which JFK was hit twice in the head, once from behind and once from in front—was such an obvious indication of Secret Service complicity that it had to be taken out, which is undoubtedly the principal reason for fixing the film. But it had other ramifications. What Clint Hill has consistently described is not in the Zapruder film: he describes several actions in those seconds around the limo stop that were deleted from the extant film. In editing the timeline of the extant film, it was necessary to delete his pushing of Mrs. Kennedy back into the seat—there just wasn’t enough time left in the film once the limo stop had been deleted. There is no possible way in which Clint could possibly have seen what he claims to have seen before the car accelerated away and passed the lead car when he was stuck on the back of the speeding limo as he is shown doing in the extant film. And from his initial reports right up to his latest “book signing” interview, he has insisted that that was when he saw those things, that he did reach Mrs. Kennedy and that he did push her down into the car, unlike what the film shows. Which means that the film is a fake.

*** end quote ***

Clearly, the truth isn’t out.

The importance is in the coverup.

Who knew what; when?

Maybe we’ll never know.

Crime pays. Criminals escape.

# # # # #