POLITICAL: Negative rights and free condoms

http://www.keywestlou.com/2012/03/weather-yesterday-was-fantastic-once.html

Saturday, March 3, 2012

*** begin quote ***

The hit topic was Rush Limbaugh’s abuse of a Georgetown University female student. Sandra Fluke. Sandra testified before a Congressional committee earlier in the week in support of birth control. She believed it should be available free to women under Obama health care.

Limbaugh referred her as a “slut” and “prostitute.” His theory basically was that if  Sandra wanted her contraception pills paid for by another, she wanted to have her sex paid for. Any woman who wanted her sex paid for was a prostitute.

*** end quote ***

Sorry, but I agree the sun has affected your legal mind. Negative rights?

If I have to pay for this woman’s birth control, then I am slave. The only rights a human is entitled to is negative ones. (Like John Locke said.) No one can prevent me from speaking; they don’t have to listen, but they can shut me up.

Positive rights — a “right” to healthcare, condoms, unionize — enslave some one to some extent. DO the doctors have to work 50% for free? Do the condom makers have to give away their product? Do workers have be enslaved to a Big Union and a Big Company at the same time? Positive rights create a requirement that someone provide them. Who?

Sorry, but imho, you are just flat wrong.

# – # – # – # – #

One Response to POLITICAL: Negative rights and free condoms

  1. John F says:

    We are losing our freedoms every day under this ‘regime’ (yes, it is), this is yet another example. It is ABSOLUTELY ridiculous that we should have to pay for this. At this rate, the pitchforks will be surrounding Washington soon, and we will all know who’s fault it is. The whole gang in there…keep throwing them out until we get people in there that care about ths country rather than their next election and their own pocketbooks!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,059 other followers

%d bloggers like this: