TINFOILHAT: Serious factual inconsistencies in the “official story”

http://whowhatwhy.com/2014/03/11/9006/

Boston Bomber Carjacking Unravels – Part I Of II
By Russ Baker on Mar 11, 2014

*** begin quote ***

An exclusive WhoWhatWhy investigation has found serious factual inconsistencies in accounts provided by the only witness to the alleged confession of the Boston Marathon bombing suspects.

Why does this matter? Because this witness is the sole source for the entire publicly accepted narrative of who was behind the bombing and its aftermath—and why these events occurred.

*** and ***

How Did Danny Gain His Freedom?

Danny said: He escaped when Tamerlan, seated next to him, was momentarily distracted, according the Boston Globe, NBC and CBS.

Conflicting version 1: He simply got out of the car when both brothers were outside the car, having left him alone, according to WMUR.

Conflicting version 2: The Tsarnaev brothers never held Danny as a captive, according to the Associated Press and Cambridge Police Department. They simply detained him for a few minutes, then left him by the roadside, essentially confiscating his vehicle. In this scenario, he had almost no interaction with the brothers, raising questions as to whether they would have confessed to the two crimes before taking off with his car.

*** end quote ***

Another case of spin, lies, and cover ups.

Any wonder why you can trust anything you read or are told!

# – # – # – # – #   

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,567 other followers

%d bloggers like this: